@article{RechHueberFinzeletal.2016, author = {Rech, Juergen and Hueber, Axel J. and Finzel, Stephanie and Englbrecht, Matthias and Haschka, Judith and Manger, Bernhard and Kleyer, Arnd and Reiser, Michaela and Cobra, Jayme Fogagnolo and Figueiredo, Camille and Tony, Hans-Peter and Kleinert, Stefan and Wendler, Joerg and Schuch, Florian and Ronneberger, Monika and Feuchtenberger, Martin and Fleck, Martin and Manger, Karin and Ochs, Wolfgang and Schmitt-Haendle, Matthias and Lorenz, Hanns-Martin and Nuesslein, Hubert and Alten, Rieke and Henes, Joerg and Krueger, Klaus and Schett, Georg}, title = {Prediction of disease relapses by multibiomarker disease activity and autoantibody status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis on tapering DMARD treatment}, series = {Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases}, volume = {75}, journal = {Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases}, number = {9}, doi = {10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207900}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-187519}, pages = {1637-1644}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Objective To analyse the role of multibiomarker disease activity (MBDA) score in predicting disease relapses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in sustained remission who tapered disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in RETRO, a prospective randomised controlled trial. Methods MBDA scores (scale 1-100) were determined based on 12 inflammation markers in baseline serum samples from 94 patients of the RETRO study. MBDA scores were compared between patients relapsing or remaining in remission when tapering DMARDs. Demographic and disease-specific parameters were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis for defining predictors of relapse. Results Moderate-to-high MBDA scores were found in 33\% of patients with RA overall. Twice as many patients who relapsed (58\%) had moderate/high MBDA compared with patients who remained in remission (21\%). Baseline MBDA scores were significantly higher in patients with RA who were relapsing than those remaining in stable remission (N=94; p=0.0001) and those tapering/stopping (N=59; p=0.0001). Multivariate regression analysis identified MBDA scores as independent predictor for relapses in addition to anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) status. Relapse rates were low (13\%) in patients who were MBDA-/ACPA-, moderate in patients who were MBDA+/ACPA- (33.3\%) and MBDA-ACPA+ (31.8\%) and high in patients who were MBDA+/ACPA+ (76.4\%). Conclusions MBDA improved the prediction of relapses in patients with RA in stable remission undergoing DMARD tapering. If combined with ACPA testing, MBDA allowed prediction of relapse in more than 80\% of the patients. Trial registration number EudraCT 2009-015740-42.}, language = {en} } @article{StephanTascilarYalcinMutluetal.2023, author = {Stephan, Marlene and Tascilar, Koray and Yalcin-Mutlu, Melek and Hagen, Melanie and Haschka, Judith and Reiser, Michaela and Hartmann, Fabian and Kleyer, Arnd and Hueber, Axel J. and Manger, Bernhard and Figueiredo, Camille and Cobra, Jayme Fogagnolo and Tony, Hans-Peter and Finzel, Stephanie and Kleinert, Stefan and Wendler, J{\"o}rg and Schuch, Florian and Ronneberger, Monika and Feuchtenberger, Martin and Fleck, Martin and Manger, Karin and Ochs, Wolfgang and Schmitt-Haendle, Matthias and Lorenz, Hannes Martin and N{\"u}sslein, Hubert and Alten, Rieke and Henes, Joerg and Kr{\"u}ger, Klaus and Schett, Georg and Rech, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Physical function of RA patients tapering treatment — a post hoc analysis of the randomized controlled RETRO trial}, series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, volume = {12}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, number = {11}, issn = {2077-0383}, doi = {10.3390/jcm12113723}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-319349}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Several studies have shown that tapering or stopping disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in sustained remission is feasible. However, tapering/stopping bears the risk of decline in physical function as some patients may relapse and face increased disease activity. Here, we analyzed the impact of tapering or stopping DMARD treatment on the physical function of RA patients. The study was a post hoc analysis of physical functional worsening for 282 patients with RA in sustained remission tapering and stopping DMARD treatment in the prospective randomized RETRO study. HAQ and DAS-28 scores were determined in baseline samples of patients continuing DMARD (arm 1), tapering their dose by 50\% (arm 2), or stopping after tapering (arm 3). Patients were followed over 1 year, and HAQ and DAS-28 scores were evaluated every 3 months. The effect of treatment reduction strategy on functional worsening was assessed in a recurrent-event Cox regression model with a study-group (control, taper, and taper/stop) as the predictor. Two-hundred and eighty-two patients were analyzed. In 58 patients, functional worsening was observed. The incidences suggest a higher probability of functional worsening in patients tapering and/or stopping DMARDs, which is likely due to higher relapse rates in these individuals. At the end of the study, however, functional worsening was similar among the groups. Point estimates and survival curves show that the decline in functionality according to HAQ after tapering or discontinuation of DMARDs in RA patients with stable remission is associated with recurrence, but not with an overall functional decline.