@article{BetzSegerNieding2022,
  author    = {Betz, Ann-Katrin and Seger, Benedikt T. and Nieding, Gerhild},
  title     = {How can carbon labels and climate-friendly default options on restaurant menus contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions associated with dining?},
  series = {PLOS Climate},
  volume    = {1},
  journal   = {PLOS Climate},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pclm.0000028},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-301039},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {In this study, we aimed to understand how restaurants can contribute to climate change mitigation via menu design. We investigated two types of interventions: changing the configuration of menu entries with variable side dishes so that the most climate-friendly option is set as the default and indicating the greenhouse gas emission of each dish via carbon labels. In an online simulation experiment, 265 participants were shown the menus of nine different restaurants and had to choose exactly one dish per menu. In six menus, the main dishes were presented with different default options: the side dish was associated either with the highest or with the lowest greenhouse gas emissions. The other three menus consisted of unitary dishes for which the default rules did not apply. All menus were presented either with or without carbon labels for each dish option. The results indicated that more climate-friendly dish choices resulting in lower greenhouse gas emissions were made with the low-emission than the high-emission default condition, and when carbon labels were present rather than absent. The effects of both interventions interacted, which indicates that the interventions partly overlap with regard to cognitive predecessors of choice behavior, such as attentional focus and social norms. The results suggest that the design of restaurant menus has a considerable effect on the carbon footprint of dining.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SegerWannagatNieding2021,
  author    = {Seger, Benedikt T. and Wannagat, Wienke and Nieding, Gerhild},
  title     = {Children's surface, textbase, and situation model representations of written and illustrated written narrative text},
  series = {Reading and Writing},
  volume    = {34},
  journal   = {Reading and Writing},
  number    = {6},
  issn      = {1573-0905},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11145-020-10118-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-269813},
  pages     = {1415-1440},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {According to the tripartite model of text representation (van Dijk \& Kintsch, 1983), readers form representations of the text surface and textbase, and construct a situation model. In this study, an experiment was conducted to investigate whether these levels of representation would be affected by adding illustrations to narrative text and whether the order of text and illustrations would make a difference. Students aged between 7 and 13 years (N = 146) read 12 narrative texts, 4 of them with illustrations presented before their corresponding sentences, 4 with illustrations presented after, and 4 without any illustration. A sentence recognition task was used to assess the accuracy for text surface, textbase, and situation model. For the text surface and situation model, neither the presence of illustrations nor the order of text and illustrations influenced accuracy. However, the textbase was negatively affected by illustrations when they followed their corresponding sentences. We suggest that illustrations can initiate model inspection after situation model construction (Schnotz, 2014), a process that can make substantial changes to the textbase representation.},
  language  = {en}
}