@article{FerreiraGamazonAlEjehetal.2019,
  author    = {Ferreira, Manuel A. and Gamazon, Eric R. and Al-Ejeh, Fares and Aittom{\"a}ki, Kristiina and Andrulis, Irene L. and Anton-Culver, Hoda and Arason, Adalgeir and Arndt, Volker and Aronson, Kristan J. and Arun, Banu K. and Asseryanis, Ella and Azzollini, Jacopo and Balma{\~n}a, Judith and Barnes, Daniel R. and Barrowdale, Daniel and Beckmann, Matthias W. and Behrens, Sabine and Benitez, Javier and Bermisheva, Marina and Bialkowska, Katarzyna and Blomqvist, Carl and Bogdanova, Natalia V. and Bojesen, Stig E. and Bolla, Manjeet K. and Borg, Ake and Brauch, Hiltrud and Brenner, Hermann and Broeks, Annegien and Burwinkel, Barbara and Cald{\´e}s, Trinidad and Caligo, Maria A. and Campa, Daniele and Campbell, Ian and Canzian, Federico and Carter, Jonathan and Carter, Brian D. and Castelao, Jose E. and Chang-Claude, Jenny and Chanock, Stephen J. and Christiansen, Hans and Chung, Wendy K. and Claes, Kathleen B. M. and Clarke, Christine L. and Couch, Fergus J. and Cox, Angela and Cross, Simon S. and Czene, Kamila and Daly, Mary B. and de la Hoya, Miguel and Dennis, Joe and Devilee, Peter and Diez, Orland and D{\"o}rk, Thilo and Dunning, Alison M. and Dwek, Miriam and Eccles, Diana M. and Ejlertsen, Bent and Ellberg, Carolina and Engel, Christoph and Eriksson, Mikael and Fasching, Peter A. and Fletcher, Olivia and Flyger, Henrik and Friedman, Eitan and Frost, Debra and Gabrielson, Marike and Gago-Dominguez, Manuela and Ganz, Patricia A. and Gapstur, Susan M. and Garber, Judy and Garc{\´i}a-Closas, Montserrat and Garc{\´i}a-S{\´a}enz, Jos{\´e} A. and Gaudet, Mia M. and Giles, Graham G. and Glendon, Gord and Godwin, Andrew K. and Goldberg, Mark S. and Goldgar, David E. and Gonz{\´a}lez-Neira, Anna and Greene, Mark H. and Gronwald, Jacek and Guen{\´e}l, Pascal and Haimann, Christopher A. and Hall, Per and Hamann, Ute and He, Wei and Heyworth, Jane and Hogervorst, Frans B. L. and Hollestelle, Antoinette and Hoover, Robert N. and Hopper, John L. and Hulick, Peter J. and Humphreys, Keith and Imyanitov, Evgeny N. and Isaacs, Claudine and Jakimovska, Milena and Jakubowska, Anna and James, Paul A. and Janavicius, Ramunas and Jankowitz, Rachel C. and John, Esther M. and Johnson, Nichola and Joseph, Vijai and Karlan, Beth Y. and Khusnutdinova, Elza and Kiiski, Johanna I. and Ko, Yon-Dschun and Jones, Michael E. and Konstantopoulou, Irene and Kristensen, Vessela N. and Laitman, Yael and Lambrechts, Diether and Lazaro, Conxi and Leslie, Goska and Lester, Jenny and Lesueur, Fabienne and Lindstr{\"o}m, Sara and Long, Jirong and Loud, Jennifer T. and Lubiński, Jan and Makalic, Enes and Mannermaa, Arto and Manoochehri, Mehdi and Margolin, Sara and Maurer, Tabea and Mavroudis, Dimitrios and McGuffog, Lesley and Meindl, Alfons and Menon, Usha and Michailidou, Kyriaki and Miller, Austin and Montagna, Marco and Moreno, Fernando and Moserle, Lidia and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Nathanson, Katherine L. and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Nevanlinna, Heli and Nevelsteen, Ines and Nielsen, Finn C. and Nikitina-Zake, Liene and Nussbaum, Robert L. and Offit, Kenneth and Olah, Edith and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Olsson, H{\aa}kan and Osorio, Ana and Papp, Janos and Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won and Parsons, Michael T. and Pedersen, Inge Sokilde and Peixoto, Ana and Peterlongo, Paolo and Pharaoh, Paul D. P. and Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana and Poppe, Bruce and Presneau, Nadege and Radice, Paolo and Rantala, Johanna and Rennert, Gad and Risch, Harvey A. and Saloustros, Emmanouil and Sanden, Kristin and Sawyer, Elinor J. and Schmidt, Marjanka K. and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Sharma, Priyanka and Shu, Xiao-Ou and Simard, Jaques and Singer, Christian F. and Soucy, Penny and Southey, Melissa C. and Spinelli, John J. and Spurdle, Amanda B. and Stone, Jennifer and Swerdlow, Anthony J. and Tapper, William J. and Taylor, Jack A. and Teixeira, Manuel R. and Terry, Mary Beth and Teul{\´e}, Alex and Thomassen, Mads and Th{\"o}ne, Kathrin and Thull, Darcy L. and Tischkowitz, Marc and Toland, Amanda E. and Torres, Diana and Truong, Th{\´e}r{\`e}se and Tung, Nadine and Vachon, Celine M. and van Asperen, Christi J. and van den Ouweland, Ans M. W. and van Rensburg, Elizabeth J. and Vega, Ana and Viel, Alexandra and Wang, Qin and Wappenschmidt, Barbara and Weitzel, Jeffrey N. and Wendt, Camilla and Winqvist, Robert and Yang, Xiaohong R. and Yannoukakos, Drakoulis and Ziogas, Argyrios and Kraft, Peter and Antoniou, Antonis C. and Zheng, Wei and Easton, Douglas F. and Milne, Roger L. and Beesley, Jonathan and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia},
  title     = {Genome-wide association and transcriptome studies identify target genes and risk loci for breast cancer},
  series = {Nature Communications},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Nature Communications},
  organization    = {EMBRACE Collaborators, GC-HBOC Study Collaborators, GEMO Study Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, HEBON Investigators, BCFR Investigators},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41467-018-08053-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228024},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 170 breast cancer susceptibility loci. Here we hypothesize that some risk-associated variants might act in non-breast tissues, specifically adipose tissue and immune cells from blood and spleen. Using expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) reported in these tissues, we identify 26 previously unreported, likely target genes of overall breast cancer risk variants, and 17 for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer, several with a known immune function. We determine the directional effect of gene expression on disease risk measured based on single and multiple eQTL. In addition, using a gene-based test of association that considers eQTL from multiple tissues, we identify seven (and four) regions with variants associated with overall (and ER-negative) breast cancer risk, which were not reported in previous GWAS. Further investigation of the function of the implicated genes in breast and immune cells may provide insights into the etiology of breast cancer.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GalluzziBravoSanPedroVitaleetal.2015,
  author    = {Galluzzi, L. and Bravo-San Pedro, J. M. and Vitale, I. and Aaronson, S. A. and Abrams, J. M. and Adam, D. and Alnemri, E. S. and Altucci, L. and Andrews, D. and Annicchiarico-Petruzelli, M. and Baehrecke, E. H. and Bazan, N. G. and Bertrand, M. J. and Bianchi, K. and Blagosklonny, M. V. and Blomgren, K. and Borner, C. and Bredesen, D. E. and Brenner, C. and Campanella, M. and Candi, E. and Cecconi, F. and Chan, F. K. and Chandel, N. S. and Cheng, E. H. and Chipuk, J. E. and Cidlowski, J. A. and Ciechanover, A. and Dawson, T. M. and Dawson, V. L. and De Laurenzi, V. and De Maria, R. and Debatin, K. M. and Di Daniele, N. and Dixit, V. M. and Dynlacht, B. D. and El-Deiry, W. S. and Fimia, G. M. and Flavell, R. A. and Fulda, S. and Garrido, C. and Gougeon, M. L. and Green, D. R. and Gronemeyer, H. and Hajnoczky, G. and Hardwick, J. M. and Hengartner, M. O. and Ichijo, H. and Joseph, B. and Jost, P. J. and Kaufmann, T. and Kepp, O. and Klionsky, D. J. and Knight, R. A. and Kumar, S. and Lemasters, J. J. and Levine, B. and Linkermann, A. and Lipton, S. A. and Lockshin, R. A. and L{\´o}pez-Ot{\´i}n, C. and Lugli, E. and Madeo, F. and Malorni, W. and Marine, J. C. and Martin, S. J. and Martinou, J. C. and Medema, J. P. and Meier, P. and Melino, S. and Mizushima, N. and Moll, U. and Mu{\~n}oz-Pinedo, C. and Nu{\~n}ez, G. and Oberst, A. and Panaretakis, T. and Penninger, J. M. and Peter, M. E. and Piacentini, M. and Pinton, P. and Prehn, J. H. and Puthalakath, H. and Rabinovich, G. A. and Ravichandran, K. S. and Rizzuto, R. and Rodrigues, C. M. and Rubinsztein, D. C. and Rudel, T. and Shi, Y. and Simon, H. U. and Stockwell, B. R. and Szabadkai, G. and Tait, S. W. and Tang, H. L. and Tavernarakis, N. and Tsujimoto, Y. and Vanden Berghe, T. and Vandenabeele, P. and Villunger, A. and Wagner, E. F. and Walczak, H. and White, E. and Wood, W. G. and Yuan, J. and Zakeri, Z. and Zhivotovsky, B. and Melino, G. and Kroemer, G.},
  title     = {Essential versus accessory aspects of cell death: recommendations of the NCCD 2015},
  series = {Cell Death and Differentiation},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {Cell Death and Differentiation},
  doi       = {10.1038/cdd.2014.137},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121207},
