@article{BlancoKuchenbaeckerCuadrasetal.2015,
  author    = {Blanco, Ignacio and Kuchenbaecker, Karoline and Cuadras, Daniel and Wang, Xianshu and Barrowdale, Daniel and Ruiz de Garibay, Gorka and Librado, Pablo and Sanchez-Gracia, Alejandro and Rozas, Julio and Bonifaci, N{\´u}ria and McGuffog, Lesley and Pankratz, Vernon S. and Islam, Abul and Mateo, Francesca and Berenguer, Antoni and Petit, Anna and Catal{\`a}, Isabel and Brunet, Joan and Feliubadal{\´o}, Lidia and Tornero, Eva and Ben{\´i}tez, Javier and Osorio, Ana and Ram{\´o}n y Cajal, Teresa and Nevanlinna, Heli and Aittom{\"a}ki, Kristina and Arun, Banu K. and Toland, Amanda E. and Karlan, Beth Y. and Walsh, Christine and Lester, Jenny and Greene, Mark H. and Mai, Phuong L. and Nussbaum, Robert L. and Andrulis, Irene L. and Domchek, Susan M. and Nathanson, Katherine L. and Rebbeck, Timothy R. and Barkardottir, Rosa B. and Jakubowska, Anna and Lubinski, Jan and Durda, Katarzyna and Jaworska-Bieniek, Katarzyna and Claes, Kathleen and Van Maerken, Tom and D{\´i}ez, Orland and Hansen, Thomas V. and J{\o}nson, Lars and Gerdes, Anne-Marie and Ejlertsen, Bent and De la Hoya, Miguel and Cald{\´e}s, Trinidad and Dunning, Alison M. and Oliver, Clare and Fineberg, Elena and Cook, Margaret and Peock, Susan and McCann, Emma and Murray, Alex and Jacobs, Chris and Pichert, Gabriella and Lalloo, Fiona and Chu, Carol and Dorkins, Huw and Paterson, Joan and Ong, Kai-Ren and Teixeira, Manuel R. and Hogervorst, Frans B. L. and Van der Hout, Annemarie H. and Seynaeve, Caroline and Van der Luijt, Rob B. and Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. L. and Devilee, Peter and Wijnen, Juul T. and Rookus, Matti A. and Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne E. J. and Blok, Marinus J. and Van den Ouweland, Ans M. W. and Aalfs, Cora M. and Rodriguez, Gustavo C. and Phillips, Kelly-Anne A. and Piedmonte, Marion and Nerenstone, Stacy R. and Bae-Jump, Victoria L. and O'Malley, David M. and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Wappenschmidt, Barbara and Rhiem, Kerstin and Engel, Christoph and Meindl, Alfons and Ditsch, Nina and Arnold, Norbert and Plendl, Hansjoerg J. and Niederacher, Dieter and Sutter, Christian and Wang-Gohrke, Shan and Steinemann, Doris and Preisler-Adams, Sabine and Kast, Karin and Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda and Gehrig, Andrea and Bojesen, Anders and Pedersen, Inge Sokilde and Sunde, Lone and Birk Jensen, Uffe and Thomassen, Mads and Kruse, Torben A. and Foretova, Lenka and Peterlongo, Paolo and Bernard, Loris and Peissel, Bernard and Scuvera, Giulietta and Manoukian, Siranoush and Radice, Paolo and Ottini, Laura and Montagna, Marco and Agata, Simona and Maugard, Christine and Simard, Jacques and Soucy, Penny and Berger, Andreas and Fink-Retter, Anneliese and Singer, Christian F. and Rappaport, Christine and Geschwantler-Kaulich, Daphne and Tea, Muy-Kheng and Pfeiler, Georg and John, Esther M. and Miron, Alex and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Terry, Mary Beth and Chung, Wendy K. and Daly, Mary B. and Goldgar, David E. and Janavicius, Ramunas and Dorfling, Cecilia M. and Van Rensburg, Elisabeth J. and Fostira, Florentia and Konstantopoulou, Irene and Garber, Judy and Godwin, Andrew K. and Olah, Edith and Narod, Steven A. and Rennert, Gad and Paluch, Shani Shimon and Laitman, Yael and Friedman, Eitan and Liljegren, Annelie and Rantala, Johanna and Stenmark-Askmalm, Marie and Loman, Niklas and Imyanitov, Evgeny N. and Hamann, Ute and Spurdle, Amanda B. and Healey, Sue and Weitzel, Jeffrey N. and Herzog, Josef and Margileth, David and Gorrini, Chiara and Esteller, Manel and G{\´o}mez, Antonio and Sayols, Sergi and Vidal, Enrique and Heyn, Holger and Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique and L{\´e}on{\´e}, Melanie and Barjhoux, Laure and Fassy-Colcombet, Marion and Pauw, Antoine de and Lasset, Christine and Fert Ferrer, Sandra and Castera, Laurent and Berthet, Pascaline and Cornelis, Fran{\c{c}}ois and Bignon, Yves-Jean and Damiola, Francesca and Mazoyer, Sylvie and Sinilnikova, Olga M. and Maxwell, Christopher A. and Vijai, Joseph and Robson, Mark and Kauff, Noah and Corines, Marina J. and Villano, Danylko and Cunningham, Julie and Lee, Adam and Lindor, Noralane and L{\´a}zaro, Conxi and Easton, Douglas F. and Offit, Kenneth and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia and Couch, Fergus J. and Antoniou, Antonis C. and Pujana, Miguel Angel},
