@article{GalluzziBravoSanPedroVitaleetal.2015,
  author    = {Galluzzi, L. and Bravo-San Pedro, J. M. and Vitale, I. and Aaronson, S. A. and Abrams, J. M. and Adam, D. and Alnemri, E. S. and Altucci, L. and Andrews, D. and Annicchiarico-Petruzelli, M. and Baehrecke, E. H. and Bazan, N. G. and Bertrand, M. J. and Bianchi, K. and Blagosklonny, M. V. and Blomgren, K. and Borner, C. and Bredesen, D. E. and Brenner, C. and Campanella, M. and Candi, E. and Cecconi, F. and Chan, F. K. and Chandel, N. S. and Cheng, E. H. and Chipuk, J. E. and Cidlowski, J. A. and Ciechanover, A. and Dawson, T. M. and Dawson, V. L. and De Laurenzi, V. and De Maria, R. and Debatin, K. M. and Di Daniele, N. and Dixit, V. M. and Dynlacht, B. D. and El-Deiry, W. S. and Fimia, G. M. and Flavell, R. A. and Fulda, S. and Garrido, C. and Gougeon, M. L. and Green, D. R. and Gronemeyer, H. and Hajnoczky, G. and Hardwick, J. M. and Hengartner, M. O. and Ichijo, H. and Joseph, B. and Jost, P. J. and Kaufmann, T. and Kepp, O. and Klionsky, D. J. and Knight, R. A. and Kumar, S. and Lemasters, J. J. and Levine, B. and Linkermann, A. and Lipton, S. A. and Lockshin, R. A. and L{\´o}pez-Ot{\´i}n, C. and Lugli, E. and Madeo, F. and Malorni, W. and Marine, J. C. and Martin, S. J. and Martinou, J. C. and Medema, J. P. and Meier, P. and Melino, S. and Mizushima, N. and Moll, U. and Mu{\~n}oz-Pinedo, C. and Nu{\~n}ez, G. and Oberst, A. and Panaretakis, T. and Penninger, J. M. and Peter, M. E. and Piacentini, M. and Pinton, P. and Prehn, J. H. and Puthalakath, H. and Rabinovich, G. A. and Ravichandran, K. S. and Rizzuto, R. and Rodrigues, C. M. and Rubinsztein, D. C. and Rudel, T. and Shi, Y. and Simon, H. U. and Stockwell, B. R. and Szabadkai, G. and Tait, S. W. and Tang, H. L. and Tavernarakis, N. and Tsujimoto, Y. and Vanden Berghe, T. and Vandenabeele, P. and Villunger, A. and Wagner, E. F. and Walczak, H. and White, E. and Wood, W. G. and Yuan, J. and Zakeri, Z. and Zhivotovsky, B. and Melino, G. and Kroemer, G.},
  title     = {Essential versus accessory aspects of cell death: recommendations of the NCCD 2015},
  series = {Cell Death and Differentiation},
  volume    = {22},
  journal   = {Cell Death and Differentiation},
  doi       = {10.1038/cdd.2014.137},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121207},
  pages     = {58-73},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Cells exposed to extreme physicochemical or mechanical stimuli die in an uncontrollable manner, as a result of their immediate structural breakdown. Such an unavoidable variant of cellular demise is generally referred to as 'accidental cell death' (ACD). In most settings, however, cell death is initiated by a genetically encoded apparatus, correlating with the fact that its course can be altered by pharmacologic or genetic interventions. 'Regulated cell death' (RCD) can occur as part of physiologic programs or can be activated once adaptive responses to perturbations of the extracellular or intracellular microenvironment fail. The biochemical phenomena that accompany RCD may be harnessed to classify it into a few subtypes, which often (but not always) exhibit stereotyped morphologic features. Nonetheless, efficiently inhibiting the processes that are commonly thought to cause RCD, such as the activation of executioner caspases in the course of apoptosis, does not exert true cytoprotective effects in the mammalian system, but simply alters the kinetics of cellular demise as it shifts its morphologic and biochemical correlates. Conversely, bona fide cytoprotection can be achieved by inhibiting the transduction of lethal signals in the early phases of the process, when adaptive responses are still operational. Thus, the mechanisms that truly execute RCD may be less understood, less inhibitable and perhaps more homogeneous than previously thought. Here, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death formulates a set of recommendations to help scientists and researchers to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of cell death.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BousquetFarrellCrooksetal.2016,