  pages     = {58-73},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Cells exposed to extreme physicochemical or mechanical stimuli die in an uncontrollable manner, as a result of their immediate structural breakdown. Such an unavoidable variant of cellular demise is generally referred to as 'accidental cell death' (ACD). In most settings, however, cell death is initiated by a genetically encoded apparatus, correlating with the fact that its course can be altered by pharmacologic or genetic interventions. 'Regulated cell death' (RCD) can occur as part of physiologic programs or can be activated once adaptive responses to perturbations of the extracellular or intracellular microenvironment fail. The biochemical phenomena that accompany RCD may be harnessed to classify it into a few subtypes, which often (but not always) exhibit stereotyped morphologic features. Nonetheless, efficiently inhibiting the processes that are commonly thought to cause RCD, such as the activation of executioner caspases in the course of apoptosis, does not exert true cytoprotective effects in the mammalian system, but simply alters the kinetics of cellular demise as it shifts its morphologic and biochemical correlates. Conversely, bona fide cytoprotection can be achieved by inhibiting the transduction of lethal signals in the early phases of the process, when adaptive responses are still operational. Thus, the mechanisms that truly execute RCD may be less understood, less inhibitable and perhaps more homogeneous than previously thought. Here, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death formulates a set of recommendations to help scientists and researchers to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of cell death.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HudsonNewboldContuetal.2014,
  author    = {Hudson, Lawrence N. and Newbold, Tim and Contu, Sara and Hill, Samantha L. L. and Lysenko, Igor and De Palma, Adriana and Phillips, Helen R. P. and Senior, Rebecca A. and Bennett, Dominic J. and Booth, Hollie and Choimes, Argyrios and Correia, David L. P. and Day, Julie and Echeverria-Londono, Susy and Garon, Morgan and Harrison, Michelle L. K. and Ingram, Daniel J. and Jung, Martin and Kemp, Victoria and Kirkpatrick, Lucinda and Martin, Callum D. and Pan, Yuan and White, Hannah J. and Aben, Job and Abrahamczyk, Stefan and Adum, Gilbert B. and Aguilar-Barquero, Virginia and Aizen, Marcelo and Ancrenaz, Marc and Arbelaez-Cortes, Enrique and Armbrecht, Inge and Azhar, Badrul and Azpiroz, Adrian B. and Baeten, Lander and B{\´a}ldi, Andr{\´a}s and Banks, John E. and Barlow, Jos and Bat{\´a}ry, P{\´e}ter and Bates, Adam J. and Bayne, Erin M. and Beja, Pedro and Berg, Ake and Berry, Nicholas J. and Bicknell, Jake E. and Bihn, Jochen H. and B{\"o}hning-Gaese, Katrin and Boekhout, Teun and Boutin, Celine and Bouyer, Jeremy and Brearley, Francis Q. and Brito, Isabel and Brunet, J{\"o}rg and Buczkowski, Grzegorz and Buscardo, Erika and Cabra-Garcia, Jimmy and Calvino-Cancela, Maria and Cameron, Sydney A. and Cancello, Eliana M. and Carrijo, Tiago F. and Carvalho, Anelena L. and Castro, Helena and Castro-Luna, Alejandro A. and Cerda, Rolando and Cerezo, Alexis and Chauvat, Matthieu and Clarke, Frank M. and Cleary, Daniel F. R. and Connop, Stuart P. and D'Aniello, Biagio and da Silva, Pedro Giovani and Darvill, Ben and Dauber, Jens and Dejean, Alain and Diek{\"o}tter, Tim and Dominguez-Haydar, Yamileth and Dormann, Carsten F. and Dumont, Bertrand and Dures, Simon G. and Dynesius, Mats and Edenius, Lars and Elek, Zolt{\´a}n and Entling, Martin H. and Farwig, Nina and Fayle, Tom M. and Felicioli, Antonio and Felton, Annika M. and Ficetola, Gentile F. and Filgueiras, Bruno K. C. and Fonte, Steve J. and Fraser, Lauchlan H. and Fukuda, Daisuke and Furlani, Dario and Ganzhorn, J{\"o}rg U. and Garden, Jenni G. and Gheler-Costa, Carla and Giordani, Paolo and Giordano, Simonetta and Gottschalk, Marco S. and Goulson, Dave and Gove, Aaron D. and Grogan, James and Hanley, Mick E. and Hanson, Thor and Hashim, Nor R. and Hawes, Joseph E. and H{\´e}bert, Christian and Helden, Alvin J. and Henden, John-Andr{\´e} and Hern{\´a}ndez, Lionel and Herzog, Felix and Higuera-Diaz, Diego and Hilje, Branko and Horgan, Finbarr G. and Horv{\´a}th, Roland and Hylander, Kristoffer and Horv{\´a}th, Roland and Isaacs-Cubides, Paola and Ishitani, Mashiro and Jacobs, Carmen T. and Jaramillo, Victor J. and Jauker, Birgit and Jonsell, Matts and Jung, Thomas S. and Kapoor, Vena and Kati, Vassiliki and Katovai, Eric and Kessler, Michael and Knop, Eva and Kolb, Annette and K{\"o}r{\"o}si, {\`A}d{\´a}m and Lachat, Thibault and Lantschner, Victoria and Le F{\´e}on, Violette and LeBuhn, Gretchen and L{\´e}gar{\´e}, Jean-Philippe and Letcher, Susan G. and Littlewood, Nick A. and L{\´o}pez-Quintero, Carlos A. and Louhaichi, Mounir and L{\"o}vei, Gabor L. and Lucas-Borja, Manuel Esteban and Luja, Victor H. and Maeto, Kaoru and Magura, Tibor and Mallari, Neil Aldrin and Marin-Spiotta, Erika and Marhall, E. J. P. and Mart{\´i}nez, Eliana and Mayfield, Margaret M. and Mikusinski, Gregorz and Milder, Jeffery C. and Miller, James R. and Morales, Carolina L. and Muchane, Mary N. and Muchane, Muchai and Naidoo, Robin and Nakamura, Akihiro and Naoe, Shoji and Nates-Parra, Guiomar and Navarerete Gutierrez, Dario A. and Neuschulz, Eike L. and Noreika, Norbertas and Norfolk, Olivia and Noriega, Jorge Ari and N{\"o}ske, Nicole M. and O'Dea, Niall and Oduro, William and Ofori-Boateng, Caleb and Oke, Chris O. and Osgathorpe, Lynne M. and Paritsis, Juan and Parrah, Alejandro and Pelegrin, Nicol{\´a}s and Peres, Carlos A. and Persson, Anna S. and Petanidou, Theodora and Phalan, Ben and Philips, T. Keith and Poveda, Katja and Power, Eileen F. and Presley, Steven J. and Proen{\c{c}}a, V{\^a}nia and Quaranta, Marino and Quintero, Carolina and Redpath-Downing, Nicola A. and Reid, J. Leighton and Reis, Yana T. and Ribeiro, Danilo B. and Richardson, Barbara A. and Richardson, Michael J. and Robles, Carolina A. and R{\"o}mbke, J{\"o}rg and Romero-Duque, Luz Piedad and Rosselli, Loreta and Rossiter, Stephen J. and Roulston, T'ai H. and Rousseau, Laurent and Sadler, Jonathan P. and S{\´a}fi{\´a}n, Szbolcs and Salda{\~n}a-V{\´a}squez, Romeo A. and Samneg{\aa}rd, Ulrika and Sch{\"u}epp, Christof and Schweiger, Oliver and Sedlock, Jodi L. and Shahabuddin, Ghazala and Sheil, Douglas and Silva, Fernando A. B. and Slade, Eleanor and Smith-Pardo, Allan H. and Sodhi, Navjot S. and Somarriba, Eduardo J. and Sosa, Ram{\´o}n A. and Stout, Jane C. and Struebig, Matthew J. and Sung, Yik-Hei and Threlfall, Caragh G. and Tonietto, Rebecca and T{\´o}thm{\´e}r{\´e}sz, B{\´e}la and Tscharntke, Teja and Turner, Edgar C. and Tylianakis, Jason M. and Vanbergen, Adam J. and Vassilev, Kiril and Verboven, Hans A. F. and Vergara, Carlos H. and Vergara, Pablo M. and Verhulst, Jort and Walker, Tony R. and Wang, Yanping and Watling, James I. and Wells, Konstans and Williams, Christopher D. and Willig, Michael R. and Woinarski, John C. Z. and Wolf, Jan H. D. and Woodcock, Ben A. and Yu, Douglas W. and Zailsev, Andreys and Collen, Ben and Ewers, Rob M. and Mace, Georgina M. and Purves, Drew W. and Scharlemann, J{\"o}rn P. W. and Pervis, Andy},
  title     = {The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts},
  series = {Ecology and Evolution},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Ecology and Evolution},
  number    = {24},
  doi       = {10.1002/ece3.1303},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-114425},
  pages     = {4701 - 4735},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Biodiversity continues to decline in the face of increasing anthropogenic pressures such as habitat destruction, exploitation, pollution and introduction of alien species. Existing global databases of species' threat status or population time series are dominated by charismatic species. The collation of datasets with broad taxonomic and biogeographic extents, and that support computation of a range of biodiversity indicators, is necessary to enable better understanding of historical declines and to project - and avert - future declines. We describe and assess a new database of more than 1.6 million samples from 78 countries representing over 28,000 species, collated from existing spatial comparisons of local-scale biodiversity exposed to different intensities and types of anthropogenic pressures, from terrestrial sites around the world. The database contains measurements taken in 208 (of 814) ecoregions, 13 (of 14) biomes, 25 (of 35) biodiversity hotspots and 16 (of 17) megadiverse countries. The database contains more than 1\% of the total number of all species described, and more than 1\% of the described species within many taxonomic groups - including flowering plants, gymnosperms, birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, beetles, lepidopterans and hymenopterans. The dataset, which is still being added to, is therefore already considerably larger and more representative than those used by previous quantitative models of biodiversity trends and responses. The database is being assembled as part of the PREDICTS project (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems - ). We make site-level summary data available alongside this article. The full database will be publicly available in 2015.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DoerkPeterlongoMannermaaetal.2019,
