@article{BeerSchenkHelfrichFoersteretal.2019, author = {Beer, Katharina and Schenk, Mariela and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte and Holzschuh, Andrea}, title = {The circadian clock uses different environmental time cues to synchronize emergence and locomotion of the solitary bee Osmia bicornis}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {9}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-019-54111-3}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202721}, pages = {17748}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Life on earth adapted to the daily reoccurring changes in environment by evolving an endogenous circadian clock. Although the circadian clock has a crucial impact on survival and behavior of solitary bees, many aspects of solitary bee clock mechanisms remain unknown. Our study is the first to show that the circadian clock governs emergence in Osmia bicornis, a bee species which overwinters as adult inside its cocoon. Therefore, its eclosion from the pupal case is separated by an interjacent diapause from its emergence in spring. We show that this bee species synchronizes its emergence to the morning. The daily rhythms of emergence are triggered by temperature cycles but not by light cycles. In contrast to this, the bee's daily rhythms in locomotion are synchronized by light cycles. Thus, we show that the circadian clock of O. bicornis is set by either temperature or light, depending on what activity is timed. Light is a valuable cue for setting the circadian clock when bees have left the nest. However, for pre-emerged bees, temperature is the most important cue, which may represent an evolutionary adaptation of the circadian system to the cavity-nesting life style of O. bicornis.}, language = {en} } @article{JoschinskiBeerHelfrichFoersteretal.2016, author = {Joschinski, Jens and Beer, Katharina and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte and Krauss, Jochen}, title = {Pea Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Have Diurnal Rhythms When Raised Independently of a Host Plant}, series = {Journal of Insect Science}, volume = {16}, journal = {Journal of Insect Science}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1093/jisesa/iew013}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-168783}, pages = {31}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Seasonal timing is assumed to involve the circadian clock, an endogenous mechanism to track time and measure day length. Some debate persists, however, and aphids were among the first organisms for which circadian clock involvement was questioned. Inferences about links to phenology are problematic, as the clock itself is little investigated in aphids. For instance, it is unknown whether aphids possess diurnal rhythms at all. Possibly, the close interaction with host plants prevents independent measurements of rhythmicity. We reared the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) on an artificial diet, and recorded survival, moulting, and honeydew excretion. Despite their plant-dependent life style, aphids were independently rhythmic under light-dark conditions. This first demonstration of diurnal aphid rhythms shows that aphids do not simply track the host plant's rhythmicity.}, language = {en} } @article{ChenReiherHermannLuibletal.2016, author = {Chen, Jiangtian and Reiher, Wencke and Hermann-Luibl, Christiane and Sellami, Azza and Cognigni, Paola and Kondo, Shu and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte and Veenstra, Jan A. and Wegener, Christian}, title = {Allatostatin A Signalling in Drosophila Regulates Feeding and Sleep and Is Modulated by PDF}, series = {PLoS Genetics}, volume = {12}, journal = {PLoS Genetics}, number = {9}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1006346}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-178170}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Feeding and sleep are fundamental behaviours with significant interconnections and cross-modulations. The circadian system and peptidergic signals are important components of this modulation, but still little is known about the mechanisms and networks by which they interact to regulate feeding and sleep. We show that specific thermogenetic activation of peptidergic Allatostatin A (AstA)-expressing PLP neurons and enteroendocrine cells reduces feeding and promotes sleep in the fruit fly Drosophila. The effects of AstA cell activation are mediated by AstA peptides with receptors homolog to galanin receptors subserving similar and apparently conserved functions in vertebrates. We further identify the PLP neurons as a downstream target of the neuropeptide pigment-dispersing factor (PDF), an output factor of the circadian clock. PLP neurons are contacted by PDF-expressing clock neurons, and express a functional PDF receptor demonstrated by cAMP imaging. Silencing of AstA signalling and continuous input to AstA cells by tethered PDF changes the sleep/activity ratio in opposite directions but does not affect rhythmicity. Taken together, our results suggest that pleiotropic AstA signalling by a distinct neuronal and enteroendocrine AstA cell subset adapts the fly to a digestive energy-saving state which can be modulated by PDF.