@article{MitchellLiWeinholdetal.2016, author = {Mitchell, Jonathan S. and Li, Ni and Weinhold, Niels and F{\"o}rsti, Asta and Ali, Mina and van Duin, Mark and Thorleifsson, Gudmar and Johnson, David C. and Chen, Bowang and Halvarsson, Britt-Marie and Gudbjartsson, Daniel F. and Kuiper, Rowan and Stephens, Owen W. and Bertsch, Uta and Broderick, Peter and Campo, Chiara and Einsele, Hermann and Gregory, Walter A. and Gullberg, Urban and Henrion, Marc and Hillengass, Jens and Hoffmann, Per and Jackson, Graham H. and Johnsson, Ellinor and J{\"o}ud, Magnus and Kristinsson, Sigurdur Y. and Lenhoff, Stig and Lenive, Oleg and Mellqvist, Ulf-Henrik and Migliorini, Gabriele and Nahi, Hareth and Nelander, Sven and Nickel, Jolanta and N{\"o}then, Markus M. and Rafnar, Thorunn and Ross, Fiona M. and da Silva Filho, Miguel Inacio and Swaminathan, Bhairavi and Thomsen, Hauke and Turesson, Ingemar and Vangsted, Annette and Vogel, Ulla and Waage, Anders and Walker, Brian A. and Wihlborg, Anna-Karin and Broyl, Annemiek and Davies, Faith E. and Thorsteinsdottir, Unnur and Langer, Christian and Hansson, Markus and Kaiser, Martin and Sonneveld, Pieter and Stefansson, Kari and Morgan, Gareth J. and Goldschmidt, Hartmut and Hemminki, Kari and Nilsson, Bj{\"o}rn and Houlston, Richard S.}, title = {Genome-wide association study identifies multiple susceptibility loci for multiple myeloma}, series = {Nature Communications}, volume = {7}, journal = {Nature Communications}, doi = {10.1038/ncomms12050}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-165983}, pages = {12050}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy with a significant heritable basis. Genome-wide association studies have transformed our understanding of MM predisposition, but individual studies have had limited power to discover risk loci. Here we perform a meta-analysis of these GWAS, add a new GWAS and perform replication analyses resulting in 9,866 cases and 239,188 controls. We confirm all nine known risk loci and discover eight new loci at 6p22.3 (rs34229995, P=1.31 × 10-8), 6q21 (rs9372120, P=9.09 × 10-15), 7q36.1 (rs7781265, P=9.71 × 10-9), 8q24.21 (rs1948915, P=4.20 × 10-11), 9p21.3 (rs2811710, P=1.72 × 10-13), 10p12.1 (rs2790457, P=1.77 × 10-8), 16q23.1 (rs7193541, P=5.00 × 10-12) and 20q13.13 (rs6066835, P=1.36 × 10-13), which localize in or near to JARID2, ATG5, SMARCD3, CCAT1, CDKN2A, WAC, RFWD3 and PREX1. These findings provide additional support for a polygenic model of MM and insight into the biological basis of tumour development.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Hoffmann2011, author = {Hoffmann, Niels}, title = {Vergleich der Einzelknopfnaht und der adjustierbaren Naht zur Skleradeckeladaption im Rahmen der Trabekulektomie}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-73055}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Die Ergebnisse der Trabekulektomie unter Verwendung der Einzelknopfnaht oder der adjustierbaren Naht sind identisch. Die Wahl der Nahttechnik sollte nach den individuellen Bed{\"u}rfnissen des Patienten und der chirurgischen Erfahren erfolgen.}, subject = {trabekulektomie}, language = {de} } @article{MatlachHoffmannFreibergetal.2012, author = {Matlach, Juliane and Hoffmann, Niels and Freiberg, Florentina J. and Grehn, Franz and Klink, Thomas}, title = {Comparative study of trabeculectomy using single sutures versus releasable sutures}, series = {Clinical ophthalmology}, volume = {6}, journal = {Clinical ophthalmology}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S32503}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-123715}, pages = {1019-1027}, year = {2012}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of trabeculectomy using single sutures or releasable sutures. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 61 patients who had undergone trabeculectomy using single sutures (n = 33, 54.1\%) or releasable sutures (n = 28, 45.9\%). The scleral flap was secured with a mean 3.9 (range 3-5) single sutures in 33 patients and with three releasable sutures in 28 patients. Primary outcomes were the success rate, based on intraocular pressure and medication usage, and the frequency of complications and post-surgical interventions. The criteria used to determine complete success were, first, intraocular pressure < 18 mmHg and, second, <=21 mmHg and >=20\% intraocular pressure reduction without glaucoma medication. RESULTS: All patients had an intraocular pressure <= 21 mmHg; 87.5\% in the single suture group and 92.6\% in the releasable suture group had an intraocular pressure < 18 mmHg at 24 months. There was a highly significant reduction in intraocular pressure to baseline values in both groups at the last visit. Applying the first criterion, complete success was achieved in 57.6\% of patients with single sutures and 71.4\% with releasable sutures, and based on the second criterion, 66.7\% and 71.4\%, respectively. No significant difference was found between the groups with regard to intraocular pressure, or success or complication rates. CONCLUSION: The results of trabeculectomy using single sutures or releasable sutures are equivalent. Therefore, the choice of suture technique should be based on individual patient requirements and surgeon experience.}, language = {en} } @article{WentSudSpeedyetal.2018, author = {Went, Molly and Sud, Amit and Speedy, Helen and Sunter, Nicola J. and F{\"o}rsti, Asta and Law, Philip J. and Johnson, David C. and Mirabella, Fabio and Holroyd, Amy and Li, Ni and Orlando, Giulia and Weinhold, Niels and van Duin, Mark and Chen, Bowang and Mitchell, Jonathan S. and Mansouri, Larry and Juliusson, Gunnar and Smedby, Karin E and Jayne, Sandrine and Majid, Aneela and Dearden, Claire and Allsup, David J. and Bailey, James R. and Pratt, Guy and Pepper, Chris and Fegan, Chris and Rosenquist, Richard and Kuiper, Rowan and Stephens, Owen W. and Bertsch, Uta and Broderick, Peter and Einsele, Hermann and Gregory, Walter M. and Hillengass, Jens and Hoffmann, Per and Jackson, Graham H. and J{\"o}ckel, Karl-Heinz and Nickel, Jolanta and N{\"o}then, Markus M. and da Silva Filho, Miguel Inacio and Thomsen, Hauke and Walker, Brian A. and Broyl, Annemiek and Davies, Faith E. and Hansson, Markus and Goldschmidt, Hartmut and Dyer, Martin J. S. and Kaiser, Martin and Sonneveld, Pieter and Morgan, Gareth J. and Hemminki, Kari and Nilsson, Bj{\"o}rn and Catovsky, Daniel and Allan, James M. and Houlston, Richard S.}, title = {Genetic correlation between multiple myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia provides evidence for shared aetiology}, series = {Blood Cancer Journal}, volume = {9}, journal = {Blood Cancer Journal}, doi = {10.1038/s41408-018-0162-8}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233627}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The clustering of different types of B-cell malignancies in families raises the possibility of shared aetiology. To examine this, we performed cross-trait linkage disequilibrium (LD)-score regression of multiple myeloma (MM) and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) genome-wide association study (GWAS) data sets, totalling 11,734 cases and 29,468 controls. A significant genetic correlation between these two B-cell malignancies was shown (Rg = 0.4, P = 0.0046). Furthermore, four of the 45 known CLL risk loci were shown to associate with MM risk and five of the 23 known MM risk loci associate with CLL risk. By integrating eQTL, Hi-C and ChIP-seq data, we show that these pleiotropic risk loci are enriched for B-cell regulatory elements and implicate B-cell developmental genes. These data identify shared biological pathways influencing the development of CLL and, MM and further our understanding of the aetiological basis of these B-cell malignancies.}, language = {en} }