  author    = {Bousquet, J. and Farrell, J. and Crooks, G. and Hellings, P. and Bel, E. H. and Bewick, M. and Chavannes, N. H. and Correia de Sousa, J. and Cruz, A. A. and Haahtela, T. and Joos, G. and Khaltaev, N. and Malva, J. and Muraro, A. and Nogues, M. and Palkonen, S. and Pedersen, S. and Robalo-Cordeiro, C. and Samolinski, B. and Strandberg, T. and Valiulis, A. and Yorgancioglu, A. and Zuberbier, T. and Bedbrook, A. and Aberer, W. and Adachi, M. and Agusti, A. and Akdis, C. A. and Akdis, M. and Ankri, J. and Alonso, A. and Annesi-Maesano, I. and Ansotegui, I. J. and Anto, J. M. and Arnavielhe, S. and Arshad, H. and Bai, C. and Baiardini, I. and Bachert, C. and Baigenzhin, A. K. and Barbara, C. and Bateman, E. D. and Begh{\´e}, B. and Ben Kheder, A. and Bennoor, K. S. and Benson, M. and Bergmann, K. C. and Bieber, T. and Bindslev-Jensen, C. and Bjermer, L. and Blain, H. and Blasi, F. and Boner, A. L. and Bonini, M. and Bonini, S. and Bosnic-Anticevitch, S. and Boulet, L. P. and Bourret, R. and Bousquet, P. J. and Braido, F. and Briggs, A. H. and Brightling, C. E. and Brozek, J. and Buhl, R. and Burney, P. G. and Bush, A. and Caballero-Fonseca, F. and Caimmi, D. and Calderon, M. A. and Calverley, P. M. and Camargos, P. A. M. and Canonica, G. W. and Camuzat, T. and Carlsen, K. H. and Carr, W. and Carriazo, A. and Casale, T. and Cepeda Sarabia, A. M. and Chatzi, L. and Chen, Y. Z. and Chiron, R. and Chkhartishvili, E. and Chuchalin, A. G. and Chung, K. F. and Ciprandi, G. and Cirule, I. and Cox, L. and Costa, D. J. and Custovic, A. and Dahl, R. and Dahlen, S. E. and Darsow, U. and De Carlo, G. and De Blay, F. and Dedeu, T. and Deleanu, D. and De Manuel Keenoy, E. and Demoly, P. and Denburg, J. A. and Devillier, P. and Didier, A. and Dinh-Xuan, A. T. and Djukanovic, R. and Dokic, D. and Douagui, H. and Dray, G. and Dubakiene, R. and Durham, S. R. and Dykewicz, M. S. and El-Gamal, Y. and Emuzyte, R. and Fabbri, L. M. and Fletcher, M. and Fiocchi, A. and Fink Wagner, A. and Fonseca, J. and Fokkens, W. J. and Forastiere, F. and Frith, P. and Gaga, M. and Gamkrelidze, A. and Garces, J. and Garcia-Aymerich, J. and Gemicioğlu, B. and Gereda, J. E. and Gonz{\´a}lez Diaz, S. and Gotua, M. and Grisle, I. and Grouse, L. and Gutter, Z. and Guzm{\´a}n, M. A. and Heaney, L. G. and Hellquist-Dahl, B. and Henderson, D. and Hendry, A. and Heinrich, J. and Heve, D. and Horak, F. and Hourihane, J. O'. B. and Howarth, P. and Humbert, M. and Hyland, M. E. and Illario, M. and Ivancevich, J. C. and Jardim, J. R. and Jares, E. J. and Jeandel, C. and Jenkins, C. and Johnston, S. L. and Jonquet, O. and Julge, K. and Jung, K. S. and Just, J. and Kaidashev, I. and Kaitov, M. R. and Kalayci, O. and Kalyoncu, A. F. and Keil, T. and Keith, P. K. and Klimek, L. and Koffi N'Goran, B. and Kolek, V. and Koppelman, G. H. and Kowalski, M. L. and Kull, I. and Kuna, P. and Kvedariene, V. and Lambrecht, B. and Lau, S. and Larenas‑Linnemann, D. and Laune, D. and Le, L. T. T. and Lieberman, P. and Lipworth, B. and Li, J. and Lodrup Carlsen, K. and Louis, R. and MacNee, W. and Magard, Y. and Magnan, A. and Mahboub, B. and Mair, A. and Majer, I. and Makela, M. J. and Manning, P. and Mara, S. and Marshall, G. D. and Masjedi, M. R. and Matignon, P. and Maurer, M. and Mavale‑Manuel, S. and Mel{\´e}n, E. and Melo‑Gomes, E. and Meltzer, E. O. and Menzies‑Gow, A. and Merk, H. and Michel, J. P. and Miculinic, N. and Mihaltan, F. and Milenkovic, B. and Mohammad, G. M. Y. and Molimard, M. and Momas, I. and Montilla‑Santana, A. and Morais‑Almeida, M. and Morgan, M. and M{\"o}sges, R. and Mullol, J. and Nafti, S. and Namazova‑Baranova, L. and Naclerio, R. and Neou, A. and Neffen, H. and Nekam, K. and Niggemann, B. and Ninot, G. and Nyembue, T. D. and O'Hehir, R. E. and Ohta, K. and Okamoto, Y. and Okubo, K. and Ouedraogo, S. and Paggiaro, P. and Pali‑Sch{\"o}ll, I. and Panzner, P. and Papadopoulos, N. and Papi, A. and Park, H. S. and Passalacqua, G. and Pavord, I. and Pawankar, R. and Pengelly, R. and Pfaar, O. and Picard, R. and Pigearias, B. and Pin, I. and Plavec, D. and Poethig, D. and Pohl, W. and Popov, T. A. and Portejoie, F. and Potter, P. and Postma, D. and Price, D. and Rabe, K. F. and Raciborski, F. and Radier Pontal, F. and Repka‑Ramirez, S. and Reitamo, S. and Rennard, S. and Rodenas, F. and Roberts, J. and Roca, J. and Rodriguez Ma{\~n}as, L. and et al,},
