@article{AntoniouKuchenbaeckerSoucyetal.2012,
  author    = {Antoniou, Antonis C. and Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B. and Soucy, Penny and Beesley, Jonathan and Chen, Xiaoqing and McGuffog, Lesley and Lee, Andrew and Barrowdale, Daniel and Healey, Sue and Sinilnikova, Olga M. and Caligo, Maria A. and Loman, Niklas and Harbst, Katja and Lindblom, Annika and Arver, Brita and Rosenquist, Richard and Karlsson, Per and Nathanson, Kate and Domchek, Susan and Rebbeck, Tim and Jakubowska, Anna and Lubinski, Jan and Jaworska, Katarzyna and Durda, Katarzyna and Zlowowcka-Perłowska, Elżbieta and Osorio, Ana and Dur{\´a}n, Mercedes and Andr{\´e}s, Raquel and Ben{\´i}tez, Javier and Hamann, Ute and Hogervorst, Frans B. and van Os, Theo A. and Verhoef, Senno and Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne E. J. and Wijnen, Juul and Garcia, Encarna B. G{\´o}mez and Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. and Kriege, Mieke and Coll{\´e}e, Margriet and Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. and Oosterwijk, Jan C. and Peock, Susan and Frost, Debra and Ellis, Steve D. and Platte, Radka and Fineberg, Elena and Evans, D. Gareth and Lalloo, Fiona and Jacobs, Chris and Eeles, Ros and Adlard, Julian and Davidson, Rosemarie and Cole, Trevor and Cook, Jackie and Paterson, Joan and Douglas, Fiona and Brewer, Carole and Hodgson, Shirley and Morrison, Patrick J. and Walker, Lisa and Rogers, Mark T. and Donaldson, Alan and Dorkins, Huw and Godwin, Andrew K. and Bove, Betsy and Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique and Houdayer, Claude and Buecher, Bruno and de Pauw, Antoine and Mazoyer, Sylvie and Calender, Alain and L{\´e}on{\´e}, M{\´e}lanie and Bressac-de Paillerets, Brigitte and Caron, Olivier and Sobol, Hagay and Frenay, Marc and Prieur, Fabienne and Ferrer, Sandra Fert and Mortemousque, Isabelle and Buys, Saundra and Daly, Mary and Miron, Alexander and Terry, Mary Beth and Hopper, John L. and John, Esther M. and Southey, Melissa and Goldgar, David and Singer, Christian F. and Fink-Retter, Anneliese and Muy-Kheng, Tea and Geschwantler Kaulich, Daphne and Hansen, Thomas V. O. and Nielsen, Finn C. and Barkardottir, Rosa B. and Gaudet, Mia and Kirchhoff, Tomas and Joseph, Vijai and Dutra-Clarke, Ana and Offit, Kenneth and Piedmonte, Marion and Kirk, Judy and Cohn, David and Hurteau, Jean and Byron, John and Fiorica, James and Toland, Amanda E. and Montagna, Marco and Oliani, Cristina and Imyanitov, Evgeny and Isaacs, Claudine and Tihomirova, Laima and Blanco, Ignacio and Lazaro, Conxi and Teul{\´e}, Alex and Del Valle, J. and Gayther, Simon A. and Odunsi, Kunle and Gross, Jenny and Karlan, Beth Y. and Olah, Edith and Teo, Soo-Hwang and Ganz, Patricia A. and Beattie, Mary S. and Dorfling, Cecelia M. and Jansen van Rensburg, Elizabeth and Diez, Orland and Kwong, Ava and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Wappenschmidt, Barbara and Engel, Christoph and Meindl, Alfons and Ditsch, Nina and Arnold, Norbert and Heidemann, Simone and Niederacher, Dieter and Preisler-Adams, Sabine and Gadzicki, Dorothea and Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda and Deissler, Helmut and Gehrig, Andrea and Sutter, Christian and Kast, Karin and Fiebig, Britta and Sch{\"a}fer, Dieter and Caldes, Trinidad and de la Hoya, Miguel and Nevanlinna, Heli and Muranen, Taru A. and Lesp{\´e}rance, Bernard and Spurdle, Amanda B. and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Ding, Yuan C. and Wang, Xianshu and Fredericksen, Zachary and Pankratz, Vernon S. and Lindor, Noralane M. and Peterlongo, Paulo and Manoukian, Siranoush and Peissel, Bernard and Zaffaroni, Daniela and Bonanni, Bernardo and Bernard, Loris and Dolcetti, Riccardo and Papi, Laura and Ottini, Laura and Radice, Paolo and Greene, Mark H. and Loud, Jennifer T. and Andrulis, Irene L. and Ozcelik, Hilmi and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Glendon, Gord and Thomassen, Mads and Gerdes, Anne-Marie and Jensen, Uffe B. and Skytte, Anne-Bine and Kruse, Torben A. and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia and Couch, Fergus J. and Simard, Jacques and Easton, Douglas F.},
  title     = {Common variants at 12p11, 12q24, 9p21, 9q31.2 and in ZNF365 are associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation carriers},
  series = {Breast Cancer Research},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Breast Cancer Research},
  number    = {R33},
  organization    = {CIMBA; SWE-BRCA; HEBON; EMBRACE; GEMO Study Collaborators; kConFab Investigators},
