@article{HanitschBaumannBoztugetal.2020,
  author    = {Hanitsch, Leif and Baumann, Ulrich and Boztug, Kaan and Burkhard-Meier, Ulrike and Fasshauer, Maria and Habermehl, Pirmin and Hauck, Fabian and Klock, Gerd and Liese, Johannes and Meyer, Oliver and M{\"u}ller, Rainer and Pachlopnik-Schmid, Jana and Pfeiffer-Kascha, Dorothea and Warnatz, Klaus and Wehr, Claudia and Wittke, Kirsten and Niehues, Tim and von Bernuth, Horst},
  title     = {Treatment and management of primary antibody deficiency: German interdisciplinary evidence-based consensus guideline},
  series = {European Journal of Immunology},
  volume    = {50},
  journal   = {European Journal of Immunology},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1002/eji.202048713},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-225731},
  pages     = {1432 -- 1446},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {This evidence-based clinical guideline provides consensus-recommendations for the treatment and care of patients with primary antibody deficiencies (PADs). The guideline group comprised 20 clinical and scientific expert associations of the German, Swiss, and Austrian healthcare system and representatives of patients. Recommendations were based on results of a systematic literature search, data extraction, and evaluation of methodology and study quality in combination with the clinical expertise of the respective representatives. Consensus-based recommendations were determined via nominal group technique. PADs are the largest clinically relevant group of primary immunodeficiencies. Most patients with PADs present with increased susceptibility to infections, however immune dysregulation, autoimmunity, and cancer affect a significant number of patients and may precede infections. This guideline therefore covers interdisciplinary clinical and therapeutic aspects of infectious (e.g., antibiotic prophylaxis, management of bronchiectasis) and non-infectious manifestations (e.g., management of granulomatous disease, immune cytopenia). PADs are grouped into disease entities with definitive, probable, possible, or unlikely benefit of IgG-replacement therapy. Summary and consensus-recommendations are provided for treatment indication, dosing, routes of administration, and adverse events of IgG-replacement therapy. Special aspects of concomitant impaired T-cell function are highlighted as well as clinical data on selected monogenetic inborn errors of immunity formerly classified into PADs (APDS, CTLA-4-, and LRBA-deficiency).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EberhardtHaasGirschicketal.2015,
  author    = {Eberhardt, Christiane S. and Haas, Johannes-Peter and Girschick, Hermann and Schwarz, Tobias and Morbach, Henner and R{\"o}sen-Wolff, Angela and Foell, Dirk and Dannecker, Guenther and Schepp, Carsten and Ganser, Gerd and Honke, Nora and Eggermann, Thomas and M{\"u}ller-Berghaus, Jan and Wagner, Norbert and Ohl, Kim and Tenbrock, Klaus},
  title     = {No association of IL-12p40 pro1.1 polymorphism with juvenile idiopathic arthritis},
  series = {Pediatric Rheumatology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Pediatric Rheumatology},
  number    = {61},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12969-015-0059-z},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-136281},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background: IL-12p40 plays an important role in the activation of the T-cell lines like Th17 and Th1-cells. Theses cells are crucial in the pathogenesis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. A polymorphism in its promoter region and the genotype IL12p40 pro1.1 leads to a higher production of IL-12p40. We studied whether there is a difference in the distribution of the genotype in patients with JIA and the healthy population. Methods: In 883 patients and 321 healthy controls the IL-12p40 promoter genotype was identified by ARMS-PCR. Results: There is no association of IL-12p40 pro polymorphism neither in patients with JIA compared to controls nor in subtypes of JIA compared to oligoarthritis. We found a non-significant tendency of a higher prevalence of the genotype pro1.1 in systemic arthritis (32.4 \%) and in rheumatoid factor negative polyarthritis (30.5 \%) and a lower pro1.1 genotype in persistent oligoarthritis (20.7 \%) and in enthesitis-related arthritis (17 \%). Likelihood of the occurrence of genotype IL12-p40 pro1.1 in patients with systemic arthritis (OR 1.722, CI 95 \% 1.344-2.615, p 0.0129) and RF-negative polyarthritis (OR 1.576, CI 95 \% 1.046-2.376, p 0.0367) compared to persistent oligoarthritis was significantly higher. This was also true for comparison of their homozygous genotypes IL-12p40 pro 1.1 and 2.2 in systemic arthritis (OR 1.779, CI 95 \% 1.045-3.029, p 0.0338). However, in Bonferroni correction for multiple hypothesis this was not significant. Conclusion: A tendency of a higher prevalence of the genotype IL-12p40 pro1.1 in systemic arthritis and in rheumatoid factor negative polyarthritis was observed but not significant. Further investigations should be done to clarify the role IL-12p40 in the different subtypes of JIA.},
  language  = {en}
}