@article{ZhouFluechterNickeletal.2020,
  author    = {Zhou, Xiang and Fl{\"u}chter, Patricia and Nickel, Katharina and Meckel, Katharina and Messerschmidt, Janin and B{\"o}ckle, David and Knorz, Sebastian and Steinhardt, Maximilian Johannes and Krummenast, Franziska and Danhof, Sophia and Einsele, Hermann and Kort{\"u}m, K. Martin and Rasche, Leo},
  title     = {Carfilzomib based treatment strategies in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers12041035},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-203704},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Published experience with carfilzomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and extramedullary disease (EMD) is still limited. The current study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of carfilzomib containing therapy regimens in EMD. We retrospectively analyzed 45 patients with extramedullary RRMM treated with carfilzomib from June 2013 to September 2019. The median age at the start of carfilzomib was 64 (range 40-80) years. Twenty (44\%) and 25 (56\%) patients had paraosseous manifestation and EMD without adjacency to bone, respectively. The serological overall response rate (ORR) was 59\%. Extramedullary response was evaluable in 33 patients, nine (27\%) of them achieved partial remission (PR) (ORR = 27\%). In 15 (33\%) patients, we observed no extramedullary response despite serological response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were five (95\% CI, 3.5-6.5) and ten (95\% CI, 7.5-12.5) months, respectively. EMD without adjacency to bone was associated with a significantly inferior PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.04) compared to paraosseous lesions. Carfilzomib based treatment strategies showed some efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with extramedullary RRMM but could not overcome the negative prognostic value of EMD. Due to the discrepancy between serological and extramedullary response, evaluation of extramedullary response using imaging is mandatory in these patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SteinhardtWiercinskaPhametal.2020,
  author    = {Steinhardt, M. J. and Wiercinska, E. and Pham, M. and Grigoleit, G. U. and Mazzoni, A. and Da-Via, M. and Zhou, X. and Meckel, K. and Nickel, K. and Duell, J. and Krummenast, F. C. and Kraus, S. and Hopkinson, C. and Weissbrich, B. and M{\"u}llges, W. and Stoll, G. and Kort{\"u}m, K. M. and Einsele, H. and Bonig, H. and Rasche, L.},
  title     = {Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in a patient post allo-HCT successfully treated with JC virus specific donor lymphocytes},
  series = {Journal of Translational Medicine},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {Journal of Translational Medicine},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12967-020-02337-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229307},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is a demyelinating CNS disorder. Reactivation of John Cunningham virus leads to oligodendrocyte infection with lysis and consequent axonal loss due to demyelination. Patients usually present with confusion and seizures. Late diagnosis and lack of adequate therapy options persistently result in permanent impairment of brain functions. Due to profound T cell depletion, impairment of T-cell function and potent immunosuppressive factors, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients are at high risk for JCV reactivation. To date, PML is almost universally fatal when occurring after allo-HCT. Methods To optimize therapy specificity, we enriched JCV specific T-cells out of the donor T-cell repertoire from the HLA-identical, anti-JCV-antibody positive family stem cell donor by unstimulated peripheral apheresis [1]. For this, we selected T cells responsive to five JCV peptide libraries via the Cytokine Capture System technology. It enables the enrichment of JCV specific T cells via identification of stimulus-induced interferon gamma secretion. Results Despite low frequencies of responsive T cells, we succeeded in generating a product containing 20 000 JCV reactive T cells ready for patient infusion. The adoptive cell transfer was performed without complication. Consequently, the clinical course stabilized and the patient slowly went into remission of PML with JCV negative CSF and containment of PML lesion expansion. Conclusion We report for the first time feasibility of generating T cells with possible anti-JCV activity from a seropositive family donor, a variation of virus specific T-cell therapies suitable for the post allo transplant setting. We also present the unusual case for successful treatment of PML after allo-HCT via virus specific T-cell therapy.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlammertMuellerHellmannetal.2015,
  author    = {Klammert, Uwe and M{\"u}ller, Thomas D. and Hellmann, Tina V. and Wuerzler, Kristian K. and Kotzsch, Alexander and Schliermann, Anna and Schmitz, Werner and Kuebler, Alexander C. and Sebald, Walter and Nickel, Joachim},
  title     = {GDF-5 can act as a context-dependent BMP-2 antagonist},
  series = {BMC Biology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {BMC Biology},
  number    = {77},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12915-015-0183-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-125550},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 and growth and differentiation factor (GDF)-5 are two related transforming growth factor (TGF)-β family members with important functions in embryonic development and tissue homeostasis. BMP-2 is best known for its osteoinductive properties whereas GDF-5—as evident from its alternative name, cartilage derived morphogenetic protein 1—plays an important role in the formation of cartilage. In spite of these differences both factors signal by binding to the same subset of BMP receptors, raising the question how these different functionalities are generated. The largest difference in receptor binding is observed in the interaction with the type I receptor BMPR-IA. GDF-5, in contrast to BMP-2, shows preferential binding to the isoform BMPR-IB, which is abrogated by a single amino acid (A57R) substitution. The resulting variant, GDF-5 R57A, represents a "BMP-2 mimic" with respect to BMP receptor binding. In this study we thus wanted to analyze whether the two growth factors can induce distinct signals via an identically composed receptor. Results Unexpectedly and dependent on the cellular context, GDF-5 R57A showed clear differences in its activity compared to BMP-2. In ATDC-5 cells, both ligands induced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression with similar potency. But in C2C12 cells, the BMP-2 mimic GDF-5 R57A (and also wild-type GDF-5) clearly antagonized BMP-2-mediated ALP expression, despite signaling in both cell lines occurring solely via BMPR-IA. The BMP-2- antagonizing properties of GDF-5 and GDF-5 R57A could also be observed in vivo when implanting BMP-2 and either one of the two GDF-5 ligands simultaneously at heterotopic sites. Conclusions Although comparison of the crystal structures of the GDF-5 R57A:BMPR-IAEC- and BMP-2:BMPR-IAEC complex revealed small ligand-specific differences, these cannot account for the different signaling characteristics because the complexes seem identical in both differently reacting cell lines. We thus predict an additional component, most likely a not yet identified GDF-5-specific co-receptor, which alters the output of the signaling complexes. Hence the presence or absence of this component then switches GDF-5′s signaling capabilities to act either similar to BMP-2 or as a BMP-2 antagonist. These findings might shed new light on the role of GDF-5, e.g., in cartilage maintenance and/or limb development in that it might act as an inhibitor of signaling events initiated by other BMPs.},
  language  = {en}
}