@article{BousquetAntoBachertetal.2021, author = {Bousquet, Jean and Anto, Josep M. and Bachert, Claus and Haahtela, Tari and Zuberbier, Torsten and Czarlewski, Wienczyslawa and Bedbrook, Anna and Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia and Walter Canonica, G. and Cardona, Victoria and Costa, Elisio and Cruz, Alvaro A. and Erhola, Marina and Fokkens, Wytske J. and Fonseca, Joao A. and Illario, Maddalena and Ivancevich, Juan-Carlos and Jutel, Marek and Klimek, Ludger and Kuna, Piotr and Kvedariene, Violeta and Le, LTT and Larenas-Linnemann, D{\´e}sir{\´e}e E. and Laune, Daniel and Louren{\c{c}}o, Olga M. and Mel{\´e}n, Erik and Mullol, Joaquim and Niedoszytko, Marek and Odemyr, Mika{\"e}la and Okamoto, Yoshitaka and Papadopoulos, Nikos G. and Patella, Vincenzo and Pfaar, Oliver and Pham-Thi, Nh{\^a}n and Rolland, Christine and Samolinski, Boleslaw and Sheikh, Aziz and Sofiev, Mikhail and Suppli Ulrik, Charlotte and Todo-Bom, Ana and Tomazic, Peter-Valentin and Toppila-Salmi, Sanna and Tsiligianni, Ioanna and Valiulis, Arunas and Valovirta, Erkka and Ventura, Maria-Teresa and Walker, Samantha and Williams, Sian and Yorgancioglu, Arzu and Agache, Ioana and Akdis, Cezmi A. and Almeida, Rute and Ansotegui, Ignacio J. and Annesi-Maesano, Isabella and Arnavielhe, Sylvie and Basaga{\~n}a, Xavier and D. Bateman, Eric and B{\´e}dard, Annabelle and Bedolla-Barajas, Martin and Becker, Sven and Bennoor, Kazi S. and Benveniste, Samuel and Bergmann, Karl C. and Bewick, Michael and Bialek, Slawomir and E. Billo, Nils and Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten and Bjermer, Leif and Blain, Hubert and Bonini, Matteo and Bonniaud, Philippe and Bosse, Isabelle and Bouchard, Jacques and Boulet, Louis-Philippe and Bourret, Rodolphe and Boussery, Koen and Braido, Fluvio and Briedis, Vitalis and Briggs, Andrew and Brightling, Christopher E. and Brozek, Jan and Brusselle, Guy and Brussino, Luisa and Buhl, Roland and Buonaiuto, Roland and Calderon, Moises A. and Camargos, Paulo and Camuzat, Thierry and Caraballo, Luis and Carriazo, Ana-Maria and Carr, Warner and Cartier, Christine and Casale, Thomas and Cecchi, Lorenzo and Cepeda Sarabia, Alfonso M. and H. Chavannes, Niels and Chkhartishvili, Ekaterine and Chu, Derek K. and Cingi, Cemal and Correia de Sousa, Jaime and Costa, David J. and Courbis, Anne-Lise and Custovic, Adnan and Cvetkosvki, Biljana and D'Amato, Gennaro and da Silva, Jane and Dantas, Carina and Dokic, Dejan and Dauvilliers, Yves and De Feo, Giulia and De Vries, Govert and Devillier, Philippe and Di Capua, Stefania and Dray, Gerard and Dubakiene, Ruta and Durham, Stephen R. and Dykewicz, Mark and Ebisawa, Motohiro and Gaga, Mina and El-Gamal, Yehia and Heffler, Enrico and Emuzyte, Regina and Farrell, John and Fauquert, Jean-Luc and Fiocchi, Alessandro and Fink-Wagner, Antje and Fontaine, Jean-Fran{\c{c}}ois and Fuentes Perez, Jos{\´e} M. and Gemicioğlu, Bilun and Gamkrelidze, Amiran and Garcia-Aymerich, Judith and Gevaert, Philippe and Gomez, Ren{\´e} Maximiliano and Gonz{\´a}lez Diaz, Sandra and Gotua, Maia and Guldemond, Nick A. and Guzm{\´a}n, Maria-Antonieta and Hajjam, Jawad and Huerta Villalobos, Yunuen R. and Humbert, Marc and Iaccarino, Guido and Ierodiakonou, Despo and Iinuma, Tomohisa and Jassem, Ewa and Joos, Guy and Jung, Ki-Suck and Kaidashev, Igor and Kalayci, Omer and Kardas, Przemyslaw and Keil, Thomas and Khaitov, Musa and Khaltaev, Nikolai and Kleine-Tebbe, Jorg and Kouznetsov, Rostislav and Kowalski, Marek L. and Kritikos, Vicky and Kull, Inger and La Grutta, Stefania and Leonardini, Lisa and Ljungberg, Henrik and Lieberman, Philip and Lipworth, Brian and Lodrup Carlsen, Karin C. and Lopes-Pereira, Catarina and Loureiro, Claudia C. and Louis, Renaud and Mair, Alpana and Mahboub, Bassam and Makris, Micha{\"e}l and Malva, Joao and Manning, Patrick and Marshall, Gailen D. and Masjedi, Mohamed R. and Maspero, Jorge F. and Carreiro-Martins, Pedro and Makela, Mika and Mathieu-Dupas, Eve and Maurer, Marcus and De Manuel Keenoy, Esteban and Melo-Gomes, Elisabete and Meltzer, Eli O. and Menditto, Enrica and Mercier, Jacques and Micheli, Yann and Miculinic, Neven