  title     = {Scaling up strategies of the chronic respiratory disease programme of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (Action Plan B3: Area 5)},
  series = {Clinical and Translational Allergy},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Clinical and Translational Allergy},
  number    = {29},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13601-016-0116-9},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-166874},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Action Plan B3 of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP on AHA) focuses on the integrated care of chronic diseases. Area 5 (Care Pathways) was initiated using chronic respiratory diseases as a model. The chronic respiratory disease action plan includes (1) AIRWAYS integrated care pathways (ICPs), (2) the joint initiative between the Reference site MACVIA-LR (Contre les MAladies Chroniques pour un VIeillissement Actif) and ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma), (3) Commitments for Action to the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing and the AIRWAYS ICPs network. It is deployed in collaboration with the World Health Organization Global Alliance against Chronic Respiratory Diseases (GARD). The European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing has proposed a 5-step framework for developing an individual scaling up strategy: (1) what to scale up: (1-a) databases of good practices, (1-b) assessment of viability of the scaling up of good practices, (1-c) classification of good practices for local replication and (2) how to scale up: (2-a) facilitating partnerships for scaling up, (2-b) implementation of key success factors and lessons learnt, including emerging technologies for individualised and predictive medicine. This strategy has already been applied to the chronic respiratory disease action plan of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DavisYuKeenanetal.2013,
  author    = {Davis, Lea K. and Yu, Dongmei and Keenan, Clare L. and Gamazon, Eric R. and Konkashbaev, Anuar I. and Derks, Eske M. and Neale, Benjamin M. and Yang, Jian and Lee, S. Hong and Evans, Patrick and Barr, Cathy L. and Bellodi, Laura and Benarroch, Fortu and Berrio, Gabriel Bedoya and Bienvenu, Oscar J. and Bloch, Michael H. and Blom, Rianne M. and Bruun, Ruth D. and Budman, Cathy L. and Camarena, Beatriz and Campbell, Desmond and Cappi, Carolina and Cardona Silgado, Julio C. and Cath, Danielle C. and Cavallini, Maria C. and Chavira, Denise A. and Chouinard, Sylvian and Conti, David V. and Cook, Edwin H. and Coric, Vladimir and Cullen, Bernadette A. and Deforce, Dieter and Delorme, Richard and Dion, Yves and Edlund, Christopher K. and Egberts, Karin and Falkai, Peter and Fernandez, Thomas V. and Gallagher, Patience J. and Garrido, Helena and Geller, Daniel and Girard, Simon L. and Grabe, Hans J. and Grados, Marco A. and Greenberg, Benjamin D. and Gross-Tsur, Varda and Haddad, Stephen and Heiman, Gary A. and Hemmings, Sian M. J. and Hounie, Ana G. and Illmann, Cornelia and Jankovic, Joseph and Jenike, Micheal A. and Kennedy, James L. and King, Robert A. and Kremeyer, Barbara and Kurlan, Roger and Lanzagorta, Nuria and Leboyer, Marion and Leckman, James F. and Lennertz, Leonhard and Liu, Chunyu and Lochner, Christine and Lowe, Thomas L. and Macciardi, Fabio and McCracken, James T. and McGrath, Lauren M. and Restrepo, Sandra C. Mesa and Moessner, Rainald and Morgan, Jubel and Muller, Heike and Murphy, Dennis L. and Naarden, Allan L. and Ochoa, William Cornejo and Ophoff, Roel A. and Osiecki, Lisa and Pakstis, Andrew J. and Pato, Michele T. and Pato, Carlos N. and Piacentini, John and Pittenger, Christopher and Pollak, Yehunda and Rauch, Scott L. and Renner, Tobias J. and Reus, Victor I. and Richter, Margaret A. and Riddle, Mark A. and Robertson, Mary M. and Romero, Roxana and Ros{\`a}rio, Maria C. and Rosenberg, David and Rouleau, Guy A. and Ruhrmann, Stephan and Ruiz-Linares, Andreas and Sampaio, Aline S. and Samuels, Jack and Sandor, Paul