@article{BaumeisterStrifflerBrandtetal.2016,
  author    = {Baumeister, Joachim and Striffler, Albrecht and Brandt, Marc and Neumann, Michael},
  title     = {Collaborative Decision Support and Documentation in Chemical Safety with KnowSEC},
  series = {Journal of Cheminformatics},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Journal of Cheminformatics},
  number    = {21},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13321-016-0132-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-146575},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {To protect the health of human and environment, the European Union implemented the REACH regulation for chemical substances. REACH is an acronym for Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals. Under REACH, the authorities have the task of assessing chemical substances, especially those that might pose a risk to human health or environment. The work under REACH is scientifically, technically and procedurally a complex and knowledge-intensive task that is jointly performed by the European Chemicals Agency and member state authorities in Europe. The assessment of substances under REACH conducted in the German Environment Agency is supported by the knowledge-based system KnowSEC, which is used for the screening, documentation, and decision support when working on chemical substances. The software KnowSEC integrates advanced semantic technologies and strong problem solving methods. It allows for the collaborative work on substances in the context of the European REACH regulation. We discuss the applied methods and process models and we report on experiences with the implementation and use of the system.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchnabelCamenKnebeletal.2021,
  author    = {Schnabel, Renate B. and Camen, Stephan and Knebel, Fabian and Hagendorff, Andreas and Bavendiek, Udo and B{\"o}hm, Michael and Doehner, Wolfram and Endres, Matthias and Gr{\"o}schel, Klaus and Goette, Andreas and Huttner, Hagen B. and Jensen, Christoph and Kirchhof, Paulus and Korosoglou, Grigorius and Laufs, Ulrich and Liman, Jan and Morbach, Caroline and Navabi, Darius G{\"u}nther and Neumann-Haefelin, Tobias and Pfeilschifter, Waltraut and Poli, Sven and Rizos, Timolaos and Rolf, Andreas and R{\"o}ther, Joachim and Sch{\"a}bitz, Wolf R{\"u}diger and Steiner, Thorsten and Thomalla, G{\"o}tz and Wachter, Rolf and Haeusler, Karl Georg},
  title     = {Expert opinion paper on cardiac imaging after ischemic stroke},
  series = {Clinical Research in Cardiology},
  volume    = {110},
  journal   = {Clinical Research in Cardiology},
  number    = {7},
  issn      = {1861-0692},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00392-021-01834-x},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-266662},
  pages     = {938-958},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {This expert opinion paper on cardiac imaging after acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) includes a statement of the "Heart and Brain" consortium of the German Cardiac Society and the German Stroke Society. The Stroke Unit-Commission of the German Stroke Society and the German Atrial Fibrillation NETwork (AFNET) endorsed this paper. Cardiac imaging is a key component of etiological work-up after stroke. Enhanced echocardiographic tools, constantly improving cardiac computer tomography (CT) as well as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offer comprehensive non- or less-invasive cardiac evaluation at the expense of increased costs and/or radiation exposure. Certain imaging findings usually lead to a change in medical secondary stroke prevention or may influence medical treatment. However, there is no proof from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that the choice of the imaging method influences the prognosis of stroke patients. Summarizing present knowledge, the German Heart and Brain consortium proposes an interdisciplinary, staged standard diagnostic scheme for the detection of risk factors of cardio-embolic stroke. This expert opinion paper aims to give practical advice to physicians who are involved in stroke care. In line with the nature of an expert opinion paper, labeling of classes of recommendations is not provided, since many statements are based on expert opinion, reported case series, and clinical experience.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GergsJahnSchulzetal.2022,
  author    = {Gergs, Ulrich and Jahn, Tina and Schulz, Nico and Großmann, Claudia and Rueckschloss, Uwe and Demus, Uta and Buchwalow, Igor B. and Neumann, Joachim},
  title     = {Protein phosphatase 2A improves cardiac functional response to ischemia and sepsis},
  series = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  number    = {9},
  issn      = {1422-0067},
  doi       = {10.3390/ijms23094688},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-284035},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Reversible protein phosphorylation is a posttranslational modification of regulatory proteins involved in cardiac signaling pathways. Here, we focus on the role of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) for cardiac gene expression and stress response using a transgenic mouse model with cardiac myocyte-specific overexpression of the catalytic subunit of PP2A (PP2A-TG). Gene and protein expression were assessed under basal conditions by gene chip analysis and Western blotting. Some cardiac genes related to the cell metabolism and to protein phosphorylation such as kinases and phosphatases were altered in PP2A-TG compared to wild type mice (WT). As cardiac stressors, a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis in vivo and a global cardiac ischemia in vitro (stop-flow isolated perfused heart model) were examined. Whereas the basal cardiac function was reduced in PP2A-TG as studied by echocardiography or as studied in the isolated work-performing heart, the acute LPS- or ischemia-induced cardiac dysfunction deteriorated less in PP2A-TG compared to WT. From the data, we conclude that increased PP2A activity may influence the acute stress tolerance of cardiac myocytes.},
  language  = {en}
}