and Mihaltan, Florin and Milenkovic, Branislava and Mitsias, Dimitirios I. and Moda, Giuliana and Mogica-Martinez, Maria-Dolores and Mohammad, Yousser and Montefort, Steve and Monti, Ricardo and Morais-Almeida, Mario and M{\"o}sges, Ralph and M{\"u}nter, Lars and Muraro, Antonella and Murray, Ruth and Naclerio, Robert and Napoli, Luigi and Namazova-Baranova, Leyla and Neffen, Hugo and Nekam, Kristoff and Neou, Angelo and Nordlund, Bj{\"o}rn and Novellino, Ettore and Nyembue, Dieudonn{\´e} and O'Hehir, Robyn and Ohta, Ken and Okubo, Kimi and Onorato, Gabrielle L. and Orlando, Valentina and Ouedraogo, Solange and Palamarchuk, Julia and Pali-Sch{\"o}ll, Isabella and Panzner, Peter and Park, Hae-Sim and Passalacqua, Gianni and P{\´e}pin, Jean-Louis and Paulino, Ema and Pawankar, Ruby and Phillips, Jim and Picard, Robert and Pinnock, Hilary and Plavec, Davor and Popov, Todor A. and Portejoie, Fabienne and Price, David and Prokopakis, Emmanuel P. and Psarros, Fotis and Pugin, Benoit and Puggioni, Francesca and Quinones-Delgado, Pablo and Raciborski, Filip and Rajabian-S{\"o}derlund, Rojin and Regateiro, Frederico S. and Reitsma, Sietze and Rivero-Yeverino, Daniela and Roberts, Graham and Roche, Nicolas and Rodriguez-Zagal, Erendira and Rolland, Christine and Roller-Wirnsberger, Regina E. and Rosario, Nelson and Romano, Antonino and Rottem, Menachem and Ryan, Dermot and Salim{\"a}ki, Johanna and Sanchez-Borges, Mario M. and Sastre, Joaquin and Scadding, Glenis K. and Scheire, Sophie and Schmid-Grendelmeier, Peter and Sch{\"u}nemann, Holger J. and Sarquis Serpa, Faradiba and Shamji, Mohamed and Sisul, Juan-Carlos and Sofiev, Mikhail and Sol{\´e}, Dirceu and Somekh, David and Sooronbaev, Talant and Sova, Milan and Spertini, Fran{\c{c}}ois and Spranger, Otto and Stellato, Cristiana and Stelmach, Rafael and Thibaudon, Michel and To, Teresa and Toumi, Mondher and Usmani, Omar and Valero, Antonio A. and Valenta, Rudolph and Valentin-Rostan, Marylin and Pereira, Marilyn Urrutia and van der Kleij, Rianne and Van Eerd, Michiel and Vandenplas, Olivier and Vasankari, Tuula and Vaz Carneiro, Antonio and Vezzani, Giorgio and Viart, Fr{\´e}d{\´e}ric and Viegi, Giovanni and Wallace, Dana and Wagenmann, Martin and Wang, De Yun and Waserman, Susan and Wickman, Magnus and Williams, Dennis M. and Wong, Gary and Wroczynski, Piotr and Yiallouros, Panayiotis K. and Yusuf, Osman M. and Zar, Heather J. and Zeng, St{\´e}phane and Zernotti, Mario E. and Zhang, Luo and Shan Zhong, Nan and Zidarn, Mihaela}, title = {ARIA digital anamorphosis: Digital transformation of health and care in airway diseases from research to practice}, series = {Allergy}, volume = {76}, journal = {Allergy}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1111/all.14422}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228339}, pages = {168 -- 190}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Digital anamorphosis is used to define a distorted image of health and care that may be viewed correctly using digital tools and strategies. MASK digital anamorphosis represents the process used by MASK to develop the digital transformation of health and care in rhinitis. It strengthens the ARIA change management strategy in the prevention and management of airway disease. The MASK strategy is based on validated digital tools. Using the MASK digital tool and the CARAT online enhanced clinical framework, solutions for practical steps of digital enhancement of care are proposed.}, language = {en} } @article{HautmannDoepfnerKatzmannetal.2018, author = {Hautmann, Christopher and D{\"o}pfner, Manfred and Katzmann, Josepha and Sch{\"u}rmann, Stephanie and Wolff Metternich-Kaizman, Tanja and Jaite, Charlotte and Kappel, Viola and Geissler, Julia and Warnke, Andreas and Jacob, Christian and Hennighausen, Klaus and Haack-Dees, Barbara and Schneider-Momm, Katja and Philipsen, Alexandra and Matthies, Swantje and R{\"o}sler, Michael and Retz, Wolfgang and Gontard, Alexander von and Sobanski, Esther and Alm, Barbara and Hohmann, Sarah and H{\"a}ge, Alexander and Poustka, Luise and Colla, Michael and Gentschow, Laura and Freitag, Christine M. and Becker, Katja