@article{KurzZanzingerHagenetal.2021,
  author    = {Kurz, Anja and Zanzinger, Maren and Hagen, Rudolf and Rak, Kirsten},
  title     = {The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single sided deafness},
  series = {European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology},
  journal   = {European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology},
  edition   = {corrected version},
  issn      = {0937-4477},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00405-020-06450-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-231750},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Objective Cochlear implantation has become a well-accepted treatment option for people with single-sided deafness (SSD) and has become a clinical standard in many countries. A cochlear implant (CI) is the only device which restores binaural hearing. The effect of microphone directionality (MD) settings has been investigated in other CI indication groups, but its impact on speech perception in noise has not been established in CI users with SSD. The focus of this investigation was, therefore, to assess binaural hearing effects using different MD settings in CI users with SSD. Methods Twenty-nine experienced CI users with SSD were recruited to determine speech reception thresholds with varying target and noise sources to define binaural effects (head shadow, squelch, summation, and spatial release from masking), sound localization, and sound quality using the SSQ12 and HISQUI19 questionnaires. Outcome measures included the MD settings "natural", "adaptive", and "omnidirectional". Results The 29 participants involved in the study were divided into two groups: 11 SONNET users and 18 OPUS 2/RONDO users. In both groups, a significant head shadow effect of 7.4-9.2 dB was achieved with the CI. The MD setting "adaptive" provided a significant head shadow effect of 9.2 dB, a squelch effect of 0.9 dB, and spatial release from masking of 7.6 dB in the SONNET group. No significant summation effect could be determined in either group with CI. Outcomes with the omnidirectional setting were not significantly different between groups. For both groups, localization improved significantly when the CI was activated and was best when the omnidirectional setting was used. The groups' sound quality scores did not significantly differ. Conclusions Adaptive directional microphone settings improve speech perception and binaural hearing abilities in CI users with SSD. Binaural effect measures are valuable to quantify the benefit of CI use, especially in this indication group.},
  language  = {en}
}