  title     = {Assessing associations between the AURKA-HMMR-TPX2-TUBG1 functional module and breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0120020},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-143469},
  pages     = {e0120020},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {While interplay between BRCA1 and AURKA-RHAMM-TPX2-TUBG1 regulates mammary epithelial polarization, common genetic variation in HMMR (gene product RHAMM) may be associated with risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Following on these observations, we further assessed the link between the AURKA-HMMR-TPX2-TUBG1 functional module and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Forty-one single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped in 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers and subsequently analyzed using a retrospective likelihood approach. The association of HMMR rs299290 with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers was confirmed: per-allele hazard ratio (HR) = 1.10, 95\% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 - 1.15, p = 1.9 x 10\(^{-4}\) (false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted p = 0.043). Variation in CSTF1, located next to AURKA, was also found to be associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers: rs2426618 per-allele HR = 1.10, 95\% CI 1.03 - 1.16, p = 0.005 (FDR-adjusted p = 0.045). Assessment of pairwise interactions provided suggestions (FDR-adjusted p\(_{interaction}\) values > 0.05) for deviations from the multiplicative model for rs299290 and CSTF1 rs6064391, and rs299290 and TUBG1 rs11649877 in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Following these suggestions, the expression of HMMR and AURKA or TUBG1 in sporadic breast tumors was found to potentially interact, influencing patients' survival. Together, the results of this study support the hypothesis of a causative link between altered function of AURKA-HMMR-TPX2-TUBG1 and breast carcinogenesis in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WilsonAmblerLeeetal.2019,
  author    = {Wilson, Duncan and Ambler, Gareth and Lee, Keon-Joo and Lim, Jae-Sung and Shiozawa, Masayuki and Koga, Masatoshi and Li, Linxin and Lovelock, Caroline and Chabriat, Hugues and Hennerici, Michael and Wong, Yuen Kwun and Mak, Henry Ka Fung and Prats-S{\´a}nchez, Luis and Mart{\´i}nez-Dome{\~n}o, Alejandro and Inamura, Shigeru and Yoshifuji, Kazuhisa and Arsava, Ethem Murat and Horstmann, Solveig and Purrucker, Jan and Lam, Bonnie Yin Ka and Wong, Adrian and Kim, Young Dae and Song, Tae-Jin and Schrooten, Maarten and Lemmens, Robin and Eppinger, Sebastian and Gattringer, Thomas and Uysal, Ender and Tanriverdi, Zeynep and Bornstein, Natan M and Ben Assayag, Einor and Hallevi, Hen and Tanaka, Jun and Hara, Hideo and Coutts, Shelagh B and Hert, Lisa and Polymeris, Alexandros and Seiffge, David J and Lyrer, Philippe and Algra, Ale and Kappelle, Jaap and Salman, Rustam Al-Shahi and J{\"a}ger, Hans R and Lip, Gregory Y H and Mattle, Heinrich P and Panos, Leonidas D and Mas, Jean-Louis and Legrand, Laurence and Karayiannis, Christopher and Phan, Thanh and Gunkel, Sarah and Christ, Nicolas and Abrigo, Jill and Leung, Thomas and Chu, Winnie and Chappell, Francesca and Makin, Stephen and Hayden, Derek and Williams, David J and Kooi, M Eline and van Dam-Nolen, Dianne H K and Barbato, Carmen and Browning, Simone and Wiegertjes, Kim