and Jans, Thomas}, title = {Sequential treatment of ADHD in mother and child (AIMAC study): importance of the treatment phases for intervention success in a randomized trial}, series = {BMC Psychiatry}, volume = {18}, journal = {BMC Psychiatry}, doi = {10.1186/s12888-018-1963-9}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-227930}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Background The efficacy of parent-child training (PCT) regarding child symptoms may be reduced if the mother has attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The AIMAC study (ADHD in Mothers and Children) aimed to compensate for the deteriorating effect of parental psychopathology by treating the mother (Step 1) before the beginning of PCT (Step 2). This secondary analysis was particularly concerned with the additional effect of the Step 2 PCT on child symptoms after the Step 1 treatment. Methods The analysis included 143 mothers and children (aged 6-12 years) both diagnosed with ADHD. The study design was a two-stage, two-arm parallel group trial (Step 1 treatment group [TG]: intensive treatment of the mother including psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy; Step 1 control group [CG]: supportive counseling only for mother; Step 2 TG and CG: PCT). Single- and multi-group analyses with piecewise linear latent growth curve models were applied to test for the effects of group and phase. Child symptoms (e.g., ADHD symptoms, disruptive behavior) were rated by three informants (blinded clinician, mother, teacher). Results Children in the TG showed a stronger improvement of their disruptive behavior as rated by mothers than those in the CG during Step 1 (Step 1: TG vs. CG). In the CG, according to reports of the blinded clinician and the mother, the reduction of children's disruptive behavior was stronger during Step 2 than during Step 1 (CG: Step 1 vs. Step 2). In the TG, improvement of child outcome did not differ across treatment steps (TG: Step 1 vs. Step 2). Conclusions Intensive treatment of the mother including pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy may have small positive effects on the child's disruptive behavior. PCT may be a valid treatment option for children with ADHD regarding disruptive behavior, even if mothers are not intensively treated beforehand. Trial registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN73911400. Registered 29 March 2007.}, language = {en} } @article{KaiserAggensteinerHoltmannetal.2021, author = {Kaiser, Anna and Aggensteiner, Pascal-M. and Holtmann, Martin and Fallgatter, Andreas and Romanos, Marcel and Abenova, Karina and Alm, Barbara and Becker, Katja and D{\"o}pfner, Manfred and Ethofer, Thomas and Freitag, Christine M. and Geissler, Julia and Hebebrand, Johannes and Huss, Michael and Jans, Thomas and Jendreizik, Lea Teresa and Ketter, Johanna and Legenbauer, Tanja and Philipsen, Alexandra and Poustka, Luise and Renner, Tobias and Retz, Wolfgang and R{\"o}sler, Michael and Thome, Johannes and Uebel-von Sandersleben, Henrik and von Wirth, Elena and Zinnow, Toivo and Hohmann, Sarah and Millenet, Sabina and Holz, Nathalie E. and Banaschewski, Tobias and Brandeis, Daniel}, title = {EEG data quality: determinants and impact in a multicenter study of children, adolescents, and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)}, series = {Brain Sciences}, volume = {11}, journal = {Brain Sciences}, number = {2}, issn = {2076-3425}, doi = {10.3390/brainsci11020214}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228788}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Electroencephalography (EEG) represents a widely established method for assessing altered and typically developing brain function. However, systematic studies on EEG data quality, its correlates, and consequences are scarce. To address this research gap, the current study focused on the percentage of artifact-free segments after standard EEG pre-processing as a data quality index. We analyzed participant-related and methodological influences, and validity by replicating landmark EEG effects. Further, effects of data quality on spectral power analyses