@article{EnigkWagnerSamapatietal.2014, author = {Enigk, Fabian and Wagner, Antje and Samapati, Rudi and Rittner, Heike and Brack, Alexander and Mousa, Shaaban A. and Sch{\"a}fer, Michael and Habazettl, Helmut and Sch{\"a}per, J{\"o}rn}, title = {Thoracic epidural anesthesia decreases endotoxin-induced endothelial injury}, series = {BMC Anesthesiology}, volume = {14}, journal = {BMC Anesthesiology}, number = {23}, doi = {10.1186/1471-2253-14-23}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-116787}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Background: The sympathetic nervous system is considered to modulate the endotoxin-induced activation of immune cells. Here we investigate whether thoracic epidural anesthesia with its regional symapathetic blocking effect alters endotoxin-induced leukocyte-endothelium activation and interaction with subsequent endothelial injury. Methods: Sprague Dawley rats were anesthetized, cannulated and hemodynamically monitored. E. coli lipopolysaccharide (Serotype 0127: B8, 1.5 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) or isotonic saline (controls) was infused for 300 minutes. An epidural catheter was inserted for continuous application of lidocaine or normal saline in endotoxemic animals and saline in controls. After 300 minutes we measured catecholamine and cytokine plasma concentrations, adhesion molecule expression, leukocyte adhesion, and intestinal tissue edema. Results: In endotoxemic animals with epidural saline, LPS significantly increased the interleukin-1 beta plasma concentration (48\%), the expression of endothelial adhesion molecules E-selectin (34\%) and ICAM-1 (42\%), and the number of adherent leukocytes (40\%) with an increase in intestinal myeloperoxidase activity (26\%) and tissue edema (75\%) when compared to healthy controls. In endotoxemic animals with epidural infusion of lidocaine the values were similar to those in control animals, while epinephrine plasma concentration was 32\% lower compared to endotoxemic animals with epidural saline. Conclusions: Thoracic epidural anesthesia attenuated the endotoxin-induced increase of IL-1 beta concentration, adhesion molecule expression and leukocyte-adhesion with subsequent endothelial injury. A potential mechanism is the reduction in the plasma concentration of epinephrine.}, language = {en} } @incollection{ClarkeEllgringWagner1981, author = {Clarke, Andrew H. and Ellgring, Johann Heinrich and Wagner, Helmut}, title = {Analyse des Blickverhaltens in sozialen Situationen}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-43012}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {1981}, abstract = {Der vorliegende Beitrag behandelt inhaltliche und methodische Probleme einer L{\"a}ngsschnittstudie, die derzeit am MPI f{\"u}r Psychiatrie in M{\"u}nchen an depressiven Patienten durchgef{\"u}hrt wird. Diese Untersuchung hat einen diagnostischen und einen kommunikationstheoretischen Aspekt. Von diagnostischem Interesse sind die depressionsspezifischen Ver{\"a}nderungen des kommunikativen Verhaltens. Kommunikationstheoretisch gewendet lautet die Frage, wie sich der interne Zustand einer Person in ihrem Verhalten reflektiert. In diesem Beitrag wird die Fragestellung konzentriert auf tonische Eigenschaften des Blickverhaltens im Interaktionsprozeß und deren Stabilit{\"a}t im Krankheitsverlauf. Zun{\"a}chst wird die theoretische Grundlage referiert, die wir f{\"u}r das Blickverhalten entwickelt haben. Im zweiten Abschnitt wird auf Datenerhebung und Reliabilit{\"a}tskontrolle eingegangen. Die Struktur der Daten bestimmt die Auswertungsmethoden. Einige der Methoden, mit denen wir derzeit arbeiten, werden im Zusammenhang mit umschriebenen