and Tuladhar, Anil M and Maaijwee, Noortje and Guevarra, Christine and Yatawara, Chathuri and Mendyk, Anne-Marie and Delmaire, Christine and K{\"o}hler, Sebastian and van Oostenbrugge, Robert and Zhou, Ying and Xu, Chao and Hilal, Saima and Gyanwali, Bibek and Chen, Christopher and Lou, Min and Staals, Julie and Bordet, R{\´e}gis and Kandiah, Nagaendran and de Leeuw, Frank-Erik and Simister, Robert and van der Lugt, Aad and Kelly, Peter J and Wardlaw, Joanna M and Soo, Yannie and Fluri, Felix and Srikanth, Velandai and Calvet, David and Jung, Simon and Kwa, Vincent I H and Engelter, Stefan T and Peters, Nils and Smith, Eric E and Yakushiji, Yusuke and Necioglu Orken, Dilek and Fazekas, Franz and Thijs, Vincent and Heo, Ji Hoe and Mok, Vincent and Veltkamp, Roland and Ay, Hakan and Imaizumi, Toshio and Gomez-Anson, Beatriz and Lau, Kui Kai and Jouvent, Eric and Rothwell, Peter M and Toyoda, Kazunori and Bae, Hee-Yoon and Marti-Fabregas, Joan and Werring, David J},
  title     = {Cerebral microbleeds and stroke risk after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from cohort studies},
  series = {The Lancet Neurology},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {The Lancet Neurology},
  organization    = {Microbleeds International Collaborative Network},
  doi       = {10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30197-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233710},
  pages     = {653-665},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background Cerebral microbleeds are a neuroimaging biomarker of stroke risk. A crucial clinical question is whether cerebral microbleeds indicate patients with recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in whom the rate of future intracranial haemorrhage is likely to exceed that of recurrent ischaemic stroke when treated with antithrombotic drugs. We therefore aimed to establish whether a large burden of cerebral microbleeds or particular anatomical patterns of cerebral microbleeds can identify ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack patients at higher absolute risk of intracranial haemorrhage than ischaemic stroke. Methods We did a pooled analysis of individual patient data from cohort studies in adults with recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Cohorts were eligible for inclusion if they prospectively recruited adult participants with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack; included at least 50 participants; collected data on stroke events over at least 3 months follow-up; used an appropriate MRI sequence that is sensitive to magnetic susceptibility; and documented the number and anatomical distribution of cerebral microbleeds reliably using consensus criteria and validated scales. Our prespecified primary outcomes were a composite of any symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage or ischaemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, and symptomatic ischaemic stroke. We registered this study with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews, number CRD42016036602. Findings Between Jan 1, 1996, and Dec 1, 2018, we identified 344 studies. After exclusions for ineligibility or declined requests for inclusion, 20 322 patients from 38 cohorts (over 35 225 patient-years of follow-up; median 1·34 years [IQR 0·19-2·44]) were included in our analyses. The adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] comparing patients with cerebral microbleeds to those without was 1·35 (95\% CI 1·20-1·50) for the composite outcome of intracranial haemorrhage and ischaemic stroke; 2·45 (1·82-3·29) for intracranial haemorrhage and 1·23 (1·08-1·40) for ischaemic stroke. The aHR increased with increasing cerebral microbleed burden for intracranial haemorrhage but this effect was less marked for ischaemic stroke (for five or more cerebral microbleeds, aHR 4·55 [95\% CI 3·08-6·72] for intracranial haemorrhage vs 1·47 [1·19-1·80] for ischaemic