  doi       = {10.1186/bcr3121},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-130449},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Introduction: Several common alleles have been shown to be associated with breast and/or ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Recent genome-wide association studies of breast cancer have identified eight additional breast cancer susceptibility loci: rs1011970 (9p21, CDKN2A/B), rs10995190 (ZNF365), rs704010 (ZMIZ1), rs2380205 (10p15), rs614367 (11q13), rs1292011 (12q24), rs10771399 (12p11 near PTHLH) and rs865686 (9q31.2). Methods: To evaluate whether these single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, we genotyped these SNPs in 12,599 BRCA1 and 7,132 BRCA2 mutation carriers and analysed the associations with breast cancer risk within a retrospective likelihood framework. Results: Only SNP rs10771399 near PTHLH was associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers (per-allele hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87, 95\% CI: 0.81 to 0.94, P-trend = 3 x 10\(^{-4}\)). The association was restricted to mutations proven or predicted to lead to absence of protein expression (HR = 0.82, 95\% CI: 0.74 to 0.90, P-trend = 3.1 x 10\(^{-5}\), P-difference = 0.03). Four SNPs were associated with the risk of breast cancer for BRCA2 mutation carriers: rs10995190, P-trend = 0.015; rs1011970, P-trend = 0.048; rs865686, 2df P = 0.007; rs1292011 2df P = 0.03. rs10771399 (PTHLH) was predominantly associated with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer for BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR = 0.81, 95\% CI: 0.74 to 0.90, P-trend = 4 x 10\(^{-5}\)) and there was marginal evidence of association with ER- negative breast cancer for BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR = 0.78, 95\% CI: 0.62 to 1.00, P-trend = 0.049). Conclusions: The present findings, in combination with previously identified modifiers of risk, will ultimately lead to more accurate risk prediction and an improved understanding of the disease etiology in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KochCappelNockeretal.2013,
  author    = {Koch, Oliver and Cappel, Daniel and Nocker, Monika and J{\"a}ger, Timo and Floh{\´e}, Leopold and Sotriffer, Christoph A. and Selzer, Paul M.},
  title     = {Molecular Dynamics Reveal Binding Mode of Glutathionylspermidine by Trypanothione Synthetase},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0056788},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-131070},
  pages     = {e56788},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The trypanothione synthetase (TryS) catalyses the two-step biosynthesis of trypanothione from spermidine and glutathione and is an attractive new drug target for the development of trypanocidal and antileishmanial drugs, especially since the structural information of TryS from Leishmania major has become available. Unfortunately, the TryS structure was solved without any of the substrates and lacks loop regions that are mechanistically important. This contribution describes docking and molecular dynamics simulations that led to further insights into trypanothione biosynthesis and, in particular, explains the binding modes of substrates for the second catalytic step. The structural model essentially confirm previously proposed binding sites for glutathione, ATP and two \(Mg^{2+}\) ions, which appear identical for both catalytic steps. The analysis of an unsolved loop region near the proposed spermidine binding site revealed a new pocket that was demonstrated to bind glutathionylspermidine in an inverted orientation. For the second step of trypanothione synthesis glutathionylspermidine is bound in a way that preferentially allows \(N^1\)-glutathionylation of \(N^8\)-glutathionylspermidine, classifying \(N^8\)-glutathionylspermidine as the favoured substrate. By inhibitor docking, the binding site for \(N^8\)-glutathionylspermidine was characterised as druggable.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{OostingaMaierSchueffelgenetal.2013,
  author    = {Oostinga, Jeroen B. and Maier, Luis and Sch{\"u}ffelgen, Peter and Knott, Daniel and Ames, Christopher and Br{\"u}ne, Christoph and Tkachov, Grigory and Buhmann, Hartmut and Molenkamp, Laurens W.},
  title     = {Josephson Supercurrent through the Topological Surface States of Strained Bulk HgTe},
  series = {Physical Review X},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {Physical Review X},
  number    = {021007},