Problemstellungen erl{\"a}utert: Deskription und Interpretation des tonischen Blickverhaltens depressiver Patienten im Krankheitsverlauf (Abschnitt 3). Zusammenhang der individuellen Blickniveaus von Interaktionspartnern (Abschnitt 4) Deskription eines Dialogs (Interviews) als Sequenz von distinkten Zust{\"a}nden. In den Zust{\"a}nden werden Sprech- und Blickverhalten beider Interaktionspartner miteinander kombiniert (Abschnitt 5) Analyse der intraindividuellen Wechselwirkung zwischen Blick- und Sprechverhalten (Abschnitt 6). Die Abschnitte 3 mit 6 werden durch vorl{\"a}ufige Ergebnisse illustriert.}, language = {de} } @article{EllgringWagnerClarke1980, author = {Ellgring, Johann Heinrich and Wagner, Helmut and Clarke, Andrew H.}, title = {Bin{\"a}re Kodierung von Sprechen und Blicken: Validit{\"a}t, Reliabilit{\"a}t und ihre Abh{\"a}ngigkeit von der zeitlichen Aufl{\"o}sung}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-43163}, year = {1980}, abstract = {Validit{\"a}t und Reliabilit{\"a}t der Sprechkodierung einer Beobachtergruppe wurden in Abh{\"a}ngigkeit von der zeitlichen Aufl{\"o}sung untersucht. Die Validit{\"a}t wurde anhand der {\"U}bereinstimmung der Beobachter mit einem automatischen Sprachdetektor berechnet. Die Reliabilit{\"a}tswerte f{\"u}r die Kodierung von Sprechen und Blikken ergaben sich aus der {\"U}bereinstimmung der Beobachter untereinander. Im wesentlichen zeigten sich folgende Ergebnisse: 1. Die Validit{\"a}t/Reliabilit{\"a}t der Sprechkodierung ist eine monotone, nichtlineare Funktion der gew{\"a}hlten Aufl{\"o}sung. Die systematischen Fehler, die auf Latenz und Tr{\"a}gheit der menschlichen Beobachter zur{\"u}ckgehen, werden bei einer Aufl{\"o}sung von 400 msec nahezu vollst{\"a}ndig unterdr{\"u}ckt. 2. Weder bei der Erfassung des Sprech- noch des Blickverhaltens lassen sich Anzeichen f{\"u}r Observer-Drift feststellen. Trainierte und untrainierte Beobachter unterscheiden sich nicht signifikant. 3. Die Kodierung des Sprechverhaltens ist geringf{\"u}gig reliabler als die des Blickverhaltens. Dieser Unterschied kann in der Praxis vernachl{\"a}ssigt werden.}, language = {de} } @article{DiersAcarWagneretal.2022, author = {Diers, Johannes and Acar, Laura and Wagner, Johanna C. and Baum, Philip and Hankir, Mohammed and Flemming, Sven and Kastner, Carolin and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and L'hoest, Helmut and Marschall, Ursula and Lock, Johan Friso and Wiegering, Armin}, title = {Cancer diagnosis is one quarter lower than the expected cancer incidence in the first year of COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: A retrospective register-based cohort study}, series = {Cancer Communications}, volume = {42}, journal = {Cancer Communications}, number = {7}, doi = {10.1002/cac2.12314}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-312862}, pages = {673-676}, year = {2022}, abstract = {No abstract available.}, language = {en} } @article{MeierMoebusHeigletal.2023, author = {Meier, Johannes P. and M{\"o}bus, Selina and Heigl, Florian and Asbach-Nitzsche, Alexandra and Niller, Hans Helmut and Plentz, Annelie and Avsar, Korkut and Heiß-Neumann, Marion and Schaaf, Bernhard and Cassens, Uwe and Seese, Bernd and Teschner, Daniel and Handzhiev, Sabin and Graf, Uwe and L{\"u}bbert, Christoph and Steinmaurer, Monika and Kontogianni, Konstantina and Berg, Christoph and Maieron, Andreas and Blaas, Stefan H. and Wagner, Ralf and Deml, Ludwig and Barabas, Sascha}, title = {Performance of T-Track\(^®\) TB, a novel dual marker RT-qPCR-based whole-blood test for improved detection of active tuberculosis}, series = {Diagnostics}, volume = {13}, journal = {Diagnostics}, number = {4}, issn = {2075-4418}, doi = {10.3390/diagnostics13040758}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-304113}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the leading causes of death by an infectious disease. It remains a major health burden worldwide, in part due to misdiagnosis. Therefore, improved diagnostic tests allowing the faster and more reliable diagnosis of patients with active TB are urgently needed. This prospective study examined the performance of the new molecular whole-blood test T-Track\(^®\) TB, which relies on the combined evaluation of IFNG and CXCL10 mRNA levels, and compared it to that of the QuantiFERON\(^®\)-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Diagnostic accuracy and agreement analyses were conducted on the whole blood of 181 active TB patients and 163 non-TB controls. T-Track\(^®\) TB presented sensitivity of 94.9\% and specificity of 93.8\% for the detection of active TB vs. non-TB controls. In comparison, the QFT-Plus ELISA showed sensitivity of 84.3\%. The sensitivity of T-Track\(^®\) TB was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of QFT-Plus. The overall agreement of T-Track\(^®\) TB with QFT-Plus to diagnose active TB was 87.9\%. Out of 21 samples with discordant results, 19 were correctly classified by T-Track\(^®\) TB while misclassified by QFT-Plus (T-Track\(^®\) TB-positive/QFT-Plus-negative), and two samples were misclassified by T-Track\(^®\) TB while correctly classified by QFT-Plus (T-Track\(^®\) TB-negative/QFT-Plus-positive). Our results demonstrate the excellent performance of the T-Track\(^®\) TB molecular assay and its suitability to accurately detect TB infection and discriminate active TB patients from non-infected controls.}, language = {en} } @article{ElHelouBiegnerBodeetal.2019, author = {El-Helou, Sabine M. and Biegner, Anika-Kerstin and Bode, Sebastian and Ehl, Stephan R. and Heeg, Maximilian and Maccari, Maria E. and Ritterbusch, Henrike and Speckmann, Carsten and Rusch, Stephan and Scheible, Raphael and Warnatz, Klaus and Atschekzei, Faranaz and Beider, Renata and Ernst, Diana and Gerschmann, Stev and Jablonka, Alexandra and Mielke, Gudrun and Schmidt, Reinhold E. and Sch{\"u}rmann, Gesine and Sogkas, Georgios and Baumann, Ulrich H. and Klemann, Christian and Viemann, Dorothee and Bernuth, Horst von and Kr{\"u}ger, Renate and Hanitsch, Leif G. and Scheibenbogen, Carmen M. and Wittke, Kirsten and Albert, Michael H. and Eichinger, Anna and Hauck, Fabian and Klein, Christoph and Rack-Hoch, Anita and Sollinger, Franz M. and Avila, Anne and Borte, Michael and Borte, Stephan and Fasshauer, Maria and Hauenherm, Anja and Kellner, Nils and M{\"u}ller, Anna H. and {\"U}lzen, Anett and Bader, Peter and Bakhtiar, Shahrzad and Lee, Jae-Yun and Heß, Ursula and Schubert, Ralf and W{\"o}lke, Sandra and Zielen, Stefan and Ghosh, Sujal and Laws, Hans-Juergen and Neubert, Jennifer and Oommen, Prasad T. and H{\"o}nig, Manfred and Schulz, Ansgar and Steinmann, Sandra and Klaus, Schwarz and D{\"u}ckers, Gregor and Lamers, Beate and Langemeyer, Vanessa and Niehues, Tim and Shai, Sonu and Graf, Dagmar and M{\"u}glich, Carmen and Schmalzing, Marc T. and Schwaneck, Eva C. and Tony, Hans-Peter and Dirks, Johannes and Haase, Gabriele and Liese, Johannes G. and Morbach, Henner and Foell, Dirk and Hellige, Antje and Wittkowski, Helmut and Masjosthusmann, Katja and Mohr, Michael and Geberzahn, Linda and Hedrich, Christian M. and M{\"u}ller, Christiane and R{\"o}sen-Wolff, Angela and Roesler, Joachim and Zimmermann, Antje and Behrends, Uta and Rieber, Nikolaus and Schauer, Uwe and Handgretinger, Rupert and Holzer, Ursula and Henes, J{\"o}rg and Kanz, Lothar and Boesecke, Christoph and Rockstroh, J{\"u}rgen K. and Schwarze-Zander, Carolynne