}, language = {en} } @article{BousquetAntoBachertetal.2021, author = {Bousquet, Jean and Anto, Josep M. and Bachert, Claus and Haahtela, Tari and Zuberbier, Torsten and Czarlewski, Wienczyslawa and Bedbrook, Anna and Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia and Walter Canonica, G. and Cardona, Victoria and Costa, Elisio and Cruz, Alvaro A. and Erhola, Marina and Fokkens, Wytske J. and Fonseca, Joao A. and Illario, Maddalena and Ivancevich, Juan-Carlos and Jutel, Marek and Klimek, Ludger and Kuna, Piotr and Kvedariene, Violeta and Le, LTT and Larenas-Linnemann, D{\´e}sir{\´e}e E. and Laune, Daniel and Louren{\c{c}}o, Olga M. and Mel{\´e}n, Erik and Mullol, Joaquim and Niedoszytko, Marek and Odemyr, Mika{\"e}la and Okamoto, Yoshitaka and Papadopoulos, Nikos G. and Patella, Vincenzo and Pfaar, Oliver and Pham-Thi, Nh{\^a}n and Rolland, Christine and Samolinski, Boleslaw and Sheikh, Aziz and Sofiev, Mikhail and Suppli Ulrik, Charlotte and Todo-Bom, Ana and Tomazic, Peter-Valentin and Toppila-Salmi, Sanna and Tsiligianni, Ioanna and Valiulis, Arunas and Valovirta, Erkka and Ventura, Maria-Teresa and Walker, Samantha and Williams, Sian and Yorgancioglu, Arzu and Agache, Ioana and Akdis, Cezmi A. and Almeida, Rute and Ansotegui, Ignacio J. and Annesi-Maesano, Isabella and Arnavielhe, Sylvie and Basaga{\~n}a, Xavier and D. Bateman, Eric and B{\´e}dard, Annabelle and Bedolla-Barajas, Martin and Becker, Sven and Bennoor, Kazi S. and Benveniste, Samuel and Bergmann, Karl C. and Bewick, Michael and Bialek, Slawomir and E. Billo, Nils and Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten and Bjermer, Leif and Blain, Hubert and Bonini, Matteo and Bonniaud, Philippe and Bosse, Isabelle and Bouchard, Jacques and Boulet, Louis-Philippe and Bourret, Rodolphe and Boussery, Koen and Braido, Fluvio and Briedis, Vitalis and Briggs, Andrew and Brightling, Christopher E. and Brozek, Jan and Brusselle, Guy and Brussino, Luisa and Buhl, Roland and Buonaiuto, Roland and Calderon, Moises A. and Camargos, Paulo and Camuzat, Thierry and Caraballo, Luis and Carriazo, Ana-Maria and Carr, Warner and Cartier, Christine and Casale, Thomas and Cecchi, Lorenzo and Cepeda Sarabia, Alfonso M. and H. Chavannes, Niels and Chkhartishvili, Ekaterine and Chu, Derek K. and Cingi, Cemal and Correia de Sousa, Jaime and Costa, David J. and Courbis, Anne-Lise and Custovic, Adnan and Cvetkosvki, Biljana and D'Amato, Gennaro and da Silva, Jane and Dantas, Carina and Dokic, Dejan and Dauvilliers, Yves and De Feo, Giulia and De Vries, Govert and Devillier, Philippe and Di Capua, Stefania and Dray, Gerard and Dubakiene, Ruta and Durham, Stephen R. and Dykewicz, Mark and Ebisawa, Motohiro and Gaga, Mina and El-Gamal, Yehia and Heffler, Enrico and Emuzyte, Regina and Farrell, John and Fauquert, Jean-Luc and Fiocchi, Alessandro and Fink-Wagner, Antje and Fontaine, Jean-Fran{\c{c}}ois and Fuentes Perez, Jos{\´e} M. and Gemicioğlu, Bilun and Gamkrelidze, Amiran and Garcia-Aymerich, Judith and Gevaert, Philippe and Gomez, Ren{\´e} Maximiliano and Gonz{\´a}lez Diaz, Sandra and Gotua, Maia and Guldemond, Nick A. and Guzm{\´a}n, Maria-Antonieta and Hajjam, Jawad and Huerta Villalobos, Yunuen R. and Humbert, Marc and Iaccarino, Guido and Ierodiakonou, Despo and Iinuma, Tomohisa and Jassem, Ewa and Joos, Guy and Jung, Ki-Suck and Kaidashev, Igor and Kalayci, Omer and Kardas, Przemyslaw and Keil, Thomas and Khaitov, Musa and Khaltaev, Nikolai and Kleine-Tebbe, Jorg and Kouznetsov, Rostislav and Kowalski, Marek L. and Kritikos, Vicky and Kull, Inger and La Grutta, Stefania and Leonardini, Lisa and Ljungberg, Henrik and Lieberman, Philip and Lipworth, Brian and Lodrup Carlsen, Karin C. and Lopes-Pereira, Catarina and Loureiro, Claudia C. and Louis, Renaud and Mair, Alpana and Mahboub, Bassam and Makris, Micha{\"e}l and Malva, Joao and Manning, Patrick and Marshall, Gailen D. and Masjedi, Mohamed R. and Maspero, Jorge F. and Carreiro-Martins, Pedro and Makela, Mika and Mathieu-Dupas, Eve and Maurer, Marcus and De Manuel Keenoy, Esteban and Melo-Gomes, Elisabete and Meltzer, Eli O. and Menditto, Enrica and Mercier, Jacques and Micheli, Yann and Miculinic, Neven and Mihaltan, Florin and Milenkovic, Branislava and Mitsias, Dimitirios I. and Moda, Giuliana and Mogica-Martinez, Maria-Dolores and Mohammad, Yousser and Montefort, Steve and Monti, Ricardo and Morais-Almeida, Mario and M{\"o}sges, Ralph and M{\"u}nter, Lars and Muraro, Antonella and Murray, Ruth and Naclerio, Robert and Napoli, Luigi and Namazova-Baranova, Leyla and Neffen, Hugo and Nekam, Kristoff and Neou, Angelo and Nordlund, Bj{\"o}rn and Novellino, Ettore and Nyembue, Dieudonn{\´e} and O'Hehir, Robyn and Ohta, Ken and Okubo, Kimi and Onorato, Gabrielle L. and Orlando, Valentina and Ouedraogo, Solange and Palamarchuk, Julia and Pali-Sch{\"o}ll, Isabella and Panzner, Peter and Park, Hae-Sim and Passalacqua, Gianni and P{\´e}pin, Jean-Louis and Paulino, Ema and Pawankar, Ruby and Phillips, Jim and Picard, Robert and Pinnock, Hilary and Plavec, Davor and Popov, Todor A. and Portejoie, Fabienne and Price, David and Prokopakis, Emmanuel P. and Psarros, Fotis and Pugin, Benoit and Puggioni, Francesca and Quinones-Delgado, Pablo and Raciborski, Filip and Rajabian-S{\"o}derlund, Rojin and Regateiro, Frederico S. and Reitsma, Sietze and Rivero-Yeverino, Daniela and Roberts, Graham and Roche, Nicolas and Rodriguez-Zagal, Erendira and Rolland, Christine and Roller-Wirnsberger, Regina E. and Rosario, Nelson and Romano, Antonino and Rottem, Menachem and Ryan, Dermot and Salim{\"a}ki, Johanna and Sanchez-Borges, Mario M. and Sastre, Joaquin and Scadding, Glenis K. and Scheire, Sophie and Schmid-Grendelmeier, Peter and Sch{\"u}nemann, Holger J. and Sarquis Serpa, Faradiba and Shamji, Mohamed and Sisul, Juan-Carlos and Sofiev, Mikhail and Sol{\´e}, Dirceu and Somekh, David and Sooronbaev, Talant and Sova, Milan and Spertini, Fran{\c{c}}ois and Spranger, Otto and Stellato, Cristiana and Stelmach, Rafael and Thibaudon, Michel and To, Teresa and Toumi, Mondher and Usmani, Omar and Valero, Antonio A. and Valenta, Rudolph and Valentin-Rostan, Marylin and Pereira, Marilyn Urrutia and van der Kleij, Rianne and Van Eerd, Michiel and Vandenplas, Olivier and Vasankari, Tuula and Vaz Carneiro, Antonio and Vezzani, Giorgio and Viart, Fr{\´e}d{\´e}ric and Viegi, Giovanni and Wallace, Dana and Wagenmann, Martin and Wang, De Yun and Waserman, Susan and Wickman, Magnus and Williams, Dennis M. and Wong, Gary and Wroczynski, Piotr and Yiallouros, Panayiotis K. and Yusuf, Osman M. and Zar, Heather J. and Zeng, St{\´e}phane and Zernotti, Mario E. and Zhang, Luo and Shan Zhong, Nan and Zidarn, Mihaela}, title = {ARIA digital anamorphosis: Digital transformation of health and care in airway diseases from research to practice}, series = {Allergy}, volume = {76}, journal = {Allergy}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1111/all.14422}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228339}, pages = {168 -- 190}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Digital anamorphosis is used to define a distorted image of health and care that may be viewed correctly using digital tools and strategies. MASK digital anamorphosis represents the process used by MASK to develop the digital transformation of health and care in rhinitis. It strengthens the ARIA change management strategy in the prevention and management of airway disease. The MASK strategy is based on validated digital tools. Using the MASK digital tool and the CARAT online enhanced clinical framework, solutions for practical steps of digital enhancement of care are proposed.