  doi       = {10.1103/PhysRevX.3.021007},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-129834},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Strained bulk HgTe is a three-dimensional topological insulator, whose surface electrons have a high mobility (~ 30 000 cm\(^2\)=Vs), while its bulk is effectively free of mobile charge carriers. These properties enable a study of transport through its unconventional surface states without being hindered by a parallel bulk conductance. Here, we show transport experiments on HgTe-based Josephson junctions to investigate the appearance of the predicted Majorana states at the interface between a topological insulator and a superconductor. Interestingly, we observe a dissipationless supercurrent flow through the topological surface states of HgTe. The current-voltage characteristics are hysteretic at temperatures below 1 K, with critical supercurrents of several microamperes. Moreover, we observe a magnetic-field-induced Fraunhofer pattern of the critical supercurrent, indicating a dominant \(2\pi\)-periodic Josephson effect in the unconventional surface states. Our results show that strained bulk HgTe is a promising material system to get a better understanding of the Josephson effect in topological surface states, and to search for the manifestation of zero-energy Majorana states in transport experiments.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{OsorioMilneKuchenbaeckeretal.2014,
  author    = {Osorio, Ana and Milne, Roger L. and Kuchenbaecker, Karoline and Vaclov{\´a}, Tereza and Pita, Guillermo and Alonso, Rosario and Peterlongo, Paolo and Blanco, Ignacio and de la Hoya, Miguel and Duran, Mercedes and Diez, Orland and Ram{\´o}n y Cajal, Teresa and Konstantopoulou, Irene and Mart{\´i}nez-Bouzas, Christina and Conejero, Raquel Andr{\´e}s and Soucy, Penny and McGuffog, Lesley and Barrowdale, Daniel and Lee, Andrew and Arver, Brita and Rantala, Johanna and Loman, Niklas and Ehrencrona, Hans and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Beattie, Mary S. and Domchek, Susan M. and Nathanson, Katherine and Rebbeck, Timothy R. and Arun, Banu K. and Karlan, Beth Y. and Walsh, Christine and Lester, Jenny and John, Esther M. and Whittemore, Alice S. and Daly, Mary B. and Southey, Melissa and Hopper, John and Terry, Mary B. and Buys, Saundra S. and Janavicius, Ramunas and Dorfling, Cecilia M. and van Rensburg, Elizabeth J. and Steele, Linda and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Ding, Yuan Chun and Hansen, Thomas V. O. and J{\o}nson, Lars and Ejlertsen, Bent and Gerdes, Anne-Marie and Infante, Mar and Herr{\´a}ez, Bel{\´e}n and Moreno, Leticia Thais and Weitzel, Jeffrey N. and Herzog, Josef and Weeman, Kisa and Manoukian, Siranoush and Peissel, Bernard and Zaffaroni, Daniela and Scuvera, Guilietta and Bonanni, Bernardo and Mariette, Frederique and Volorio, Sara and Viel, Alessandra and Varesco, Liliana and Papi, Laura and Ottini, Laura and Tibiletti, Maria Grazia and Radice, Paolo and Yannoukakos, Drakoulis and Garber, Judy and Ellis, Steve and Frost, Debra and Platte, Radka and Fineberg, Elena and Evans, Gareth and Lalloo, Fiona and Izatt, Louise and Eeles, Ros and Adlard, Julian and Davidson, Rosemarie and Cole, Trevor and Eccles, Diana and Cook, Jackie and Hodgson, Shirley and Brewer, Carole and Tischkowitz, Marc and Douglas, Fiona and Porteous, Mary and Side, Lucy and Walker, Lisa and Morrison, Patrick and Donaldson, Alan and Kennedy, John and Foo, Claire and Godwin, Andrew K. and Schmutzler, Rita Katharina and Wappenschmidt, Barbara and Rhiem, Kerstin and Engel, Christoph and Meindl, Alftons and Ditsch, Nina and Arnold, Norbert and Plendl, Hans J{\"o}rg and Niederacher, Dieter and Sutter, Christian and Wang-Gohrke, Shan and Steinemann, Doris and Preisler-Adams, Sabine and Kast, Karin and Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda and Gehrig, Andrea and Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique and Sinilnikova, Olga M. and Mazoyer, Sylvie and Damiola, Francesca and Poppe, Bruce and Claes, Kathleen and Piedmonte, Marion and Tucker, Kathy and Backes, Floor and Rodr{\´i}guez, Gustavo and Brewster, Wendy and Wakeley, Katie and Rutherford, Thomas and Cald{\´e}s, Trinidad and Nevanlinna, Heli and Aittom{\"a}ki, Kristiina and Rookus, Matti A. and van Os, Theo A. M. and van der Kolk, Lizet and de Lange, J. L. and Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne E. J. and van der Hout, A. H. and van Asperen, Christi J. and Gom{\´e}z Garcia, Encarna B. and Encarna, B. and Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline and Coll{\´e}e, J. Margriet and van Deurzen, Carolien H. M. and van der Luijt, Rob B. and Devilee, Peter and Olah, Edith and L{\´a}zaro, Conxi and Teul{\´e}, Alex and Men{\´e}ndez, Mireia and Jakubowska, Anna and Cybulski, Cezary and Gronwald, Jecek and Lubinski, Jan and Durda, Katarzyna and Jaworska-Bieniek, Katarzyna and Johannsson, Oskar Th. and Maugard, Christine and Montagna, Marco and Tognazzo, Silvia and Teixeira, Manuel R. and Healey, Sue and Olswold, Curtis and Guidugli, Lucia