@article{WurmbSchlerethKredeletal.2014, author = {Wurmb, Thomas Erik and Schlereth, Stefan and Kredel, Markus and Muellenbach, Ralf M. and Wunder, Christian and Brederlau, J{\"o}rg and Roewer, Norbert and Kenn, Werner and Kunze, Ekkehard}, title = {Routine Follow-Up Cranial Computed Tomography for Deeply Sedated, Intubated, and Ventilated Multiple Trauma Patients with Suspected Severe Head Injury}, series = {BioMed Research International}, journal = {BioMed Research International}, number = {361949}, doi = {10.1155/2014/361949}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-120084}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Background. Missed or delayed detection of progressive neuronal damage after traumatic brain injury (TBI) may have negative impact on the outcome. We investigated whether routine follow-up CT is beneficial in sedated and mechanically ventilated trauma patients. Methods. The study design is a retrospective chart review. A routine follow-up cCT was performed 6 hours after the admission scan. We defined 2 groups of patients, group I: patients with equal or recurrent pathologies and group II: patients with new findings or progression of known pathologies. Results. A progression of intracranial injury was found in 63 patients (42\%) and 18 patients (12\%) had new findings in cCT 2 (group II). In group II a change in therapy was found in 44 out of 81 patients (54\%). 55 patients with progression or new findings on the second cCT had no clinical signs of neurological deterioration. Of those 24 patients (44\%) had therapeutic consequences due to the results of the follow-up cCT. Conclusion. We found new diagnosis or progression of intracranial pathology in 54\% of the patients. In 54\% of patients with new findings and progression of pathology, therapy was changed due to the results of follow-up cCT. In trauma patients who are sedated and ventilated for different reasons a routine follow-up CT is beneficial.}, language = {en} }