}, language = {en} } @article{SchwaabBjarnasonWehrensMengetal.2021, author = {Schwaab, Bernhard and Bjarnason-Wehrens, Birna and Meng, Karin and Albus, Christian and Salzwedel, Annett and Schmid, Jean-Paul and Benzer, Werner and Metz, Matthes and Jensen, Katrin and Rauch, Bernhard and B{\"o}nner, Gerd and Brzoska, Patrick and Buhr-Schinner, Heike and Charrier, Albrecht and Cordes, Carsten and D{\"o}rr, Gesine and Eichler, Sarah and Exner, Anne-Kathrin and Fromm, Bernd and Gielen, Stephan and Glatz, Johannes and Gohlke, Helmut and Grilli, Maurizio and Gysan, Detlef and H{\"a}rtel, Ursula and Hahmann, Harry and Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph and Karger, Gabriele and Karoff, Marthin and Kiwus, Ulrich and Knoglinger, Ernst and Krusch, Christian-Wolfgang and Langheim, Eike and Mann, Johannes and Max, Regina and Metzendorf, Maria-Inti and Nebel, Roland and Niebauer, Josef and Predel, Hans-Georg and Preßler, Axel and Razum, Oliver and Reiss, Nils and Saure, Daniel and von Schacky, Clemens and Sch{\"u}tt, Morten and Schultz, Konrad and Skoda, Eva-Maria and Steube, Diethard and Streibelt, Marco and St{\"u}ttgen, Martin and St{\"u}ttgen, Michaela and Teufel, Martin and Tschanz, Hansueli and V{\"o}ller, Heinz and Vogel, Heiner and Westphal, Ronja}, title = {Cardiac rehabilitation in German speaking countries of Europe — evidence-based guidelines from Germany, Austria and Switzerland LLKardReha-DACH — part 2}, series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, volume = {10}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, number = {14}, issn = {2077-0383}, doi = {10.3390/jcm10143071}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-242645}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Background: Scientific guidelines have been developed to update and harmonize exercise based cardiac rehabilitation (ebCR) in German speaking countries. Key recommendations for ebCR indications have recently been published in part 1 of this journal. The present part 2 updates the evidence with respect to contents and delivery of ebCR in clinical practice, focusing on exercise training (ET), psychological interventions (PI), patient education (PE). In addition, special patients' groups and new developments, such as telemedical (Tele) or home-based ebCR, are discussed as well. Methods: Generation of evidence and search of literature have been described in part 1. Results: Well documented evidence confirms the prognostic significance of ET in patients with coronary artery disease. Positive clinical effects of ET are described in patients with congestive heart failure, heart valve surgery or intervention, adults with congenital heart disease, and peripheral arterial disease. Specific recommendations for risk stratification and adequate exercise prescription for continuous-, interval-, and strength training are given in detail. PI when added to ebCR did not show significant positive effects in general. There was a positive trend towards reduction in depressive symptoms for "distress management" and "lifestyle changes". PE is able to increase patients' knowledge and motivation, as well as behavior changes, regarding physical activity, dietary habits, and smoking cessation. The evidence for distinct ebCR programs in special patients' groups is less clear. Studies on Tele-CR predominantly included low-risk patients. Hence, it is questionable, whether clinical results derived from studies in conventional ebCR may be transferred to Tele-CR. Conclusions: ET is the cornerstone of ebCR. Additional PI should be included, adjusted to the needs of the individual patient. PE is able to promote patients self-management, empowerment, and motivation. Diversity-sensitive structures should be established to interact with the needs of special patient groups and gender issues. Tele-CR should be further investigated as a valuable tool to implement ebCR more widely and effectively.}, language = {en} } @article{DietzschBraesigkSeideletal.2022, author = {Dietzsch, Stefan and Braesigk, Annett and Seidel, Clemens and Remmele, Julia and Kitzing, Ralf and Schlender, Tina and Mynarek, Martin and Geismar, Dirk and Jablonska, Karolina and Schwarz, Rudolf and Pazos, Montserrat and Weber, Damien C. and Frick, Silke and Gurtner, Kristin and Matuschek, Christiane and Harrabi, Semi Ben and Gl{\"u}ck, Albrecht and Lewitzki, Victor and Dieckmann, Karin and Benesch, Martin and Gerber, Nicolas U. and Obrecht, Denise and Rutkowski, Stefan and Timmermann, Beate and Kortmann, Rolf-Dieter}, title = {Types of deviation and review criteria in pretreatment central quality control of tumor bed boost in medulloblastoma—an analysis of the German Radiotherapy Quality Control Panel in the SIOP PNET5 MB trial}, series = {Strahlentherapie und Onkologie}, volume = {198}, journal = {Strahlentherapie und Onkologie}, number = {3}, issn = {0179-7158}, doi = {10.1007/s00066-021-01822-0}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-307812}, pages = {282-290}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Purpose In Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, pretreatment radiotherapy quality control (RT-QC) for tumor bed boost (TB) in non-metastatic medulloblastoma (MB) was not mandatory but was recommended for patients enrolled in the SIOP PNET5 MB trial between 2014 and 2018. This individual case review (ICR) analysis aimed to evaluate types of deviations in the initial plan proposals and develop uniform review criteria for TB boost. Patients and methods A total of 78 patients were registered in this trial, of whom a subgroup of 65 patients were available