  author    = {D{\"o}rk, Thilo and Peterlongo, Peter and Mannermaa, Arto and Bolla, Manjeet K. and Wang, Qin and Dennis, Joe and Ahearn, Thomas and Andrulis, Irene L. and Anton-Culver, Hoda and Arndt, Volker and Aronson, Kristan J. and Augustinsson, Annelie and Beane Freeman, Laura E. and Beckmann, Matthias W. and Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia and Behrens, Sabine and Bermisheva, Marina and Blomqvist, Carl and Bogdanova, Natalia V. and Bojesen, Stig E. and Brauch, Hiltrud and Brenner, Hermann and Burwinkel, Barbara and Canzian, Federico and Chan, Tsun L. and Chang-Claude, Jenny and Chanock, Stephen J. and Choi, Ji-Yeob and Christiansen, Hans and Clarke, Christine L. and Couch, Fergus J. and Czene, Kamila and Daly, Mary B. and dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel and Dwek, Miriam and Eccles, Diana M. and Ekici, Arif B. and Eriksson, Mikael and Evans, D. Gareth and Fasching, Peter A. and Figueroa, Jonine and Flyger, Henrik and Fritschi, Lin and Gabrielson, Marike and Gago-Dominguez, Manuela and Gao, Chi and Gapstur, Susan M. and Garc{\´i}a-Closas, Montserrat and Garc{\´i}a-S{\´a}enz, Jos{\´e} A. and Gaudet, Mia M. and Giles, Graham G. and Goldberg, Mark S. and Goldgar, David E. and Guen{\´e}l, Pascal and Haeberle, Lothar and Haimann, Christopher A. and H{\aa}kansson, Niclas and Hall, Per and Hamann, Ute and Hartman, Mikael and Hauke, Jan and Hein, Alexander and Hillemanns, Peter and Hogervorst, Frans B. L. and Hooning, Maartje J. and Hopper, John L. and Howell, Tony and Huo, Dezheng and Ito, Hidemi and Iwasaki, Motoki and Jakubowska, Anna and Janni, Wolfgang and John, Esther M. and Jung, Audrey and Kaaks, Rudolf and Kang, Daehee and Kapoor, Pooja Middha and Khusnutdinova, Elza and Kim, Sung-Won and Kitahara, Cari M. and Koutros, Stella and Kraft, Peter and Kristensen, Vessela N. and Kwong, Ava and Lambrechts, Diether and Le Marchand, Loic and Li, Jingmei and Lindstr{\"o}m, Sara and Linet, Martha and Lo, Wing-Yee and Long, Jirong and Lophatananon, Artitaya and Lubiński, Jan and Manoochehri, Mehdi and Manoukian, Siranoush and Margolin, Sara and Martinez, Elena and Matsuo, Keitaro and Mavroudis, Dimitris and Meindl, Alfons and Menon, Usha and Milne, Roger L. and Mohd Taib, Nur Aishah and Muir, Kenneth and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Nevanlinna, Heli and Neven, Patrick and Newman, William G. and Offit, Kenneth and Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. and Olshan, Andrew F. and Olson, Janet E. and Olsson, H{\aa}kan and Park, Sue K. and Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won and Peto, Julian and Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana and Pohl-Rescigno, Esther and Presneau, Nadege and Rack, Brigitte and Radice, Paolo and Rashid, Muhammad U. and Rennert, Gad and Rennert, Hedy S. and Romero, Atocha and Ruebner, Matthias and Saloustros, Emmanouil and Schmidt, Marjanka K. and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Schneider, Michael O. and Schoemaker, Minouk J. and Scott, Christopher and Shen, Chen-Yang and Shu, Xiao-Ou and Simard, Jaques and Slager, Susan and Smichkoska, Snezhana and Southey, Melissa C. and Spinelli, John J. and Stone, Jennifer and Surowy, Harald and Swerdlow, Anthony J. and Tamimi, Rulla M. and Tapper, William J. and Teo, Soo H. and Terry, Mary Beth and Toland, Amanda E. and Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M. and Torres, Diana and Torres-Mej{\´i}a, Gabriela and Troester, Melissa A. and Truong, Th{\´e}r{\`e}se and Tsugane, Shoichiro and Untch, Michael and Vachon, Celine M. and van den Ouweland, Ans M. W. and van Veen, Elke M. and Vijai, Joseph and Wendt, Camilla and Wolk, Alicja and Yu, Jyh-Cherng and Zheng, Wei and Ziogas, Argyrios and Ziv, Elad and Dunnig, Alison and Pharaoh, Paul D. P. and Schindler, Detlev and Devilee, Peter and Easton, Douglas F.},
  title     = {Two truncating variants in FANCC and breast cancer risk},
  series = {Scientific Reports},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Scientific Reports},
  organization    = {ABCTB Investigators, NBCS Collaborators},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41598-019-48804-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-222838},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder with 22 disease-causing genes reported to date. In some FA genes, monoallelic mutations have been found to be associated with breast cancer risk, while the risk associations of others remain unknown. The gene for FA type C, FANCC, has been proposed as a breast cancer susceptibility gene based on epidemiological and sequencing studies. We used the Oncoarray project to genotype two truncating FANCC variants (p.R185X and p.R548X) in 64,760 breast cancer cases and 49,793 controls of European descent. FANCC mutations were observed in 25 cases (14 with p.R185X, 11 with p.R548X) and 26 controls (18 with p.R185X, 8 with p.R548X). There was no evidence of an association with the risk of breast cancer, neither overall (odds ratio 0.77, 95\%CI 0.44-1.33, p = 0.4) nor by histology, hormone receptor status, age or family history. We conclude that the breast cancer risk association of these two FANCC variants, if any, is much smaller than for BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mutations. If this applies to all truncating variants in FANCC it would suggest there are differences between FA genes in their roles on breast cancer risk and demonstrates the merit of large consortia for clarifying risk associations of rare variants.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DavisYuKeenanetal.2013,
  author    = {Davis, Lea K. and Yu, Dongmei and Keenan, Clare L. and Gamazon, Eric R. and Konkashbaev, Anuar I. and Derks, Eske M. and Neale, Benjamin M. and Yang, Jian and Lee, S. Hong and Evans, Patrick and Barr, Cathy L. and Bellodi, Laura and Benarroch, Fortu and Berrio, Gabriel Bedoya and Bienvenu, Oscar J. and Bloch, Michael H. and Blom, Rianne M. and Bruun, Ruth D. and Budman, Cathy L. and Camarena, Beatriz and Campbell, Desmond and Cappi, Carolina and Cardona Silgado, Julio C. and Cath, Danielle C. and Cavallini, Maria C. and Chavira, Denise A. and Chouinard, Sylvian and Conti, David V. and Cook, Edwin H. and Coric, Vladimir and Cullen, Bernadette A. and Deforce, Dieter and Delorme, Richard and Dion, Yves and Edlund, Christopher K. and Egberts, Karin and Falkai, Peter and Fernandez, Thomas V. and Gallagher, Patience J. and Garrido, Helena and Geller, Daniel and Girard, Simon L. and Grabe, Hans J. and Grados, Marco A. and Greenberg, Benjamin D. and Gross-Tsur, Varda and Haddad, Stephen and Heiman, Gary A. and Hemmings, Sian M. J. and Hounie, Ana G. and Illmann, Cornelia and Jankovic, Joseph and Jenike, Micheal A. and Kennedy, James L. and King, Robert A. and Kremeyer, Barbara and Kurlan, Roger and Lanzagorta, Nuria and Leboyer, Marion and Leckman, James F. and Lennertz, Leonhard and Liu, Chunyu and Lochner, Christine and Lowe, Thomas L. and Macciardi, Fabio and McCracken, James T. and McGrath, Lauren M. and Restrepo, Sandra C. Mesa and Moessner, Rainald and Morgan, Jubel and Muller, Heike and Murphy, Dennis L. and Naarden, Allan L. and Ochoa, William Cornejo and Ophoff, Roel A. and Osiecki, Lisa and Pakstis, Andrew J. and Pato, Michele T. and Pato, Carlos N. and Piacentini, John and Pittenger, Christopher and Pollak, Yehunda and Rauch, Scott L. and Renner, Tobias J. and Reus, Victor I. and Richter, Margaret A. and Riddle, Mark A. and Robertson, Mary M. and Romero, Roxana and Ros{\`a}rio, Maria C. and Rosenberg, David and Rouleau, Guy A. and Ruhrmann, Stephan and Ruiz-Linares, Andreas and Sampaio, Aline S. and Samuels, Jack and Sandor, Paul and Sheppard, Broke and Singer, Harvey S. and Smit, Jan H. and Stein, Dan J. and Strengman, E. and Tischfield, Jay A. and Valencia Duarte, Ana V. and Vallada, Homero and Van Nieuwerburgh, Flip and Veenstra-VanderWeele, Jeremy and Walitza, Susanne and Wang, Ying and Wendland, Jens R. and Westenberg, Herman G. M. and Shugart, Yin Yao and Miguel, Euripedes C. and McMahon, William and Wagner, Michael and Nicolini, Humberto and Posthuma, Danielle and Hanna, Gregory L. and Heutink, Peter and Denys, Damiaan and Arnold, Paul D. and Oostra, Ben A. and Nestadt, Gerald and Freimer, Nelson B. and Pauls, David L. and Wray, Naomi R. and Stewart, S. Evelyn and Mathews, Carol A. and Knowles, James A. and Cox, Nancy J. and Scharf, Jeremiah M.},
  title     = {Partitioning the Heritability of Tourette Syndrome and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Reveals Differences in Genetic Architecture},
  series = {PLoS Genetics},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {PLoS Genetics},
  number    = {10},
  issn      = {1553-7390},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1003864},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-127377},
  pages     = {e1003864},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The direct estimation of heritability from genome-wide common variant data as implemented in the program Genome-wide Complex Trait Analysis (GCTA) has provided a means to quantify heritability attributable to all interrogated variants. We have quantified the variance in liability to disease explained by all SNPs for two phenotypically-related neurobehavioral disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette Syndrome (TS), using GCTA. Our analysis yielded a heritability point estimate of 0.58 (se = 0.09, p = 5.64e-12) for TS, and 0.37 (se = 0.07, p = 1.5e-07) for OCD. In addition, we conducted multiple genomic partitioning analyses to identify genomic elements that concentrate this heritability. We examined genomic architectures of TS and OCD by chromosome, MAF bin, and functional annotations. In addition, we assessed heritability for early onset and adult onset OCD. Among other notable results, we found that SNPs with a minor allele frequency of less than 5\% accounted for 21\% of the TS heritability and 0\% of the OCD heritability. Additionally, we identified a significant contribution to TS and OCD heritability by variants significantly associated with gene expression in two regions of the brain (parietal cortex and cerebellum) for which we had available expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). Finally we analyzed the genetic correlation between TS and OCD, revealing a genetic correlation of 0.41 (se = 0.15, p = 0.002). These results are very close to previous heritability estimates for TS and OCD based on twin and family studies, suggesting that very little, if any, heritability is truly missing (i.e., unassayed) from TS and OCD GWAS studies of common variation. The results also indicate that there is some genetic overlap between these two phenotypically-related neuropsychiatric disorders, but suggest that the two disorders have distinct genetic architectures.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MajounieRentonMoketal.2012,
