@article{JuhaszGondaHullametal.2015,
  author    = {Juhasz, Gabriella and Gonda, Xenia and Hullam, Gabor and Eszlari, Nora and Kovacs, David and Lazary, Judit and Pap, Dorottya and Petschner, Peter and Elliott, Rebecca and Deakin, John Francis William and Muir Anderson, Ian and Antal, Peter and Lesch, Klaus-Peter and Bagdy, Gyorgy},
  title     = {Variability in the effect of 5-HTTLPR on depression in a large European population: the role of age, symptom profile, type and intensity of life stressors},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0116316},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-143703},
  pages     = {e0116316},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background Although 5-HTTLPR has been shown to influence the risk of life stress-induced depression in the majority of studies, others have produced contradictory results, possibly due to weak effects and/or sample heterogeneity. Methods In the present study we investigated how age, type and intensity of life-stressors modulate the effect of 5-HTTLPR on depression and anxiety in a European population cohort of over 2300 subjects. Recent negative life events (RLE), childhood adversity (CHA), lifetime depression, Brief Symptoms Inventory (BSI) depression and anxiety scores were determined in each subject. Besides traditional statistical analysis we calculated Bayesian effect strength and relevance of 5-HTTLPR genotypes in specified models. Results The short (s) low expressing allele showed association with increased risk of depression related phenotypes, but all nominally significant effects would turn to non-significant after correction for multiple testing in the traditional analysis. Bayesian effect strength and relevance analysis, however, confirmed the role of 5-HTTLPR. Regarding current (BSI) and lifetime depression 5-HTTLPR-by-RLE interactions were confirmed. Main effect, with other words direct association, was supported with BSI anxiety. With more frequent RLE the prevalence or symptoms of depression increased in ss carriers. Although CHA failed to show an interaction with 5-HTTLPR, in young subjects CHA sensitized towards the depression promoting effect of even mild RLE. Furthermore, the direct association of anxiety with the s allele was driven by young (\(\leq\)30) individuals. Limitations Our study is cross-sectional and applies self-report questionnaires. Conclusions Albeit 5-HTTLPR has only weak/moderate effects, the s allele is directly associated with anxiety and modulates development of depression in homogeneous subgroups.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlokeSchreiberBoddenetal.2014,
  author    = {Kloke, Vanessa and Schreiber, Rebecca S. and Bodden, Carina and M{\"o}llers, Julian and Ruhmann, Hanna and Kaiser, Sylvia and Lesch, Klaus-Peter and Sachser, Norbert and Lewejohann, Lars},
  title     = {Hope for the Best or Prepare for the Worst? Towards a Spatial Cognitive Bias Test for Mice},
  series = {PLOS ONE},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {PLOS ONE},
  number    = {8},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0105431},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-115569},
  pages     = {e105431},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Cognitive bias, the altered information processing resulting from the background emotional state of an individual, has been suggested as a promising new indicator of animal emotion. Comparable to anxious or depressed humans, animals in a putatively negative emotional state are more likely to judge an ambiguous stimulus as if it predicts a negative event, than those in positive states. The present study aimed to establish a cognitive bias test for mice based on a spatial judgment task and to apply it in a pilot study to serotonin transporter (5-HTT) knockout mice, a well-established mouse model for the study of anxiety- and depression-related behavior. In a first step, we validated that our setup can assess different expectations about the outcome of an ambiguous stimulus: mice having learned to expect something positive within a maze differed significantly in their behavior towards an unfamiliar location than animals having learned to expect something negative. In a second step, the use of spatial location as a discriminatory stimulus was confirmed by showing that mice interpret an ambiguous stimulus depending on its spatial location, with a position exactly midway between a positive and a negative reference point provoking the highest level of ambiguity. Finally, the anxiety- and depression-like phenotype of the 5-HTT knockout mouse model manifested - comparable to human conditions - in a trend for a negatively distorted interpretation of ambiguous information, albeit this effect was not statistically significant. The results suggest that the present cognitive bias test provides a useful basis to study the emotional state in mice, which may not only increase the translational value of animal models in the study of human affective disorders, but which is also a central objective of animal welfare research.},
  language  = {en}
}