@article{KroeberWengerSchwegleretal.2015,
  author    = {Kroeber, Jana and Wenger, Barbara and Schwegler, Manuela and Daniel, Christoph and Schmidt, Manfred and Djuzenova, Cholpon S and Polat, B{\"u}lent and Flentje, Michael and Fietkau, Rainer and Distel, Luitpold V.},
  title     = {Distinct increased outliers among 136 rectal cancer patients assessed by \(\gamma\)H2AX},
  series = {Radiation Oncology},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Radiation Oncology},
  number    = {36},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13014-015-0344-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-144085},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background: In recent years attention has focused on \(\gamma\)H2AX as a very sensitive double strand break indicator. It has been suggested that \(\gamma\)H2AX might be able to predict individual radiosensitivity. Our aim was to study the induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks labelled by \(\gamma\)H2AX in a large cohort. Methods: In a prospective study lymphocytes of 136 rectal cancer (RC) patients and 59 healthy individuals were ex vivo irradiated (IR) and initial DNA damage was compared to remaining DNA damage after 2 Gy and 24 hours repair time and preexisting DNA damage in unirradiated lymphocytes. Lymphocytes were immunostained with anti-\(\gamma\)H2AX antibodies and microscopic images with an extended depth of field were acquired. \(\gamma\)H2AX foci counting was performed using a semi-automatic image analysis software. Results: Distinct increased values of preexisting and remaining \(\gamma\)H2AX foci in the group of RC patients were found compared to the healthy individuals. Additionally there are clear differences within the groups and there are outliers in about 12\% of the RC patients after ex vivo IR. Conclusions: The \(\gamma\)H2AX assay has the capability to identify a group of outliers which are most probably patients with increased radiosensitivity having the highest risk of suffering radiotherapy-related late sequelae.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KimpelSchindlerSchmidtPenningtonetal.2023,
  author    = {Kimpel, Otilia and Schindler, Paul and Schmidt-Pennington, Laura and Altieri, Barbara and Megerle, Felix and Haak, Harm and Pittaway, James and Dischinger, Ulrich and Quinkler, Marcus and Mai, Knut and Kroiss, Matthias and Polat, B{\"u}lent and Fassnacht, Martin},
  title     = {Efficacy and safety of radiation therapy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma},
  series = {British Journal of Cancer},
  volume    = {128},
  journal   = {British Journal of Cancer},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41416-022-02082-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324411},
  pages     = {586-593},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Background International guidelines emphasise the role of radiotherapy (RT) for the management of advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). However, the evidence for this recommendation is very low. Methods We retrospectively analysed all patients who received RT for advanced ACC in five European centres since 2000. Primary endpoint: time to progression of the treated lesion (tTTP). Secondary endpoints: best objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events, and the establishment of predictive factors by Cox analyses. Results In total, 132 tumoural lesions of 80 patients were treated with conventional RT (cRT) of 50-60 Gy (n = 20) or 20-49 Gy (n = 69), stereotactic body RT of 35-50 Gy (SBRT) (n = 36), or brachytherapy of 12-25 Gy (BT) (n = 7). Best objective lesional response was complete (n = 6), partial (n = 52), stable disease (n = 60), progressive disease (n = 14). Median tTTP was 7.6 months (1.0-148.6). In comparison to cRT\(_{20-49Gy}\), tTTP was significantly longer for cRT\(_{50-60Gy}\) (multivariate adjusted HR 0.10; 95\% CI 0.03-0.33; p < 0.001) and SBRT (HR 0.31; 95\% CI 0.12-0.80; p = 0.016), but not for BT (HR 0.66; 95\% CI 0.22-1.99; p = 0.46). Toxicity was generally mild and moderate with three grade 3 events. No convincing predictive factors could be established. Conclusions This largest published study on RT in advanced ACC provides clear evidence that RT is effective in ACC.},
  language  = {en}
}