  author    = {Majounie, Elisa and Renton, Alan E. and Mok, Kin and Dopper, Elise G. P. and Waite, Adrian and Rollinson, Sara and Chi{\`o}, Adriano and Restagno, Gabriella and Nicolaou, Nayia and Simon-Sanchez, Javier and van Swieten, John C. and Abramzon, Yevgeniya and Johnson, Janel O. and Sendtner, Michael and Pamphlett, Roger and Orrell, Richard W. and Mead, Simon and Sidle, Katie C. and Houlden, Henry and Rohrer, Jonathan D. and Morrison, Karen E. and Pall, Hardev and Talbot, Kevin and Ansorge, Olaf and Hernandez, Dena G. and Arepalli, Sampath and Sabatelli, Mario and Mora, Gabriele and Corbo, Massimo and Giannini, Fabio and Calvo, Andrea and Englund, Elisabet and Borghero, Giuseppe and Floris, Gian Luca and Remes, Anne M. and Laaksovirta, Hannu and McCluskey, Leo and Trojanowski, John Q. and Van Deerlin, Vivianna M. and Schellenberg, Gerard D. and Nalls, Michael A. and Drory, Vivian E. and Lu, Chin-Song and Yeh, Tu-Hsueh and Ishiura, Hiroyuki and Takahashi, Yuji and Tsuji, Shoji and Le Ber, Isabelle and Brice, Alexis and Drepper, Carsten and Williams, Nigel and Kirby, Janine and Shaw, Pamela and Hardy, John and Tienari, Pentti J. and Heutink, Peter and Morris, Huw R. and Pickering-Brown, Stuart and Traynor, Bryan J.},
  title     = {Frequency of the C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia: a cross-sectional study},
  series = {The Lancet Neurology},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {The Lancet Neurology},
  doi       = {10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70043-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-154644},
  pages     = {323 -- 330},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Background We aimed to accurately estimate the frequency of a hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9orf72 that has been associated with a large proportion of cases of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Methods We screened 4448 patients diagnosed with ALS (El Escorial criteria) and 1425 patients with FTD (Lund-Manchester criteria) from 17 regions worldwide for the GGGGCC hexanucleotide expansion using a repeat-primed PCR assay. We assessed familial disease status on the basis of self-reported family history of similar neurodegenerative diseases at the time of sample collection. We compared haplotype data for 262 patients carrying the expansion with the known Finnish founder risk haplotype across the chromosomal locus. We calculated age-related penetrance using the Kaplan-Meier method with data for 603 individuals with the expansion. Findings In patients with sporadic ALS, we identified the repeat expansion in 236 (7·0\%) of 3377 white individuals from the USA, Europe, and Australia, two (4·1\%) of 49 black individuals from the USA, and six (8·3\%) of 72 Hispanic individuals from the USA. The mutation was present in 217 (39·3\%) of 552 white individuals with familial ALS from Europe and the USA. 59 (6·0\%) of 981 white Europeans with sporadic FTD had the mutation, as did 99 (24·8\%) of 400 white Europeans with familial FTD. Data for other ethnic groups were sparse, but we identified one Asian patient with familial ALS (from 20 assessed) and two with familial FTD (from three assessed) who carried the mutation. The mutation was not carried by the three Native Americans or 360 patients from Asia or the Pacific Islands with sporadic ALS who were tested, or by 41 Asian patients with sporadic FTD. All patients with the repeat expansion had (partly or fully) the founder haplotype, suggesting a one-off expansion occurring about 1500 years ago. The pathogenic expansion was non-penetrant in individuals younger than 35 years, 50\% penetrant by 58 years, and almost fully penetrant by 80 years. Interpretation A common Mendelian genetic lesion in C9orf72 is implicated in many cases of sporadic and familial ALS and FTD. Testing for this pathogenic expansion should be considered in the management and genetic counselling of patients with these fatal neurodegenerative diseases.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BensaadFavaroLewisetal.2014,
  author    = {Bensaad, Karim and Favaro, Elena and Lewis, Caroline A. and Peck, Barrie and Lord, Simon and Collins, Jennifer M. and Pinnick, Katherine E. and Wigfield, Simon and Buffa, Francesca M. and Li, Ji-Liang and Zhang, Qifeng and Wakelam, Michael J. O. and Karpe, Fredrik and Schulze, Almut and Harris, Adrian L.},
  title     = {Fatty Acid Uptake and Lipid Storage Induced by HIF-1 alpha Contribute to Cell Growth and Survival after Hypoxia-Reoxygenation},
  series = {Cell Reports},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Cell Reports},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {2211-1247},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.056},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-115162},
  pages     = {349-365},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {An in vivo model of antiangiogenic therapy allowed us to identify genes upregulated by bevacizumab treatment, including Fatty Acid Binding Protein 3 (FABP3) and FABP7, both of which are involved in fatty acid uptake. In vitro, both were induced by hypoxia in a hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha)-dependent manner. There was a significant lipid droplet (LD) accumulation in hypoxia that was time and O-2 concentration dependent. Knockdown of endogenous expression of FABP3, FABP7, or Adipophilin (an essential LD structural component) significantly impaired LD formation under hypoxia. We showed that LD accumulation is due to FABP3/7-dependent fatty acid uptake while de novo fatty acid synthesis is repressed in hypoxia. We also showed that ATP production occurs via beta-oxidation or glycogen degradation in a cell-type-dependent manner in hypoxia-reoxygenation. Finally, inhibition of lipid storage reduced protection against reactive oxygen species toxicity, decreased the survival of cells subjected to hypoxia-reoxygenation in vitro, and strongly impaired tumorigenesis in vivo.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BittnerBingenerCaseyDietzetal.2014,
  author    = {Bittner, R. and Bingener-Casey, J. and Dietz, U. and Fabian, M. and Ferzli, G. S. and Fortelny, R. H. and K{\"o}ckerling, F. and Kukleta, J. and LeBlanc, K. and Lomanto, D. and Misra, M. C. and Morales-Conde, S. and Ramshaw, B. and Reinpold, W. and Rim, S. and Rohr, M. and Schrittwieser, R. and Simon, T. and Smietanski, M. and Stechemesser, B. and Timoney, M. and Chowbey, P.},
  title     = {Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS])—Part 2},
  series = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00464-013-3171-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121510},
  pages     = {353 - 379},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Guidelines are increasingly determining the decision process in day-to-day clinical work. Guidelines describe the current best possible standard in diagnostics and therapy. They should be developed by an international panel of experts, whereby alongside individual experience, above all, the results of comparative studies are decisive. According to the results of high-ranking scientific studies published in peer-reviewed journals, statements and recommendations are formulated, and these are graded strictly according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine. Guidelines can therefore be valuable in helping particularly the young surgeon in his or her day-to-day work to find the best decision for the patient when confronted with a wide and confusing range of options. However, even experienced surgeons benefit because by virtue of a heavy workload and commitment, they often find it difficult to keep up with the ever-increasing published literature. All guidelines require regular updating, usually every 3 years, in line with progress in the field. The current Guidelines focus on technique and perioperative management of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and constitute the first comprehensive guidelines on this topic. In this issue of Surgical Endoscopy, the first part of the Guidelines is published including sections on basics, indication for surgery, perioperative management, and key points of technique. The next part (Part 2) of the Guidelines will address complications and comparisons between open and laparoscopic techniques. Part 3 will cover mesh technology, hernia prophylaxis, technique-related issues, new technologic developments, lumbar and other unusual hernias, and training/education.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BittnerBingenerCaseyDietzetal.2014,
  author    = {Bittner, R. and Bingener-Casey, J. and Dietz, U. and Fabian, M. and Ferzli, G. and Fortelny, R. and K{\"o}ckerling, F. and Kukleta, J. and LeBlanc, K. and Lomanto, D. and Misra, M. and Morales-Conde, S. and Ramshaw, B. and Reinpold, W. and Rim, S. and Rohr, M. and Schrittwieser, R. and Simon, T. and Smietanski, M. and Stechemesser, B. and Timoney, M. and Chowbey, P.},
