@article{BinderMayBaronetal.2011, author = {Binder, Andreas and May, Denisa and Baron, Ralf and Maier, Christoph and T{\"o}lle, Thomas R. and Treede, Rolf-Detlef and Berthele, Achim and Faltraco, Frank and Flor, Herta and Gierthm{\"u}hlen, Janne and Haenisch, Sierk and Huge, Volker and Magerl, Walter and Maih{\"o}fner, Christian and Richter, Helmut and Rolke, Roman and Scherens, Andrea and {\"U}{\c{c}}eyler, Nurcan and Ufer, Mike and Wasner, Gunnar and Zhu, Jihong and Cascorbi, Ingolf}, title = {Transient Receptor Potential Channel Polymorphisms Are Associated with the Somatosensory Function in Neuropathic Pain Patients}, series = {PLoS ONE}, volume = {6}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0017387}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-142782}, pages = {e17387}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Transient receptor potential channels are important mediators of thermal and mechanical stimuli and play an important role in neuropathic pain. The contribution of hereditary variants in the genes of transient receptor potential channels to neuropathic pain is unknown. We investigated the frequency of transient receptor potential ankyrin 1, transient receptor potential melastin 8 and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 single nucleotide polymorphisms and their impact on somatosensory abnormalities in neuropathic pain patients. Within the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (Deutscher Forscbungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz) 371 neuropathic pain patients were phenotypically characterized using standardized quantitative sensory testing. Pyrosequencing was employed to determine a total of eleven single nucleotide polymorphisms in transient receptor potential channel genes of the neuropathic pain patients and a cohort of 253 German healthy volunteers. Associations of quantitative sensory testing parameters and single nucleotide polymorphisms between and within groups and subgroups, based on sensory phenotypes, were analyzed. Single nucleotide polymorphisms frequencies did not differ between both the cohorts. However, in neuropathic pain patients transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 710G>A (rs920829, E179K) was associated with the presence of paradoxical heat sensation (p=0.03), and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 1911A>G (rs8065080, I585V) with cold hypoalgesia (p=0.0035). Two main subgroups characterized by preserved (1) and impaired (2) sensory function were identified. In subgroup 1 transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 1911A>G led to significantly less heat hyperalgesia, pinprick hyperalgesia and mechanical hypaesthesia (p=0.006, p=0.005 and p<0.001) and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 1103C>G (rs222747, M315I) to cold hypaesthesia (p=0.002), but there was absence of associations in subgroup 2. In this study we found no evidence that genetic variants of transient receptor potential channels are involved in the expression of neuropathic pain, but transient receptor potential channel polymorphisms contributed significantly to the somatosensory abnormalities of neuropathic pain patients.}, language = {en} } @article{SommerRichterRogauschetal.2011, author = {Sommer, Claudia and Richter, Helmut and Rogausch, Jan P. and Frettloh, Jule and Lungenhausen, Margitta and Maier, Christoph}, title = {A modified score to identify and discriminate neuropathic pain: a study on the German version of the neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI)}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-68716}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Background: Neuropathic pain must be correctly diagnosed for optimal treatment. The questionnaire named Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) was developed in its original French version to evaluate the different symptoms of neuropathic pain. We hypothesized that the NPSI might also be used to differentiate neuropathic from non-neuropathic pain. Methods: We translated the NPSI into German using a standard forward-backward translation and administered it in a case-control design to patients with neuropathic (n = 68) and non-neuropathic pain (headache and osteoarthritis, n = 169) to validate it and to analyze its discriminant properties, its sensitivity to change, and to detect neuropathic pain subgroups with distinct profiles. Results: Using a sum score (the NPSI-G score), we found sensitivity to change (r between 0.37 and 0.5 for pain items of the graded chronic pain scale) and could distinguish between neuropathic and other pain on a group basis, but not for individual patients. Post hoc development of a discriminant score with optimized diagnostic properties to distinguish neuropathic pain from non-neuropathic pain resulted in an instrument with high sensitivity (91\%) and acceptable specificity (70\%). We detected six different pain profiles in the patient group with neuropathic pain; three profiles were found to be distinct. Conclusions: The NPSI-G potentially combines the properties of a diagnostic tool and an instrument to identify subtypes of neuropathic pain.}, subject = {Neuralgie}, language = {en} } @article{WendlerBurmesterSoerensenetal.2014, author = {Wendler, J{\"o}rg and Burmester, Gerd R. and S{\"o}rensen, Helmut and Krause, Andreas and Richter, Constanze and Tony, Hans-Peter and Rubbert-Roth, Andrea and Bartz-Bazzanella, Peter and Wassenberg, Siegfried and Haug-Rost, Iris and D{\"o}rner, Thomas}, title = {Rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine practice (GERINIS): six-year results from a prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study in 2,484 patients}, series = {Arthritis Research \& Therapy}, volume = {16}, journal = {Arthritis Research \& Therapy}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1186/ar4521}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121184}, pages = {R80}, year = {2014}, abstract = {INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine care, and to monitor changes in daily practice since the introduction of RTX therapy. METHODS: This was a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study conducted under routine practice conditions in Germany. Efficacy was evaluated using Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Safety was assessed by recording adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Physician and patient global efficacy and tolerability assessments were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 2,484 patients (76.7\% female, mean age 56.4 years, mean disease duration 11.7 years) received RTX treatment (22.7\% monotherapy). The total observation period was approximately six-years (median follow-up 14.7 months). RTX treatment led to improvements in DAS28 and HAQ-DI that were sustained over multiple courses. DAS28 improvements positively correlated with higher rheumatoid factor levels up to 50 IU/ml. Response and tolerability were rated good/very good by the majority of physicians and patients. Mean treatment intervals were 10.5 and 6.8 months for the first and last 400 enrolled patients, respectively. Infections were the most frequently reported ADRs (9.1\%; 11.39/100 patient-years); approximately 1\% of patients per course discontinued therapy due to ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged RTX treatment in routine care is associated with good efficacy and tolerability, as measured by conventional parameters and by physicians' and patients' global assessments. Rheumatoid factor status served as a distinct and quantitative biomarker of RTX responsiveness. With growing experience, physicians repeated treatments earlier in patients with less severe disease activity.}, language = {en} }