and Lindor, Noralane and Slager, Susan and Szabo, Csilla I. and Vijai, Joseph and Robson, Mark and Kauff, Noah and Zhang, Liying and Rau-Murthy, Rohini and Fink-Retter, Anneliese and Singer, Christine F. and Rappaport, Christine and Kaulich, Daphne Geschwantler and Pfeiler, Georg and Tea, Muy-Kheng and Berger, Andreas and Phelan, Catherine M. and Greene, Mark H. and Mai, Phuong L. and Lejbkowicz, Flavio and Andrulis, Irene and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Glendon, Gord and Toland, Amanda Ewart and Bojesen, Anders and Pedersen, Inge Sokilde and Sunde, Lone and Thomassen, Mads and Kruse, Torben A. and Jensen, Uffe Birk and Friedman, Eitan and Laitman, Yeal and Shimon, Shanie Paluch and Simard, Jaques and Easton, Douglas F. and Offit, Kenneth and Couch, Fergus J. and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia and Antoniou, Antonis C. and Benitez, Javier},
  title     = {DNA Glycosylases Involved in Base Excision Repair May Be Associated with Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers},
  series = {PLOS Genetics},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {PLOS Genetics},
  number    = {e1004256},
  issn      = {1553-7404},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1004256},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-116820},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in the DNA Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway could be associated with cancer risk in carriers of mutations in the high-penetrance susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, given the relation of synthetic lethality that exists between one of the components of the BER pathway, PARP1 (poly ADP ribose polymerase), and both BRCA1 and BRCA2. In the present study, we have performed a comprehensive analysis of 18 genes involved in BER using a tagging SNP approach in a large series of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. 144 SNPs were analyzed in a two stage study involving 23,463 carriers from the CIMBA consortium (the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2). Eleven SNPs showed evidence of association with breast and/or ovarian cancer at p<0.05 in the combined analysis. Four of the five genes for which strongest evidence of association was observed were DNA glycosylases. The strongest evidence was for rs1466785 in the NEIL2 (endonuclease VIII-like 2) gene (HR: 1.09, 95\% CI (1.03-1.16), p = 2.7x10(-3)) for association with breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers, and rs2304277 in the OGG1 (8-guanine DNA glycosylase) gene, with ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR: 1.12 95\% CI: 1.03-1.21, p = 4.8x10(-3)). DNA glycosylases involved in the first steps of the BER pathway may be associated with cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and should be more comprehensively studied.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FruchartDavignonHermansetal.2014,
  author    = {Fruchart, Jean-Charles and Davignon, Jean and Hermans, Michael P. and Al-Rubeaan, Khalid and Amarenco, Pierre and Assmann, Gerd and Barter, Philip and Betteridge, John and Bruckert, Eric and Cuevas, Ada and Farnier, Michel and Ferrannini, Ele and Fioretto, Paola and Genest, Jacques and Ginsberg, Henry N. and Gotto Jr., Antonio M. and Hu, Dayi and Kadowaki, Takashi and Kodama, Tatsuhiko and Krempf, Michel and Matsuzawa, Yuji and N{\´u}{\~n}ez-Cort{\´e}s, Jes{\´u}s Mill{\´a}n and Monfil, Calos Calvo and Ogawa, Hisao and Plutzky, Jorge and Rader, Daniel J. and Sadikot, Shaukat and Santos, Raul D. and Shlyakhto, Evgeny and Sritara, Piyamitr and Sy, Rody and Tall, Alan and Tan, Chee Eng and Tokg{\"o}zoğlu, Lale and Toth, Peter P. and Valensi, Paul and Wanner, Christoph and Zambon, Albertro and Zhu, Junren and Zimmet, Paul},
  title     = {Residual macrovascular risk in 2013: what have we learned?},
  series = {Cardiovascual Diabetology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cardiovascual Diabetology},
  number    = {26},
  issn      = {1475-2840},