  title     = {Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS])—Part III},
  series = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00464-013-3172-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121289},
  pages     = {380-404},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Guidelines are increasingly determining the decision process in day-to-day clinical work. Guidelines describe the current best possible standard in diagnostics and therapy. They should be developed by an international panel of experts, whereby alongside individual experience, above all, the results of comparative studies are decisive. According to the results of high-ranking scientific studies published in peer-reviewed journals, statements and recommendations are formulated, and these are graded strictly according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine. Guidelines can therefore be valuable in helping particularly the young surgeon in his or her day-to-day work to find the best decision for the patient when confronted with a wide and confusing range of options. However, even experienced surgeons benefit because by virtue of a heavy workload and commitment, they often find it difficult to keep up with the ever-increasing published literature. All guidelines require regular updating, usually every 3 years, in line with progress in the field. The current Guidelines focus on technique and perioperative management of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and constitute the first comprehensive guidelines on this topic. In this issue of Surgical Endoscopy, the first part of the Guidelines is published including sections on basics, indication for surgery, perioperative management, and key points of technique. The next part (Part 2) of the Guidelines will address complications and comparisons between open and laparoscopic techniques. Part 3 will cover mesh technology, hernia prophylaxis, technique-related issues, new technologic developments, lumbar and other unusual hernias, and training/education.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BittnerBingenerCaseyDietzetal.2014,
  author    = {Bittner, R. and Bingener-Casey, J. and Dietz, U. and Fabian, M. and Ferzli, G. S. and Fortelny, R. H. and K{\"o}ckerling, F. and Kukleta, J. and LeBlanc, K. and Lomanto, D. and Misra, M. C. and Bansal, V. K. and Morales-Conde, S. and Ramshaw, B. and Reinpold, W. and Rim, S. and Rohr, M. and Schrittwieser, R. and Simon, T. and Smietanski, M. and Stechemesser, B. and Timoney, M. and Chowbey, P.},
  title     = {Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)—Part 1},
  series = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121294},
  pages     = {2-29},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Guidelines are increasingly determining the decision process in day-to-day clinical work. Guidelines describe the current best possible standard in diagnostics and therapy. They should be developed by an international panel of experts, whereby alongside individual experience, above all, the results of comparative studies are decisive. According to the results of high-ranking scientific studies published in peer-reviewed journals, statements and recommendations are formulated, and these are graded strictly according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine. Guidelines can therefore be valuable in helping particularly the young surgeon in his or her day-to-day work to find the best decision for the patient when confronted with a wide and confusing range of options. However, even experienced surgeons benefit because by virtue of a heavy workload and commitment, they often find it difficult to keep up with the ever-increasing published literature. All guidelines require regular updating, usually every 3 years, in line with progress in the field. The current Guidelines focus on technique and perioperative management of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and constitute the first comprehensive guidelines on this topic. In this issue of Surgical Endoscopy, the first part of the Guidelines is published including sections on basics, indication for surgery, perioperative management, and key points of technique. The next part (Part 2) of the Guidelines will address complications and comparisons between open and laparoscopic techniques. Part 3 will cover mesh technology, hernia prophylaxis, technique-related issues, new technologic developments, lumbar and other unusual hernias, and training/education.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AntoniouKuchenbaeckerSoucyetal.2012,
  author    = {Antoniou, Antonis C. and Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B. and Soucy, Penny and Beesley, Jonathan and Chen, Xiaoqing and McGuffog, Lesley and Lee, Andrew and Barrowdale, Daniel and Healey, Sue and Sinilnikova, Olga M. and Caligo, Maria A. and Loman, Niklas and Harbst, Katja and Lindblom, Annika and Arver, Brita and Rosenquist, Richard and Karlsson, Per and Nathanson, Kate and Domchek, Susan and Rebbeck, Tim and Jakubowska, Anna and Lubinski, Jan and Jaworska, Katarzyna and Durda, Katarzyna and Zlowowcka-Perłowska, Elżbieta and Osorio, Ana and Dur{\´a}n, Mercedes and Andr{\´e}s, Raquel and Ben{\´i}tez, Javier and Hamann, Ute and Hogervorst, Frans B. and van Os, Theo A. and Verhoef, Senno and Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne E. J. and Wijnen, Juul and Garcia, Encarna B. G{\´o}mez and Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J. and Kriege, Mieke and Coll{\´e}e, Margriet and Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. and Oosterwijk, Jan C. and Peock, Susan and Frost, Debra and Ellis, Steve D. and Platte, Radka and Fineberg, Elena and Evans, D. Gareth and Lalloo, Fiona and Jacobs, Chris and Eeles, Ros and Adlard, Julian and Davidson, Rosemarie and Cole, Trevor and Cook, Jackie and Paterson, Joan and Douglas, Fiona and Brewer, Carole and Hodgson, Shirley and Morrison, Patrick J. and Walker, Lisa and Rogers, Mark T. and Donaldson, Alan and Dorkins, Huw and Godwin, Andrew K. and Bove, Betsy and Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique and Houdayer, Claude and Buecher, Bruno and de Pauw, Antoine and Mazoyer, Sylvie and Calender, Alain and L{\´e}on{\´e}, M{\´e}lanie and Bressac-de Paillerets, Brigitte and Caron, Olivier and Sobol, Hagay and Frenay, Marc and Prieur, Fabienne and Ferrer, Sandra Fert and Mortemousque, Isabelle and Buys, Saundra and Daly, Mary and Miron, Alexander and Terry, Mary Beth and Hopper, John L. and John, Esther M. and Southey, Melissa and Goldgar, David and Singer, Christian F. and Fink-Retter, Anneliese and Muy-Kheng, Tea and Geschwantler Kaulich, Daphne and Hansen, Thomas V. O. and Nielsen, Finn C. and Barkardottir, Rosa B. and Gaudet, Mia and Kirchhoff, Tomas and Joseph, Vijai and Dutra-Clarke, Ana and Offit, Kenneth and Piedmonte, Marion and Kirk, Judy and Cohn, David and Hurteau, Jean and Byron, John and Fiorica, James and Toland, Amanda E. and Montagna, Marco and Oliani, Cristina and Imyanitov, Evgeny and Isaacs, Claudine and Tihomirova, Laima and Blanco, Ignacio and Lazaro, Conxi and Teul{\´e}, Alex and Del Valle, J. and Gayther, Simon A. and Odunsi, Kunle and Gross, Jenny and Karlan, Beth Y. and Olah, Edith and Teo, Soo-Hwang and Ganz, Patricia A. and Beattie, Mary S. and Dorfling, Cecelia M. and Jansen van Rensburg, Elizabeth and Diez, Orland and Kwong, Ava and Schmutzler, Rita K. and Wappenschmidt, Barbara and Engel, Christoph and Meindl, Alfons and Ditsch, Nina and Arnold, Norbert and Heidemann, Simone and Niederacher, Dieter and Preisler-Adams, Sabine and Gadzicki, Dorothea and Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda and Deissler, Helmut and Gehrig, Andrea and Sutter, Christian and Kast, Karin and Fiebig, Britta and Sch{\"a}fer, Dieter and Caldes, Trinidad and de la Hoya, Miguel and Nevanlinna, Heli and Muranen, Taru A. and Lesp{\´e}rance, Bernard and Spurdle, Amanda B. and Neuhausen, Susan L. and Ding, Yuan C. and Wang, Xianshu and Fredericksen, Zachary and Pankratz, Vernon S. and Lindor, Noralane M. and Peterlongo, Paulo and Manoukian, Siranoush and Peissel, Bernard and Zaffaroni, Daniela and Bonanni, Bernardo and Bernard, Loris and Dolcetti, Riccardo and Papi, Laura and Ottini, Laura and Radice, Paolo and Greene, Mark H. and Loud, Jennifer T. and Andrulis, Irene L. and Ozcelik, Hilmi and Mulligan, Anna Marie and Glendon, Gord and Thomassen, Mads and Gerdes, Anne-Marie and Jensen, Uffe B. and Skytte, Anne-Bine and Kruse, Torben A. and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia and Couch, Fergus J. and Simard, Jacques and Easton, Douglas F.},
  title     = {Common variants at 12p11, 12q24, 9p21, 9q31.2 and in ZNF365 are associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation carriers},
  series = {Breast Cancer Research},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Breast Cancer Research},
  number    = {R33},
  organization    = {CIMBA; SWE-BRCA; HEBON; EMBRACE; GEMO Study Collaborators; kConFab Investigators},