stroke; for ten or more cerebral microbleeds, aHR 5·52 [3·36-9·05] vs 1·43 [1·07-1·91]; and for ≥20 cerebral microbleeds, aHR 8·61 [4·69-15·81] vs 1·86 [1·23-2·82]). However, irrespective of cerebral microbleed anatomical distribution or burden, the rate of ischaemic stroke exceeded that of intracranial haemorrhage (for ten or more cerebral microbleeds, 64 ischaemic strokes [95\% CI 48-84] per 1000 patient-years vs 27 intracranial haemorrhages [17-41] per 1000 patient-years; and for ≥20 cerebral microbleeds, 73 ischaemic strokes [46-108] per 1000 patient-years vs 39 intracranial haemorrhages [21-67] per 1000 patient-years). Interpretation In patients with recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack, cerebral microbleeds are associated with a greater relative hazard (aHR) for subsequent intracranial haemorrhage than for ischaemic stroke, but the absolute risk of ischaemic stroke is higher than that of intracranial haemorrhage, regardless of cerebral microbleed presence, antomical distribution, or burden.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WestburyTurroGreeneetal.2015,
  author    = {Westbury, Sarah K and Turro, Ernest and Greene, Daniel and Lentaigne, Claire and Kelly, Anne M and Bariana, Tadbir K and Simeoni, Ilenia and Pillois, Xavier and Attwood, Antony and Austin, Steve and Jansen, Sjoert BG and Bakchoul, Tamam and Crisp-Hihn, Abi and Erber, Wendy N and Favier, R{\´e}mi and Foad, Nicola and Gattens, Michael and Jolley, Jennifer D and Liesner, Ri and Meacham, Stuart and Millar, Carolyn M and Nurden, Alan T and Peerlinck, Kathelijne and Perry, David J and Poudel, Pawan and Schulman, Sol and Schulze, Harald and Stephens, Jonathan C and Furie, Bruce and Robinson, Peter N and van Geet, Chris and Rendon, Augusto and Gomez, Keith and Laffan, Michael A and Lambert, Michele P and Nurden, Paquita and Ouwehand, Willem H and Richardson, Sylvia and Mumford, Andrew D and Freson, Kathleen},
  title     = {Human phenotype ontology annotation and cluster analysis to unravel genetic defects in 707 cases with unexplained bleeding and platelet disorders},
  series = {Genome Medicine},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Genome Medicine},
  number    = {36},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13073-015-0151-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-143329},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background: Heritable bleeding and platelet disorders (BPD) are heterogeneous and frequently have an unknown genetic basis. The BRIDGE-BPD study aims to discover new causal genes for BPD by high throughput sequencing using cluster analyses based on improved and standardised deep, multi-system phenotyping of cases. Methods: We report a new approach in which the clinical and laboratory characteristics of BPD cases are annotated with adapted Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms. Cluster analyses are then used to characterise groups of cases with similar HPO terms and variants in the same genes. Results: We show that 60\% of index cases with heritable BPD enrolled at 10 European or US centres were annotated with HPO terms indicating abnormalities in organ systems other than blood or blood-forming tissues, particularly the nervous system. Cases within pedigrees clustered closely together on the bases of their HPO-coded phenotypes, as did cases sharing several clinically suspected syndromic disorders. Cases subsequently found to harbour variants in ACTN1 also clustered closely, even though diagnosis of this recently described disorder was not possible using only the clinical and laboratory data available to the enrolling clinician. Conclusions: These findings validate our novel HPO-based phenotype clustering methodology for known BPD, thus providing a new discovery tool for BPD of unknown genetic basis. This approach will also be relevant for other rare diseases with significant genetic heterogeneity.},
  language  = {en}
}