for evaluation of the TB treatment plans. Dose uniformity was evaluated according to the definitions of the protocol. Additional RT-QC criteria for standardized review of target contours were elaborated and data evaluated accordingly. Results Of 65 initial TB plan proposals, 27 (41.5\%) revealed deviations of target volume delineation. Deviations according to the dose uniformity criteria were present in 14 (21.5\%) TB plans. In 25 (38.5\%) cases a modification of the RT plan was recommended. Rejection of the TB plans was rather related to unacceptable target volume delineation than to insufficient dose uniformity. Conclusion In this analysis of pretreatment RT-QC, protocol deviations were present in a high proportion of initial TB plan proposals. These findings emphasize the importance of pretreatment RT-QC in clinical trials for MB. Based on these data, a proposal for RT-QC criteria for tumor bed boost in non-metastatic MB was developed.}, language = {en} } @article{SchilbachAlkhaledWelkeretal.2015, author = {Schilbach, Karin and Alkhaled, Mohammed and Welker, Christian and Eckert, Franziska and Blank, Gregor and Ziegler, Hendrik and Sterk, Marco and M{\"u}ller, Friederike and Sonntag, Katja and Wieder, Thomas and Braum{\"u}ller, Heidi and Schmitt, Julia and Eyrich, Matthias and Schleicher, Sabine and Seitz, Christian and Erbacher, Annika and Pichler, Bernd J. and M{\"u}ller, Hartmut and Tighe, Robert and Lim, Annick and Gillies, Stephen D. and Strittmatter, Wolfgang and R{\"o}cken, Martin and Handgretinger, Rupert}, title = {Cancer-targeted IL-12 controls human rhabdomyosarcoma by senescence induction and myogenic differentiation}, series = {OncoImmunology}, volume = {4}, journal = {OncoImmunology}, number = {7}, doi = {10.1080/2162402X.2015.1014760}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-154579}, pages = {e1014760}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Stimulating the immune system to attack cancer is a promising approach, even for the control of advanced cancers. Several cytokines that promote interferon-γ-dominated immune responses show antitumor activity, with interleukin 12 (IL-12) being of major importance. Here, we used an antibody-IL-12 fusion protein (NHS-IL12) that binds histones of necrotic cells to treat human sarcoma in humanized mice. Following sarcoma engraftment, NHS-IL12 therapy was combined with either engineered IL-7 (FcIL-7) or IL-2 (IL-2MAB602) for continuous cytokine bioavailability. NHS-IL12 strongly induced innate and adaptive antitumor immunity when combined with IL-7 or IL-2. NHS-IL12 therapy significantly improved survival of sarcoma-bearing mice and caused long-term remissions when combined with IL-2. NHS-IL12 induced pronounced cancer cell senescence, as documented by strong expression of senescence-associated p16\(^{INK4a}\) and nuclear translocation of p-HP1γ, and permanent arrest of cancer cell proliferation. In addition, this cancer immunotherapy initiated the induction of myogenic differentiation, further promoting the hypothesis that efficient antitumor immunity includes mechanisms different from cytotoxicity for efficient cancer control in vivo.}, language = {en} } @article{MitchellLiWeinholdetal.2016, author = {Mitchell, Jonathan S. and Li, Ni and Weinhold, Niels and F{\"o}rsti, Asta and Ali, Mina and van Duin, Mark and Thorleifsson, Gudmar and Johnson, David C. and Chen, Bowang and Halvarsson, Britt-Marie and Gudbjartsson, Daniel F. and Kuiper, Rowan and Stephens, Owen W. and Bertsch, Uta and Broderick, Peter and Campo, Chiara and Einsele, Hermann and Gregory, Walter A. and Gullberg, Urban and Henrion, Marc and Hillengass, Jens and Hoffmann, Per and Jackson, Graham H. and Johnsson, Ellinor and J{\"o}ud, Magnus and Kristinsson, Sigurdur Y. and Lenhoff, Stig and Lenive, Oleg and Mellqvist, Ulf-Henrik and Migliorini, Gabriele and Nahi, Hareth and Nelander, Sven and Nickel, Jolanta and N{\"o}then, Markus M. and Rafnar, Thorunn and Ross, Fiona M. and da Silva Filho, Miguel Inacio and Swaminathan, Bhairavi and Thomsen, Hauke and Turesson, Ingemar and Vangsted, Annette and Vogel, Ulla and Waage, Anders and Walker, Brian A. and Wihlborg, Anna-Karin and Broyl, Annemiek and Davies, Faith E. and Thorsteinsdottir, Unnur and Langer, Christian and Hansson, Markus and Kaiser, Martin and Sonneveld, Pieter and Stefansson, Kari and Morgan, Gareth J. and Goldschmidt, Hartmut and Hemminki, Kari and Nilsson, Bj{\"o}rn and Houlston, Richard S.}, title = {Genome-wide association study identifies multiple susceptibility loci for multiple myeloma}, series = {Nature Communications}, volume = {7}, journal = {Nature Communications}, doi = {10.1038/ncomms12050}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-165983}, pages = {12050}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy with a significant heritable basis. Genome-wide association studies have transformed our understanding of MM predisposition, but individual studies have had limited power to discover risk loci. Here we perform a meta-analysis of these GWAS, add a new GWAS and perform replication analyses resulting in 9,866 cases and 239,188 controls. We confirm all nine known risk loci and discover eight new loci at 6p22.3 (rs34229995, P=1.31 × 10-8), 6q21 (rs9372120, P=9.09 × 10-15), 7q36.1 (rs7781265, P=9.71 × 10-9), 8q24.21 (rs1948915, P=4.20 × 10-11), 9p21.3 (rs2811710, P=1.72 × 10-13), 10p12.1 (rs2790457, P=1.77 × 10-8), 16q23.1 (rs7193541, P=5.00 × 10-12) and 20q13.13 (rs6066835, P=1.36 × 10-13), which localize in or near to JARID2, ATG5, SMARCD3, CCAT1, CDKN2A, WAC, RFWD3 and PREX1. These findings provide additional support for a polygenic model of MM and insight into the biological basis of tumour development.