  doi       = {10.1186/1475-2840-13-26},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-117546},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Cardiovascular disease poses a major challenge for the 21st century, exacerbated by the pandemics of obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. While best standards of care, including high-dose statins, can ameliorate the risk of vascular complications, patients remain at high risk of cardiovascular events. The Residual Risk Reduction Initiative (R(3)i) has previously highlighted atherogenic dyslipidaemia, defined as the imbalance between proatherogenic triglyceride-rich apolipoprotein B-containing-lipoproteins and antiatherogenic apolipoprotein A-I-lipoproteins (as in high-density lipoprotein, HDL), as an important modifiable contributor to lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk, especially in insulin-resistant conditions. As part of its mission to improve awareness and clinical management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia, the R(3)i has identified three key priorities for action: i) to improve recognition of atherogenic dyslipidaemia in patients at high cardiometabolic risk with or without diabetes; ii) to improve implementation and adherence to guideline-based therapies; and iii) to improve therapeutic strategies for managing atherogenic dyslipidaemia. The R(3)i believes that monitoring of non-HDL cholesterol provides a simple, practical tool for treatment decisions regarding the management of lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk. Addition of a fibrate, niacin (North and South America), omega-3 fatty acids or ezetimibe are all options for combination with a statin to further reduce non-HDL cholesterol, although lacking in hard evidence for cardiovascular outcome benefits. Several emerging treatments may offer promise. These include the next generation peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonists, cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors and monoclonal antibody therapy targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. However, long-term outcomes and safety data are clearly needed. In conclusion, the R(3)i believes that ongoing trials with these novel treatments may help to define the optimal management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia to reduce the clinical and socioeconomic burden of residual cardiovascular risk.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{UeceylerKahnKrameretal.2013,
  author    = {{\"U}{\c{c}}eyler, Nurcan and Kahn, Ann-Kathrin and Kramer, Daniela and Zeller, Daniel and Casanova-Molla, Jordi and Wanner, Christoph and Weidemann, Frank and Katsarava, Zaza and Sommer, Claudia},
  title     = {Impaired small fiber conduction in patients with Fabry disease: a neurophysiological case-control study},
  series = {BMC Neurology},
  journal   = {BMC Neurology},
  doi       = {10.1186/1471-2377-13-47},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-96527},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Background Fabry disease is an inborn lysosomal storage disorder which is associated with small fiber neuropathy. We set out to investigate small fiber conduction in Fabry patients using pain-related evoked potentials (PREP). Methods In this case-control study we prospectively studied 76 consecutive Fabry patients for electrical small fiber conduction in correlation with small fiber function and morphology. Data were compared with healthy controls using non-parametric statistical tests. All patients underwent neurological examination and were investigated with pain and depression questionnaires. Small fiber function (quantitative sensory testing, QST), morphology (skin punch biopsy), and electrical conduction (PREP) were assessed and correlated. Patients were stratified for gender and disease severity as reflected by renal function. Results All Fabry patients (31 men, 45 women) had small fiber neuropathy. Men with Fabry disease showed impaired cold (p < 0.01) and warm perception (p < 0.05), while women did not differ from controls. Intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) was reduced at the lower leg (p < 0.001) and the back (p < 0.05) mainly of men with impaired renal function. When investigating A-delta fiber conduction with PREP, men but not women with Fabry disease had lower amplitudes upon stimulation at face (p < 0.01), hands (p < 0.05), and feet (p < 0.01) compared to controls. PREP amplitudes further decreased with advance in disease severity. PREP amplitudes and warm (p < 0.05) and cold detection thresholds (p < 0.01) at the feet correlated positively in male patients. Conclusion Small fiber conduction is impaired in men with Fabry disease and worsens with advanced disease severity. PREP are well-suited to measure A-delta fiber conduction.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KraftFleischerWiedmannetal.2017,
  author    = {Kraft, Peter and Fleischer, Anna and Wiedmann, Silke and R{\"u}cker, Viktoria and Mackenrodt, Daniel and Morbach, Caroline and Malzahn, Uwe and Kleinschnitz, Christoph and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Heuschmann, Peter U.},
  title     = {Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care handheld echocardiography in acute ischemic stroke patients - a pilot study},
  series = {BMC Neurology},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {BMC Neurology},
