@article{VazquezRodriguezVilarKachleretal.2020,
  author    = {Vazquez-Rodriguez, Saleta and Vilar, Santiago and Kachler, Sonja and Klotz, Karl-Norbert and Uriarte, Eugenio and Borges, Fernanda and Matos, Maria Jo{\~a}o},
  title     = {Adenosine receptor ligands: coumarin-chalcone hybrids as modulating agents on the activity of hARs},
  series = {Molecules},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Molecules},
  number    = {18},
  issn      = {1420-3049},
  doi       = {10.3390/molecules25184306},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-213165},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Adenosine receptors (ARs) play an important role in neurological and psychiatric disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy and schizophrenia. The different subtypes of ARs and the knowledge on their densities and status are important for understanding the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of diseases and for developing new therapeutics. Looking for new scaffolds for selective AR ligands, coumarin-chalcone hybrids were synthesized (compounds 1-8) and screened in radioligand binding (hA\(_1\), hA\(_{2A}\) and hA\(_3\)) and adenylyl cyclase (hA\(_{2B}\)) assays in order to evaluate their affinity for the four human AR subtypes (hARs). Coumarin-chalcone hybrid has been established as a new scaffold suitable for the development of potent and selective ligands for hA\(_1\) or hA\(_3\) subtypes. In general, hydroxy-substituted hybrids showed some affinity for the hA\(_1\), while the methoxy counterparts were selective for the hA\(_3\). The most potent hA\(_1\) ligand was compound 7 (K\(_i\) = 17.7 µM), whereas compound 4 was the most potent ligand for hA\(_3\) (K\(_i\) = 2.49 µM). In addition, docking studies with hA\(_1\) and hA\(_3\) homology models were established to analyze the structure-function relationships. Results showed that the different residues located on the protein binding pocket could play an important role in ligand selectivity.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SpinaciLambertucciBuccionietal.2022,
  author    = {Spinaci, Andrea and Lambertucci, Catia and Buccioni, Michela and Dal Ben, Diego and Graiff, Claudia and Barbalace, Maria Cristina and Hrelia, Silvana and Angeloni, Cristina and Tayebati, Seyed Khosrow and Ubaldi, Massimo and Masi, Alessio and Klotz, Karl-Norbert and Volpini, Rosaria and Marucci, Gabriella},
  title     = {A\(_{2A}\) adenosine receptor antagonists: are triazolotriazine and purine scaffolds interchangeable?},
  series = {Molecules},
  volume    = {27},
  journal   = {Molecules},
  number    = {8},
  issn      = {1420-3049},
  doi       = {10.3390/molecules27082386},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-270618},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The A\(_{2A}\) adenosine receptor (A\(_{2A}\)AR) is one of the four subtypes activated by nucleoside adenosine, and the molecules able to selectively counteract its action are attractive tools for neurodegenerative disorders. In order to find novel A\(_{2A}\)AR ligands, two series of compounds based on purine and triazolotriazine scaffolds were synthesized and tested at ARs. Compound 13 was also tested in an in vitro model of neuroinflammation. Some compounds were found to possess high affinity for A\(_{2A}\)AR, and it was observed that compound 13 exerted anti-inflammatory properties in microglial cells. Molecular modeling studies results were in good agreement with the binding affinity data and underlined that triazolotriazine and purine scaffolds are interchangeable only when 5- and 2-positions of the triazolotriazine moiety (corresponding to the purine 2- and 8-positions) are substituted.},
  language  = {en}
}