@article{MoussetBuchheidtHeinzetal.2014,
  author    = {Mousset, Sabine and Buchheidt, Dieter and Heinz, Werner and Ruhnke, Markus and Cornely, Oliver A. and Egerer, Gerlinde and Kr{\"u}ger, William and Link, Hartmut and Neumann, Silke and Ostermann, Helmut and Panse, Jens and Penack, Olaf and Rieger, Christina and Schmidt-Hieber, Martin and Silling, Gerda and S{\"u}dhoff, Thomas and Ullmann, Andrew J. and Wolf, Hans-Heinrich and Maschmeyer, Georg and B{\"o}hme, Angelika},
  title     = {Treatment of invasive fungal infections in cancer patients—updated recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO)},
  series = {Annals of Hematology},
  volume    = {96},
  journal   = {Annals of Hematology},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00277-013-1867-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121340},
  pages     = {13-32},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Invasive fungal infections are a main cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy regimens. Early antifungal treatment is mandatory to improve survival. Today, a number of effective and better-tolerated but more expensive antifungal agents compared to the former gold standard amphotericin B deoxycholate are available. Clinical decision-making must consider results from numerous studies and published guidelines, as well as licensing status and cost pressure. New developments in antifungal prophylaxis improving survival rates result in a continuous need for actualization. The treatment options for invasive Candida infections include fluconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B and its lipid formulations, as well as echinocandins. Voriconazole, amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid formulations, caspofungin, itraconazole, and posaconazole are available for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Additional procedures, such as surgical interventions, immunoregulatory therapy, and granulocyte transfusions, have to be considered. The Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology here presents its 2008 recommendations discussing the dos and do-nots, as well as the problems and possible solutions, of evidence criteria selection.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RiegerLissMellinghoffetal.2018,
  author    = {Rieger, C. T. and Liss, B. and Mellinghoff, S. and Buchheidt, D. and Cornely, O. A. and Egerer, G. and Heinz, W. J. and Hentrich, M. and Maschmeyer, G. and Mayer, K. and Sandherr, M. and Silling, G. and Ullmann, A. and Vehreschild, M. J. G. T. and von Lilienfeld-Toal, M. and Wolf, H. H. and Lehners, N.},
  title     = {Anti-infective vaccination strategies in patients with hematologic malignancies or solid tumors-Guideline of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO)},
  series = {Annals of Oncology},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {Annals of Oncology},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.1093/annonc/mdy117},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-226196},
  pages     = {1354-1365},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Infectious complications are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with malignancies specifically when receiving anticancer treatments. Prevention of infection through vaccines is an important aspect of clinical care of cancer patients. Immunocompromising effects of the underlying disease as well as of antineoplastic therapies need to be considered when devising vaccination strategies. This guideline provides clinical recommendations on vaccine use in cancer patients including autologous stem cell transplant recipients, while allogeneic stem cell transplantation is subject of a separate guideline. The document was prepared by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) by reviewing currently available data and applying evidence-based medicine criteria.},
  language  = {en}
}