@article{GaudronLiuScholzetal.2016,
  author    = {Gaudron, Philipp Daniel and Liu, Dan and Scholz, Friederike and Hu, Kai and Florescu, Christiane and Herrmann, Sebastian and Bijnens, Bart and Ertl, Georg and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Weidemann, Frank},
  title     = {The septal bulge - an early echocardiographic sign in hypertensive heart disease},
  series = {Journal of the American Society of Hypertension},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Journal of the American Society of Hypertension},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jash.2015.11.006},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-191433},
  pages     = {70-80},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Patients in the early stage of hypertensive heart disease tend to have normal echocardiographic findings. The aim of this study was to investigate whether pathology-specific echocardiographic morphologic and functional parameters can help to detect subclinical hypertensive heart disease. One hundred ten consecutive patients without a history and medication for arterial hypertension (AH) or other cardiac diseases were enrolled. Standard echocardiography and two-dimensional speckle tracking -imaging analysis were performed. Resting blood pressure (BP) measurement, cycle ergometer test (CET), and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) were conducted. Patients were referred to "septal bulge (SB)" group (basal-septal wall thickness >= 2 mm thicker than mid-septal wall thickness) or "no-SB" group. Echocardiographic SB was found in 48 (43.6\%) of 110 patients. In this SB group, 38 (79.2\%) patients showed AH either by CET or ABPM. In contrast, in the no-SB group (n = 62), 59 (95.2\%) patients had no positive test for AH by CET or ABPM. When AH was solely defined by resting BP, SB was a reasonable predictive sign for AH (sensitivity 73\%, specificity 76\%). However, when AH was confirmed by CET or ABPM the echocardiographic SB strongly predicted clinical AH (sensitivity 93\%, specificity 86\%). In addition, regional myocardial deformation of the basal-septum in SB group was significantly lower than in no-SB group (14 +/- 4\% vs. 17 +/- 4\%; P < .001). In conclusion, SB is a morphologic echocardiographic sign for early hypertensive heart disease. Sophisticated BP evaluation including resting BP, ABPM, and CET should be performed in all patients with an accidental finding of a SB in echocardiography.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LiuHuLauetal.2021,
  author    = {Liu, Dan and Hu, Kai and Lau, Kolja and Kiwitz, Tobias and Robitzkat, Katharina and Hammel, Clara and Lengenfelder, Bj{\"o}rn Daniel and Ertl, Georg and Frantz, Stefan and Nordbeck, Peter},
  title     = {Impact of diastolic dysfunction on outcome in heart failure patients with mid-range or reduced ejection fraction},
  series = {ESC Heart Failure},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {ESC Heart Failure},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1002/ehf2.13352},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258894},
  pages     = {2802-2815},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Aims The role of diastolic dysfunction (DD) in prognostic evaluation in heart failure (HF) patients with impaired systolic function remains unclear. We investigated the impact of echocardiography-defined DD on survival in HF patients with mid-range (HFmrEF, EF 41-49\%) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, EF < 40\%). Methods and results A total of 2018 consecutive hospitalized HF patients were retrospectively included and divided in two groups based on baseline EF: HFmrEF group (n = 951, aged 69 ± 13 years, 74.2\% male) and HFrEF group (n = 1067, aged 68 ± 13 years, 76.3\% male). Clinical data were collected and analysed. All patients completed ≥1 year clinical follow-up. The primary endpoint was defined as all-cause death (including heart transplantation) and cardiovascular (CV)-related death. All-cause mortality (30.8\% vs. 24.9\%, P = 0.003) and CV mortality (19.1\% vs. 13.5\%, P = 0.001) were significantly higher in the HFrEF group than the HFmrEF group during follow-up [median 24 (13-36) months]. All-cause mortality increased in proportion to DD severity (mild, moderate, and severe) in either HFmrEF (17.1\%, 25.4\%, and 37.0\%, P < 0.001) or HFrEF (18.9\%, 30.3\%, and 39.2\%, P < 0.001) patients. The risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.347, P = 0.015] and CV mortality (HR = 1.508, P = 0.007) was significantly higher in HFrEF patients with severe DD compared with non-severe DD after adjustment for identified clinical and echocardiographic covariates. For HFmrEF patients, severe DD was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR = 1.358, P = 0.046) but not with CV mortality (HR = 1.155, P = 0.469). Conclusions Echocardiography-defined severe DD is independently associated with increased all-cause mortality in patients with HFmrEF and HFrEF.},
  language  = {en}
}