  number    = {159},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12883-017-0937-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158081},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Background: Standard echocardiography (SE) is an essential part of the routine diagnostic work-up after ischemic stroke (IS) and also serves for research purposes. However, access to SE is often limited. We aimed to assess feasibility and accuracy of point-of-care (POC) echocardiography in a stroke unit (SU) setting. Methods: IS patients were recruited on the SU of the University Hospital W{\"u}rzburg, Germany. Two SU team members were trained in POC echocardiography for a three-month period to assess a set of predefined cardiac parameters including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Diagnostic agreement was assessed by comparing POC with SE executed by an expert sonographer, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) or kappa (κ) with 95\% confidence intervals (95\% CI) were calculated. Results: In the 78 patients receiving both POC and SE agreement for cardiac parameters was good, with ICC varying from 0.82 (95\% CI 0.71-0.89) to 0.93 (95\% CI 0.87-0.96), and κ from 0.39 (-95\% CI 0.14-0.92) to 0.79 (95\% CI 0.67-0.91). Detection of systolic dysfunction with POC echocardiography compared to SE was very good, with an area under the curve of 0.99 (0.96-1.00). Interrater agreement for LVEF measured by POC echocardiography was good with κ 0.63 (95\% CI 0.40-0.85). Conclusions: POC echocardiography in a SU setting is feasible enabling reliable quantification of LVEF and preliminary assessment of selected cardiac parameters that might be used for research purposes. Its potential clinical utility in triaging stroke patients who should undergo or do not necessarily require SE needs to be investigated in larger prospective diagnostic studies.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LenschowFussKircheretal.2021,
  author    = {Lenschow, Christina and Fuss, Carmina Teresa and Kircher, Stefan and Buck, Andreas and Kickuth, Ralph and Reibetanz, Joachim and Wiegering, Armin and Stenzinger, Albrecht and H{\"u}bschmann, Daniel and Germer, Christoph Thomas and Fassnacht, Martin and Fr{\"o}hling, Stefan and Schlegel, Nicolas and Kroiss, Matthias},
  title     = {Case Report: Abdominal Lymph Node Metastases of Parathyroid Carcinoma: Diagnostic Workup, Molecular Diagnosis, and Clinical Management},
  series = {Frontiers in Endocrinology},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Endocrinology},
  issn      = {1664-2392},
  doi       = {10.3389/fendo.2021.643328},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233362},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is an orphan malignancy accounting for only ~1\% of all cases with primary hyperparathyroidism. The localization of recurrent PC is of critical importance and can be exceedingly difficult to diagnose and sometimes futile when common sites of recurrence in the neck and chest cannot be confirmed. Here, we present the diagnostic workup, molecular analysis and multimodal therapy of a 46-year old woman with the extraordinary manifestation of abdominal lymph node metastases 12 years after primary diagnosis of PC. The patient was referred to our endocrine tumor center in 2016 with the aim to localize the tumor causative of symptomatic biochemical recurrence. In view of the extensive previous workup we decided to perform [18F]FDG-PET-CT. A pathological lymph node in the liver hilus showed slightly increased FDG-uptake and hence was suspected as site of recurrence. Selective venous sampling confirmed increased parathyroid hormone concentration in liver veins. Abdominal lymph node metastasis was resected and histopathological examination confirmed PC. Within four months, the patient experienced biochemical recurrence and based on high tumor mutational burden detected in the surgical specimen by whole exome sequencing the patient received immunotherapy with pembrolizumab that led to a biochemical response. Subsequent to disease progression repeated abdominal lymph node resection was performed in 10/2018, 01/2019 and in 01/2020. Up to now (12/2020) the patient is biochemically free of disease. In conclusion, a multimodal diagnostic approach and therapy in an interdisciplinary setting is needed for patients with rare endocrine tumors. Molecular analyses may inform additional treatment options including checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{OderUeceylerLiuetal.2016,
  author    = {Oder, Daniel and {\"U}ceyler, Nurcan and Liu, Dan and Hu, Kai and Petritsch, Bernhard and Sommer, Claudia and Ertl, Georg and Wanner, Christoph and Nordbeck, Peter},
