@article{GratwohlPfirrmannZanderetal.2016,
  author    = {Gratwohl, A and Pfirrmann, M and Zander, A and Kr{\"o}ger, N and Beelen, D and Novotny, J and Nerl, C and Scheid, C and Spiekermann, K and Mayer, J and Sayer, HG and Falge, C and Bunjes, D and D{\"o}hner, H and Ganser, A and Schmidt-Wolf, I and Schwerdtfeger, R and Baurmann, H and Kuse, R and Schmitz, N and Wehmeier, A and Fischer, J Th and Ho, AD and Wilhelm, M and Goebeler, M-E and Lindemann, HW and Bormann, M and Hertenstein, B and Schlimok, G and Baerlocher, GM and Aul, C and Pfreundschuh, M and Fabian, M and Staib, P and Edinger, M and Schatz, M and Fauser, A and Arnold, R and Kindler, T and Wulf, G and Rosselet, A and Hellmann, A and Sch{\"a}fer, E and Pr{\"u}mmer, O and Schenk, M and Hasford, J and Heimpel, H and Hossfeld, DK and Kolb, H-J and B{\"u}sche, G and Haferlach, C and Schnittger, S and M{\"u}ller, MC and Reiter, A and Berger, U and Saußele, S and Hochhaus, A and Hehlmann, R},
  title     = {Long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a randomized comparison of stem cell transplantation with drug treatment},
  series = {Leukemia},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Leukemia},
  doi       = {10.1038/leu.2015.281},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-150368},
  pages     = {562-569},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent today's treatment of choice in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is regarded as salvage therapy. This prospective randomized CML-study IIIA recruited 669 patients with newly diagnosed CML between July 1997 and January 2004 from 143 centers. Of these, 427 patients were considered eligible for HSCT and were randomized by availability of a matched family donor between primary HSCT (group A; N=166 patients) and best available drug treatment (group B; N=261). Primary end point was long-term survival. Survival probabilities were not different between groups A and B (10-year survival: 0.76 (95\% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.82) vs 0.69 (95\% CI: 0.61-0.76)), but influenced by disease and transplant risk. Patients with a low transplant risk showed superior survival compared with patients with high- (P<0.001) and non-high-risk disease (P=0.047) in group B; after entering blast crisis, survival was not different with or without HSCT. Significantly more patients in group A were in molecular remission (56\% vs 39\%; P = 0.005) and free of drug treatment (56\% vs 6\%; P<0.001). Differences in symptoms and Karnofsky score were not significant. In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, HSCT remains a valid option when both disease and transplant risk are considered.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StoelzelMohrKrameretal.2016,
  author    = {St{\"o}lzel, F. and Mohr, B. and Kramer, M. and Oelschl{\"a}gel, U. and Bochtler, T. and Berdel, W. E. and Kaufmann, M. and Baldus, C. D. and Sch{\"a}fer-Eckart, K. and Stuhlmann, R. and Einsele, H. and Krause, S. W. and Serve, H. and H{\"a}nel, M. and Herbst, R. and Neubauer, A. and Sohlbach, K. and Mayer, J. and Middeke, J. M. and Platzbecker, U. and Schaich, M. and Kr{\"a}mer, A. and R{\"o}llig, C. and Schetelig, J. and Bornh{\"a}user, M. and Ehninger, G.},
  title     = {Karyotype complexity and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia},
  series = {Blood Cancer Journal},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Blood Cancer Journal},
  doi       = {10.1038/bcj.2015.114},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164530},
  pages     = {e386},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {A complex aberrant karyotype consisting of multiple unrelated cytogenetic abnormalities is associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The European Leukemia Net classification and the UK Medical Research Council recommendation provide prognostic categories that differ in the definition of unbalanced aberrations as well as the number of single aberrations. The aim of this study on 3526 AML patients was to redefine and validate a cutoff for karyotype complexity in AML with regard to adverse prognosis. Our study demonstrated that (1) patients with a pure hyperdiploid karyotype have an adverse risk irrespective of the number of chromosomal gains, (2) patients with translocation t(9;11)(p21∼22;q23) have an intermediate risk independent of the number of additional aberrations, (3) patients with 4 abnormalities have an adverse risk per se and (4) patients with three aberrations in the absence of abnormalities of strong influence (hyperdiploid karyotype, t(9;11)(p21∼22;q23), CBF-AML, unique adverse-risk aberrations) have borderline intermediate/adverse risk with a reduced overall survival compared with patients with a normal karyotype.},
  language  = {en}
}