@article{OsorioMilneKuchenbaeckeretal.2014,
  author    = {Osorio, Ana and Milne, Roger L. and Kuchenbaecker, Karoline and Vaclov{\´a}, Tereza and Pita, Guillermo and Alonso, Rosario and Peterlongo, Paolo and Blanco, Ignacio and de la Hoya, Miguel and Duran, Mercedes and Diez, Orland and Ram{\´o}n y Cajal, Teresa and Konstantopoulou, Irene and Mart{\´i}nez-Bouzas, Christina and Conejero, Raquel Andr{\´e}s and Soucy, Penny and McGuffog, Lesley and Barrowdale, Daniel and Lee, Andrew and Arver, Brita and Rantala, Johanna and Loman, Niklas and Ehrencrona, Hans and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Beattie, Mary S. and Domchek, Susan M. and Nathanson, Katherine and Rebbeck, Timothy R. and Arun, Banu K. and Karlan, Beth Y. and Walsh, Christine and Lester, Jenny and John, Esther M. and Whittemore, Alice S. and Daly, Mary B. and Southey, Melissa and Hopper, John and Terry, Mary B. and Buys, Saundra S. and Janavicius, Ramunas and Dorfling, Cecilia M. and van Rensburg, Elizabeth J. and Steele, Linda and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Ding, Yuan Chun and Hansen, Thomas V. O. and J{\o}nson, Lars and Ejlertsen, Bent and Gerdes, Anne-Marie and Infante, Mar and Herr{\´a}ez, Bel{\´e}n and Moreno, Leticia Thais and Weitzel, Jeffrey N. and Herzog, Josef and Weeman, Kisa and Manoukian, Siranoush and Peissel, Bernard and Zaffaroni, Daniela and Scuvera, Guilietta and Bonanni, Bernardo and Mariette, Frederique and Volorio, Sara and Viel, Alessandra and Varesco, Liliana and Papi, Laura and Ottini, Laura and Tibiletti, Maria Grazia and Radice, Paolo and Yannoukakos, Drakoulis and Garber, Judy and Ellis, Steve and Frost, Debra and Platte, Radka and Fineberg, Elena and Evans, Gareth and Lalloo, Fiona and Izatt, Louise and Eeles, Ros and Adlard, Julian and Davidson, Rosemarie and Cole, Trevor and Eccles, Diana and Cook, Jackie and Hodgson, Shirley and Brewer, Carole and Tischkowitz, Marc and Douglas, Fiona and Porteous, Mary and Side, Lucy and Walker, Lisa and Morrison, Patrick and Donaldson, Alan and Kennedy, John and Foo, Claire and Godwin, Andrew K. and Schmutzler, Rita Katharina and Wappenschmidt, Barbara and Rhiem, Kerstin and Engel, Christoph and Meindl, Alftons and Ditsch, Nina and Arnold, Norbert and Plendl, Hans J{\"o}rg and Niederacher, Dieter and Sutter, Christian and Wang-Gohrke, Shan and Steinemann, Doris and Preisler-Adams, Sabine and Kast, Karin and Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda and Gehrig, Andrea and Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique and Sinilnikova, Olga M. and Mazoyer, Sylvie and Damiola, Francesca and Poppe, Bruce and Claes, Kathleen and Piedmonte, Marion and Tucker, Kathy and Backes, Floor and Rodr{\´i}guez, Gustavo and Brewster, Wendy and Wakeley, Katie and Rutherford, Thomas and Cald{\´e}s, Trinidad and Nevanlinna, Heli and Aittom{\"a}ki, Kristiina and Rookus, Matti A. and van Os, Theo A. M. and van der Kolk, Lizet and de Lange, J. L. and Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne E. J. and van der Hout, A. H. and van Asperen, Christi J. and Gom{\´e}z Garcia, Encarna B. and Encarna, B. and Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline and Coll{\´e}e, J. Margriet and van Deurzen, Carolien H. M. and van der Luijt, Rob B. and Devilee, Peter and Olah, Edith and L{\´a}zaro, Conxi and Teul{\´e}, Alex and Men{\´e}ndez, Mireia and Jakubowska, Anna and Cybulski, Cezary and Gronwald, Jecek and Lubinski, Jan and Durda, Katarzyna and Jaworska-Bieniek, Katarzyna and Johannsson, Oskar Th. and Maugard, Christine and Montagna, Marco and Tognazzo, Silvia and Teixeira, Manuel R. and Healey, Sue and Olswold, Curtis and Guidugli, Lucia and Lindor, Noralane and Slager, Susan and Szabo, Csilla I. and Vijai, Joseph and Robson, Mark and Kauff, Noah and Zhang, Liying and Rau-Murthy, Rohini and Fink-Retter, Anneliese and Singer, Christine F. and Rappaport, Christine and Kaulich, Daphne Geschwantler and Pfeiler, Georg and Tea, Muy-Kheng and Berger, Andreas and Phelan, Catherine M. and Greene, Mark H. and Mai, Phuong L. and Lejbkowicz, Flavio and Andrulis, Irene and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Glendon, Gord and Toland, Amanda Ewart and Bojesen, Anders and Pedersen, Inge Sokilde and Sunde, Lone and Thomassen, Mads and Kruse, Torben A. and Jensen, Uffe Birk and Friedman, Eitan and Laitman, Yeal and Shimon, Shanie Paluch and Simard, Jaques and Easton, Douglas F. and Offit, Kenneth and Couch, Fergus J. and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia and Antoniou, Antonis C. and Benitez, Javier},
  title     = {DNA Glycosylases Involved in Base Excision Repair May Be Associated with Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers},
  series = {PLOS Genetics},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {PLOS Genetics},
  number    = {e1004256},
  issn      = {1553-7404},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1004256},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-116820},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in the DNA Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway could be associated with cancer risk in carriers of mutations in the high-penetrance susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, given the relation of synthetic lethality that exists between one of the components of the BER pathway, PARP1 (poly ADP ribose polymerase), and both BRCA1 and BRCA2. In the present study, we have performed a comprehensive analysis of 18 genes involved in BER using a tagging SNP approach in a large series of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. 