beyond participant-related characteristics were explored. EEG data from a multicenter ADHD-cohort (age range 6 to 45 years), and a non-ADHD school-age control group were analyzed (n\(_{total}\) = 305). Resting-state data during eyes open, and eyes closed conditions, and task-related data during a cued Continuous Performance Task (CPT) were collected. After pre-processing, general linear models, and stepwise regression models were fitted to the data. We found that EEG data quality was strongly related to demographic characteristics, but not to methodological factors. We were able to replicate maturational, task, and ADHD effects reported in the EEG literature, establishing a link with EEG-landmark effects. Furthermore, we showed that poor data quality significantly increases spectral power beyond effects of maturation and symptom severity. Taken together, the current results indicate that with a careful design and systematic quality control, informative large-scale multicenter trials characterizing neurophysiological mechanisms in neurodevelopmental disorders across the lifespan are feasible. Nevertheless, results are restricted to the limitations reported. Future work will clarify predictive value.}, language = {en} } @article{MemmelSisarioZoelleretal.2017, author = {Memmel, Simon and Sisario, Dmitri and Z{\"o}ller, Caren and Fiedler, Vanessa and Katzer, Astrid and Heiden, Robin and Becker, Nicholas and Eing, Lorenz and Ferreira, F{\´a}bio L.R. and Zimmermann, Heiko and Sauer, Markus and Flentje, Michael and Sukhorukov, Vladimir L. and Djuzenova, Cholpon S.}, title = {Migration pattern, actin cytoskeleton organization and response to PI3K-, mTOR-, and Hsp90-inhibition of glioblastoma cells with different invasive capacities}, series = {Oncotarget}, volume = {8}, journal = {Oncotarget}, number = {28}, doi = {10.18632/oncotarget.16847}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-170719}, pages = {45298-45310}, year = {2017}, abstract = {High invasiveness and resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) make it the most lethal brain tumor. Therefore, new treatment strategies for preventing migration and invasion of GBM cells are needed. Using two different migration assays, Western blotting, conventional and super-resolution (dSTORM) fluorescence microscopy we examine the effects of the dual PI3K/mTOR-inhibitor PI-103 alone and in combination with the Hsp90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922 and/or irradiation on the migration, expression of marker proteins, focal adhesions and F-actin cytoskeleton in two GBM cell lines (DK-MG and SNB19) markedly differing in their invasive capacity. Both lines were found to be strikingly different in morphology and migration behavior. The less invasive DK-MG cells maintained a polarized morphology and migrated in a directionally persistent manner, whereas the highly invasive SNB19 cells showed a multipolar morphology and migrated randomly. Interestingly, a single dose of 2 Gy accelerated wound closure in both cell lines without affecting their migration measured by single-cell tracking. PI-103 inhibited migration of DK-MG (p53 wt, PTEN wt) but not of SNB19 (p53 mut, PTEN mut) cells probably due to aberrant reactivation of the PI3K pathway in SNB19 cells treated with PI-103. In contrast, NVP-AUY922 exerted strong anti-migratory effects in both cell lines. Inhibition of cell migration was associated with massive morphological changes and reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. Our results showed a cell line-specific response to PI3K/mTOR inhibition in terms of GBM cell motility. We conclude that anti-migratory agents warrant further preclinical investigation as potential therapeutics for treatment of GBM.}, language = {en} } @article{KleinschnitzGrundWingleretal.2010, author = {Kleinschnitz, Christoph and Grund, Henrike and Wingler, Kirstin and Armitage, Melanie E. and Jones, Emma and Mittal, Manish and Barit, David and Schwarz, Tobias and Geis, Christian and Kraft, Peter and Barthel, Konstanze and Schuhmann, Michael K. and Herrmann, Alexander M. and Meuth, Sven G. and Stoll, Guido and Meurer, Sabine and Schrewe, Anja and Becker, Lore and Gailus-Durner, Valerie and Fuchs, Helmut and Klopstock, Thomas and de Angelis, Martin Hrabe and Jandeleit-Dahm, Karin and Shah, Ajay M. and Weissmann, Norbert and Schmidt, Harald H. H. W.