@article{TranGiaDenisBacelarFerreiraetal.2023,
  author    = {Tran-Gia, Johannes and Denis-Bacelar, Ana M. and Ferreira, Kelley M. and Robinson, Andrew P. and Bobin, Christophe and Bonney, Lara M. and Calvert, Nicholas and Collins, Sean M. and Fenwick, Andrew J. and Finocchiaro, Domenico and Fioroni, Federica and Giannopoulou, Katerina and Grassi, Elisa and Heetun, Warda and Jewitt, Stephanie J. and Kotzasarlidou, Maria and Ljungberg, Michael and Louren{\c{c}}o, Val{\´e}rie and McGowan, Daniel R. and Mewburn-Crook, Jamie and Sabot, Benoit and Scuffham, James and Sj{\"o}green Gleisner, Katarina and Solc, Jaroslav and Thiam, Cheick and Tipping, Jill and Wevrett, Jill and Lassmann, Michael},
  title     = {On the use of solid 133Ba sources as surrogate for liquid 131I in SPECT/CT calibration: a European multi-centre evaluation},
  series = {EJNMMI Physics},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {EJNMMI Physics},
  organization    = {The MRT Dosimetry Collaboration},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40658-023-00582-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-357740},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Introduction Commissioning, calibration, and quality control procedures for nuclear medicine imaging systems are typically performed using hollow containers filled with radionuclide solutions. This leads to multiple sources of uncertainty, many of which can be overcome by using traceable, sealed, long-lived surrogate sources containing a radionuclide of comparable energies and emission probabilities. This study presents the results of a quantitative SPECT/CT imaging comparison exercise performed within the MRTDosimetry consortium to assess the feasibility of using 133Ba as a surrogate for 131I imaging. Materials and methods Two sets of four traceable 133Ba sources were produced at two National Metrology Institutes and encapsulated in 3D-printed cylinders (volume range 1.68-107.4 mL). Corresponding hollow cylinders to be filled with liquid 131I and a mounting baseplate for repeatable positioning within a Jaszczak phantom were also produced. A quantitative SPECT/CT imaging comparison exercise was conducted between seven members of the consortium (eight SPECT/CT systems from two major vendors) based on a standardised protocol. Each site had to perform three measurements with the two sets of 133Ba sources and liquid 131I. Results As anticipated, the 131I pseudo-image calibration factors (cps/MBq) were higher than those for 133Ba for all reconstructions and systems. A site-specific cross-calibration reduced the performance differences between both radionuclides with respect to a cross-calibration based on the ratio of emission probabilities from a median of 12-1.5\%. The site-specific cross-calibration method also showed agreement between 133Ba and 131I for all cylinder volumes, which highlights the potential use of 133Ba sources to calculate recovery coefficients for partial volume correction. Conclusion This comparison exercise demonstrated that traceable solid 133Ba sources can be used as surrogate for liquid 131I imaging. The use of solid surrogate sources could solve the radiation protection problem inherent in the preparation of phantoms with 131I liquid activity solutions as well as reduce the measurement uncertainties in the activity. This is particularly relevant for stability measurements, which have to be carried out at regular intervals.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TranGiaDenisBacelarFerreiraetal.2021,
  author    = {Tran-Gia, Johannes and Denis-Bacelar, Ana M. and Ferreira, Kelley M. and Robinson, Andrew P. and Calvert, Nicholas and Fenwick, Andrew J. and Finocchiaro, Domenico and Fioroni, Federica and Grassi, Elisa and Heetun, Warda and Jewitt, Stephanie J. and Kotzassarlidou, Maria and Ljungberg, Michael and McGowan, Daniel R. and Scott, Nathaniel and Scuffham, James and Gleisner, Katarina Sj{\"o}green and Tipping, Jill and Wevrett, Jill and Lassmann, Michael},
  title     = {A multicentre and multi-national evaluation of the accuracy of quantitative Lu-177 SPECT/CT imaging performed within the MRTDosimetry project},
  series = {EJNMMI Physics},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {EJNMMI Physics},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40658-021-00397-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-270380},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Purpose Patient-specific dosimetry is required to ensure the safety of molecular radiotherapy and to predict response. Dosimetry involves several steps, the first of which is the determination of the activity of the radiopharmaceutical taken up by an organ/lesion over time. As uncertainties propagate along each of the subsequent steps (integration of the time-activity curve, absorbed dose calculation), establishing a reliable activity quantification is essential. The MRTDosimetry project was a European initiative to bring together expertise in metrology and nuclear medicine research, with one main goal of standardizing quantitative \(^{177}\)Lu SPECT/CT imaging based on a calibration protocol developed and tested in a multicentre inter-comparison. This study presents the setup and results of this comparison exercise. Methods The inter-comparison included nine SPECT/CT systems. Each site performed a set of three measurements with the same setup (system, acquisition and reconstruction): (1) Determination of an image calibration for conversion from counts to activity concentration (large cylinder phantom), (2) determination of recovery coefficients for partial volume correction (IEC NEMA PET body phantom with sphere inserts), (3) validation of the established quantitative imaging setup using a 3D printed two-organ phantom (ICRP110-based kidney and spleen). In contrast to previous efforts, traceability of the activity measurement was required for each participant, and all participants were asked to calculate uncertainties for their SPECT-based activities. Results Similar combinations of imaging system and reconstruction lead to similar image calibration factors. The activity ratio results of the anthropomorphic phantom validation demonstrate significant harmonization of quantitative imaging performance between the sites with all sites falling within one standard deviation of the mean values for all inserts. Activity recovery was underestimated for total kidney, spleen, and kidney cortex, while it was overestimated for the medulla. Conclusion This international comparison exercise demonstrates that harmonization of quantitative SPECT/CT is feasible when following very specific instructions of a dedicated calibration protocol, as developed within the MRTDosimetry project. While quantitative imaging performance demonstrates significant harmonization, an over- and underestimation of the activity recovery highlights the limitations of any partial volume correction in the presence of spill-in and spill-out between two adjacent volumes of interests.},
  language  = {en}
}