@article{SodianSchneider1990,
  author    = {Sodian, Beate and Schneider, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Children's understanding of cognitive cueing: How to manipulate cues to fool a competitor},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62132},
  year      = {1990},
  abstract  = {4-6-year-old children's understanding of cognitive cuing was studied in 2 experiments using a strategic interaction paradigm. Ghildren could fool a competitor by hiding targets in locations that were labeled with semantically weakly associated cues and help a cooperative partner by hiding them in semantically highly associated locations. Very few 4-year-olds, half the 5-year-olds, and almost all 6-year-olds appropriately chose semantically highly vs. weakly associated hiding places to make the targets easy vs. difficult to find. The second experiment showed that 4-year-olds did not strategically manipulate cues as sources of information, although they themselves proficiently used them as such in a search task. These findings are discussed with regard to research on children's developing understanding of origins of knowledge and belief and with regard to recent claims that young preschoolers possess a metacognitive understanding of cognitive cuing.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SodianSchneiderPerlmutter1986,
  author    = {Sodian, Beate and Schneider, Wolfgang and Perlmutter, Marion},
  title     = {Recall, clustering, and metamemory in young children},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62014},
  year      = {1986},
  abstract  = {Thirty-two 4-year-olds and thirty-two 6-year-olds were tested for free and cued recall following either play-and-remember or sort-and-remember instructions and assessed for their metamemory of the efficacy of conceptual and perceptual sorting strategies. The younger children recalled significantly more items under sort-and-remember than under play-and-remember instructions, whereas no significant recall differences between instructional conditions were found for the older children. However, 6-year-olds showed higher levels of recall than 4-year-olds in both instructional conditions. Category cues were much more effective than color cues, regardless of age. In addition, clustering scores indicated that conceptual organization at both encoding and retrieval increased with age and with instruction. These results show that from 4 to 6 years of age children are learning to spontaneously employ memory strategies. In addition, they highlight the increasing importance of conceptual organization to retention of young children. Finally, the metamemory data suggest that there may be a lag between children's articulated declarative knowledge about the usefulness of conceptual organization and their procedural use of it.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchneiderSodian1988,
  author    = {Schneider, Wolfgang and Sodian, Beate},
  title     = {Metamemory-memory behavior relationships in young children: Evidence from a memory-for-location task},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62062},
  year      = {1988},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchneiderSodian1991,
  author    = {Schneider, Wolfgang and Sodian, Beate},
  title     = {A longitudinal study of young children's memory behavior and Performance in a sort-recall task},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62169},
  year      = {1991},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}