@article{HerrmannDiederichsMelniketal.2021,
  author    = {Herrmann, Marietta and Diederichs, Solvig and Melnik, Svitlana and Riegger, Jana and Trivanović, Drenka and Li, Shushan and Jenei-Lanzl, Zsuzsa and Brenner, Rolf E. and Huber-Lang, Markus and Zaucke, Frank and Schildberg, Frank A. and Gr{\"a}ssel, Susanne},
  title     = {Extracellular Vesicles in Musculoskeletal Pathologies and Regeneration},
  series = {Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology},
  issn      = {2296-4185},
  doi       = {10.3389/fbioe.2020.624096},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-222882},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The incidence of musculoskeletal diseases is steadily increasing with aging of the population. In the past years, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have gained attention in musculoskeletal research. EVs have been associated with various musculoskeletal pathologies as well as suggested as treatment option. EVs play a pivotal role in communication between cells and their environment. Thereby, the EV cargo is highly dependent on their cellular origin. In this review, we summarize putative mechanisms by which EVs can contribute to musculoskeletal tissue homeostasis, regeneration and disease, in particular matrix remodeling and mineralization, pro-angiogenic effects and immunomodulatory activities. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) present the most frequently used cell source for EV generation for musculoskeletal applications, and herein we discuss how the MSC phenotype can influence the cargo and thus the regenerative potential of EVs. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells (iMPs) may overcome current limitations of MSCs, and iMP-derived EVs are discussed as an alternative strategy. In the last part of the article, we focus on therapeutic applications of EVs and discuss both practical considerations for EV production and the current state of EV-based therapies.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HerrmannHildebrandMenzeletal.2019,
  author    = {Herrmann, Marietta and Hildebrand, Maria and Menzel, Ursula and Fahy, Niamh and Alini, Mauro and Lang, Siegmund and Benneker, Lorin and Verrier, Sophie and Stoddart, Martin J. and Bara, Jennifer J.},
  title     = {Phenotypic characterization of bone marrow mononuclear cells and derived stromal cell populations from human iliac crest, vertebral body and femoral head},
  series = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  volume    = {20},
  journal   = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  number    = {14},
  issn      = {1422-0067},
  doi       = {10.3390/ijms20143454},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-285054},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {(1) In vitro, bone marrow-derived stromal cells (BMSCs) demonstrate inter-donor phenotypic variability, which presents challenges for the development of regenerative therapies. Here, we investigated whether the frequency of putative BMSC sub-populations within the freshly isolated mononuclear cell fraction of bone marrow is phenotypically predictive for the in vitro derived stromal cell culture. (2) Vertebral body, iliac crest, and femoral head bone marrow were acquired from 33 patients (10 female and 23 male, age range 14-91). BMSC sub-populations were identified within freshly isolated mononuclear cell fractions based on cell-surface marker profiles. Stromal cells were expanded in monolayer on tissue culture plastic. Phenotypic assessment of in vitro derived cell cultures was performed by examining growth kinetics, chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. (3) Gender, donor age, and anatomical site were neither predictive for the total yield nor the population doubling time of in vitro derived BMSC cultures. The abundance of freshly isolated progenitor sub-populations (CD45-CD34-CD73+, CD45-CD34-CD146+, NG2+CD146+) was not phenotypically predictive of derived stromal cell cultures in terms of growth kinetics nor plasticity. BMSCs derived from iliac crest and vertebral body bone marrow were more responsive to chondrogenic induction, forming superior cartilaginous tissue in vitro, compared to those isolated from femoral head. (4) The identification of discrete progenitor populations in bone marrow by current cell-surface marker profiling is not predictive for subsequently derived in vitro BMSC cultures. Overall, the iliac crest and the vertebral body offer a more reliable tissue source of stromal progenitor cells for cartilage repair strategies compared to femoral head.},
  language  = {en}
}