and Sheppard, Broke and Singer, Harvey S. and Smit, Jan H. and Stein, Dan J. and Strengman, E. and Tischfield, Jay A. and Valencia Duarte, Ana V. and Vallada, Homero and Van Nieuwerburgh, Flip and Veenstra-VanderWeele, Jeremy and Walitza, Susanne and Wang, Ying and Wendland, Jens R. and Westenberg, Herman G. M. and Shugart, Yin Yao and Miguel, Euripedes C. and McMahon, William and Wagner, Michael and Nicolini, Humberto and Posthuma, Danielle and Hanna, Gregory L. and Heutink, Peter and Denys, Damiaan and Arnold, Paul D. and Oostra, Ben A. and Nestadt, Gerald and Freimer, Nelson B. and Pauls, David L. and Wray, Naomi R. and Stewart, S. Evelyn and Mathews, Carol A. and Knowles, James A. and Cox, Nancy J. and Scharf, Jeremiah M.},
  title     = {Partitioning the Heritability of Tourette Syndrome and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Reveals Differences in Genetic Architecture},
  series = {PLoS Genetics},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {PLoS Genetics},
  number    = {10},
  issn      = {1553-7390},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1003864},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-127377},
  pages     = {e1003864},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The direct estimation of heritability from genome-wide common variant data as implemented in the program Genome-wide Complex Trait Analysis (GCTA) has provided a means to quantify heritability attributable to all interrogated variants. We have quantified the variance in liability to disease explained by all SNPs for two phenotypically-related neurobehavioral disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette Syndrome (TS), using GCTA. Our analysis yielded a heritability point estimate of 0.58 (se = 0.09, p = 5.64e-12) for TS, and 0.37 (se = 0.07, p = 1.5e-07) for OCD. In addition, we conducted multiple genomic partitioning analyses to identify genomic elements that concentrate this heritability. We examined genomic architectures of TS and OCD by chromosome, MAF bin, and functional annotations. In addition, we assessed heritability for early onset and adult onset OCD. Among other notable results, we found that SNPs with a minor allele frequency of less than 5\% accounted for 21\% of the TS heritability and 0\% of the OCD heritability. Additionally, we identified a significant contribution to TS and OCD heritability by variants significantly associated with gene expression in two regions of the brain (parietal cortex and cerebellum) for which we had available expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). Finally we analyzed the genetic correlation between TS and OCD, revealing a genetic correlation of 0.41 (se = 0.15, p = 0.002). These results are very close to previous heritability estimates for TS and OCD based on twin and family studies, suggesting that very little, if any, heritability is truly missing (i.e., unassayed) from TS and OCD GWAS studies of common variation. The results also indicate that there is some genetic overlap between these two phenotypically-related neuropsychiatric disorders, but suggest that the two disorders have distinct genetic architectures.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DiersWagnerBaumetal.2020,
  author    = {Diers, J. and Wagner, J. and Baum, P. and Lichthardt, S. and Kastner, C. and Matthes, N. and Matthes, H. and Germer, C.-T. and L{\"o}b, S. and Wiegering, A.},
  title     = {Nationwide in-hospital mortality rate following rectal resection for rectal cancer according to annual hospital volume in Germany},
  series = {BJS Open},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {BJS Open},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1002/bjs5.50254},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-212878},
