@article{MegasSimonsKimetal.2021,
  author    = {Megas, Ioannis-Fivos and Simons, David and Kim, Bong-Sung and Stoppe, Christian and Piatkowski, Andrzej and Fikatas, Panagiotis and Fuchs, Paul Christian and Bastiaanse, Jacqueline and Pallua, Norbert and Bernhagen, J{\"u}rgen and Grieb, Gerrit},
  title     = {Macrophage migration inhibitory factor — an innovative indicator for free flap ischemia after microsurgical reconstruction},
  series = {Healthcare},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Healthcare},
  number    = {6},
  issn      = {2227-9032},
  doi       = {10.3390/healthcare9060616},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-239632},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {(1) Background: Nowadays, the use of microsurgical free flaps is a standard operative procedure in reconstructive surgery. Still, thrombosis of the microanastomosis is one of the most fatal postoperative complications. Clinical evaluation, different technical devices and laboratory markers are used to monitor critical flap perfusion. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), a structurally unique cytokine with chemokine-like characteristics, could play a role in predicting vascular problems and the failure of flap perfusion. (2) Methods: In this prospective observational study, 26 subjects that underwent microsurgical reconstruction were observed. Besides clinical data, the number of blood leukocytes, CRP and MIF were monitored. (3) Results: Blood levels of MIF, C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocytes increased directly after surgery. Subjects that needed surgical revision due to thrombosis of the microanastomosis showed significantly higher blood levels of MIF than subjects without revision. (4) Conclusion: We conclude that MIF is a potential and innovative indicator for thrombosis of the microanastomosis after free flap surgery. Since it is easy to obtain diagnostically, MIF could be an additional tool to monitor flap perfusion besides clinical and technical assessments.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GamezViruesPerovićGossneretal.2015,
  author    = {G{\´a}mez-Viru{\´e}s, Sagrario and Perović, David J. and Gossner, Martin M. and B{\"o}rschig, Carmen and Bl{\"u}thgen, Nico and de Jong, Heike and Simons, Nadja K. and Klein, Alexandra-Maria and Krauss, Jochen and Maier, Gwen and Scherber, Christoph and Steckel, Juliane and Rothenw{\"o}hrer, Christoph and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf and Weiner, Christiane N. and Weisser, Wolfgang and Werner, Michael and Tscharntke, Teja and Westphal, Catrin},
  title     = {Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization},
  series = {Nature Communications},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Nature Communications},
  number    = {8568},
  doi       = {10.1038/ncomms9568},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-141925},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Biodiversity loss can affect the viability of ecosystems by decreasing the ability of communities to respond to environmental change and disturbances. Agricultural intensification is a major driver of biodiversity loss and has multiple components operating at different spatial scales: from in-field management intensity to landscape-scale simplification. Here we show that landscape-level effects dominate functional community composition and can even buffer the effects of in-field management intensification on functional homogenization, and that animal communities in real-world managed landscapes show a unified response (across orders and guilds) to both landscape-scale simplification and in-field intensification. Adults and larvae with specialized feeding habits, species with shorter activity periods and relatively small body sizes are selected against in simplified landscapes with intense in-field management. Our results demonstrate that the diversity of land cover types at the landscape scale is critical for maintaining communities, which are functionally diverse, even in landscapes where in-field management intensity is high.},
  language  = {en}
}