@article{StejskalStreinzerDyeretal.2015,
  author    = {Stejskal, Kerstin and Streinzer, Martin and Dyer, Adrian and Paulus, Hannes F. and Spaethe, Johannes},
  title     = {Functional Significance of Labellum Pattern Variation in a Sexually Deceptive Orchid (Ophrys heldreichii): Evidence of Individual Signature Learning Effects},
  series = {PLoS One},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {PLoS One},
  number    = {11},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0142971},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-137582},
  pages     = {e0142971},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Mimicking female insects to attract male pollinators is an important strategy in sexually deceptive orchids of the genus Ophrys, and some species possess flowers with conspicuous labellum patterns. The function of the variation of the patterns remains unresolved, with suggestions that these enhance pollinator communication. We investigated the possible function of the labellum pattern in Ophrys heldreichii, an orchid species in which the conspicuous and complex labellum pattern contrasts with a dark background. The orchid is pollinated exclusively by males of the solitary bee, Eucera berlandi. Comparisons of labellum patterns revealed that patterns within inflorescences are more similar than those of other conspecific plants. Field observations showed that the males approach at a great speed and directly land on flowers, but after an unsuccessful copulation attempt, bees hover close and visually scan the labellum pattern for up to a minute. Learning experiments conducted with honeybees as an accessible model of bee vision demonstrated that labellum patterns of different plants can be reliably learnt; in contrast, patterns of flowers from the same inflorescence could not be discriminated. These results support the hypothesis that variable labellum patterns in O. heldreichii are involved in flower-pollinator communication which would likely help these plants to avoid geitonogamy.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EckertBohnSpaethe2022,
  author    = {Eckert, Johanna and Bohn, Manuel and Spaethe, Johannes},
  title     = {Does quantity matter to a stingless bee?},
  series = {Animal Cognition},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Animal Cognition},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {1435-9448},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10071-021-01581-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-307696},
  pages     = {617-629},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Quantitative information is omnipresent in the world and a wide range of species has been shown to use quantities to optimize their decisions. While most studies have focused on vertebrates, a growing body of research demonstrates that also insects such as honeybees possess basic quantitative abilities that might aid them in finding profitable flower patches. However, it remains unclear if for insects, quantity is a salient feature relative to other stimulus dimensions, or if it is only used as a "last resort" strategy in case other stimulus dimensions are inconclusive. Here, we tested the stingless bee Trigona fuscipennis, a species representative of a vastly understudied group of tropical pollinators, in a quantity discrimination task. In four experiments, we trained wild, free-flying bees on stimuli that depicted either one or four elements. Subsequently, bees were confronted with a choice between stimuli that matched the training stimulus either in terms of quantity or another stimulus dimension. We found that bees were able to discriminate between the two quantities, but performance differed depending on which quantity was rewarded. Furthermore, quantity was more salient than was shape. However, quantity did not measurably influence the bees' decisions when contrasted with color or surface area. Our results demonstrate that just as honeybees, small-brained stingless bees also possess basic quantitative abilities. Moreover, invertebrate pollinators seem to utilize quantity not only as "last resort" but as a salient stimulus dimension. Our study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on quantitative cognition in invertebrate species and adds to our understanding of the evolution of numerical cognition.},
  language  = {en}
}