}, title = {Post-Stroke Inhibition of Induced NADPH Oxidase Type 4 Prevents Oxidative Stress and Neurodegeneration}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-68416}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Ischemic stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Only one moderately effective therapy exists, albeit with contraindications that exclude 90\% of the patients. This medical need contrasts with a high failure rate of more than 1,000 pre-clinical drug candidates for stroke therapies. Thus, there is a need for translatable mechanisms of neuroprotection and more rigid thresholds of relevance in pre-clinical stroke models. One such candidate mechanism is oxidative stress. However, antioxidant approaches have failed in clinical trials, and the significant sources of oxidative stress in stroke are unknown. We here identify NADPH oxidase type 4 (NOX4) as a major source of oxidative stress and an effective therapeutic target in acute stroke. Upon ischemia, NOX4 was induced in human and mouse brain. Mice deficient in NOX4 (Nox42/2) of either sex, but not those deficient for NOX1 or NOX2, were largely protected from oxidative stress, blood-brain-barrier leakage, and neuronal apoptosis, after both transient and permanent cerebral ischemia. This effect was independent of age, as elderly mice were equally protected. Restoration of oxidative stress reversed the stroke-protective phenotype in Nox42/2 mice. Application of the only validated low-molecular-weight pharmacological NADPH oxidase inhibitor, VAS2870, several hours after ischemia was as protective as deleting NOX4. The extent of neuroprotection was exceptional, resulting in significantly improved long-term neurological functions and reduced mortality. NOX4 therefore represents a major source of oxidative stress and novel class of drug target for stroke therapy.}, subject = {Schlaganfall}, language = {en} } @techreport{MuellerBrandeckBocquetGiegLowingeretal.2015, type = {Working Paper}, author = {M{\"u}ller-Brandeck-Bocquet, Gisela and Gieg, Philipp and Lowinger, Timo and Gs{\"a}nger, Matthias and Becker, Michael and Kundu, Amitabh and Valerian, Rodrigues and S, Shaji and Sch{\"o}mbucher-Kusterer, Elisabeth and Biswas, Aparajita}, title = {Exploring Emerging India - Eight Essays}, editor = {M{\"u}ller-Brandeck-Bocquet, Gisela and Gieg, Philipp and Lowinger, Timo}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-11997}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-119973}, pages = {58}, year = {2015}, abstract = {India's economic rise since the 1990s has been followed by a more prominent global role for the country. Despite economic setbacks in recent years and huge domestic challenges like poverty, caste issues, and gender inequality, India today is almost universally characterised as an "emerging power". At the same time, the country continues to show an enormous diversity. Thus, exploring emerging India can surely not be confined to economic analysis only. Instead, it is vital to take current developments in domestic and international politics, society, culture, religion, and political thinking into consideration as well. Following an interdisciplinary approach, contributions from Political Science, International Relations, Indology, Political Theory, and Economics are fundamental in order to grasp the country's diversity. This collection assembles eight essays which, individually, serve as working papers reflecting the authors' various research focuses, while collectively composing a multifaceted and multidis-ciplinary picture of emerging India. It thereby reflects the approach the University of W{\"u}rz-burg's Centre for Modern India and the Institute for Political Science and Sociology's India Forum are committed to: bringing together different academic disciplines in order to generate nuanced insights into India's manifold diversity.