  title     = {Organ manifestations and long-term outcome of Fabry disease in patients with the GLA haplotype D313Y},
  series = {BMJ Open},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {BMJ Open},
  doi       = {10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010422},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-161210},
  pages     = {e010422},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Objectives: The severity of Fabry disease is dependent on the type of mutation in the α-galactosidase A (AgalA) encoding gene (GLA). This study focused on the impact of the GLA haplotype D313Y on long-term organ involvement and function. Setting and participants: In this monocentric study, all participants presenting with the D313Y haplotype between 2001 and 2015 were comprehensively clinically investigated at baseline and during a 4-year follow-up if available. Five females and one male were included. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Cardiac, nephrological, neurological, laboratory and quality of life data. Results: AgalA enzyme activity in leucocytes (0.3±0.9 nmol/min/mg protein (mean±SD)) and serum lyso-Gb3 (0.6±0.3 ng/mL at baseline) were in normal range in all patients. Cardiac morphology and function were normal (left-ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 66±8\%; interventricular septum 7.7±1.4 mm; LV posterior wall 7.5±1.4 mm; normalised LV mass in MRI 52±9 g/m2; LV global longitudinal strain -21.6±1.9\%) and there were no signs of myocardial fibrosis in cardiac MRI. Cardiospecific biomarkers were also in normal range. Renal function was not impaired (estimated glomerular filtration rate MDRD 103±15 mL/min; serum-creatinine 0.75±0.07 mg/dL; cystatin-c 0.71±0.12 mg/L). One female patient (also carrying a Factor V Leiden mutation) had a transitory ischaemic attack. One patient showed white matter lesions in brain MRI, but none had Fabry-associated pain attacks, pain crises, evoked pain or permanent pain. Health-related quality of life analysis revealed a reduction in individual well-being. At long-term follow-up after 4 years, no significant change was seen in any parameter. Conclusions: The results of the current study suggest that the D313Y genotype does not lead to severe organ manifestations as seen in genotypes known to be causal for classical FD."},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BleinBardelDanjeanetal.2015,
  author    = {Blein, Sophie and Bardel, Claire and Danjean, Vincent and McGuffog, Lesley and Healay, Sue and Barrowdale, Daniel and Lee, Andrew and Dennis, Joe and Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B. and Soucy, Penny and Terry, Mary Beth and Chung, Wendy K. and Goldgar, David E. and Buys, Saundra S. and Janavicius, Ramunas and Tihomirova, Laima and Tung, Nadine and Dorfling, Cecilia M. and van Rensburg, Elizabeth J. and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Ding, Yuan Chun and Gerdes, Anne-Marie and Ejlertsen, Bent and Nielsen, Finn C. and Hansen, Thomas V. O. and Osorio, Ana and Benitez, Javier and Andreas Conejero, Raquel and Segota, Ena and Weitzel, Jeffrey N. and Thelander, Margo and Peterlongo, Paolo and Radice, Paolo and Pensotti, Valeria and Dolcetti, Riccardo and Bonanni, Bernardo and Peissel, Bernard and Zaffaroni, Daniela and Scuvera, Giulietta and Manoukian, Siranoush and Varesco, Liliana and Capone, Gabriele L. and Papi, Laura and Ottini, Laura and Yannoukakos, Drakoulis and Konstantopoulou, Irene and Garber, Judy and Hamann, Ute and Donaldson, Alan and Brady, Angela and Brewer, Carole and Foo, Claire and Evans, D. Gareth and Frost, Debra and Eccles, Diana and Douglas, Fiona and Cook, Jackie and Adlard, Julian and Barwell, Julian and Walker, Lisa and Izatt, Louise and Side, Lucy E. and Kennedy, M. John and Tischkowitz, Marc and Rogers, Mark T. and Porteous, Mary E. and Morrison, Patrick J. and Platte, Radka and Eeles, Ros and Davidson, Rosemarie and Hodgson, Shirley and Cole, Trevor and Godwin, Andrew K and Isaacs, Claudine and Claes, Kathleen and De Leeneer, Kim and Meindl, Alfons and Gehrig, Andrea and Wappenschmidt, Barbara and Sutter, Christian and Engel, Christoph and Niederacher, Dieter and Steinemann, Doris and Plendl, Hansjoerg and Kast, Karin and Rhiem, Kerstin and Ditsch, Nina and Arnold, Norbert and Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Preisler-Adams, Sabine and Markov, Nadja Bogdanova and Wang-Gohrke, Shan and de Pauw, Antoine and Lefol, Cedrick and Lasset, Christine and Leroux, Dominique and Rouleau, Etienne and Damiola, Francesca and Dreyfus, Helene and Barjhoux, Laure and Golmard, Lisa and Uhrhammer, Nancy and Bonadona, Valerie and Sornin, Valerie and Bignon, Yves-Jean and Carter, Jonathan