@article{AppeltshauserMessingerStarzetal.2022, author = {Appeltshauser, Luise and Messinger, Julia and Starz, Katharina and Heinrich, David and Brunder, Anna-Michelle and Stengel, Helena and Fiebig, Bianca and Ayzenberg, Ilya and Birklein, Frank and Dresel, Christian and Dorst, Johannes and Dvorak, Florian and Grimm, Alexander and Joerk, Alexander and Leypoldt, Frank and M{\"a}urer, Mathias and Merl, Patrick and Michels, Sebastian and Pitarokoili, Kalliopi and Rosenfeldt, Mathias and Sperfeld, Anne-Dorte and Weihrauch, Marc and Welte, Gabriel Simon and Sommer, Claudia and Doppler, Kathrin}, title = {Diabetes Mellitus Is a Possible Risk Factor for Nodo-paranodopathy With Antiparanodal Autoantibodies}, series = {Neurology: Neuroimmunology \& Neuroinflammation}, volume = {9}, journal = {Neurology: Neuroimmunology \& Neuroinflammation}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1212/NXI.0000000000001163}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-300551}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Background and Objectives Nodo-paranodopathies are peripheral neuropathies with dysfunction of the node of Ranvier. Affected patients who are seropositive for antibodies against adhesion molecules like contactin-1 and neurofascin show distinct clinical features and a disruption of the paranodal complex. An axoglial dysjunction is also a characteristic finding of diabetic neuropathy. Here, we aim to investigate a possible association of antibody-mediated nodo-paranodopathy and diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 227 patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and Guillain-Barr{\´e} syndrome from multiple centers in Germany who had undergone diagnostic testing for antiparanodal antibodies targeting neurofascin-155, pan-neurofascin, contactin-1-associated protein 1, and contactin-1. To study possible direct pathogenic effects of antiparanodal antibodies, we performed immunofluorescence binding assays on human pancreatic tissue sections. Results The frequency of DM was 33.3\% in seropositive patients and thus higher compared with seronegative patients (14.1\%, OR = 3.04, 95\% CI = 1.31-6.80). The relative risk of DM in seropositive patients was 3.4-fold higher compared with the general German population. Seropositive patients with DM most frequently harbored anti-contactin-1 antibodies and had higher antibody titers than seropositive patients without DM. The diagnosis of DM preceded the onset of neuropathy in seropositive patients. No immunoreactivity of antiparanodal antibodies against pancreatic tissue was detected. Discussion We report an association of nodo-paranodopathy and DM. Our results suggest that DM may be a potential risk factor for predisposing to developing nodo-paranodopathy and argue against DM being induced by the autoantibodies. Our findings set the basis for further research investigating underlying immunopathogenetic connections.}, language = {en} } @article{GugelGrimmHartjenetal.2021, author = {Gugel, Isabel and Grimm, Florian and Hartjen, Philip and Breun, Maria and Zipfel, Julian and Liebsch, Marina and L{\"o}wenheim, Hubert and Ernemann, Ulrike and Kluwe, Lan and Mautner, Victor-Felix and Tatagiba, Marcos and Schuhmann, Martin Ulrich}, title = {Risk stratification for immediate postoperative hearing loss by preoperative BAER (brainstem auditory evoked response) and audiometry in NF2-associated vestibular schwannomas}, series = {Cancers}, volume = {13}, journal = {Cancers}, number = {6}, issn = {2072-6694}, doi = {10.3390/cancers13061384}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-234165}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Both brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) and audiometry play a crucial role in neuro-oncological treatment decisions in Neurofibromatosis Type 2 associated (NF2) vestibular schwannoma (VS) as hearing preservation is the major goal. In this study, we investigated the risk of immediate postoperative hearing deterioration (>15 dB and/or 15\% loss in pure-tone average [PTA]/ speech discrimination score [SDS] in a cohort of 100 operated VS (ears) in 72 NF2 patients by retrospective analysis of pre- and postoperative hearing data (PTA, SDS, American Association of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [AAO-HNS], and brainstem auditory evoked potential [BAEP] class) taking into account relevant influencing factors, particularly preoperative audiometry and BAEP status and the extent of resection. Immediately after surgery, the hearing was preserved in 73\% of ears and approximately ~60\% of ears kept their hearing classes. Preoperative BAEP (p = 0.015) and resection amount (p = 0.048) significantly influenced postoperative hearing outcome. The prediction model for postoperative hearing deterioration/loss between preoperative BAEP and AAO-HNS class showed increased risk by increasing BAEP class. Twenty-one tumors/ears were identified with large BAEP and AAO-HNS class discrepancies (≥2 points) and were associated with a high (48-100\%) risk of deafness after surgery in ears with preoperative available hearing. Overall, the results were heterogeneous but the better both BAEP and audiometry class before surgery, the higher the chance of hearing maintenance afterwards. Large resection amounts (e.g., 100\% risk in near-total resections) exhibit a significant (p < 0.05) higher risk compared to smaller amounts (e.g., 10/20\% in laser-coagulated/partially resected tumors). Our results emphasized the indispensable role of both hearing monitoring in form of audiometry and neurophysiology (BAEP) in the pre-and perioperative monitoring of NF2-associated VS. Both BAEP and audiometry are good prognostic markers for the postoperative hearing outcome. The extent of resection should be strictly guided by and adjusted to the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.}, language = {en} }