@article{HicklHeintzBuschartTrautweinSchultetal.2019,
  author    = {Hickl, Oskar and Heintz-Buschart, Anna and Trautwein-Schult, Anke and Hercog, Rajna and Bork, Peer and Wilmes, Paul and Becher, D{\"o}rte},
  title     = {Sample preservation and storage significantly impact taxonomic and functional profiles in metaproteomics studies of the human gut microbiome},
  series = {Microorganisms},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Microorganisms},
  number    = {9},
  issn      = {2076-2607},
  doi       = {10.3390/microorganisms7090367},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-195976},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {With the technological advances of the last decade, it is now feasible to analyze microbiome samples, such as human stool specimens, using multi-omic techniques. Given the inherent sample complexity, there exists a need for sample methods which preserve as much information as possible about the biological system at the time of sampling. Here, we analyzed human stool samples preserved and stored using different methods, applying metagenomics as well as metaproteomics. Our results demonstrate that sample preservation and storage have a significant effect on the taxonomic composition of identified proteins. The overall identification rates, as well as the proportion of proteins from Actinobacteria were much higher when samples were flash frozen. Preservation in RNAlater overall led to fewer protein identifications and a considerable increase in the share of Bacteroidetes, as well as Proteobacteria. Additionally, a decrease in the share of metabolism-related proteins and an increase of the relative amount of proteins involved in the processing of genetic information was observed for RNAlater-stored samples. This suggests that great care should be taken in choosing methods for the preservation and storage of microbiome samples, as well as in comparing the results of analyses using different sampling and storage methods. Flash freezing and subsequent storage at -80 °C should be chosen wherever possible.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchmidtHaywardCoelhoetal.2019,
  author    = {Schmidt, Thomas S. B. and Hayward, Matthew R. and Coelho, Luiis P. and Li, Simone S. and Costea, Paul I. and Voigt, Anita Y. and Wirbel, Jakob and Maistrenko, Oleksandr M. and Alves, Renato J. C. and Bergsten, Emma and de Beaufort, Carine and Sobhani, Iradj and Heintz-Buschart, Anna and Sunagawa, Shinichi and Zeller, Georg and Wilmes, Paul and Bork, Peer},
  title     = {Extensive transmission of microbes along the gastrointestinal tract},
  series = {eLife},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {eLife},
  doi       = {10.7554/eLife.42693},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228954},
  pages     = {e42693, 1-18},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The gastrointestinal tract is abundantly colonized by microbes, yet the translocation of oral species to the intestine is considered a rare aberrant event, and a hallmark of disease. By studying salivary and fecal microbial strain populations of 310 species in 470 individuals from five countries, we found that transmission to, and subsequent colonization of, the large intestine by oral microbes is common and extensive among healthy individuals. We found evidence for a vast majority of oral species to be transferable, with increased levels of transmission in colorectal cancer and rheumatoid arthritis patients and, more generally, for species described as opportunistic pathogens. This establishes the oral cavity as an endogenous reservoir for gut microbial strains, and oral-fecal transmission as an important process that shapes the gastrointestinal microbiome in health and disease.},
  subject      = {Barrier},
  language  = {en}
}