}, language = {en} } @article{DusikSenthilanMentzeletal.2014, author = {Dusik, Verena and Senthilan, Pingkalai R. and Mentzel, Benjamin and Hartlieb, Heiko and W{\"u}lbeck, Corina and Yoshii, Taishi and Raabe, Thomas and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte}, title = {The MAP Kinase p38 Is Part of Drosophila melanogaster's Circadian Clock}, series = {PLoS Genetics}, volume = {10}, journal = {PLoS Genetics}, number = {8}, issn = {1553-7404}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1004565}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-119433}, pages = {e1004565}, year = {2014}, abstract = {All organisms have to adapt to acute as well as to regularly occurring changes in the environment. To deal with these major challenges organisms evolved two fundamental mechanisms: the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, a major stress pathway for signaling stressful events, and circadian clocks to prepare for the daily environmental changes. Both systems respond sensitively to light. Recent studies in vertebrates and fungi indicate that p38 is involved in light-signaling to the circadian clock providing an interesting link between stress-induced and regularly rhythmic adaptations of animals to the environment, but the molecular and cellular mechanisms remained largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate by immunocytochemical means that p38 is expressed in Drosophila melanogaster's clock neurons and that it is activated in a clock-dependent manner. Surprisingly, we found that p38 is most active under darkness and, besides its circadian activation, additionally gets inactivated by light. Moreover, locomotor activity recordings revealed that p38 is essential for a wild-type timing of evening activity and for maintaining ∼ 24 h behavioral rhythms under constant darkness: flies with reduced p38 activity in clock neurons, delayed evening activity and lengthened the period of their free-running rhythms. Furthermore, nuclear translocation of the clock protein Period was significantly delayed on the expression of a dominant-negative form of p38b in Drosophila's most important clock neurons. Western Blots revealed that p38 affects the phosphorylation degree of Period, what is likely the reason for its effects on nuclear entry of Period. In vitro kinase assays confirmed our Western Blot results and point to p38 as a potential "clock kinase" phosphorylating Period. Taken together, our findings indicate that the p38 MAP Kinase is an integral component of the core circadian clock of Drosophila in addition to playing a role in stress-input pathways.}, language = {en} } @article{VieiraJonesDanonetal.2012, author = {Vieira, Jacqueline and Jones, Alex R. and Danon, Antoine and Sakuma, Michiyo and Hoang, Nathalie and Robles, David and Tait, Shirley and Heyes, Derren J. and Picot, Marie and Yoshii, Taishi and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte and Soubigou, Guillaume and Coppee, Jean-Yves and Klarsfeld, Andr{\´e} and Rouyer, Francois and Scrutton, Nigel S. and Ahmad, Margaret}, title = {Human Cryptochrome-1 Confers Light Independent Biological Activity in Transgenic Drosophila Correlated with Flavin Radical Stability}, series = {PLoS One}, volume = {7}, journal = {PLoS One}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0031867}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-134513}, pages = {e31867}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Cryptochromes are conserved flavoprotein receptors found throughout the biological kingdom with diversified roles in plant development and entrainment of the circadian clock in animals. Light perception is proposed to occur through flavin radical formation that correlates with biological activity in vivo in both plants and Drosophila. By contrast, mammalian (Type II) cryptochromes regulate the circadian clock independently of light, raising the fundamental question of whether mammalian cryptochromes have evolved entirely distinct signaling mechanisms. Here we show by developmental and transcriptome analysis that Homo sapiens cryptochrome - 1 (HsCRY1) confers biological activity in transgenic expressing Drosophila in darkness, that can in some cases be further stimulated by light. In contrast to all other cryptochromes, purified recombinant HsCRY1 protein was stably isolated in the anionic radical flavin state, containing only a small proportion of oxidized flavin which could be reduced by illumination. We conclude that animal Type I and Type II cryptochromes may both have signaling mechanisms involving formation of a flavin radical signaling state, and that light independent activity of Type II cryptochromes is a consequence of dark accumulation of this redox form in vivo rather than of a fundamental difference in signaling mechanism.