@article{VolkmannAlbaneseAntoninietal.2013,
  author    = {Volkmann, Jens and Albanese, Alberto and Antonini, Angelo and Chaudhuri, K. Ray and Clarke, Karl E. and de Bie, Rob M. A. and Deuschl, G{\"u}nther and Eggert, Karla and Houeto, Jean-Luc and Kulisevsky, Jaime and Nyholm, Dag and Odin, Per and Ostergaard, Karen and Poewe, Werner and Pollak, Pierre and Rabey, Jose Martin and Rascol, Olivier and Ruzicka, Evzen and Samuel, Michael and Speelman, Hans and Sydow, Olof and Valldeoriola, Francesc and van der Linden, Chris and Oertel, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Selecting deep brain stimulation or infusion therapies in advanced Parkinson's disease: an evidence-based review},
  series = {Journal of Neurology},
  volume    = {260},
  journal   = {Journal of Neurology},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00415-012-6798-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-132373},
  pages     = {2701-2714},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD) result from the short half-life and irregular plasma fluctuations of oral levodopa. When strategies of providing more continuous dopaminergic stimulation by adjusting oral medication fail, patients may be candidates for one of three device-aided therapies: deep brain stimulation (DBS), continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion, or continuous duodenal/jejunal levodopa/carbidopa pump infusion (DLI). These therapies differ in their invasiveness, side-effect profile, and the need for nursing care. So far, very few comparative studies have evaluated the efficacy of the three device-aided therapies for specific motor problems in advanced PD. As a result, neurologists currently lack guidance as to which therapy could be most appropriate for a particular PD patient. A group of experts knowledgeable in all three therapies reviewed the currently available literature for each treatment and identified variables of clinical relevance for choosing one of the three options such as type of motor problems, age, and cognitive and psychiatric status. For each scenario, pragmatic and (if available) evidence-based recommendations are provided as to which patients could be candidates for either DBS, DLI, or subcutaneous apomorphine.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MuellerGirardHopfneretal.2016,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller, Stefanie H. and Girard, Simon L. and Hopfner, Franziska and Merner, Nancy D. and Bourassa, Cynthia V. and Lorenz, Delia and Clark, Lorraine N. and Tittmann, Lukas and Soto-Ortolaza, Alexandra I. and Klebe, Stephan and Hallett, Mark and Schneider, Susanne A. and Hodgkinson, Colin A. and Lieb, Wolfgang and Wszolek, Zbigniew K. and Pendziwiat, Manuela and Lorenzo-Betancor, Oswaldo and Poewe, Werner and Ortega-Cubero, Sara and Seppi, Klaus and Rajput, Alex and Hussl, Anna and Rajput, Ali H. and Berg, Daniela and Dion, Patrick A. and Wurster, Isabel and Shulman, Joshua M. and Srulijes, Karin and Haubenberger, Dietrich and Pastor, Pau and Vilari{\~n}o-G{\"u}ell, Carles and Postuma, Ronald B. and Bernard, Genevi{\`e}ve and Ladwig, Karl-Heinz and Dupr{\´e}, Nicolas and Jankovic, Joseph and Strauch, Konstantin and Panisset, Michel and Winkelmann, Juliane and Testa, Claudia M. and Reischl, Eva and Zeuner, Kirsten E. and Ross, Owen A. and Arzberger, Thomas and Chouinard, Sylvain and Deuschl, G{\"u}nther and Louis, Elan D. and Kuhlenb{\"a}umer, Gregor and Rouleau, Guy A.},
  title     = {Genome-wide association study in essential tremor identifies three new loci},
  series = {Brain},
  volume    = {139},
  journal   = {Brain},
  doi       = {10.1093/brain/aww242},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-186541},
  pages     = {3163-3169},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {We conducted a genome-wide association study of essential tremor, a common movement disorder characterized mainly by a postural and kinetic tremor of the upper extremities. Twin and family history studies show a high heritability for essential tremor. The molecular genetic determinants of essential tremor are unknown. We included 2807 patients and 6441 controls of European descent in our two-stage genome-wide association study. The 59 most significantly disease-associated markers of the discovery stage were genotyped in the replication stage. After Bonferroni correction two markers, one (rs10937625) located in the serine/threonine kinase STK32B and one (rs17590046) in the transcriptional coactivator PPARGC1A were associated with essential tremor. Three markers (rs12764057, rs10822974, rs7903491) in the cell-adhesion molecule CTNNA3 were significant in the combined analysis of both stages. The expression of STK32B was increased in the cerebellar cortex of patients and expression quantitative trait loci database mining showed association between the protective minor allele of rs10937625 and reduced expression in cerebellar cortex. We found no expression differences related to disease status or marker genotype for the other two genes. Replication of two lead single nucleotide polymorphisms of previous small genome-wide association studies (rs3794087 in SLC1A2, rs9652490 in LINGO1) did not confirm the association with essential tremor.},
  language  = {en}
}