@article{ChaudryGrimmFriedbergeretal.2020,
  author    = {Chaudry, Oliver and Grimm, Alexandra and Friedberger, Andreas and Kemmler, Wolfgang and Uder, Michael and Jakob, Franz and Quick, Harald H. and von Stengel, Simon and Engelke, Klaus},
  title     = {Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Assess Visceral and Abdominal Adipose Tissue},
  series = {Obesity},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Obesity},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1002/oby.22712},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-213591},
  pages     = {277 -- 283},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Objective This study aimed to compare a state-of-the-art bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) device with two-point Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the quantification of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) as a health-related risk factor. Methods A total of 63 male participants were measured using a 3-T MRI scanner and a segmental, multifrequency BIA device. MRI generated fat fraction (FF) maps, in which VAT volume, total abdominal adipose tissue volume, and FF of visceral and total abdominal compartments were quantified. BIA estimated body fat mass and VAT area. Results Coefficients of determination between abdominal (r\(^{2}\) = 0.75) and visceral compartments (r\(^{2}\) = 0.78) were similar for both groups, but slopes differed by a factor of two. The ratio of visceral to total abdominal FF was increased in older men compared with younger men. This difference was not detected with BIA. MRI and BIA measurements of the total abdominal volume correlated moderately (r\(^{2}\) = 0.31-0.56), and visceral measurements correlated poorly (r\(^{2}\) = 0.13-0.44). Conclusions Visceral BIA measurements agreed better with MRI measurements of the total abdomen than of the visceral compartment, indicating that BIA visceral fat area assessment cannot differentiate adipose tissue between visceral and abdominal compartments in young and older participants.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MagesShojaaKohletal.2021,
  author    = {Mages, Michelle and Shojaa, Mahdieh and Kohl, Matthias and Stengel, Simon von and Becker, Clemens and Gosch, Markus and Jakob, Franz and Kerschan-Schindl, Katharina and Kladny, Bernd and Kl{\"o}ckner, Nicole and Lange, Uwe and Middeldorf, Stefan and Peters, Stefan and Schoene, Daniel and Sieber, Cornel C. and Tholen, Reina and Thomasius, Friederike E. and Uder, Michael and Kemmler, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Exercise effects on Bone Mineral Density in men},
  series = {Nutrients},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Nutrients},
  number    = {12},
  issn      = {2072-6643},
  doi       = {10.3390/nu13124244},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-250247},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In contrast to postmenopausal women, evidence for a favorable effect of exercise on Bone Mineral Density (BMD) is still limited for men. This might be due to the paucity of studies, but also to the great variety of participants and study characteristics that may dilute study results. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of exercise on BMD changes with rational eligibility criteria. A comprehensive search of six electronic databases up to 15 March 2021 was conducted. Briefly, controlled trials ≥6 months that determined changes in areal BMD in men >18 years old, with no apparent diseases or pharmacological therapy that relevantly affect bone metabolism, were included. BMD changes (standardized mean differences: SMD) of the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) were considered as outcomes. Twelve studies with 16 exercise and 12 control groups were identified. The pooled estimate of random-effect analysis was SMD = 0.38, 95\%-CI: 0.14-0.61 and SMD = 0.25, 95\%-CI: 0.00-0.49, for LS and FN, respectively. Heterogeneity between the trials was low-moderate. Funnel plots and rank and regression correlation tests indicate evidence for small study publication bias for LS but not FN-BMD. Subgroup analyses that focus on study length, type of exercise and methodologic quality revealed no significant difference between each of the three categories. In summary, we provided further evidence for a low but significant effect of exercise on BMD in men. However, we are currently unable to give even rough exercise recommendations for male cohorts.},
  language  = {en}
}