}, language = {en} } @article{ReinhardBertoliniSaitoetal.2022, author = {Reinhard, Nils and Bertolini, Enrico and Saito, Aika and Sekiguchi, Manabu and Yoshii, Taishi and Rieger, Dirk and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte}, title = {The lateral posterior clock neurons of Drosophila melanogaster express three neuropeptides and have multiple connections within the circadian clock network and beyond}, series = {Journal of Comparative Neurology}, volume = {530}, journal = {Journal of Comparative Neurology}, number = {9}, doi = {10.1002/cne.25294}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-276456}, pages = {1507 -- 1529}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Drosophila's lateral posterior neurons (LPNs) belong to a small group of circadian clock neurons that is so far not characterized in detail. Thanks to a new highly specific split-Gal4 line, here we describe LPNs' morphology in fine detail, their synaptic connections, daily bimodal expression of neuropeptides, and propose a putative role of this cluster in controlling daily activity and sleep patterns. We found that the three LPNs are heterogeneous. Two of the neurons with similar morphology arborize in the superior medial and lateral protocerebrum and most likely promote sleep. One unique, possibly wakefulness-promoting, neuron with wider arborizations extends from the superior lateral protocerebrum toward the anterior optic tubercle. Both LPN types exhibit manifold connections with the other circadian clock neurons, especially with those that control the flies' morning and evening activity (M- and E-neurons, respectively). In addition, they form synaptic connections with neurons of the mushroom bodies, the fan-shaped body, and with many additional still unidentified neurons. We found that both LPN types rhythmically express three neuropeptides, Allostatin A, Allostatin C, and Diuretic Hormone 31 with maxima in the morning and the evening. The three LPN neuropeptides may, furthermore, signal to the insect hormonal center in the pars intercerebralis and contribute to rhythmic modulation of metabolism, feeding, and reproduction. We discuss our findings in the light of anatomical details gained by the recently published hemibrain of a single female fly on the electron microscopic level and of previous functional studies concerning the LPN.}, language = {en} } @article{BeerHelfrichFoerster2020, author = {Beer, Katharina and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte}, title = {Model and Non-model Insects in Chronobiology}, series = {Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience}, volume = {14}, journal = {Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience}, issn = {1662-5153}, doi = {10.3389/fnbeh.2020.601676}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-218721}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is an established model organism in chronobiology, because genetic manipulation and breeding in the laboratory are easy. The circadian clock neuroanatomy in D. melanogaster is one of the best-known clock networks in insects and basic circadian behavior has been characterized in detail in this insect. Another model in chronobiology is the honey bee Apis mellifera, of which diurnal foraging behavior has been described already in the early twentieth century. A. mellifera hallmarks the research on the interplay between the clock and sociality and complex behaviors like sun compass navigation and time-place-learning. Nevertheless, there are aspects of clock structure and function, like for example the role of the clock in photoperiodism and diapause, which can be only insufficiently investigated in these two models. Unlike high-latitude flies such as Chymomyza costata or D. ezoana, cosmopolitan D. melanogaster flies do not display a photoperiodic diapause. Similarly, A. mellifera bees do not go into "real" diapause, but most solitary bee species exhibit an obligatory diapause. Furthermore, sociality evolved in different Hymenoptera independently, wherefore it might be misleading to study the social clock only in one social insect. Consequently, additional research on non-model insects is required to understand the circadian clock in Diptera and Hymenoptera. In this review, we introduce the two chronobiology model insects D. melanogaster and A. mellifera, compare them with other insects and show their advantages and limitations as general models for insect circadian clocks.}, language = {en} } @article{SenthilanHelfrichFoerster2016, author = {Senthilan, Pingkalai R. and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte}, title = {Rhodopsin 7-The unusual Rhodopsin in Drosophila}, series = {PeerJ}, volume = {4}, journal = {PeerJ}, doi = {10.7717/peerj.2427}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177998}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Rhodopsins are the major photopigments in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Drosophila express six well-characterized Rhodopsins (Rh1-Rh6) with distinct absorption maxima and expression pattern. In 2000, when the Drosophila genome was published, a novel Rhodopsin gene was discovered: Rhodopsin 7 (Rh7). Rh7 is highly conserved among the Drosophila genus and is also found in other arthropods. Phylogenetic trees based on protein sequences suggest that the seven Drosophila Rhodopsins cluster in three different groups. While Rh1, Rh2 and Rh6 form a "vertebrate-melanopsin-type"-cluster, and Rh3, Rh4 and Rh5 form an "insect-type"-Rhodopsin cluster, Rh7 seem to form its own cluster. Although Rh7 has nearly all important features of a functional Rhodopsin, it differs from other Rhodopsins in its genomic and structural properties, suggesting it might have an overall different role than other known Rhodopsins.