@article{SponslerKallnikRequieretal.2022,
  author    = {Sponsler, Douglas and Kallnik, Katharina and Requier, Fabrice and Classen, Alice and Maihoff, A. Fabienne and Sieger, Johanna and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf},
  title     = {Floral preferences of mountain bumble bees are constrained by functional traits but flexible through elevation and season},
  series = {Oikos},
  volume    = {2022},
  journal   = {Oikos},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1111/oik.08902},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-259653},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Patterns of resource use by animals can clarify how ecological communities have assembled in the past, how they currently function and how they are likely to respond to future perturbations. Bumble bees (Hymentoptera: Bombus spp.) and their floral hosts provide a diverse yet tractable system in which to explore resource selection in the context of plant-pollinator networks. Under conditions of resource limitation, the ability of bumble bees species to coexist should depend on dietary niche overlap. In this study, we report patterns and dynamics of floral morphotype preferences in a mountain bumble bee community based on ~13 000 observations of bumble bee floral visits recorded along a 1400 m elevation gradient. We found that bumble bees are highly selective generalists, rarely visiting floral morphotypes at the rates predicted by their relative abundances. Preferences also differed markedly across bumble bee species, and these differences were well-explained by variation in bumble bee tongue length, generating patterns of preference similarity that should be expected to predict competition under conditions of resource limitation. Within species, though, morphotype preferences varied by elevation and season, possibly representing adaptive flexibility in response to the high elevational and seasonal turnover of mountain floral communities. Patterns of resource partitioning among bumble bee communities may determine which species can coexist under the altered distributions of bumble bees and their floral hosts caused by climate and land use change.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RequierPailletLarocheetal.2019,
  author    = {Requier, Fabrice and Paillet, Yoan and Laroche, Fabienne and Rutschmann, Benjamin and Zhang, Jie and Lombardi, Fabio and Svoboda, Miroslav and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf},
  title     = {Contribution of European forests to safeguard wild honeybee populations},
  series = {Conservation Letters},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Conservation Letters},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1111/conl.12693},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-204407},
  pages     = {e12693},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Abstract Recent studies reveal the use of tree cavities by wild honeybee colonies in European forests. This highlights the conservation potential of forests for a highly threatened component of the native entomofauna in Europe, but currently no estimate of potential wild honeybee population sizes exists. Here, we analyzed the tree cavity densities of 106 forest areas across Europe and inferred an expected population size of wild honeybees. Both forest and management types affected the density of tree cavities. Accordingly, we estimated that more than 80,000 wild honeybee colonies could be sustained in European forests. As expected, potential conservation hotspots were identified in unmanaged forests, and, surprisingly, also in other large forest areas across Europe. Our results contribute to the EU policy strategy to halt pollinator declines and reveal the potential of forest areas for the conservation of so far neglected wild honeybee populations in Europe.},
  language  = {en}
}