}, subject = {Indien / Government}, language = {en} } @article{HafnerHoubenBaeurleetal.2012, author = {Hafner, Christian and Houben, Roland and Baeurle, Anne and Ritter, Cathrin and Schrama, David and Landthaler, Michael and Becker, J{\"u}rgen C.}, title = {Activation of the PI3K/AKT Pathway in Merkel Cell Carcinoma}, series = {PLoS One}, volume = {7}, journal = {PLoS One}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0031255}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-131398}, pages = {e31255}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a highly aggressive skin cancer with an increasing incidence. The understanding of the molecular carcinogenesis of MCC is limited. Here, we scrutinized the PI3K/AKT pathway, one of the major pathways activated in human cancer, in MCC. Immunohistochemical analysis of 41 tumor tissues and 9 MCC cell lines revealed high levels of AKT phosphorylation at threonine 308 in 88\% of samples. Notably, the AKT phosphorylation was not correlated with the presence or absence of the Merkel cell polyoma virus (MCV). Accordingly, knock-down of the large and small T antigen by shRNA in MCV positive MCC cells did not affect phosphorylation of AKT. We also analyzed 46 MCC samples for activating PIK3CA and AKT1 mutations. Oncogenic PIK3CA mutations were found in 2/46 (4\%) MCCs whereas mutations in exon 4 of AKT1 were absent. MCC cell lines demonstrated a high sensitivity towards the PI3K inhibitor LY-294002. This finding together with our observation that the PI3K/AKT pathway is activated in the majority of human MCCs identifies PI3K/AKT as a potential new therapeutic target for MCC patients.}, language = {en} } @article{BeckerOelschlaegerWullaertetal.2013, author = {Becker, Svetlana and Oelschlaeger, Tobias A. and Wullaert, Andy and Pasparakis, Manolis and Wehkamp, Jan and Stange, Eduard F. and Gersemann, Michael}, title = {Bacteria Regulate Intestinal Epithelial Cell Differentiation Factors Both In Vitro and In Vivo}, series = {PLoS ONE}, volume = {8}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0055620}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-131168}, pages = {e55620}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Background: The human colon harbours a plethora of bacteria known to broadly impact on mucosal metabolism and function and thought to be involved in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis and colon cancer development. In this report, we investigated the effect of colonic bacteria on epithelial cell differentiation factors in vitro and in vivo. As key transcription factors we focused on Hes1, known to direct towards an absorptive cell fate, Hath1 and KLF4, which govern goblet cell. Methods: Expression of the transcription factors Hes1, Hath1 and KLF4, the mucins Muc1 and Muc2 and the defensin HBD2 were measured by real-time PCR in LS174T cells following incubation with several heat-inactivated E. coli strains, including the probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917+/- flagellin, Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria. For protein detection Western blot experiments and chamber-slide immunostaining were performed. Finally, mRNA and protein expression of these factors was evaluated in the colon of germfree vs. specific pathogen free vs. conventionalized mice and colonic goblet cells were counted. Results: Expression of Hes1 and Hath1, and to a minor degree also of KLF4, was reduced by E. coli K-12 and E. coli Nissle 1917. In contrast, Muc1 and HBD2 expression were significantly enhanced, independent of the Notch signalling pathway. Probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 regulated Hes1, Hath1, Muc1 and HBD2 through flagellin. In vivo experiments confirmed the observed in vitro effects of bacteria by a diminished colonic expression of Hath1 and KLF4 in specific pathogen free and conventionalized mice as compared to germ free mice whereas the number of goblet cells was unchanged in these mice. Conclusions: Intestinal bacteria influence the intestinal epithelial differentiation factors Hes1, Hath1 and KLF4, as well as Muc1 and HBD2, in vitro and in vivo. The induction of Muc1 and HBD2 seems to be triggered directly by bacteria and not by Notch.