@article{KrebsBehrmannKalogirouetal.2019,
  author    = {Krebs, Markus and Behrmann, Christoph and Kalogirou, Charis and Sokolakis, Ioannis and Kneitz, Susanne and Kruithof-de Julio, Marianna and Zoni, Eugenio and Rech, Anne and Schilling, Bastian and K{\"u}bler, Hubert and Spahn, Martin and Kneitz, Burkhard},
  title     = {miR-221 Augments TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in prostate cancer cells by inducing endogenous TRAIL expression and targeting the functional repressors SOCS3 and PIK3R1},
  series = {BioMed Research International},
  volume    = {2019},
  journal   = {BioMed Research International},
  doi       = {10.1155/2019/6392748},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202480},
  pages     = {6392748},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {miR-221 is regarded as an oncogene in many malignancies, and miR-221-mediated resistance towards TRAIL was one of the first oncogenic roles shown for this small noncoding RNA. In contrast, miR-221 is downregulated in prostate cancer (PCa), thereby implying a tumour suppressive function. By using proliferation and apoptosis assays, we show a novel feature of miR-221 in PCa cells: instead of inducing TRAIL resistance, miR-221 sensitized cells towards TRAIL-induced proliferation inhibition and apoptosis induction. Partially responsible for this effect was the interferon-mediated gene signature, which among other things contained an endogenous overexpression of the TRAIL encoding gene TNFSF10. This TRAIL-friendly environment was provoked by downregulation of the established miR-221 target gene SOCS3. Moreover, we introduced PIK3R1 as a target gene of miR-221 in PCa cells. Proliferation assays showed that siRNA-mediated downregulation of SOCS3 and PIK3R1 mimicked the effect of miR-221 on TRAIL sensitivity. Finally, Western blotting experiments confirmed lower amounts of phospho-Akt after siRNA-mediated downregulation of PIK3R1 in PC3 cells. Our results further support the tumour suppressing role of miR-221 in PCa, since it sensitises PCa cells towards TRAIL by regulating the expression of the oncogenes SOCS3 and PIK3R1. Given the TRAIL-inhibiting effect of miR-221 in various cancer entities, our results suggest that the influence of miR-221 on TRAIL-mediated apoptosis is highly context- and entity-dependent.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GlutschGraenWeberetal.2019,
  author    = {Glutsch, Valerie and Gr{\"a}n, Franziska and Weber, Judith and Gesierich, Anja and Goebeler, Matthias and Schilling, Bastian},
  title     = {Response to combined ipilimumab and nivolumab after development of a nephrotic syndrome related to PD-1 monotherapy},
  series = {Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40425-019-0655-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201214},
  pages     = {181},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background High response rates of metastatic melanoma have been reported upon immune checkpoint inhibition by PD-1 blockade alone or in combination with CTLA-4 inhibitors. However, the majority of patients with a primary resistance to anti-PD-1 monotherapy is also refractory to a subsequent combined checkpoint inhibition. In BRAF wildtype patients with a primary resistance to PD-1 inhibitors, therapeutic options are therefore limited and immune-related adverse events (irAE) have to be taken into consideration when discussing a subsequent immunotherapy. Case presentation We report the case of a 68-year-old male patient with metastatic melanoma who experienced an acute renal failure with nephrotic syndrome due to a minimal change disease developing after a single dose of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab. A kidney biopsy revealed a podocytopathy without signs of interstitial nephritis. Renal function recovered to almost normal creatinine and total urine protein levels upon treatment with oral steroids and diuretics. Unfortunately, a disease progression (PD, RECIST 1.1) was observed in a CT scan after resolution of the irAE. In a grand round, re-exposure to a PD-1-containing regime was recommended. Consensually, a combined immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab was initiated. Nephrotoxicity was tolerable during combined immunotherapy and a CT scan of chest and abdomen showed a deep partial remission (RECIST 1.1) after three doses of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) and nivolumab (1 mg/kg). Conclusion This case illustrates that a fulminant response to combined checkpoint inhibition is possible after progression after anti-PD-1 monotherapy and a severe irAE.},
  language  = {en}
}