  doi       = {10.1186/bcr3121},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-130449},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Introduction: Several common alleles have been shown to be associated with breast and/or ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Recent genome-wide association studies of breast cancer have identified eight additional breast cancer susceptibility loci: rs1011970 (9p21, CDKN2A/B), rs10995190 (ZNF365), rs704010 (ZMIZ1), rs2380205 (10p15), rs614367 (11q13), rs1292011 (12q24), rs10771399 (12p11 near PTHLH) and rs865686 (9q31.2). Methods: To evaluate whether these single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, we genotyped these SNPs in 12,599 BRCA1 and 7,132 BRCA2 mutation carriers and analysed the associations with breast cancer risk within a retrospective likelihood framework. Results: Only SNP rs10771399 near PTHLH was associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers (per-allele hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87, 95\% CI: 0.81 to 0.94, P-trend = 3 x 10\(^{-4}\)). The association was restricted to mutations proven or predicted to lead to absence of protein expression (HR = 0.82, 95\% CI: 0.74 to 0.90, P-trend = 3.1 x 10\(^{-5}\), P-difference = 0.03). Four SNPs were associated with the risk of breast cancer for BRCA2 mutation carriers: rs10995190, P-trend = 0.015; rs1011970, P-trend = 0.048; rs865686, 2df P = 0.007; rs1292011 2df P = 0.03. rs10771399 (PTHLH) was predominantly associated with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer for BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR = 0.81, 95\% CI: 0.74 to 0.90, P-trend = 4 x 10\(^{-5}\)) and there was marginal evidence of association with ER- negative breast cancer for BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR = 0.78, 95\% CI: 0.62 to 1.00, P-trend = 0.049). Conclusions: The present findings, in combination with previously identified modifiers of risk, will ultimately lead to more accurate risk prediction and an improved understanding of the disease etiology in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SimonNerzPresteretal.1985,
  author    = {Simon, M. M. and Nerz, G. and Prester, M. and Moll, Heidrun},
  title     = {Immunoregulation by mouse T cell clones III. Cloned H-Y-specific cytotoxic T cells secrete a soluble mediator(s) that inhibits cytotoxic responses by acting on both Lyt-2\(^-\) and L3T4\(^-\)- lymphocytes},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-31625},
  year      = {1985},
  abstract  = {In this study we report that cloned Thy-l +, L3T4-, Lyt-l-, Lyt-2+, H-Y-specific and H-2Db-restricted cytotoxic T ce11 lines (CTLL) when indueed by lectin or antigen secrete a soluble mediator(s) (SF) that inhibits proliferation and generation of cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTL) in mixed lymphocyte cultures (MLC). The biological activity was separable by gel filtration and appeared as a broad peak in the moleeular mass range between 10000 and 50000 kDa. It was found that the suppressive activity released by CTLL neither strictly correlates with their cytotoxic potential nor with their ability to produce immune interferon or Iymphotoxin. SF was shown to elicitits activity in an antigen-nonspeeific manner in that it suppressed the maturation of T lymphocytes responding to both, the appropriate H-Y antigen as weH as to unrelated H_2d alloantigens or to the hapten 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl (TNP). The effect of SF on CTL responses was most pronounced in early phases of primary or secondary MLC. When analyzed for its inhibitory activity on precursor ceHs in populations selected for either Lyt-2- or L3T4- lymphocytes, it was found that SF interfered with the maturation of both subsets. The inhibition of CTL responses elicited by SF could not be reversed by the addition of exogenous interleukin 2. The findtng that SF also inhi. bited the proliferation of some but not a11 antigen-dependent cloned T ceHs with helper or eytc'toxic potential provides evidence that the faetor also may regulate effector lymphl)cytes. In addition, the results support the assumption that SF exerts its effect direetly on the responder rather than the stimulator population, and demonstrate that the development of CTL from their preeursor eeHs is contro11ed at least in part by the eytotoxic effeetor cells themselves via a soluble factor(s) that interferes with distinct stages of T ce11 maturation. These findings again emphasize the expression of multiple functions by CTL and indieate their possible role du ring the course of an immune response by their capability to eliminate target cells and to secrete a soluble product(s) that mediates feedback contro!.},
  subject      = {Infektionsbiologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KleijnWinfreeBartomeusetal.2015,
  author    = {Kleijn, David and Winfree, Rachael and Bartomeus, Ignasi and Carvalheiro, Lu{\´i}sa G. and Henry, Mickael and Isaacs, Rufus and Klein, Alexandra-Maria and Kremen, Claire and M'Gonigle, Leithen K. and Rader, Romina and Ricketts, Taylor H. and Williams, Neal M. and Adamson, Nancy Lee and Ascher, John S. and B{\´a}ldi, Andr{\´a}s and Bat{\´a}ry, P{\´e}ter and Benjamin, Faye and Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. and Blitzer, Eleanor J. and Bommarco, Riccardo and Brand, Mariette R. and Bretagnolle, Vincent and Button, Lindsey and Cariveau, Daniel P. and Chifflet, R{\´e}my and Colville, Jonathan F. and Danforth, Bryan N. and Elle, Elizabeth and Garratt, Michael P. D. and Herzog, Felix and Holzschuh, Andrea and Howlett, Brad G. and Jauker, Frank and Jha, Shalene and Knop, Eva and Krewenka, Kristin M. and Le F{\´e}on, Violette and Mandelik, Yael and May, Emily A. and Park, Mia G. and Pisanty, Gideon and Reemer, Menno and Riedinger, Verena and Rollin, Orianne and Rundl{\"o}f, Maj and Sardi{\~n}as, Hillary S. and Scheper, Jeroen and Sciligo, Amber R. and Smith, Henrik G. and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf and Thorp, Robbin and Tscharntke, Teja and Verhulst, Jort and Viana, Blandina F. and Vaissi{\`e}re, Bernard E. and Veldtman, Ruan and Ward, Kimiora L. and Westphal, Catrin and Potts, Simon G.},
  title     = {Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation},
  series = {Nature Communications},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Nature Communications},
  number    = {7414},
  doi       = {10.1038/ncomms8414},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-151879},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost- effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost- effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PostemaHoogmanAmbrosinoetal.2021,
  author    = {Postema, Merel C. and Hoogman, Martine and Ambrosino, Sara and Asherson, Philip and Banaschewski, Tobias and Bandeira, Cibele E. and Baranov, Alexandr and Bau, Claiton H.D. and Baumeister, Sarah and Baur-Streubel, Ramona and Bellgrove, Mark A. and Biederman, Joseph and Bralten, Janita and Brandeis, Daniel and Brem, Silvia and Buitelaar, Jan K. and Busatto, Geraldo F. and Castellanos, Francisco X. and Cercignani, Mara and Chaim-Avancini, Tiffany M. and Chantiluke, Kaylita C. and Christakou, Anastasia and Coghill, David and Conzelmann, Annette and Cubillo, Ana I. and Cupertino, Renata B. and de Zeeuw, Patrick and Doyle, Alysa E. and Durston, Sarah and Earl, Eric A. and Epstein, Jeffery N. and Ethofer, Thomas and Fair, Damien A. and Fallgatter, Andreas J. and Faraone, Stephen V. and Frodl, Thomas and Gabel, Matt C. and Gogberashvili, Tinatin and Grevet, Eugenio H. and Haavik, Jan and Harrison, Neil A. and Hartman, Catharina A. and Heslenfeld, Dirk J. and Hoekstra, Pieter J. and Hohmann, Sarah and H{\o}vik, Marie F. and Jernigan, Terry L. and Kardatzki, Bernd and Karkashadze, Georgii and Kelly, Clare and Kohls, Gregor and Konrad, Kerstin and Kuntsi, Jonna and Lazaro, Luisa and Lera-Miguel, Sara and Lesch, Klaus-Peter and Louza, Mario R. and Lundervold, Astri J. and Malpas, Charles B and Mattos, Paulo and McCarthy, Hazel and Namazova-Baranova, Leyla and Nicolau, Rosa and Nigg, Joel T. and Novotny, Stephanie E. and Oberwelland Weiss, Eileen and O'Gorman Tuura, Ruth L. and Oosterlaan, Jaap and Oranje, Bob and Paloyelis, Yannis and Pauli, Paul and Picon, Felipe A. and Plessen, Kerstin J. and Ramos-Quiroga, J. Antoni and Reif, Andreas and Reneman, Liesbeth and Rosa, Pedro G.P. and Rubia, Katya and Schrantee, Anouk and Schweren, Lizanne J.S. and Seitz, Jochen and Shaw, Philip and Silk, Tim J. and Skokauskas, Norbert and Soliva Vila, Juan C. and Stevens, Michael C. and Sudre, Gustavo and Tamm, Leanne and Tovar-Moll, Fernanda and van Erp, Theo G.M. and Vance, Alasdair and Vilarroya, Oscar and Vives-Gilabert, Yolanda and von Polier, Georg G. and Walitza, Susanne and Yoncheva, Yuliya N. and Zanetti, Marcus V. and Ziegler, Georg C. and Glahn, David C. and Jahanshad, Neda and Medland, Sarah E. and Thompson, Paul M. and Fisher, Simon E. and Franke, Barbara and Francks, Clyde},
  title     = {Analysis of structural brain asymmetries in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in 39 datasets},
  series = {Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry},
  volume    = {62},
  journal   = {Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1111/jcpp.13396},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-239968},
