@article{LyutovaSelchoPfeufferetal.2019, author = {Lyutova, Radostina and Selcho, Mareike and Pfeuffer, Maximilian and Segebarth, Dennis and Habenstein, Jens and Rohwedder, Astrid and Frantzmann, Felix and Wegener, Christian and Thum, Andreas S. and Pauls, Dennis}, title = {Reward signaling in a recurrent circuit of dopaminergic neurons and peptidergic Kenyon cells}, series = {Nature Communications}, volume = {10}, journal = {Nature Communications}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-019-11092-1}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202161}, pages = {3097}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Dopaminergic neurons in the brain of the Drosophila larva play a key role in mediating reward information to the mushroom bodies during appetitive olfactory learning and memory. Using optogenetic activation of Kenyon cells we provide evidence that recurrent signaling exists between Kenyon cells and dopaminergic neurons of the primary protocerebral anterior (pPAM) cluster. Optogenetic activation of Kenyon cells paired with odor stimulation is sufficient to induce appetitive memory. Simultaneous impairment of the dopaminergic pPAM neurons abolishes appetitive memory expression. Thus, we argue that dopaminergic pPAM neurons mediate reward information to the Kenyon cells, and in turn receive feedback from Kenyon cells. We further show that this feedback signaling is dependent on short neuropeptide F, but not on acetylcholine known to be important for odor-shock memories in adult flies. Our data suggest that recurrent signaling routes within the larval mushroom body circuitry may represent a mechanism subserving memory stabilization.}, language = {en} } @article{DavisYuKeenanetal.2013, author = {Davis, Lea K. and Yu, Dongmei and Keenan, Clare L. and Gamazon, Eric R. and Konkashbaev, Anuar I. and Derks, Eske M. and Neale, Benjamin M. and Yang, Jian and Lee, S. Hong and Evans, Patrick and Barr, Cathy L. and Bellodi, Laura and Benarroch, Fortu and Berrio, Gabriel Bedoya and Bienvenu, Oscar J. and Bloch, Michael H. and Blom, Rianne M. and Bruun, Ruth D. and Budman, Cathy L. and Camarena, Beatriz and Campbell, Desmond and Cappi, Carolina and Cardona Silgado, Julio C. and Cath, Danielle C. and Cavallini, Maria C. and Chavira, Denise A. and Chouinard, Sylvian and Conti, David V. and Cook, Edwin H. and Coric, Vladimir and Cullen, Bernadette A. and Deforce, Dieter and Delorme, Richard and Dion, Yves and Edlund, Christopher K. and Egberts, Karin and Falkai, Peter and Fernandez, Thomas V. and Gallagher, Patience J. and Garrido, Helena and Geller, Daniel and Girard, Simon L. and Grabe, Hans J. and Grados, Marco A. and Greenberg, Benjamin D. and Gross-Tsur, Varda and Haddad, Stephen and Heiman, Gary A. and Hemmings, Sian M. J. and Hounie, Ana G. and Illmann, Cornelia and Jankovic, Joseph and Jenike, Micheal A. and Kennedy, James L. and King, Robert A. and Kremeyer, Barbara and Kurlan, Roger and Lanzagorta, Nuria and Leboyer, Marion and Leckman, James F. and Lennertz, Leonhard and Liu, Chunyu and Lochner, Christine and Lowe, Thomas L. and Macciardi, Fabio and McCracken, James T. and McGrath, Lauren M. and Restrepo, Sandra C. Mesa and Moessner, Rainald and Morgan, Jubel and Muller, Heike and Murphy, Dennis L. and Naarden, Allan L. and Ochoa, William Cornejo and Ophoff, Roel A. and Osiecki, Lisa and Pakstis, Andrew J. and Pato, Michele T. and Pato, Carlos N. and Piacentini, John and Pittenger, Christopher and Pollak, Yehunda and Rauch, Scott L. and Renner, Tobias J. and Reus, Victor I. and Richter, Margaret A. and Riddle, Mark A. and Robertson, Mary M. and Romero, Roxana and Ros{\`a}rio, Maria C. and Rosenberg, David and Rouleau, Guy A. and Ruhrmann, Stephan and Ruiz-Linares, Andreas and Sampaio, Aline S. and Samuels, Jack and Sandor, Paul and Sheppard, Broke and Singer, Harvey S. and Smit, Jan H. and Stein, Dan J. and Strengman, E. and Tischfield, Jay A. and Valencia Duarte, Ana V. and Vallada, Homero and Van Nieuwerburgh, Flip and Veenstra-VanderWeele, Jeremy and Walitza, Susanne and Wang, Ying and Wendland, Jens R. and Westenberg, Herman G. M. and Shugart, Yin Yao and Miguel, Euripedes C. and McMahon, William and Wagner, Michael and Nicolini, Humberto and Posthuma, Danielle and Hanna, Gregory L. and Heutink, Peter and Denys, Damiaan and Arnold, Paul D. and Oostra, Ben A. and Nestadt, Gerald and Freimer, Nelson B. and Pauls, David L. and Wray, Naomi R. and Stewart, S. Evelyn and Mathews, Carol A. and Knowles, James A. and Cox, Nancy J. and Scharf, Jeremiah M.}, title = {Partitioning the Heritability of Tourette Syndrome and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Reveals Differences in Genetic Architecture}, series = {PLoS Genetics}, volume = {9}, journal = {PLoS Genetics}, number = {10}, issn = {1553-7390}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1003864}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-127377}, pages = {e1003864}, year = {2013}, abstract = {The direct estimation of heritability from genome-wide common variant data as implemented in the program Genome-wide Complex Trait Analysis (GCTA) has provided a means to quantify heritability attributable to all interrogated variants. We have quantified the variance in liability to disease explained by all SNPs for two phenotypically-related neurobehavioral disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette Syndrome (TS), using GCTA. Our analysis yielded a heritability point estimate of 0.58 (se = 0.09, p = 5.64e-12) for TS, and 0.37 (se = 0.07, p = 1.5e-07) for OCD. In addition, we conducted multiple genomic partitioning analyses to identify genomic elements that concentrate this heritability. We examined genomic architectures of TS and OCD by chromosome, MAF bin, and functional annotations. In addition, we assessed heritability for early onset and adult onset OCD. Among other notable results, we found that SNPs with a minor allele frequency of less than 5\% accounted for 21\% of the TS heritability and 0\% of the OCD heritability. Additionally, we identified a significant contribution to TS and OCD heritability by variants significantly associated with gene expression in two regions of the brain (parietal cortex and cerebellum) for which we had available expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). Finally we analyzed the genetic correlation between TS and OCD, revealing a genetic correlation of 0.41 (se = 0.15, p = 0.002). These results are very close to previous heritability estimates for TS and OCD based on twin and family studies, suggesting that very little, if any, heritability is truly missing (i.e., unassayed) from TS and OCD GWAS studies of common variation. The results also indicate that there is some genetic overlap between these two phenotypically-related neuropsychiatric disorders, but suggest that the two disorders have distinct genetic architectures.}, language = {en} } @article{HuserRohwedderApostolopoulouetal.2012, author = {Huser, Annina and Rohwedder, Astrid and Apostolopoulou, Anthi A. and Widmann, Annekathrin and Pfitzenmaier, Johanna E. and Maiolo, Elena M. and Selcho, Mareike and Pauls, Dennis and von Essen, Alina and Gupta, Tript and Sprecher, Simon G. and Birman, Serge and Riemensperger, Thomas and Stocker, Reinhard F. and Thum, Andreas S.}, title = {The Serotonergic Central Nervous System of the Drosophila Larva: Anatomy and Behavioral Function}, series = {PLoS One}, volume = {7}, journal = {PLoS One}, number = {10}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0047518}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-130437}, pages = {e47518}, year = {2012}, abstract = {The Drosophila larva has turned into a particularly simple model system for studying the neuronal basis of innate behaviors and higher brain functions. Neuronal networks involved in olfaction, gustation, vision and learning and memory have been described during the last decade, often up to the single-cell level. Thus, most of these sensory networks are substantially defined, from the sensory level up to third-order neurons. This is especially true for the olfactory system of the larva. Given the wealth of genetic tools in Drosophila it is now possible to address the question how modulatory systems interfere with sensory systems and affect learning and memory. Here we focus on the serotonergic system that was shown to be involved in mammalian and insect sensory perception as well as learning and memory. Larval studies suggested that the serotonergic system is involved in the modulation of olfaction, feeding, vision and heart rate regulation. In a dual anatomical and behavioral approach we describe the basic anatomy of the larval serotonergic system, down to the single-cell level. In parallel, by expressing apoptosis-inducing genes during embryonic and larval development, we ablate most of the serotonergic neurons within the larval central nervous system. When testing these animals for naive odor, sugar, salt and light perception, no profound phenotype was detectable; even appetitive and aversive learning was normal. Our results provide the first comprehensive description of the neuronal network of the larval serotonergic system. Moreover, they suggest that serotonin per se is not necessary for any of the behaviors tested. However, our data do not exclude that this system may modulate or fine-tune a wide set of behaviors, similar to its reported function in other insect species or in mammals. Based on our observations and the availability of a wide variety of genetic tools, this issue can now be addressed.}, language = {en} } @article{PaulsHamaratTrufasuetal.2019, author = {Pauls, Dennis and Hamarat, Yasmin and Trufasu, Luisa and Schendzielorz, Tim M. and Gramlich, Gertrud and Kahnt, J{\"o}rg and Vanselow, Jens and Schlosser, Andreas and Wegener, Christian}, title = {Drosophila carboxypeptidase D (SILVER) is a key enzyme in neuropeptide processing required to maintain locomotor activity levels and survival rate}, series = {European Journal of Neuroscience}, volume = {50}, journal = {European Journal of Neuroscience}, number = {9}, doi = {10.1111/ejn.14516}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-204863}, pages = {3502-3519}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Neuropeptides are processed from larger preproproteins by a dedicated set of enzymes. The molecular and biochemical mechanisms underlying preproprotein processing and the functional importance of processing enzymes are well-characterised in mammals, but little studied outside this group. In contrast to mammals, Drosophila melanogaster lacks a gene for carboxypeptidase E (CPE ), a key enzyme for mammalian peptide processing. By combining peptidomics and neurogenetics, we addressed the role of