and Van Le, Linda and Piedmonte, Marion and DiSilvestro, Paul A. and de la Hoya, Miguel and Caldes, Trinidad and Nevanlinna, Heli and Aittom{\"a}ki, Kristiina and Jager, Agnes and van den Ouweland, Ans M. W. and Kets, Carolien M. and Aalfs, Cora M. and van Leeuwen, Flora E. and Hogervorst, Frans B. L. and Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne E. J. and Oosterwijk, Jan C. and van Roozendaal, Kees E. P. and Rookus, Matti A. and Devilee, Peter and van der Luijt, Rob B. and Olah, Edith and Diez, Orland and Teule, Alex and Lazaro, Conxi and Blanco, Ignacio and Del Valle, Jesus and Jakubowska, Anna and Sukiennicki, Grzegorz and Gronwald, Jacek and Spurdle, Amanda B. and Foulkes, William and Olswold, Curtis and Lindor, Noralene M. and Pankratz, Vernon S. and Szabo, Csilla I. and Lincoln, Anne and Jacobs, Lauren and Corines, Marina and Robson, Mark and Vijai, Joseph and Berger, Andreas and Fink-Retter, Anneliese and Singer, Christian F. and Rappaport, Christine and Geschwantler Kaulich, Daphne and Pfeiler, Georg and Tea, Muy-Kheng and Greene, Mark H. and Mai, Phuong L. and Rennert, Gad and Imyanitov, Evgeny N. and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Glendon, Gord and Andrulis, Irene L. and Tchatchou, Andrine and Toland, Amanda Ewart and Pedersen, Inge Sokilde and Thomassen, Mads and Kruse, Torben A. and Jensen, Uffe Birk and Caligo, Maria A. and Friedman, Eitan and Zidan, Jamal and Laitman, Yael and Lindblom, Annika and Melin, Beatrice and Arver, Brita and Loman, Niklas and Rosenquist, Richard and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Nussbaum, Robert L. and Ramus, Susan J. and Nathanson, Katherine L. and Domchek, Susan M. and Rebbeck, Timothy R. and Arun, Banu K. and Mitchell, Gillian and Karlan, Bethy Y. and Lester, Jenny and Orsulic, Sandra and Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique and Thomas, Gilles and Simard, Jacques and Couch, Fergus J. and Offit, Kenenth and Easton, Douglas F. and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia and Antoniou, Antonis C. and Mazoyer, Sylvie and Phelan, Catherine M. and Sinilnikova, Olga M. and Cox, David G.},
  title     = {An original phylogenetic approach identified mitochondrial haplogroup T1a1 as inversely associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers},
  series = {Breast Cancer Research},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Breast Cancer Research},
  number    = {61},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13058-015-0567-2},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-145458},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Introduction: Individuals carrying pathogenic mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have a high lifetime risk of breast cancer. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in DNA double-strand break repair, DNA alterations that can be caused by exposure to reactive oxygen species, a main source of which are mitochondria. Mitochondrial genome variations affect electron transport chain efficiency and reactive oxygen species production. Individuals with different mitochondrial haplogroups differ in their metabolism and sensitivity to oxidative stress. Variability in mitochondrial genetic background can alter reactive oxygen species production, leading to cancer risk. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that mitochondrial haplogroups modify breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Methods: We genotyped 22,214 (11,421 affected, 10,793 unaffected) mutation carriers belonging to the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 for 129 mitochondrial polymorphisms using the iCOGS array. Haplogroup inference and association detection were performed using a phylogenetic approach. ALTree was applied to explore the reference mitochondrial evolutionary tree and detect subclades enriched in affected or unaffected individuals. Results: We discovered that subclade T1a1 was depleted in affected BRCA2 mutation carriers compared with the rest of clade T (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.55; 95\% confidence interval (CI), 0.34 to 0.88; P = 0.01). Compared with the most frequent haplogroup in the general population (that is, H and T clades), the T1a1 haplogroup has a HR of 0.62 (95\% CI, 0.40 to 0.95; P = 0.03). We also identified three potential susceptibility loci, including G13708A/rs28359178, which has demonstrated an inverse association with familial breast cancer risk. Conclusions: This study illustrates how original approaches such as the phylogeny-based method we used can empower classical molecular epidemiological studies aimed at identifying association or risk modification effects.},
  language  = {en}
}