@article{AngheloiuHaenscheidWenetal.2012,
  author    = {Angheloiu, George O. and H{\"a}nscheid, Heribert and Wen, Xiaoyan and Capponi, Vincent and Anderson, William D. and Kellum, John A.},
  title     = {Experimental first-pass method for testing and comparing sorbent polymers used in the clearance of iodine contrast materials},
  series = {Blood Purification},
  volume    = {34},
  journal   = {Blood Purification},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {0253-5068},
  doi       = {10.1159/000339816},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-199118},
  pages     = {34-39},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Background: Sorbents have been shown to adsorb iodinated radiocontrast media. Objective: In this study we describe a simple method to compare various sorbents in terms of capacity to adsorb radiocontrast media. Methods: Iodixanol solution was injected into columns filled with three types of sorbent at filtration velocities of increasing magnitude. Two variables of interest - contrast removal rate and matched iodine retention (MIR) - were calculated to measure the adsorption efficiency and the mass of contrast iodine adsorbed versus sorbent used, respectively. Results: The highest contrast removal and MIR for Porapak Q, CST 401 and Amberlite XAD4 were 41, 38 and 16\% (p = 0.22 and 0.0005 for comparisons between Porapak Q-CST 401 and CST 401-Amberlite XAD4) and 0.060, 0.055 and 0.024, respectively (p = 0.18 and 0.0008). Extrapolation to a clinical scenario may suggest that removal of 8 ml iodixanol could be achieved by masses of sorbents of 43, 47 and 107 g, respectively. Conclusion: In this study we set a benchmark for comparing the radiocontrast-adsorbing efficiency of polymer sorbents during first-pass experiments, using a readily available methodology.},
  language  = {en}
}