  pages     = {1202 -- 1219},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Objective Some studies have suggested alterations of structural brain asymmetry in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but findings have been contradictory and based on small samples. Here, we performed the largest ever analysis of brain left-right asymmetry in ADHD, using 39 datasets of the ENIGMA consortium. Methods We analyzed asymmetry of subcortical and cerebral cortical structures in up to 1,933 people with ADHD and 1,829 unaffected controls. Asymmetry Indexes (AIs) were calculated per participant for each bilaterally paired measure, and linear mixed effects modeling was applied separately in children, adolescents, adults, and the total sample, to test exhaustively for potential associations of ADHD with structural brain asymmetries. Results There was no evidence for altered caudate nucleus asymmetry in ADHD, in contrast to prior literature. In children, there was less rightward asymmetry of the total hemispheric surface area compared to controls (t = 2.1, p = .04). Lower rightward asymmetry of medial orbitofrontal cortex surface area in ADHD (t = 2.7, p = .01) was similar to a recent finding for autism spectrum disorder. There were also some differences in cortical thickness asymmetry across age groups. In adults with ADHD, globus pallidus asymmetry was altered compared to those without ADHD. However, all effects were small (Cohen's d from -0.18 to 0.18) and would not survive study-wide correction for multiple testing. Conclusion Prior studies of altered structural brain asymmetry in ADHD were likely underpowered to detect the small effects reported here. Altered structural asymmetry is unlikely to provide a useful biomarker for ADHD, but may provide neurobiological insights into the trait.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ViljurAbellaAdameketal.2022,
  author    = {Viljur, Mari-Liis and Abella, Scott R. and Ad{\´a}mek, Martin and Alencar, Janderson Batista Rodrigues and Barber, Nicholas A. and Beudert, Burkhard and Burkle, Laura A. and Cagnolo, Luciano and Campos, Brent R. and Chao, Anne and Chergui, Brahim and Choi, Chang-Yong and Cleary, Daniel F. R. and Davis, Thomas Seth and Dechnik-V{\´a}zquez, Yanus A. and Downing, William M. and Fuentes-Ramirez, Andr{\´e}s and Gandhi, Kamal J. K. and Gehring, Catherine and Georgiev, Kostadin B. and Gimbutas, Mark and Gongalsky, Konstantin B. and Gorbunova, Anastasiya Y. and Greenberg, Cathryn H. and Hylander, Kristoffer and Jules, Erik S. and Korobushkin, Daniil I. and K{\"o}ster, Kajar and Kurth, Valerie and Lanham, Joseph Drew and Lazarina, Maria and Leverkus, Alexandro B. and Lindenmayer, David and Marra, Daniel Magnabosco and Mart{\´i}n-Pinto, Pablo and Meave, Jorge A. and Moretti, Marco and Nam, Hyun-Young and Obrist, Martin K. and Petanidou, Theodora and Pons, Pere and Potts, Simon G. and Rapoport, Irina B. and Rhoades, Paul R. and Richter, Clark and Saifutdinov, Ruslan A. and Sanders, Nathan J. and Santos, Xavier and Steel, Zachary and Tavella, Julia and Wendenburg, Clara and Wermelinger, Beat and Zaitsev, Andrey S. and Thorn, Simon},
  title     = {The effect of natural disturbances on forest biodiversity: an ecological synthesis},
  series = {Biological Reviews},
  volume    = {97},
  journal   = {Biological Reviews},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1111/brv.12876},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-287168},
  pages     = {1930 -- 1947},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Disturbances alter biodiversity via their specific characteristics, including severity and extent in the landscape, which act at different temporal and spatial scales. Biodiversity response to disturbance also depends on the community characteristics and habitat requirements of species. Untangling the mechanistic interplay of these factors has guided disturbance ecology for decades, generating mixed scientific evidence of biodiversity responses to disturbance. Understanding the impact of natural disturbances on biodiversity is increasingly important due to human-induced changes in natural disturbance regimes. In many areas, major natural forest disturbances, such as wildfires, windstorms, and insect outbreaks, are becoming more frequent, intense, severe, and widespread due to climate change and land-use change. Conversely, the suppression of natural disturbances threatens disturbance-dependent biota. Using a meta-analytic approach, we analysed a global data set (with most sampling concentrated in temperate and boreal secondary forests) of species assemblages of 26 taxonomic groups, including plants, animals, and fungi collected from forests affected by wildfires, windstorms, and insect outbreaks. The overall effect of natural disturbances on α-diversity did not differ significantly from zero, but some taxonomic groups responded positively to disturbance, while others tended to respond negatively. Disturbance was beneficial for taxonomic groups preferring conditions associated with open canopies (e.g. hymenopterans and hoverflies), whereas ground-dwelling groups and/or groups typically associated with shady conditions (e.g. epigeic lichens and mycorrhizal fungi) were more likely to be negatively impacted by disturbance. Across all taxonomic groups, the highest α-diversity in disturbed forest patches occurred under moderate disturbance severity, i.e. with approximately 55\% of trees killed by disturbance. We further extended our meta-analysis by applying a unified diversity concept based on Hill numbers to estimate α-diversity changes in different taxonomic groups across a gradient of disturbance severity measured at the stand scale and incorporating other disturbance features. We found that disturbance severity negatively affected diversity for Hill number q = 0 but not for q = 1 and q = 2, indicating that diversity-disturbance relationships are shaped by species relative abundances. Our synthesis of α-diversity was extended by a synthesis of disturbance-induced change in species assemblages, and revealed that disturbance changes the β-diversity of multiple taxonomic groups, including some groups that were not affected at the α-diversity level (birds and woody plants). Finally, we used mixed rarefaction/extrapolation to estimate biodiversity change as a function of the proportion of forests that were disturbed, i.e. the disturbance extent measured at the landscape scale. The comparison of intact and naturally disturbed forests revealed that both types of forests provide habitat for unique species assemblages, whereas species diversity in the mixture of disturbed and undisturbed forests peaked at intermediate values of disturbance extent in the simulated landscape. Hence, the relationship between α-diversity and disturbance severity in disturbed forest stands was strikingly similar to the relationship between species richness and disturbance extent in a landscape consisting of both disturbed and undisturbed forest habitats. This result suggests that both moderate disturbance severity and moderate disturbance extent support the highest levels of biodiversity in contemporary forest landscapes.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MollEichmannSimon1985,
  author    = {Moll, Heidrun and Eichmann, K. and Simon, M. M.},
  title     = {Immunoregulation by mouse T-cell clones. II. The same H-Y-specific T helper clone can provide help for the generation of cytotoxic lymphocytes and of antibody-secreting cells.},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-30903},
  year      = {1985},
  abstract  = {Mouse H-Y-specific and I-Ab restricted T-cell clones have been established and compared for their helper effects in the differentiation ofboth T and B Iymphocytes. The results demonstrate that three individual T -cell clones and one subclone could help in the antigen-driven induction of cytotoxic Iymphocytes (CTL) from their precursor cells (CTL-P), and were able to activate B cells to develop into antibody-secreting cells (PFC) in the presence of SRBC, provided the cloned T cells were restimulated by H-Y antigen on antigen-presenting cells. In addition, antigen or lectin could induce the same H -Y -specific T -cell clones to secrete factor(s) expressing helper activities similar to that ofthe cloned T cells. Furthermore, it is shown that the T cell-derived soluble mediator(s) was distinct from T-cell growth factor (TCGF) and from immune interferon (lFN-y). The data reveal a new type ofT cell with helper potential for the activation ofCTL-P and B Iymphocytes, and suggest the existence of distinct T helper cells which can provide help for both cytotoxic and antibody responses by virtue of different Iymphokine activities.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BartomeusPottsSteffanDewenteretal.2014,
  author    = {Bartomeus, Ignasi and Potts, Simon G. and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf and Vaissiere, Bernard E. and Woyciechowski, Michal and Krewenka, Kristin M. and Tscheulin, Thomas and Roberts, Stuart P. M. and Szentgyoergyi, Hajnalka and Westphal, Catrin and Bommarco, Riccardo},
  title     = {Contribution of insect pollinators to crop yield and quality varies with agricultural intensification},
  series = {PEERJ},
  volume    = {2},
  journal   = {PEERJ},
  number    = {e328},
  issn      = {2167-9843},