144 SNPs were analyzed in a two stage study involving 23,463 carriers from the CIMBA consortium (the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2). Eleven SNPs showed evidence of association with breast and/or ovarian cancer at p<0.05 in the combined analysis. Four of the five genes for which strongest evidence of association was observed were DNA glycosylases. The strongest evidence was for rs1466785 in the NEIL2 (endonuclease VIII-like 2) gene (HR: 1.09, 95\% CI (1.03-1.16), p = 2.7x10(-3)) for association with breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers, and rs2304277 in the OGG1 (8-guanine DNA glycosylase) gene, with ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR: 1.12 95\% CI: 1.03-1.21, p = 4.8x10(-3)). DNA glycosylases involved in the first steps of the BER pathway may be associated with cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and should be more comprehensively studied.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RauBuggischMaussetal.2022,
  author    = {Rau, Monika and Buggisch, Peter and Mauss, Stefan and Boeker, Klaus H. W. and Klinker, Hartwig and M{\"u}ller, Tobias and Stoehr, Albrecht and Schattenberg, J{\"o}rn M. and Geier, Andreas},
  title     = {Prognostic impact of steatosis in the clinical course of chronic HCV infection-Results from the German Hepatitis C-Registry},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0264741},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-300549},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background Liver steatosis is often observed in chronic HCV infection and associated to genotype or comorbidities. NAFLD is an important risk factor for end-stage liver disease. We aimed to analyse the course of NAFLD as a concomitant disease in a cohort of HCV patients. Methods The German Hepatitis C-Registry is a national multicenter real-world cohort. In the current analysis, 8789 HCV patients were included and separated based on the presence of steatosis on ultrasound and/or histology. Fibrosis progression was assessed by transient elastography (TE), ultrasound or non-invasive surrogate scores. Results At the time of study inclusion 12.3\% (n = 962) of HCV patients presented with steatosis (+S) (higher rate in GT-3). Diabetes mellitus was more frequent in GT-1 patients. HCV patients without steatosis (-S) had a slightly higher rate of fibrosis progression (FP) over time (30.3\%) in contrast to HCV patients +S (26\%). This effect was mainly observed in GT-3 patients (34.4\% vs. 20.6\%). A larger decrease of ALT, AST and GGT from baseline to FU-1 (4-24 weeks after EOT) was found in HCV patients (without FP) +S compared to -S. HCV patients -S and with FP presented more often metabolic comorbidities with a significantly higher BMI (+0.58kg/m\(^{2}\)) compared to patients -S without FP. This was particularly pronounced in patients with abnormal ALT. Conclusion Clinically diagnosed steatosis in HCV patients does not seem to contribute to significant FP in this unique cohort. The low prevalence of steatosis could reflect a lower awareness of fatty liver in HCV patients, as patients -S and with FP presented more metabolic risk factors.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PauliLutzenbergerRauetal.1994,
  author    = {Pauli, Paul and Lutzenberger, W. and Rau, H. and Birbaumer, N. and Rickard, T. C. and Yaroush, R. A. and Bourne, L. E. J.},
  title     = {Brain potentials during mental arithmetic: effects of extensive practice and problem difficulty},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-61345},
  year      = {1994},
  abstract  = {Recent behavioral investigations indicate that the processes underlying mental arithmetic change systematically with practice from deliberate, conscious calculation to automatic, direct retrieval of answers from memory [Bourne, L.E.Jr. and Rickard, T.C., Mental calculation: The development of a cognitive skill, Paper presented at the Interamerican Congress of Psychology, San Jose, Costa Rica, 1991; Psychol. Rev., 95 (1988) 492-527]. Results reviewed by Moscovitch and Winocur [In: The handbook of aging and cognition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1992, pp. 315-372] suggest that consciously controlled processes are more dependent on frontal lobe function than are automatic processes. It is appropriate, therefore to determine whether transitions in the locus of primary brain activity occur with practice on mental calculation. In this experiment, we examine the relationship between characteristics of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and mental arithmetic. Single-digit mental multiplication problems varying in difficulty (problem size) were used, and subjects were trained on these problems for four sessions. Problem-size and practice effects were reliably found in behavioral measures (RT). The ERP was characterized by a pronounced late positivity after task presentation followed by a slow wave, and a negativity during response indication. These components responded differentially to the practice and problem-size manipulations. Practice mainly affected topography of the amplitude of positivity and offset latency of slow wave, and problem-size mainly offset latency of slow wave and pre-response negativity. Fronto-central positivity diminished from session to session, and the focus of positivity centered finally at centro-parietal regions. This finding suggests that frontal lobe processing is necessary as long as task performance is not automatized, while automatized arithmetic processing requires parietal brain activity only. The pre-response negativity observed in the first session and during more difficult tasks is assumed to reflect excitatory preparatory processes, which could be associated with activation of calculation strategies.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}