@article{EdgecockCarettaDavenneetal.2013,
  author    = {Edgecock, T. R. and Caretta, O. and Davenne, T. and Densam, C. and Fitton, M. and Kelliher, D. and Loveridge, P. and Machida, S. and Prior, C. and Rogers, C. and Rooney, M. and Thomason, J. and Wilcox, D. and Wildner, E. and Efthymiopoulos, I. and Garoby, R. and Gilardoni, S. and Hansen, C. and Benedetto, E. and Jensen, E. and Kosmicki, A. and Martini, M. and Osborne, J. and Prior, G. and Stora, T. and Melo Mendonca, T. and Vlachoudis, V. and Waaijer, C. and Cupial, P. and Chanc{\´e}, A. and Longhin, A. and Payet, J. and Zito, M. and Baussan, E. and Bobeth, C. and Bouquerel, E. and Dracos, M. and Gaudiot, G. and Lepers, B. and Osswald, F. and Poussot, P. and Vassilopoulos, N. and Wurtz, J. and Zeter, V. and Bielski, J. and Kozien, M. and Lacny, L. and Skoczen, B. and Szybinski, B. and Ustrycka, A. and Wroblewski, A. and Marie-Jeanne, M. and Balint, P. and Fourel, C. and Giraud, J. and Jacob, J. and Lamy, T. and Latrasse, L. and Sortais, P. and Thuillier, T. and Mitrofanov, S. and Loiselet, M. and Keutgen, Th. and Delbar, Th. and Debray, F. and Trophine, C. and Veys, S. and Daversin, C. and Zorin, V. and Izotov, I. and Skalyga, V. and Burt, G. and Dexter, A. C. and Kravchuk, V. L. and Marchi, T. and Cinausero, M. and Gramegna, F. and De Angelis, G. and Prete, G. and Collazuol, G. and Laveder, M. and Mazzocco, M. and Mezzetto, M. and Signorini, C. and Vardaci, E. and Di Nitto, A. and Brondi, A. and La Rana, G. and Migliozzi, P. and Moro, R. and Palladino, V. and Gelli, N. and Berkovits, D. and Hass, M. and Hirsh, T. Y. and Schuhmann, M. and Stahl, A. and Wehner, J. and Bross, A. and Kopp, J. and Neuffer, D. and Wands, R. and Bayes, R. and Laing, A. and Soler, P. and Agarwalla, S. K. and Cervera Villanueva, A. and Donini, A. and Ghosh, T. and G{\´o}mez Cadenas, J. J. and Hern{\´a}ndez, P. and Mart{\´i}n-Albo, J. and Mena, O. and Burguet-Castell, J. and Agostino, L. and Buizza-Avanzini, M. and Marafini, M. and Patzak, T. and Tonazzo, A. and Duchesneau, D. and Mosca, L. and Bogomilov, M. and Karadzhov, Y. and Matev, R. and Tsenov, R. and Akhmedov, E. and Blennow, M. and Lindner, M. and Schwetz, T. and Fern{\´a}ndez Martinez, E. and Maltoni, M. and Men{\´e}ndez, J. and Giunti, C. and Gonz{\´a}lez Garc{\´i}a, M. C. and Salvado, J. and Coloma, P. and Huber, P. and Li, T. and L{\´o}pez Pav{\´o}n, J. and Orme, C. and Pascoli, S. and Meloni, D. and Tang, J. and Winter, W. and Ohlsson, T. and Zhang, H. and Scotto-Lavina, L. and Terranova, F. and Bonesini, M. and Tortora, L. and Alekou, A. and Aslaninejad, M. and Bontoiu, C. and Kurup, A. and Jenner, L. J. and Long, K. and Pasternak, J. and Pozimski, J. and Back, J. J. and Harrison, P. and Beard, K. and Bogacz, A. and Berg, J. S. and Stratakis, D. and Witte, H. and Snopok, P. and Bliss, N. and Cordwell, M. and Moss, A. and Pattalwar, S. and Apollonio, M.},
  title     = {High intensity neutrino oscillation facilities in Europe},
  series = {Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.16.021002},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126611},
  pages     = {21002},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The EUROnu project has studied three possible options for future, high intensity neutrino oscillation facilities in Europe. The first is a Super Beam, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of pions created by bombarding targets with a 4 MW proton beam from the CERN High Power Superconducting Proton Linac. The far detector for this facility is the 500 kt MEMPHYS water Cherenkov, located in the Frejus tunnel. The second facility is the Neutrino Factory, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of mu(+) and mu(-) beams in a storage ring. The far detector in this case is a 100 kt magnetized iron neutrino detector at a baseline of 2000 km. The third option is a Beta Beam, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of beta emitting isotopes, in particular He-6 and Ne-18, also stored in a ring. The far detector is also the MEMPHYS detector in the Frejus tunnel. EUROnu has undertaken conceptual designs of these facilities and studied the performance of the detectors. Based on this, it has determined the physics reach of each facility, in particular for the measurement of CP violation in the lepton sector, and estimated the cost of construction. These have demonstrated that the best facility to build is the Neutrino Factory. However, if a powerful proton driver is constructed for another purpose or if the MEMPHYS detector is built for astroparticle physics, the Super Beam also becomes very attractive.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LevitisGouldvan PraagGauetal.2021,