  pages     = {310 -- 319},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background The impact of hospital volume after rectal cancer surgery is seldom investigated. This study aimed to analyse the impact of annual rectal cancer surgery cases per hospital on postoperative mortality and failure to rescue. Methods All patients diagnosed with rectal cancer and who had a rectal resection procedure code from 2012 to 2015 were identified from nationwide administrative hospital data. Hospitals were grouped into five quintiles according to caseload. The absolute number of patients, postoperative deaths and failure to rescue (defined as in-hospital mortality after a documented postoperative complication) for severe postoperative complications were determined. Results Some 64 349 patients were identified. The overall in-house mortality rate was 3·9 per cent. The crude in-hospital mortality rate ranged from 5·3 per cent in very low-volume hospitals to 2·6 per cent in very high-volume centres, with a distinct trend between volume categories (P < 0·001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis using hospital volume as random effect, very high-volume hospitals (53 interventions/year) had a risk-adjusted odds ratio of 0·58 (95 per cent c.i. 0·47 to 0·73), compared with the baseline in-house mortality rate in very low-volume hospitals (6 interventions per year) (P < 0·001). The overall postoperative complication rate was comparable between different volume quintiles, but failure to rescue decreased significantly with increasing caseload (15·6 per cent after pulmonary embolism in the highest volume quintile versus 38 per cent in the lowest quintile; P = 0·010). Conclusion Patients who had rectal cancer surgery in high-volume hospitals showed better outcomes and reduced failure to rescue rates for severe complications than those treated in low-volume hospitals.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DiersWagnerBaumetal.2019,
  author    = {Diers, J. and Wagner, J. and Baum, P. and Lichthardt, S. and Kastner, C. and Matthes, N. and L{\"o}b, S. and Matthes, H. and Germer, C.-T. and Wiegering, A.},
  title     = {Nationwide in-hospital mortality following colonic cancer resection according to hospital volume in Germany},
  series = {BJS Open},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {BJS Open},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1002/bjs5.50173},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-204385},
  pages     = {672-677},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background: Colonic cancer is the most common cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to determine mortality rates following colonic cancer resection and the effect of hospital caseload on in-hospital mortality in Germany. Methods: Patients admitted with a diagnosis of colonic cancer undergoing colonic resection from 2012 to 2015 were identifed from a nationwide registry using procedure codes. The outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Hospitals were ranked according to their caseload for colonic cancer resection, and patients were categorized into five subgroups on the basis of hospital volume. Results: Some 129 196 colonic cancer resections were reviewed. The overall in-house mortality rate was 5⋅8 per cent, ranging from 6⋅9 per cent (1775 of 25 657 patients) in very low-volume hospitals to 4⋅8 per cent (1239 of 25 825) in very high-volume centres (P < 0⋅001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis the risk-adjusted odds ratio for in-house mortality was 0⋅75 (95 per cent c.i. 0⋅66 to 0⋅84) in very high-volume hospitals performing a mean of 85⋅0 interventions per year, compared with that in very low-volume hospitals performing a mean of only 12⋅7 interventions annually, after adjustment for sex, age, co-morbidity, emergency procedures, prolonged mechanical ventilation and transfusion. Conclusion: In Germany, patients undergoing colonic cancer resections in high-volume hospitals had with improved outcomes compared with patients treated in low-volume hospitals},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HaakeHaackSchaeferetal.2023,