}, language = {en} } @article{DrubeWeberLoschinskietal.2015, author = {Drube, Sebastian and Weber, Franziska and Loschinski, Romy and Beyer, Mandy and Rothe, Mandy and Rabenhorst, Anja and G{\"o}pfert, Christiane and Meininger, Isabel and Diamanti, Michaela A. and Stegner, David and H{\"a}fner, Norman and B{\"o}ttcher, Martin and Reinecke, Kirstin and Herdegen, Thomas and Greten, Florian R. and Nieswandt, Bernhard and Hartmann, Karin and Kr{\"a}mer, Oliver H. and Kamradt, Thomas}, title = {Subthreshold IKK activation modulates the effector functions of primary mast cells and allows specific targeting of transformed mast cells}, series = {Oncotarget}, volume = {6}, journal = {Oncotarget}, number = {7}, doi = {10.18632/oncotarget.3022}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-143681}, pages = {5354-5368}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Mast cell differentiation and proliferation depends on IL-3. IL-3 induces the activation of MAP-kinases and STATs and consequently induces proliferation and survival. Dysregulation of IL-3 signaling pathways also contribute to inflammation and tumorigenesis. We show here that IL-3 induces a SFK- and Ca2\(^{+}\)-dependent activation of the inhibitor of κB kinases 2 (IKK2) which results in mast cell proliferation and survival but does not induce IκBα-degradation and NFκB activation. Therefore we propose the term "subthreshold IKK activation". This subthreshold IKK activation also primes mast cells for enhanced responsiveness to IL-33R signaling. Consequently, co-stimulation with IL-3 and IL-33 increases IKK activation and massively enhances cytokine production induced by IL-33. We further reveal that in neoplastic mast cells expressing constitutively active Ras, subthreshold IKK activation is associated with uncontrolled proliferation. Consequently, pharmacological IKK inhibition reduces tumor growth selectively by inducing apoptosis in vivo. Together, subthreshold IKK activation is crucial to mediate the full IL-33-induced effector functions in primary mast cells and to mediate uncontrolled proliferation of neoplastic mast cells. Thus, IKK2 is a new molecularly defined target structure.}, language = {en} } @article{LitovkinVanEyndeJoniauetal.2015, author = {Litovkin, Kirill and Van Eynde, Aleyde and Joniau, Steven and Lerut, Evelyne and Laenen, Annouschka and Gevaert, Thomas and Gevaert, Olivier and Spahn, Martin and Kneitz, Burkhard and Gramme, Pierre and Helleputte, Thibault and Isebaert, Sofie and Haustermans, Karin and Bollen, Mathieu}, title = {DNA Methylation-Guided Prediction of Clinical Failure in High-Risk Prostate Cancer}, series = {PLoS ONE}, volume = {10}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, number = {6}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0130651}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-151705}, pages = {e0130651}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Background Prostate cancer (PCa) is a very heterogeneous disease with respect to clinical outcome. This study explored differential DNA methylation in a priori selected genes to diagnose PCa and predict clinical failure (CF) in high-risk patients. Methods A quantitative multiplex, methylation-specific PCR assay was developed to assess promoter methylation of the APC, CCND2, GSTP1, PTGS2 and RARB genes in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 42 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and radical prostatectomy specimens of patients with high-risk PCa, encompassing training and validation cohorts of 147 and 71 patients, respectively. Log-rank tests, univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to investigate the prognostic value of the DNA methylation. Results Hypermethylation of APC, CCND2, GSTP1, PTGS2 and RARB was highly cancer-specific. However, only GSTP1 methylation was significantly associated with CF in both independent high-risk PCa cohorts. Importantly, trichotomization into low, moderate and high GSTP1 methylation level subgroups was highly predictive for CF. Patients with either a low or high GSTP1 methylation level, as compared to the moderate methylation groups, were at a higher risk for CF in both the training (Hazard ratio [HR], 3.65; 95\% CI, 1.65 to 8.07) and validation sets (HR, 4.27; 95\% CI, 1.03 to 17.72) as well as in the combined cohort ( HR, 2.74; 95\% CI, 1.42 to 5.27) in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Classification of primary high-risk tumors into three subtypes based on DNA methylation can be combined with clinico-pathological parameters for a more informative risk-stratification of these PCa patients.}, language = {en} } @article{KleinschnitzGrundWingleretal.2010, author = {Kleinschnitz, Christoph and Grund, Henrike and Wingler, Kirstin and Armitage, Melanie E. and Jones, Emma and Mittal, Manish and Barit, David and Schwarz, Tobias and Geis, Christian and Kraft, Peter and Barthel, Konstanze and Schuhmann, Michael K. and Herrmann, Alexander M. and Meuth, Sven G. and Stoll, Guido and Meurer, Sabine and Schrewe, Anja and Becker, Lore and Gailus-Durner, Valerie and Fuchs, Helmut and Klopstock, Thomas and de Angelis, Martin Hrabe and Jandeleit-Dahm, Karin and Shah, Ajay M. and Weissmann, Norbert and Schmidt, Harald H. H. W.}, title = {Post-Stroke Inhibition of Induced NADPH Oxidase Type 4 Prevents Oxidative Stress and Neurodegeneration}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-68416}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Ischemic stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Only one moderately effective therapy exists, albeit with contraindications that exclude 90\% of the patients. This medical need contrasts with a high failure rate of more than 1,000 pre-clinical drug candidates for stroke therapies. Thus, there is a need for translatable mechanisms of neuroprotection and more rigid thresholds of relevance in pre-clinical stroke models. One such candidate mechanism is oxidative stress. However, antioxidant approaches have failed in clinical trials, and the significant sources of oxidative stress in stroke are unknown. We here identify NADPH oxidase type 4 (NOX4) as a major source of oxidative stress and an effective therapeutic target in acute stroke. Upon ischemia, NOX4 was induced in human and mouse brain. Mice deficient in NOX4 (Nox42/2) of either sex, but not those deficient for NOX1 or NOX2, were largely protected from oxidative stress, blood-brain-barrier leakage, and neuronal apoptosis, after both transient and permanent cerebral ischemia. This effect was independent of age, as elderly mice were equally protected. Restoration of oxidative stress reversed the stroke-protective phenotype in Nox42/2 mice. Application of the only validated low-molecular-weight pharmacological NADPH oxidase inhibitor, VAS2870, several hours after ischemia was as protective as deleting NOX4. The extent of neuroprotection was exceptional, resulting in significantly improved long-term neurological functions and reduced mortality. NOX4 therefore represents a major source of oxidative stress and novel class of drug target for stroke therapy.