@article{NotzHeylandLeeetal.2023,
  author    = {Notz, Quirin and Heyland, Daren K. and Lee, Zheng-Yii and Menger, Johannes and Herrmann, Johannes and Chillon, Thilo S. and Fremes, Stephen and Mohammadi, Siamak and Elke, Gunnar and Mazer, C. David and Hill, Aileen and Velten, Markus and Ott, Sascha and Kleine-Brueggeney, Maren and Meybohm, Patrick and Schomburg, Lutz and Stoppe, Christian},
  title     = {Identifying a target group for selenium supplementation in high-risk cardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of the SUSTAIN CSX trial},
  series = {Intensive Care Medicine Experimental},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Intensive Care Medicine Experimental},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40635-023-00574-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-357196},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Background Recent data from the randomized SUSTAIN CSX trial could not confirm clinical benefits from perioperative selenium treatment in high-risk cardiac surgery patients. Underlying reasons may involve inadequate biosynthesis of glutathione peroxidase (GPx3), which is a key mediator of selenium's antioxidant effects. This secondary analysis aimed to identify patients with an increase in GPx3 activity following selenium treatment. We hypothesize that these responders might benefit from perioperative selenium treatment. Methods Patients were selected based on the availability of selenium biomarker information. Four subgroups were defined according to the patient's baseline status, including those with normal kidney function, reduced kidney function, selenium deficiency, and submaximal GPx3 activity. Results Two hundred and forty-four patients were included in this analysis. Overall, higher serum concentrations of selenium, selenoprotein P (SELENOP) and GPx3 were correlated with less organ injury. GPx3 activity at baseline was predictive of 6-month survival (AUC 0.73; p = 0.03). While selenium treatment elevated serum selenium and SELENOP concentrations but not GPx3 activity in the full patient cohort, subgroup analyses revealed that GPx3 activity increased in patients with reduced kidney function, selenium deficiency and low to moderate GPx3 activity. Clinical outcomes did not vary between selenium treatment and placebo in any of these subgroups, though the study was not powered to conclusively detect differences in outcomes. Conclusions The identification of GPx3 responders encourages further refined investigations into the treatment effects of selenium in high-risk cardiac surgery patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MengerLeeNotzetal.2022,
  author    = {Menger, Johannes and Lee, Zheng-Yii and Notz, Quirin and Wallqvist, Julia and Hasan, M. Shahnaz and Elke, Gunnar and Dworschak, Martin and Meybohm, Patrick and Heyland, Daren K. and Stoppe, Christian},
  title     = {Administration of vitamin D and its metabolites in critically ill adult patients: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials},
  series = {Critical Care},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Critical Care},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13054-022-04139-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-299700},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background The clinical significance of vitamin D administration in critically ill patients remains inconclusive. The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of vitamin D and its metabolites on major clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, including a subgroup analysis based on vitamin D status and route of vitamin D administration. Methods Major databases were searched through February 9, 2022. Randomized controlled trials of adult critically ill patients with an intervention group receiving vitamin D or its metabolites were included. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed to estimate the pooled risk ratio (dichotomized outcomes) or mean difference (continuous outcomes). Risk of bias assessment included the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Results Sixteen randomized clinical trials with 2449 patients were included. Vitamin D administration was associated with lower overall mortality (16 studies: risk ratio 0.78, 95\% confidence interval 0.62-0.97, p = 0.03; I2 = 30\%), reduced intensive care unit length of stay (12 studies: mean difference - 3.13 days, 95\% CI - 5.36 to - 0.89, n = 1250, p = 0.006; I2 = 70\%), and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (9 studies: mean difference - 5.07 days, 95\% CI - 7.42 to - 2.73, n = 572, p < 0.0001; I2 = 54\%). Parenteral administration was associated with a greater effect on overall mortality than enteral administration (test of subgroup differences, p = 0.04), whereas studies of parenteral subgroups had lower quality. There were no subgroup differences based on baseline vitamin D levels. Conclusions Vitamin D supplementation in critically ill patients may reduce mortality. Parenteral administration might be associated with a greater impact on mortality. Heterogeneity and assessed certainty among the studies limits the generalizability of the results.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{NotzLeeMengeretal.2022,
  author    = {Notz, Quirin and Lee, Zheng-Yii and Menger, Johannes and Elke, Gunnar and Hill, Aileen and Kranke, Peter and Roeder, Daniel and Lotz, Christopher and Meybohm, Patrick and Heyland, Daren K. and Stoppe, Christian},
  title     = {Omega-6 sparing effects of parenteral lipid emulsions-an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients},
  series = {Critical Care},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Critical Care},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13054-022-03896-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-299710},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background Parenteral lipid emulsions in critical care are traditionally based on soybean oil (SO) and rich in pro-inflammatory omega-6 fatty acids (FAs). Parenteral nutrition (PN) strategies with the aim of reducing omega-6 FAs may potentially decrease the morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and CENTRAL was conducted to identify all randomized controlled trials in critically ill patients published from inception to June 2021, which investigated clinical omega-6 sparing effects. Two independent reviewers extracted bias risk, treatment details, patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. Random effect meta-analysis was performed. Results 1054 studies were identified in our electronic search, 136 trials were assessed for eligibility and 26 trials with 1733 critically ill patients were included. The median methodologic score was 9 out of 14 points (95\% confidence interval [CI] 7, 10). Omega-6 FA sparing PN in comparison with traditional lipid emulsions did not decrease overall mortality (20 studies; risk ratio [RR] 0.91; 95\% CI 0.76, 1.10; p = 0.34) but hospital length of stay was substantially reduced (6 studies; weighted mean difference [WMD] - 6.88; 95\% CI - 11.27, - 2.49; p = 0.002). Among the different lipid emulsions, fish oil (FO) containing PN reduced the length of intensive care (8 studies; WMD - 3.53; 95\% CI - 6.16, - 0.90; p = 0.009) and rate of infectious complications (4 studies; RR 0.65; 95\% CI 0.44, 0.95; p = 0.03). When FO was administered as a stand-alone medication outside PN, potential mortality benefits were observed compared to standard care. Conclusion Overall, these findings highlight distinctive omega-6 sparing effects attributed to PN. Among the different lipid emulsions, FO in combination with PN or as a stand-alone treatment may have the greatest clinical impact.},
  language  = {en}
}