  author    = {Haake, Markus and Haack, Beatrice and Sch{\"a}fer, Tina and Harter, Patrick N. and Mattavelli, Greta and Eiring, Patrick and Vashist, Neha and Wedekink, Florian and Genssler, Sabrina and Fischer, Birgitt and Dahlhoff, Julia and Mokhtari, Fatemeh and Kuzkina, Anastasia and Welters, Marij J. P. and Benz, Tamara M. and Sorger, Lena and Thiemann, Vincent and Almanzar, Giovanni and Selle, Martina and Thein, Klara and Sp{\"a}th, Jacob and Gonzalez, Maria Cecilia and Reitinger, Carmen and Ipsen-Escobedo, Andrea and Wistuba-Hamprecht, Kilian and Eichler, Kristin and Filipski, Katharina and Zeiner, Pia S. and Beschorner, Rudi and Goedemans, Renske and Gogolla, Falk Hagen and Hackl, Hubert and Rooswinkel, Rogier W. and Thiem, Alexander and Romer Roche, Paula and Joshi, Hemant and P{\"u}hringer, Dirk and W{\"o}ckel, Achim and Diessner, Joachim E. and R{\"u}diger, Manfred and Leo, Eugen and Cheng, Phil F. and Levesque, Mitchell P. and Goebeler, Matthias and Sauer, Markus and Nimmerjahn, Falk and Schuberth-Wagner, Christine and Felten, Stefanie von and Mittelbronn, Michel and Mehling, Matthias and Beilhack, Andreas and van der Burg, Sjoerd H. and Riedel, Angela and Weide, Benjamin and Dummer, Reinhard and Wischhusen, J{\"o}rg},
  title     = {Tumor-derived GDF-15 blocks LFA-1 dependent T cell recruitment and suppresses responses to anti-PD-1 treatment},
  series = {Nature Communications},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Nature Communications},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41467-023-39817-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-357333},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Immune checkpoint blockade therapy is beneficial and even curative for some cancer patients. However, the majority don't respond to immune therapy. Across different tumor types, pre-existing T cell infiltrates predict response to checkpoint-based immunotherapy. Based on in vitro pharmacological studies, mouse models and analyses of human melanoma patients, we show that the cytokine GDF-15 impairs LFA-1/β2-integrin-mediated adhesion of T cells to activated endothelial cells, which is a pre-requisite of T cell extravasation. In melanoma patients, GDF-15 serum levels strongly correlate with failure of PD-1-based immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Neutralization of GDF-15 improves both T cell trafficking and therapy efficiency in murine tumor models. Thus GDF-15, beside its known role in cancer-related anorexia and cachexia, emerges as a regulator of T cell extravasation into the tumor microenvironment, which provides an even stronger rationale for therapeutic anti-GDF-15 antibody development.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WagnerCrippaAmariccietal.2023,
  author    = {Wagner, N. and Crippa, L. and Amaricci, A. and Hansmann, P. and Klett, M. and K{\"o}nig, E. J. and Sch{\"a}fer, T. and Di Sante, D. and Cano, J. and Millis, A. J. and Georges, A. and Sangiovanni, G.},
  title     = {Mott insulators with boundary zeros},
  series = {Nature Communications},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Nature Communications},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41467-023-42773-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-358150},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {The topological classification of electronic band structures is based on symmetry properties of Bloch eigenstates of single-particle Hamiltonians. In parallel, topological field theory has opened the doors to the formulation and characterization of non-trivial phases of matter driven by strong electron-electron interaction. Even though important examples of topological Mott insulators have been constructed, the relevance of the underlying non-interacting band topology to the physics of the Mott phase has remained unexplored. Here, we show that the momentum structure of the Green's function zeros defining the "Luttinger surface" provides a topological characterization of the Mott phase related, in the simplest description, to the one of the single-particle electronic dispersion. Considerations on the zeros lead to the prediction of new phenomena: a topological Mott insulator with an inverted gap for the bulk zeros must possess gapless zeros at the boundary, which behave as a form of "topological antimatter" annihilating conventional edge states. Placing band and Mott topological insulators in contact produces distinctive observable signatures at the interface, revealing the otherwise spectroscopically elusive Green's function zeros.},
  language  = {en}
}