  doi       = {10.7717/peerj.328},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-116928},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Background. Up to 75\% of crop species benefit at least to some degree from animal pollination for fruit or seed set and yield. However, basic information on the level of pollinator dependence and pollinator contribution to yield is lacking for many crops. Even less is known about how insect pollination affects crop quality. Given that habitat loss and agricultural intensification are known to decrease pollinator richness and abundance, there is a need to assess the consequences for different components of crop production. Methods. We used pollination exclusion on flowers or inflorescences on a whole plant basis to assess the contribution of insect pollination to crop yield and quality in four flowering crops (spring oilseed rape, field bean, strawberry, and buckwheat) located in four regions of Europe. For each crop, we recorded abundance and species richness of flower visiting insects in ten fields located along a gradient from simple to heterogeneous landscapes. Results. Insect pollination enhanced average crop yield between 18 and 71\% depending on the crop. Yield quality was also enhanced in most crops. For instance, oilseed rape had higher oil and lower chlorophyll contents when adequately pollinated, the proportion of empty seeds decreased in buckwheat, and strawberries' commercial grade improved; however, we did not find higher nitrogen content in open pollinated field beans. Complex landscapes had a higher overall species richness of wild pollinators across crops, but visitation rates were only higher in complex landscapes for some crops. On the contrary, the overall yield was consistently enhanced by higher visitation rates, but not by higher pollinator richness. Discussion. For the four crops in this study, there is clear benefit delivered by pollinators on yield quantity and/or quality, but it is not maximized under current agricultural intensification. Honeybees, the most abundant pollinator, might partially compensate the loss of wild pollinators in some areas, but our results suggest the need of landscape-scale actions to enhance wild pollinator populations.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SimonRauskolbGunnersenetal.2015,
  author    = {Simon, Christian M. and Rauskolb, Stefanie and Gunnersen, Jennifer M. and Holtmann, Bettina and Drepper, Carsten and Dombert, Benjamin and Braga, Massimiliano and Wiese, Stefan and Jablonka, Sibylle and P{\"u}hringer, Dirk and Zielasek, J{\"u}rgen and Hoeflich, Andreas and Silani, Vincenzo and Wolf, Eckhard and Kneitz, Susanne and Sommer, Claudia and Toyka, Klaus V. and Sendtner, Michael},
  title     = {Dysregulated IGFBP5 expression causes axon degeneration and motoneuron loss in diabetic neuropathy},
  series = {Acta Neuropathologica},
  volume    = {130},
  journal   = {Acta Neuropathologica},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00401-015-1446-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-154569},
  pages     = {373 -- 387},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Diabetic neuropathy (DNP), afflicting sensory and motor nerve fibers, is a major complication in diabetes.The underlying cellular mechanisms of axon degeneration are poorly understood. IGFBP5, an inhibitory binding protein for insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) is highly up-regulated in nerve biopsies of patients with DNP. We investigated the pathogenic relevance of this finding in transgenic mice overexpressing IGFBP5 in motor axons and sensory nerve fibers. These mice develop motor axonopathy and sensory deficits similar to those seen in DNP. Motor axon degeneration was also observed in mice in which the IGF1 receptor(IGF1R) was conditionally depleted in motoneurons, indicating that reduced activity of IGF1 on IGF1R in motoneurons is responsible for the observed effect. These data provide evidence that elevated expression of IGFBP5 in diabetic nerves reduces the availability of IGF1 for IGF1R on motor axons, thus leading to progressive neurodegeneration. Inhibition of IGFBP5 could thus offer novel treatment strategies for DNP.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TriphanJobstAnjorinetal.2017,
  author    = {Triphan, Simon M. F. and Jobst, Bertram J. and Anjorin, Angela and Sedlaczek, Oliver and Wolf, Ursula and Terekhov, Maxim and Hoffmann, Christian and Ley, Sebastian and D{\"u}ber, Christoph and Biederer, J{\"u}rgen and Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich and Jakob, Peter M. and Wielp{\"u}tz, Mark O.},
  title     = {Reproducibility and comparison of oxygen-enhanced T\(_1\) quantification in COPD and asthma patients},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0172479},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-171833},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {T\(_1\) maps have been shown to yield useful diagnostic information on lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, both for native T\(_1\) and ΔT\(_1\), the relative reduction while breathing pure oxygen. As parameter quantification is particularly interesting for longitudinal studies, the purpose of this work was both to examine the reproducibility of lung T\(_1\) mapping and to compare T\(_1\) found in COPD and asthma patients using IRSnapShotFLASH embedded in a full MRI protocol. 12 asthma and 12 COPD patients (site 1) and further 15 COPD patients (site 2) were examined on two consecutive days. In each patient, T\(_1\) maps were acquired in 8 single breath-hold slices, breathing first room air, then pure oxygen. Maps were partitioned into 12 regions each to calculate average values. In asthma patients, the average T\(_{1,RA}\) = 1206ms (room air) was reduced to T\(_{1,O2}\) = 1141ms under oxygen conditions (ΔT\(_1\) = 5.3\%, p < 5⋅10\(^{-4})\), while in COPD patients both native T\(_{1,RA}\) = 1125ms was significantly shorter (p < 10\(^{-3})\) and the relative reduction to T\(_{1,O2}\) = 1081ms on average ΔT\(_1\) = 4.2\%(p < 10\(^{-5}\)). On the second day, with T\(_{1,RA}\) = 1186ms in asthma and T\(_{1,RA}\) = 1097ms in COPD, observed values were slightly shorter on average in all patient groups. ΔT\(_1\) reduction was the least repeatable parameter and varied from day to day by up to 23\% in individual asthma and 30\% in COPD patients. While for both patient groups T\(_1\) was below the values reported for healthy subjects, the T\(_1\) and ΔT\(_1\) found in asthmatics lies between that of the COPD group and reported values for healthy subjects, suggesting a higher blood volume fraction and better ventilation. However, it could be demonstrated that lung T\(_1\) quantification is subject to notable inter-examination variability, which here can be attributed both to remaining contrast agent from the previous day and the increased dependency of lung T\(_1\) on perfusion and thus current lung state.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MuellerGirardHopfneretal.2016,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller, Stefanie H. and Girard, Simon L. and Hopfner, Franziska and Merner, Nancy D. and Bourassa, Cynthia V. and Lorenz, Delia and Clark, Lorraine N. and Tittmann, Lukas and Soto-Ortolaza, Alexandra I. and Klebe, Stephan and Hallett, Mark and Schneider, Susanne A. and Hodgkinson, Colin A. and Lieb, Wolfgang and Wszolek, Zbigniew K. and Pendziwiat, Manuela and Lorenzo-Betancor, Oswaldo and Poewe, Werner and Ortega-Cubero, Sara and Seppi, Klaus and Rajput, Alex and Hussl, Anna and Rajput, Ali H. and Berg, Daniela and Dion, Patrick A. and Wurster, Isabel and Shulman, Joshua M. and Srulijes, Karin and Haubenberger, Dietrich and Pastor, Pau and Vilari{\~n}o-G{\"u}ell, Carles and Postuma, Ronald B. and Bernard, Genevi{\`e}ve and Ladwig, Karl-Heinz and Dupr{\´e}, Nicolas and Jankovic, Joseph and Strauch, Konstantin and Panisset, Michel and Winkelmann, Juliane and Testa, Claudia M. and Reischl, Eva and Zeuner, Kirsten E. and Ross, Owen A. and Arzberger, Thomas and Chouinard, Sylvain and Deuschl, G{\"u}nther and Louis, Elan D. and Kuhlenb{\"a}umer, Gregor and Rouleau, Guy A.},
  title     = {Genome-wide association study in essential tremor identifies three new loci},
  series = {Brain},
  volume    = {139},
  journal   = {Brain},
  doi       = {10.1093/brain/aww242},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-186541},
  pages     = {3163-3169},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {We conducted a genome-wide association study of essential tremor, a common movement disorder characterized mainly by a postural and kinetic tremor of the upper extremities. Twin and family history studies show a high heritability for essential tremor. The molecular genetic determinants of essential tremor are unknown. We included 2807 patients and 6441 controls of European descent in our two-stage genome-wide association study. The 59 most significantly disease-associated markers of the discovery stage were genotyped in the replication stage. After Bonferroni correction two markers, one (rs10937625) located in the serine/threonine kinase STK32B and one (rs17590046) in the transcriptional coactivator PPARGC1A were associated with essential tremor. Three markers (rs12764057, rs10822974, rs7903491) in the cell-adhesion molecule CTNNA3 were significant in the combined analysis of both stages. The expression of STK32B was increased in the cerebellar cortex of patients and expression quantitative trait loci database mining showed association between the protective minor allele of rs10937625 and reduced expression in cerebellar cortex. We found no expression differences related to disease status or marker genotype for the other two genes. Replication of two lead single nucleotide polymorphisms of previous small genome-wide association studies (rs3794087 in SLC1A2, rs9652490 in LINGO1) did not confirm the association with essential tremor.},
  language  = {en}
}