}, subject = {Schlaganfall}, language = {en} } @article{DufnerKesslerJustetal.2022, author = {Dufner, Vera and Kessler, Almuth Friederike and Just, Larissa and Hau, Peter and Bumes, Elisabeth and Pels, Hendrik Johannes and Grauer, Oliver Martin and Wiese, Bettina and L{\"o}hr, Mario and Jordan, Karin and Strik, Herwig}, title = {The emesis trial: depressive glioma patients are more affected by chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting}, series = {Frontiers in Neurology}, volume = {13}, journal = {Frontiers in Neurology}, issn = {1664-2295}, doi = {10.3389/fneur.2022.773265}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-262859}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Purpose Glioma patients face a limited life expectancy and at the same time, they suffer from afflicting symptoms and undesired effects of tumor treatment. Apart from bone marrow suppression, standard chemotherapy with temozolomide causes nausea, emesis and loss of appetite. In this pilot study, we investigated how chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) affects the patients' levels of depression and their quality of life. Methods In this prospective observational multicentre study (n = 87), nausea, emesis and loss of appetite were evaluated with an expanded MASCC questionnaire, covering 10 days during the first and the second cycle of chemotherapy. Quality of life was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BN 20 questionnaire and levels of depression with the PHQ-9 inventory before and after the first and second cycle of chemotherapy. Results CINV affected a minor part of patients. If present, it reached its maximum at day 3 and decreased to baseline level not before day 8. Levels of depression increased significantly after the first cycle of chemotherapy, but decreased during the further course of treatment. Patients with higher levels of depression were more severely affected by CINV and showed a lower quality of life through all time-points. Conclusion We conclude that symptoms of depression should be perceived in advance and treated in order to avoid more severe side effects of tumor treatment. Additionally, in affected patients, delayed nausea was most prominent, pointing toward an activation of the NK1 receptor. We conclude that long acting antiemetics are necessary totreat temozolomide-induced nausea.}, language = {en} } @article{JiangOronClarketal.2016, author = {Jiang, Yuxiang and Oron, Tal Ronnen and Clark, Wyatt T. and Bankapur, Asma R. and D'Andrea, Daniel and Lepore, Rosalba and Funk, Christopher S. and Kahanda, Indika and Verspoor, Karin M. and Ben-Hur, Asa and Koo, Da Chen Emily and Penfold-Brown, Duncan and Shasha, Dennis and Youngs, Noah and Bonneau, Richard and Lin, Alexandra and Sahraeian, Sayed M. E. and Martelli, Pier Luigi and Profiti, Giuseppe and Casadio, Rita and Cao, Renzhi and Zhong, Zhaolong and Cheng, Jianlin and Altenhoff, Adrian and Skunca, Nives and Dessimoz, Christophe and Dogan, Tunca and Hakala, Kai and Kaewphan, Suwisa and Mehryary, Farrokh and Salakoski, Tapio and Ginter, Filip and Fang, Hai and Smithers, Ben and Oates, Matt and Gough, Julian and T{\"o}r{\"o}nen, Petri and Koskinen, Patrik and Holm, Liisa and Chen, Ching-Tai and Hsu, Wen-Lian and Bryson, Kevin and Cozzetto, Domenico and Minneci, Federico and Jones, David T. and Chapman, Samuel and BKC, Dukka and Khan, Ishita K. and Kihara, Daisuke and Ofer, Dan and Rappoport, Nadav and Stern, Amos and Cibrian-Uhalte, Elena and Denny, Paul and Foulger, Rebecca E. and Hieta, Reija and Legge, Duncan and Lovering, Ruth C. and Magrane, Michele and Melidoni, Anna N. and Mutowo-Meullenet, Prudence and Pichler, Klemens and Shypitsyna, Aleksandra and Li, Biao and Zakeri, Pooya and ElShal, Sarah and Tranchevent, L{\´e}on-Charles and Das, Sayoni and Dawson, Natalie L. and Lee, David and Lees, Jonathan G. and Sillitoe, Ian and Bhat, Prajwal and Nepusz, Tam{\´a}s and Romero, Alfonso E. and Sasidharan, Rajkumar and Yang, Haixuan and Paccanaro, Alberto and Gillis, Jesse and Sede{\~n}o-Cort{\´e}s, Adriana E. and Pavlidis, Paul and Feng, Shou and Cejuela, Juan M. and Goldberg, Tatyana and Hamp, Tobias and Richter, Lothar and Salamov, Asaf and Gabaldon, Toni and Marcet-Houben, Marina and Supek, Fran and Gong, Qingtian and Ning, Wei and Zhou, Yuanpeng and Tian, Weidong and Falda, Marco and Fontana, Paolo and Lavezzo, Enrico and Toppo, Stefano and Ferrari, Carlo and Giollo, Manuel and Piovesan, Damiano and Tosatto, Silvio C. E. and del Pozo, Angela and Fern{\´a}ndez, Jos{\´e} M. and Maietta, Paolo and Valencia, Alfonso and Tress, Michael L. and Benso, Alfredo and Di Carlo, Stefano and Politano, Gianfranco and Savino, Alessandro and Rehman, Hafeez Ur and Re, Matteo and Mesiti, Marco and Valentini, Giorgio and Bargsten, Joachim W. and van Dijk, Aalt D. J. and Gemovic, Branislava and Glisic, Sanja and Perovic, Vladmir and Veljkovic, Veljko and Almeida-e-Silva, Danillo C. and Vencio, Ricardo Z. N. and Sharan, Malvika and Vogel, J{\"o}rg and Kansakar, Lakesh and Zhang, Shanshan and Vucetic, Slobodan and Wang, Zheng and Sternberg, Michael J. E. and Wass, Mark N. and Huntley, Rachael P. and Martin, Maria J. and O'Donovan, Claire and Robinson, Peter N. and Moreau, Yves and Tramontano, Anna and Babbitt, Patricia C. and Brenner, Steven E. and Linial, Michal and Orengo, Christine A. and Rost, Burkhard and Greene, Casey S. and Mooney, Sean D. and Friedberg, Iddo and Radivojac, Predrag and Veljkovic, Nevena}, title = {An expanded evaluation of protein function prediction methods shows an improvement in accuracy}, series = {Genome Biology}, volume = {17}, journal = {Genome Biology}, number = {184}, doi = {10.1186/s13059-016-1037-6}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-166293}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Background A major bottleneck in our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of life is the assignment of function to proteins. While molecular experiments provide the most reliable annotation of proteins, their relatively low throughput and restricted purview have led to an increasing role