and Wasmuth, Jan-Christian and Dilloo, Dagmar and H{\"u}lsmann, Brigitte and Sch{\"o}nberger, Stefan and Schreiber, Stefan and Zeuner, Rainald and Ankermann, Tobias and Bismarck, Philipp von and Huppertz, Hans-Iko and Kaiser-Labusch, Petra and Greil, Johann and Jakoby, Donate and Kulozik, Andreas E. and Metzler, Markus and Naumann-Bartsch, Nora and Sobik, Bettina and Graf, Norbert and Heine, Sabine and Kobbe, Robin and Lehmberg, Kai and M{\"u}ller, Ingo and Herrmann, Friedrich and Horneff, Gerd and Klein, Ariane and Peitz, Joachim and Schmidt, Nadine and Bielack, Stefan and Groß-Wieltsch, Ute and Classen, Carl F. and Klasen, Jessica and Deutz, Peter and Kamitz, Dirk and Lassy, Lisa and Tenbrock, Klaus and Wagner, Norbert and Bernbeck, Benedikt and Brummel, Bastian and Lara-Villacanas, Eusebia and M{\"u}nstermann, Esther and Schneider, Dominik T. and Tietsch, Nadine and Westkemper, Marco and Weiß, Michael and Kramm, Christof and K{\"u}hnle, Ingrid and Kullmann, Silke and Girschick, Hermann and Specker, Christof and Vinnemeier-Laubenthal, Elisabeth and Haenicke, Henriette and Schulz, Claudia and Schweigerer, Lothar and M{\"u}ller, Thomas G. and Stiefel, Martina and Belohradsky, Bernd H. and Soetedjo, Veronika and Kindle, Gerhard and Grimbacher, Bodo}, title = {The German national registry of primary immunodeficiencies (2012-2017)}, series = {Frontiers in Immunology}, volume = {10}, journal = {Frontiers in Immunology}, doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2019.01272}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-226629}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Introduction: The German PID-NET registry was founded in 2009, serving as the first national registry of patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID) in Germany. It is part of the European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) registry. The primary purpose of the registry is to gather data on the epidemiology, diagnostic delay, diagnosis, and treatment of PIDs. Methods: Clinical and laboratory data was collected from 2,453 patients from 36 German PID centres in an online registry. Data was analysed with the software Stata® and Excel. Results: The minimum prevalence of PID in Germany is 2.72 per 100,000 inhabitants. Among patients aged 1-25, there was a clear predominance of males. The median age of living patients ranged between 7 and 40 years, depending on the respective PID. Predominantly antibody disorders were the most prevalent group with 57\% of all 2,453 PID patients (including 728 CVID patients). A gene defect was identified in 36\% of patients. Familial cases were observed in 21\% of patients. The age of onset for presenting symptoms ranged from birth to late adulthood (range 0-88 years). Presenting symptoms comprised infections (74\%) and immune dysregulation (22\%). Ninety-three patients were diagnosed without prior clinical symptoms. Regarding the general and clinical diagnostic delay, no PID had undergone a slight decrease within the last decade. However, both, SCID and hyper IgE-syndrome showed a substantial improvement in shortening the time between onset of symptoms and genetic diagnosis. Regarding treatment, 49\% of all patients received immunoglobulin G (IgG) substitution (70\%-subcutaneous; 29\%-intravenous; 1\%-unknown). Three-hundred patients underwent at least one hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Five patients had gene therapy. Conclusion: The German PID-NET registry is a precious tool for physicians, researchers, the pharmaceutical industry, politicians, and ultimately the patients, for whom the outcomes will eventually lead to a more timely diagnosis and better treatment.}, language = {en} }