@article{ZhouFluechterNickeletal.2020,
  author    = {Zhou, Xiang and Fl{\"u}chter, Patricia and Nickel, Katharina and Meckel, Katharina and Messerschmidt, Janin and B{\"o}ckle, David and Knorz, Sebastian and Steinhardt, Maximilian Johannes and Krummenast, Franziska and Danhof, Sophia and Einsele, Hermann and Kort{\"u}m, K. Martin and Rasche, Leo},
  title     = {Carfilzomib based treatment strategies in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers12041035},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-203704},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Published experience with carfilzomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and extramedullary disease (EMD) is still limited. The current study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of carfilzomib containing therapy regimens in EMD. We retrospectively analyzed 45 patients with extramedullary RRMM treated with carfilzomib from June 2013 to September 2019. The median age at the start of carfilzomib was 64 (range 40-80) years. Twenty (44\%) and 25 (56\%) patients had paraosseous manifestation and EMD without adjacency to bone, respectively. The serological overall response rate (ORR) was 59\%. Extramedullary response was evaluable in 33 patients, nine (27\%) of them achieved partial remission (PR) (ORR = 27\%). In 15 (33\%) patients, we observed no extramedullary response despite serological response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were five (95\% CI, 3.5-6.5) and ten (95\% CI, 7.5-12.5) months, respectively. EMD without adjacency to bone was associated with a significantly inferior PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.04) compared to paraosseous lesions. Carfilzomib based treatment strategies showed some efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with extramedullary RRMM but could not overcome the negative prognostic value of EMD. Due to the discrepancy between serological and extramedullary response, evaluation of extramedullary response using imaging is mandatory in these patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZhouSteinhardtDuelletal.2020,
  author    = {Zhou, Xiang and Steinhardt, Maximilian Johannes and D{\"u}ll, Johannes and Krummenast, Franziska and Danhof, Sophia and Meckel, Katharina and Nickel, Katharina and Grathwohl, Denise and Leicht, Hans-Benno and Rosenwald, Andreas and Einsele, Hermann and Rasche, Leo and Kort{\"u}m, Martin},
  title     = {Obinutuzumab and venetoclax induced complete remission in a patient with ibrutinib-resistant non-nodal leukemic mantle cell lymphoma},
  series = {European Journal of Haematology},
  volume    = {104},
  journal   = {European Journal of Haematology},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1111/ejh.13382},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-215513},
  pages     = {352 -- 355},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {We herein report the case of a 73-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with leukemic non-nodal MCL. This patient had received six cycles of bendamustine, which resulted in a transient remission, and a second-line therapy with ibrutinib, which unfortunately failed to induce remission. We started a treatment with single-agent obinutuzumab at a dose of 20 mg on day 1, 50 mg on day 2-4, 330 mg on day 5, and 1000 mg on day 6. The laboratory analysis showed a rapid decrease of leukocyte count. Four weeks later, we repeated the treatment with obinutuzumab at a dose of 1000 mg q4w and started a therapy with venetoclax at a dose of 400 mg qd, which could be increased to 800 mg qd from the third cycle. This combination therapy was well tolerated. The patient achieved a complete remission (CR) after three cycles of obinutuzumab and venetoclax. To date, the patient has a progression-free survival of 17 months under ongoing obinutuzumab maintenance q4w. This is the first report about obinutuzumab and venetoclax induced CR in rituximab-intolerant patient with an ibrutinib-resistant MCL. This case suggests that obinutuzumab- and venetoclax-based combination therapy might be salvage therapy in patients with ibrutinib-resistant MCL.},
  language  = {en}
}