@article{MeyerPetersThieletal.2021,
  author    = {Meyer, Constantin and Peters, Jan Christoph and Thiel, Michael and Rathmann, Joachim and Job, Hubert},
  title     = {Monitoring von Freifl{\"a}cheninanspruchnahme und -versiegelung f{\"u}r eine nachhaltige Raumentwicklung in Bayern},
  series = {Raumforschung und Raumordnung},
  volume    = {79},
  journal   = {Raumforschung und Raumordnung},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.14512/rur.40},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-261622},
  pages     = {172-189},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Im Freistaat Bayern wird intensiv diskutiert, wie die nach wie vor hohe Freifl{\"a}cheninanspruchnahme f{\"u}r Siedlungs- und Verkehrszwecke reduziert werden kann. Wissenschaftliche Grundlage f{\"u}r Steuerungsans{\"a}tze in der Stadt- und Regionalentwicklung sollte ein verbessertes staatliches Fl{\"a}chenmonitoring sein, welches {\"u}ber die amtliche Statistik und deren Hauptindikator "Siedlungs- und Verkehrsfl{\"a}che" hinaus auch die qualitative Dimension der Fl{\"a}cheninanspruchnahme einbezieht. Daf{\"u}r stellt dieser Beitrag methodische Erweiterungsans{\"a}tze f{\"u}r das Fl{\"a}chenmonitoring vor, welche kleinr{\"a}umige Analysen der Zersiedelung, Freiraumstruktur, Fl{\"a}chenversiegelung und {\"O}kosystemleistungen am Beispiel des Landkreises Rh{\"o}n-Grabfeld aufzeigen. Diese werden im Kontext der Debatte zu Ursachen und Steuerung der Freifl{\"a}cheninanspruchnahme sowie zu aktuellen Anforderungen an das Fl{\"a}chenmonitoring diskutiert. Betont wird deren Bedeutung f{\"u}r das Monitoring rechtlicher Vorgaben und politischer Ziele zur nachhaltigen Fl{\"a}chennutzung.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{JobBittlingmaierMayeretal.2021,
  author    = {Job, Hubert and Bittlingmaier, Sarah and Mayer, Marius and von Ruschkowski, Eick and Woltering, Manuel},
  title     = {Park-People Relationships: The Socioeconomic Monitoring of National Parks in Bavaria, Germany},
  series = {Sustainability},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Sustainability},
  number    = {16},
  issn      = {2071-1050},
  doi       = {10.3390/su13168984},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-245061},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Questions about park-people relationships and the understanding and handling of the conflicts that may result from the creation and management of national parks in the surrounding area are prerequisites for both successful park management and sustainable rural tourism development. This paper analyzes the roles that research may play in relation to park-people relationships in the context of the two oldest German national parks located in Bavaria. The different fields of action of national parks are used to identify the potential for conflict, using detailed case studies from the Bavarian Forest and Berchtesgaden National Parks using quantitative population surveys carried out in 2018. The overall attitude towards both national parks is overwhelmingly positive, with trust towards park administrations and the perceived economic benefits from rural tourism being the attitudes most strongly correlated to the overall level of park-people relationships. Nevertheless, some points of contention still exist, like the ecological integrity approach towards strict nature conservation and related landscape changes (e.g., deadwood cover). A comparison over time shows in both cases that the spatial proximity to the protected area negatively influences people's attitudes towards the parks, but less so than in the past. Recommendations for national park management include communicating proactively and with greater transparency with locals and decision-makers, to identify conflicts earlier and, where possible, to eliminate them. Furthermore, developing a standardized method to monitor park-people relationships in Germany is a must and would benefit integrated approaches in research and management based on conservation social science.},
  language  = {en}
}