carboxypeptidase D (dCPD ) in global neuropeptide processing and selected peptide-regulated behaviours in Drosophila . We found that a deficiency in dCPD results in C-terminally extended peptides across the peptidome, suggesting that dCPD took over CPE function in the fruit fly. dCPD is widely expressed throughout the nervous system, including peptidergic neurons in the mushroom body and neuroendocrine cells expressing adipokinetic hormone. Conditional hypomorphic mutation in the dCPD -encoding gene silver in the larva causes lethality, and leads to deficits in starvation-induced hyperactivity and appetitive gustatory preference, as well as to reduced viability and activity levels in adults. A phylogenomic analysis suggests that loss of CPE is not common to insects, but only occurred in Hymenoptera and Diptera. Our results show that dCPD is a key enzyme for neuropeptide processing and peptide-regulated behaviour in Drosophila . dCPD thus appears as a suitable target to genetically shut down total neuropeptide production in peptidergic neurons. The persistent occurrence of CPD in insect genomes may point to important further CPD functions beyond neuropeptide processing which cannot be fulfilled by CPE.}, language = {en} } @article{PaulsBlechschmidtFrantzmannetal.2018, author = {Pauls, Dennis and Blechschmidt, Christine and Frantzmann, Felix and el Jundi, Basil and Selcho, Mareike}, title = {A comprehensive anatomical map of the peripheral octopaminergic/tyraminergic system of Drosophila melanogaster}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {8}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, number = {15314}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-018-33686-3}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177412}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The modulation of an animal's behavior through external sensory stimuli, previous experience and its internal state is crucial to survive in a constantly changing environment. In most insects, octopamine (OA) and its precursor tyramine (TA) modulate a variety of physiological processes and behaviors by shifting the organism from a relaxed or dormant condition to a responsive, excited and alerted state. Even though OA/TA neurons of the central brain are described on single cell level in Drosophila melanogaster, the periphery was largely omitted from anatomical studies. Given that OA/TA is involved in behaviors like feeding, flying and locomotion, which highly depend on a variety of peripheral organs, it is necessary to study the peripheral connections of these neurons to get a complete picture of the OA/TA circuitry. We here describe the anatomy of this aminergic system in relation to peripheral tissues of the entire fly. OA/TA neurons arborize onto skeletal muscles all over the body and innervate reproductive organs, the heart, the corpora allata, and sensory organs in the antennae, legs, wings and halteres underlining their relevance in modulating complex behaviors.}, language = {en} } @article{BeckYuStrzelczykPaulsetal.2018, author = {Beck, Sebastian and Yu-Strzelczyk, Jing and Pauls, Dennis and Constantin, Oana M. and Gee, Christine E. and Ehmann, Nadine and Kittel, Robert J. and Nagel, Georg and Gao, Shiqiang}, title = {Synthetic light-activated ion channels for optogenetic activation and inhibition}, series = {Frontiers in Neuroscience}, volume = {12}, journal = {Frontiers in Neuroscience}, number = {643}, doi = {10.3389/fnins.2018.00643}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177520}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Optogenetic manipulation of cells or living organisms became widely used in neuroscience following the introduction of the light-gated ion channel channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2). ChR2 is a non-selective cation channel, ideally suited to depolarize and evoke action potentials in neurons. However, its calcium (Ca2\(^{2+}\)) permeability and single channel conductance are low and for some applications longer-lasting increases in intracellular Ca\(^{2+}\) might be desirable. Moreover, there is need for an efficient light-gated potassium (K\(^{+}\)) channel that can rapidly inhibit spiking in targeted neurons. Considering the importance of Ca\(^{2+}\) and K\(^{+}\) in cell physiology, light-activated Ca\(^{2+}\)-permeant and K\(^{+}\)-specific channels would be welcome additions to the optogenetic toolbox. Here we describe the engineering of novel light-gated Ca\(^{2+}\)-permeant and K\(^{+}\)-specific channels by fusing a bacterial photoactivated adenylyl cyclase to cyclic nucleotide-gated channels with high permeability for Ca\(^{2+}\) or for K\(^{+}\), respectively. Optimized fusion constructs showed strong light-gated conductance in Xenopus laevis oocytes and in rat hippocampal neurons. These constructs could also be used to control the motility of Drosophila melanogaster larvae, when expressed in motoneurons. Illumination led to body contraction when motoneurons expressed the light-sensitive Ca\(^{2+}\)-permeant channel, and to body extension when expressing the light-sensitive K\(^{+}\) channel, both effectively and reversibly paralyzing the larvae. Further optimization of these constructs will be required for application in adult flies since both constructs led to eclosion failure when expressed in motoneurons.}, language = {en} }