  author    = {Levitis, Elizabeth and Gould van Praag, Cassandra D and Gau, R{\´e}mi and Heunis, Stephan and DuPre, Elizabeth and Kiar, Gregory and Bottenhorn, Katherine L and Glatard, Tristan and Nikolaidis, Aki and Whitaker, Kirstie Jane and Mancini, Matteo and Niso, Guiomar and Afyouni, Soroosh and Alonso-Ortiz, Eva and Appelhoff, Stefan and Arnatkeviciute, Aurina and Atay, Selim Melvin and Auer, Tibor and Baracchini, Giulia and Bayer, Johanna M M and Beauvais, Michael J S and Bijsterbosch, Janine D and Bilgin, Isil P and Bollmann, Saskia and Bollmann, Steffen and Botvinik-Nezer, Rotem and Bright, Molly G and Calhoun, Vince D and Chen, Xiao and Chopra, Sidhant and Chuan-Peng, Hu and Close, Thomas G and Cookson, Savannah L and Craddock, R Cameron and De La Vega, Alejandro and De Leener, Benjamin and Demeter, Damion V and Di Maio, Paola and Dickie, Erin W and Eickhoff, Simon B and Esteban, Oscar and Finc, Karolina and Frigo, Matteo and Ganesan, Saampras and Ganz, Melanie and Garner, Kelly G and Garza-Villarreal, Eduardo A and Gonzalez-Escamilla, Gabriel and Goswami, Rohit and Griffiths, John D and Grootswagers, Tijl and Guay, Samuel and Guest, Olivia and Handwerker, Daniel A and Herholz, Peer and Heuer, Katja and Huijser, Dorien C and Iacovella, Vittorio and Joseph, Michael J E and Karakuzu, Agah and Keator, David B and Kobeleva, Xenia and Kumar, Manoj and Laird, Angela R and Larson-Prior, Linda J and Lautarescu, Alexandra and Lazari, Alberto and Legarreta, Jon Haitz and Li, Xue-Ying and Lv, Jinglei and Mansour L., Sina and Meunier, David and Moraczewski, Dustin and Nandi, Tulika and Nastase, Samuel A and Nau, Matthias and Noble, Stephanie and Norgaard, Martin and Obungoloch, Johnes and Oostenveld, Robert and Orchard, Edwina R and Pinho, Ana Lu{\´i}sa and Poldrack, Russell A and Qiu, Anqi and Raamana, Pradeep Reddy and Rokem, Ariel and Rutherford, Saige and Sharan, Malvika and Shaw, Thomas B and Syeda, Warda T and Testerman, Meghan M and Toro, Roberto and Valk, Sofie L and Van Den Bossche, Sofie and Varoquaux, Ga{\"e}l and V{\´a}ša, František and Veldsman, Michele and Vohryzek, Jakub and Wagner, Adina S and Walsh, Reubs J and White, Tonya and Wong, Fu-Te and Xie, Xihe and Yan, Chao-Gan and Yang, Yu-Fang and Yee, Yohan and Zanitti, Gaston E and Van Gulick, Ana E and Duff, Eugene and Maumet, Camille},
  title     = {Centering inclusivity in the design of online conferences—An OHBM-Open Science perspective},
  series = {GigaScience},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {GigaScience},
  doi       = {10.1093/gigascience/giab051},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-371574},
  pages     = {1-14},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {As the global health crisis unfolded, many academic conferences moved online in 2020. This move has been hailed as a positive step towards inclusivity in its attenuation of economic, physical, and legal barriers and effectively enabled many individuals from groups that have traditionally been underrepresented to join and participate. A number of studies have outlined how moving online made it possible to gather a more global community and has increased opportunities for individuals with various constraints, e.g., caregiving responsibilities. Yet, the mere existence of online conferences is no guarantee that everyone can attend and participate meaningfully. In fact, many elements of an online conference are still significant barriers to truly diverse participation: the tools used can be inaccessible for some individuals; the scheduling choices can favour some geographical locations; the set-up of the conference can provide more visibility to well-established researchers and reduce opportunities for early-career researchers. While acknowledging the benefits of an online setting, especially for individuals who have traditionally been underrepresented or excluded, we recognize that fostering social justice requires inclusivity to actively be centered in every aspect of online conference design. Here, we draw from the literature and from our own experiences to identify practices that purposefully encourage a diverse community to attend, participate in, and lead online conferences. Reflecting on how to design more inclusive online events is especially important as multiple scientific organizations have announced that they will continue offering an online version of their event when in-person conferences can resume.},
  language  = {en}
}