for computational function prediction. However, assessing methods for protein function prediction and tracking progress in the field remain challenging. Results We conducted the second critical assessment of functional annotation (CAFA), a timed challenge to assess computational methods that automatically assign protein function. We evaluated 126 methods from 56 research groups for their ability to predict biological functions using Gene Ontology and gene-disease associations using Human Phenotype Ontology on a set of 3681 proteins from 18 species. CAFA2 featured expanded analysis compared with CAFA1, with regards to data set size, variety, and assessment metrics. To review progress in the field, the analysis compared the best methods from CAFA1 to those of CAFA2. Conclusions The top-performing methods in CAFA2 outperformed those from CAFA1. This increased accuracy can be attributed to a combination of the growing number of experimental annotations and improved methods for function prediction. The assessment also revealed that the definition of top-performing algorithms is ontology specific, that different performance metrics can be used to probe the nature of accurate predictions, and the relative diversity of predictions in the biological process and human phenotype ontologies. While there was methodological improvement between CAFA1 and CAFA2, the interpretation of results and usefulness of individual methods remain context-dependent.}, language = {en} } @article{SchofferSchueleinArandetal.2016, author = {Schoffer, Olaf and Sch{\"u}lein, Stefanie and Arand, Gerlinde and Arnholdt, Hans and Baaske, Dieter and Bargou, Ralf C. and Becker, Nikolaus and Beckmann, Matthias W. and Bodack, Yves and B{\"o}hme, Beatrix and Bozkurt, Tayfun and Breitsprecher, Regine and Buchali, Andre and Burger, Elke and Burger, Ulrike and Dommisch, Klaus and Elsner, Gudrun and Fernschild, Karin and Flintzer, Ulrike and Funke, Uwe and Gerken, Michael and G{\"o}bel, Hubert and Grobe, Norbert and Gumpp, Vera and Heinzerling, Lucie and Kempfer, Lana Raffaela and Kiani, Alexander and Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika and Kl{\"o}cking, Sabine and Kreibich, Ute and Knabner, Katrin and Kuhn, Peter and Lutze, Stine and M{\"a}der, Uwe and Maisel, Tanja and Maschke, Jan and Middeke, Martin and Neubauer, Andreas and Niedostatek, Antje and Opazo-Saez, Anabelle and Peters, Christoph and Schell, Beatrice and Schenkirsch, Gerhard and Schmalenberg, Harald and Schmidt, Peter and Schneider, Constanze and Schubotz, Birgit and Seide, Anika and Strecker, Paul and Taubenheim, Sabine and Wackes, Matthias and Weiß, Steffen and Welke, Claudia and Werner, Carmen and Wittekind, Christian and Wulff, J{\"o}rg and Zettl, Heike and Klug, Stefanie J.}, title = {Tumour stage distribution and survival of malignant melanoma in Germany 2002-2011}, series = {BMC Cancer}, volume = {16}, journal = {BMC Cancer}, number = {936}, doi = {10.1186/s12885-016-2963-0}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164544}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Background Over the past two decades, there has been a rising trend in malignant melanoma incidence worldwide. In 2008, Germany introduced a nationwide skin cancer screening program starting at age 35. The aims of this study were to analyse the distribution of malignant melanoma tumour stages over time, as well as demographic and regional differences in stage distribution and survival of melanoma patients. Methods Pooled data from 61 895 malignant melanoma patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2011 and documented in 28 German population-based and hospital-based clinical cancer registries were analysed using descriptive methods, joinpoint regression, logistic regression and relative survival. Results The number of annually documented cases increased by 53.2\% between 2002 (N = 4 779) and 2011 (N = 7 320). There was a statistically significant continuous positive trend in the proportion of stage UICC I cases diagnosed between 2002 and 2011, compared to a negative trend for stage UICC II. No trends were found for stages UICC III and IV respectively. Age (OR 0.97, 95\% CI 0.97-0.97), sex (OR 1.18, 95\% CI 1.11-1.25), date of diagnosis (OR 1.05, 95\% CI 1.04-1.06), 'diagnosis during screening' (OR 3.24, 95\% CI 2.50-4.19) and place of residence (OR 1.23, 95\% CI 1.16-1.30) had a statistically significant influence on the tumour stage at diagnosis. The overall 5-year relative survival for invasive cases was 83.4\% (95\% CI 82.8-83.9\%). Conclusions No distinct changes in the distribution of malignant melanoma tumour stages among those aged 35 and older were seen that could be directly attributed to the introduction of skin cancer screening in 2008. "}, language = {en} } @article{MorisVandenBroeckToscoetal.2016, author = {Moris, Lisa and Van den Broeck, Thomas and Tosco, Lorenzo and Van Baelen, Anthony and Gontero, Paolo and Karnes, Robert Jeffrey and Everaerts, Wouter and Albersen, Maarten and Bastian, Patrick J. and Chlosta, Piotr and Claessens, Frank and Chun, Felix K. and Graefen, Markus and Gratzke, Christian and Kneitz, Burkhard and Marchioro, Giansilvio and Salas, Rafael Sanchez and Tombal, Bertrand and Van Der Poel, Henk and Walz, Jochen Christoph and De Meerleer, Gert and Bossi, Alberto and Haustermans, Karin and Montorsi, Francesco and Van Poppel, Hendrik and Spahn, Martin and Briganti, Alberto and Joniau, Steven}, title = {Impact of lymph node burden on survival of high-risk prostate cancer patients following radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection}, series = {Frontiers in Surgery}, volume = {3}, journal = {Frontiers in Surgery}, organization = {European Multicenter Prostate Cancer Clinical and Translational Research Group (EMPaCT)}, issn = {2296-875X}, doi = {10.3389/fsurg.2016.00065}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-195721}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Aim To determine the impact of the extent of lymph node invasion (LNI) on long-term oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). Material and methods In this retrospective study, we examined the data of 1,249 high-risk, non-metastatic PCa patients treated with RP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) between 1989 and 2011 at eight different tertiary institutions. We fitted univariate and multivariate Cox models to assess independent predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). The number of positive lymph node (LN) was dichotomized according to the most informative cutoff predicting CSS. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed CSS and OS rates. Only patients with at least 10 LNs removed at PLND were included. This cutoff was chosen as a surrogate for a well performed PNLD. Results Mean age was 65 years (median: 66, IQR 60-70). Positive surgical margins were present in 53.7\% (n = 671). Final Gleason score (GS) was 2-6 in 12.7\% (n = 158), 7 in 52\% (n = 649), and 8-10 in 35.4\% (n = 442). The median number of LNs removed during PLND was 15 (IQR 12-17). Of all patients, 1,128 (90.3\%) had 0-3 positive LNs, while 126 (9.7\%) had ≥4 positive LNs. Patients with 0-3 positive LNs had significantly better CSS outcome at 10-year follow-up compared to patients with ≥4 positive LNs (87 vs. 50\%; p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained for OS, with a 72 vs. 37\% (p < 0.0001) survival at 10 years for patients with 0-3 vs. ≥4 positive LNs, respectively. At multivariate analysis, final GS of 8-10, salvage ADT therapy, and ≥4 (vs. <4) positive LNs were predictors of worse CSS and OS. Pathological stage pT4 was an additional predictor of worse CSS. Conclusion Four or more positive LNs, pathological stage pT4, and final GS of 8-10 represent independent predictors for worse CSS in patients with high-risk PCa. Primary tumor biology remains a strong driver of tumor progression and patients having ≥4 positive LNs could be considered an enriched patient group in which novel treatment strategies should be studied.}, language = {en} } @article{WulfBarkovitsSchorketal.2022, author = {Wulf, Maximilian and Barkovits, Katalin and Schork, Karin and Eisenacher, Martin and Riederer, Peter and Gerlach, Manfred and Eggers, Britta and Marcus, Katrin}, title = {The proteome of neuromelanin granules in dementia with Lewy bodies}, series = {Cells}, volume = {11}, journal = {Cells}, number = {22}, issn = {2073-4409}, doi = {10.3390/cells11223538}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-297465}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Neuromelanin granules (NMGs) are organelle-like structures present in the human substantia nigra pars compacta. In addition to neuromelanin, NMGs contain proteins, lipids and metals. As NMG-containing dopaminergic neurons are preferentially lost in Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), it is assumed that NMGs may play a role in neurodegenerative processes. Until now, this role is not completely understood and needs further investigation. We therefore set up an exploratory proteomic study to identify differences in the proteomic profile of NMGs from DLB patients (n = 5) compared to healthy controls (CTRL, n = 5). We applied a laser microdissection and mass-spectrometry-based approach, in which we used targeted mass spectrometric experiments for validation. In NMG-surrounding (SN\(_{Surr.}\)) tissue of DLB patients, we found evidence for ongoing oxidative damage and an impairment of protein degradation. As a potentially disease-related mechanism, we found α-synuclein and protein S100A9 to be enriched in NMGs of DLB cases, while the abundance of several ribosomal proteins was significantly decreased. As S100A9 is known to be able to enhance the formation of toxic α-synuclein fibrils, this finding points towards an involvement of NMGs in pathogenesis, however the exact role of NMGs as either neuroprotective or neurotoxic needs to be further investigated. Nevertheless, our study provides evidence for an impairment of protein degradation, ongoing oxidative damage and accumulation of potentially neurotoxic protein aggregates to be central mechanisms of neurodegeneration in DLB.}, language = {en} } @article{ReddersenGuellmarTonndorfMartinietal.2021, author = {Reddersen, Kirsten and G{\"u}llmar, Andr{\´e} and Tonndorf-Martini, Silke and Sigusch, Bernd W. and Ewald, Andrea and Dauben, Thomas J. and Martin, Karin and Wiegand, Cornelia}, title = {Critical parameters in cultivation of experimental biofilms using the example of Pseudomonas fluorescens}, series = {Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine}, volume = {32}, journal = {Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine}, number = {9}, issn = {0957-4530}, doi = {10.1007/s10856-021-06568-w}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-309911}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Formation and treatment of biofilms present a great challenge for health care and industry. About 80\% of human infections are associated with biofilms including biomaterial centered infections, like infections of prosthetic heart valves, central venous catheters, or urinary catheters. Additionally, biofilms can cause food and drinking water contamination. Biofilm research focusses on application of experimental biofilm models to study initial adherence processes, to optimize physico-chemical properties of medical materials for reducing interactions between materials and bacteria, and to investigate biofilm treatment under controlled conditions. Exploring new antimicrobial strategies plays a key role in a variety of scientific disciplines, like medical material research, anti-infectious research, plant engineering, or wastewater treatment. Although a variety of biofilm models exist, there is a lack of standardization for experimental protocols, and designing experimental setups remains a challenge. In this study, a number of experimental parameters critical for material research have been tested that influence formation and stability of an experimental biofilm using the non-pathogenic model strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens. These parameters include experimental time frame, nutrient supply, inoculum concentration, static and dynamic cultivation conditions, material properties, and sample treatment during staining for visualization of the biofilm. It was shown, that all tested parameters critically influence the experimental biofilm formation process. The results obtained in this study shall support material researchers in designing experimental biofilm setups.}, language = {en} }