}, language = {en} } @article{BuderLapaKreissletal.2014, author = {Buder, Kristina and Lapa, Constantin and Kreissl, Michael C. and Schirbel, Andreas and Herrmann, Ken and Schnack, Alexander and Br{\"o}cker, Eva-Bettina and Goebeler, Matthias and Buck, Andreas K. and Becker, J{\"u}rgen C.}, title = {"Somatostatin receptor expression in Merkel cell carcinoma as target for molecular imaging"}, doi = {10.1186/1471-2407-14-268}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-110326}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Background Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous neoplasm with increasing incidence, aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) are expressed in MCC and represent a potential target for both imaging and treatment. Methods To non-invasively assess SSTR expression in MCC using PET and the radiotracers [68Ga]DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide (DOTATOC) or -octreotate (DOTATATE) as surrogate for tumor burden. In 24 patients with histologically proven MCC SSTR-PET was performed and compared to results of computed tomography (CT). Results SSTR-PET detected primary and metastatic MCC lesions. On a patient-based analysis, sensitivity of SSTR-PET was 73\% for nodal metastases, 100\% for bone, and 67\% for soft-tissue metastases, respectively. Notably, brain metastases were initially detected by SSTR-PET in 2 patients, whereas liver and lung metastases were diagnosed exclusively by CT. SSTR-PET showed concordance to CT results in 20 out of 24 patients. Four patients (17\%) were up-staged due to SSTR-PET and patient management was changed in 3 patients (13\%). Conclusion SSTR-PET showed high sensitivity for imaging bone, soft tissue and brain metastases, and particularly in combination with CT had a significant impact on clinical stage and patient management.}, language = {en} } @article{JaiteBuehrenDahmenetal.2019, author = {Jaite, Charlotte and B{\"u}hren, Katharina and Dahmen, Brigitte and Dempfle, Astrid and Becker, Katja and Correll, Christoph U. and Egberts, Karin M. and Ehrlich, Stefan and Fleischhaker, Christian and von Gontard, Alexander and Hahn, Freia and Kolar, David and Kaess, Michael and Legenbauer, Tanja and Renner, Tobias J. and Schulze, Ulrike and Sinzig, Judith and Thomae, Ellen and Weber, Linda and Wessing, Ida and Antony, Gisela and Hebebrand, Johannes and F{\"o}cker, Manuel and Herpertz-Dahlmann, Beate}, title = {Clinical Characteristics of Inpatients with Childhood vs. Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa}, series = {Nutrients}, volume = {11}, journal = {Nutrients}, number = {11}, issn = {2072-6643}, doi = {10.3390/nu11112593}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-193160}, pages = {2593}, year = {2019}, abstract = {We aimed to compare the clinical data at first presentation to inpatient treatment of children (<14 years) vs. adolescents (≥14 years) with anorexia nervosa (AN), focusing on duration of illness before hospital admission and body mass index (BMI) at admission and discharge, proven predictors of the outcomes of adolescent AN. Clinical data at first admission and at discharge in 289 inpatients with AN (children: n = 72; adolescents: n = 217) from a German multicenter, web-based registry for consecutively enrolled patients with childhood and adolescent AN were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were a maximum age of 18 years, first inpatient treatment due to AN, and a BMI <10th BMI percentile at admission. Compared to adolescents, children with AN had a shorter duration of illness before admission (median: 6.0 months vs. 8.0 months, p = 0.004) and higher BMI percentiles at admission (median: 0.7 vs. 0.2, p = 0.004) as well as at discharge (median: 19.3 vs. 15.1, p = 0.011). Thus, in our study, children with AN exhibited clinical characteristics that have been associated with better outcomes, including higher admission and discharge BMI percentile. Future studies should examine whether these factors are actually associated with positive long-term outcomes in children.}, language = {en} }