@article{DuekingHolmbergKunzetal.2020,
  author    = {D{\"u}king, Peter and Holmberg, Hans‑Christer and Kunz, Philipp and Leppich, Robert and Sperlich, Billy},
  title     = {Intra-individual physiological response of recreational runners to different training mesocycles: a randomized cross-over study},
  series = {European Journal of Applied Physiology},
  volume    = {120},
  journal   = {European Journal of Applied Physiology},
  issn      = {1439-6319},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00421-020-04477-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-235022},
  pages     = {2705-2713},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Purpose Pronounced differences in individual physiological adaptation may occur following various training mesocycles in runners. Here we aimed to assess the individual changes in performance and physiological adaptation of recreational runners performing mesocycles with different intensity, duration and frequency. Methods Employing a randomized cross-over design, the intra-individual physiological responses [i.e., peak (\(\dot{VO}_{2peak}\)) and submaximal (\(\dot{VO}_{2submax}\)) oxygen uptake, velocity at lactate thresholds (V\(_2\), V\(_4\))] and performance (time-to-exhaustion (TTE)) of 13 recreational runners who performed three 3-week sessions of high-intensity interval training (HIIT), high-volume low-intensity training (HVLIT) or more but shorter sessions of HVLIT (high-frequency training; HFT) were assessed. Results \(\dot{VO}_{2submax}\), V\(_2\), V\(_4\) and TTE were not altered by HIIT, HVLIT or HFT (p > 0.05). \(\dot{VO}_{2peak}\) improved to the same extent following HVLIT (p = 0.045) and HFT (p = 0.02). The number of moderately negative responders was higher following HIIT (15.4\%); and HFT (15.4\%) than HVLIT (7.6\%). The number of very positive responders was higher following HVLIT (38.5\%) than HFT (23\%) or HIIT (7.7\%). 46\% of the runners responded positively to two mesocycles, while 23\% did not respond to any. Conclusion On a group level, none of the interventions altered \(\dot{VO}_{2submax}\), V\(_2\), V\(_4\) or TTE, while HVLIT and HFT improved \(\dot{VO}_{2peak}\). The mean adaptation index indicated similar numbers of positive, negative and non-responders to HIIT, HVLIT and HFT, but more very positive responders to HVLIT than HFT or HIIT. 46\% responded positively to two mesocycles, while 23\% did not respond to any. These findings indicate that the magnitude of responses to HIIT, HVLIT and HFT is highly individual and no pattern was apparent.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KunzAzadEngelHolmbergetal.2019,
  author    = {Kunz, Philipp and Azad Engel, Florian and Holmberg, Hans-Christer and Sperlich, Billy},
  title     = {A meta-comparison of the effects of high-intensity interval training to those of small-sided games and other training protocols on parameters related to the physiology and performance of youth soccer players},
  series = {Sports Medicine - Open},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {Sports Medicine - Open},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40798-019-0180-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200332},
  pages     = {7},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is frequently employed to improve the endurance of various types of athletes. To determine whether youth soccer players may benefit from the intermittent load and time efficiency of HIIT, we performed a meta-analysis of the relevant scientific literature. Objectives Our primary objective was to compare changes in various physiological parameters related to the performance of youth soccer players in response to running-based HIIT to the effects of other common training protocols (i.e., small-sided games, technical training and soccer-specific training, or high-volume endurance training). A secondary objective was to compare specifically running-based HIIT to a soccer-specific form of HIIT known as small-sided games (SSG) in this same respect, since this latter type of training is being discussed extensively by coaches. Method A systematic search of the PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was performed in August of 2017 and updated during the review process in December of 2018. The criteria for inclusion of articles for analysis were as follows: (1) comparison of HIIT to SSG or some other training protocol employing a pre-post design, (2) involvement of healthy young athletes (≤ 18 years old), and (3) assessment of variables related to endurance or soccer performance. Hedges' g effect size (dppc2) and associated 95\% confidence intervals for the comparison of the responses to HIIT and other interventions were calculated. Results Nine studies, involving 232 young soccer players (mean age 16.2 ± 1.6 years), were examined. Endurance training in the form of HIIT or SSG produced similar positive effects on most parameters assessed, including peak oxygen uptake and maximal running performance during incremental running (expressed as Vmax or maximal aerobic speed (MAS)), shuttle runs (expressed as the distance covered or time to exhaustion), and time-trials, as well as submaximal variables such as running economy and running velocity at the lactate threshold. HIIT induced a moderate improvement in soccer-related tests involving technical exercises with the soccer ball and other game-specific parameters (i.e., total distance covered, number of sprints, and number of involvements with the ball). Neuromuscular parameters were largely unaffected by HIIT or SSG. Conclusion The present meta-analysis indicates that HIIT and SSG have equally beneficial impacts on variables related to the endurance and soccer-specific performance of youth soccer players, but little influence on neuromuscular performance.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DuekingZinnerReedetal.2020,
  author    = {D{\"u}king, Peter and Zinner, Christoph and Reed, Jennifer L. and Holmberg, Hans-Christer and Sperlich, Billy},
  title     = {Predefined vs data-guided training prescription based on autonomic nervous system variation: A systematic review},
  series = {Scandinavian Journal of Medicine \& Science in Sports},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Scandinavian Journal of Medicine \& Science in Sports},
  number    = {12},
  doi       = {10.1111/sms.13802},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-217893},
  pages     = {2291 -- 2304},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Monitoring variations in the functioning of the autonomic nervous system may help personalize training of runners and provide more pronounced physiological adaptations and performance improvements. We systematically reviewed the scientific literature comparing physiological adaptations and/or improvements in performance following training based on responses of the autonomic nervous system (ie, changes in heart rate variability) and predefined training. PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched systematically in July 2019. Keywords related to endurance, running, autonomic nervous system, and training. Studies were included if they (a) involved interventions consisting predominantly of running training; (b) lasted at least 3 weeks; (c) reported pre- and post-intervention assessment of running performance and/or physiological parameters; (d) included an experimental group performing training adjusted continuously on the basis of alterations in HRV and a control group; and (e) involved healthy runners. Five studies involving six interventions and 166 participants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Four HRV-based interventions reduced the amount of moderate- and/or high-intensity training significantly. In five interventions, improvements in performance parameters (3000 m, 5000 m, Loadmax, Tlim) were more pronounced following HRV-based training. Peak oxygen uptake (VO\(_{2peak}\)) and submaximal running parameters (eg, LT1, LT2) improved following both HRV-based and predefined training, with no clear difference in the extent of improvement in VO\(_{2peak}\). Submaximal running parameters tended to improve more following HRV-based training. Research findings to date have been limited and inconsistent. Both HRV-based and predefined training improve running performance and certain submaximal physiological adaptations, with effects of the former training tending to be greater.},
  language  = {en}
}