}, language = {en} } @article{FischerHelfrichFoersterPeschel2016, author = {Fischer, Robin and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte and Peschel, Nicolai}, title = {GSK-3 Beta Does Not Stabilize Cryptochrome in the Circadian Clock of Drosophila}, series = {PLoS ONE}, volume = {11}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0146571}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-180370}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Cryptochrome (CRY) is the primary photoreceptor of Drosophila's circadian clock. It resets the circadian clock by promoting light-induced degradation of the clock protein Timeless (TIM) in the proteasome. Under constant light, the clock stops because TIM is absent, and the flies become arrhythmic. In addition to TIM degradation, light also induces CRY degradation. This depends on the interaction of CRY with several proteins such as the E3 ubiquitin ligases Jetlag (JET) and Ramshackle (BRWD3). However, CRY can seemingly also be stabilized by interaction with the kinase Shaggy (SGG), the GSK-3 beta fly orthologue. Consequently, flies with SGG overexpression in certain dorsal clock neurons are reported to remain rhythmic under constant light. We were interested in the interaction between CRY, Ramshackle and SGG and started to perform protein interaction studies in S2 cells. To our surprise, we were not able to replicate the results, that SGG overexpression does stabilize CRY, neither in S2 cells nor in the relevant clock neurons. SGG rather does the contrary. Furthermore, flies with SGG overexpression in the dorsal clock neurons became arrhythmic as did wild-type flies. Nevertheless, we could reproduce the published interaction of SGG with TIM, since flies with SGG overexpression in the lateral clock neurons shortened their free-running period. We conclude that SGG does not directly interact with CRY but rather with TIM. Furthermore we could demonstrate, that an unspecific antibody explains the observed stabilization effects on CRY.}, language = {en} } @article{ReinhardSchubertBertolinietal.2022, author = {Reinhard, Nils and Schubert, Frank K. and Bertolini, Enrico and Hagedorn, Nicolas and Manoli, Giulia and Sekiguchi, Manabu and Yoshii, Taishi and Rieger, Dirk and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte}, title = {The neuronal circuit of the dorsal circadian clock neurons in Drosophila melanogaster}, series = {Frontiers in Physiology}, volume = {13}, journal = {Frontiers in Physiology}, issn = {1664-042X}, doi = {10.3389/fphys.2022.886432}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-272527}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Drosophila's dorsal clock neurons (DNs) consist of four clusters (DN1as, DN1ps, DN2s, and DN3s) that largely differ in size. While the DN1as and the DN2s encompass only two neurons, the DN1ps consist of ∼15 neurons, and the DN3s comprise ∼40 neurons per brain hemisphere. In comparison to the well-characterized lateral clock neurons (LNs), the neuroanatomy and function of the DNs are still not clear. Over the past decade, numerous studies have addressed their role in the fly's circadian system, leading to several sometimes divergent results. Nonetheless, these studies agreed that the DNs are important to fine-tune activity under light and temperature cycles and play essential roles in linking the output from the LNs to downstream neurons that control sleep and metabolism. Here, we used the Flybow system, specific split-GAL4 lines, trans-Tango, and the recently published fly connectome (called hemibrain) to describe the morphology of the DNs in greater detail, including their synaptic connections to other clock and non-clock neurons. We show that some DN groups are largely heterogenous. While certain DNs are strongly connected with the LNs, others are mainly output neurons that signal to circuits downstream of the clock. Among the latter are mushroom body neurons, central complex neurons, tubercle bulb neurons, neurosecretory cells in the pars intercerebralis, and other still unidentified partners. This heterogeneity of the DNs may explain some of the conflicting results previously found about their functionality. Most importantly, we identify two putative novel communication centers of the clock network: one fiber bundle in the superior lateral protocerebrum running toward the anterior optic tubercle and one fiber hub in the posterior lateral protocerebrum. Both are invaded by several DNs and LNs and might play an instrumental role in the clock network.}, language = {en} }