@article{ManchiaAdliAkulaetal.2013,
  author    = {Manchia, Mirko and Adli, Mazda and Akula, Nirmala and Arda, Raffaella and Aubry, Jean-Michel and Backlund, Lena and Banzato, Claudio E. M. and Baune, Bernhard T. and Bellivier, Frank and Bengesser, Susanne and Biernacka, Joanna M. and Brichant-Petitjean, Clara and Bui, Elise and Calkin, Cynthia V. and Cheng, Andrew Tai Ann and Chillotti, Caterina and Cichon, Sven and Clark, Scott and Czerski, Piotr M. and Dantas, Clarissa and Del Zompo, Maria and DePaulo, J. Raymond and Detera-Wadleigh, Sevilla D. and Etain, Bruno and Falkai, Peter and Fris{\´e}n, Louise and Frye, Mark A. and Fullerton, Jan and Gard, S{\´e}bastien and Garnham, Julie and Goes, Fernando S. and Grof, Paul and Gruber, Oliver and Hashimoto, Ryota and Hauser, Joanna and Heilbronner, Urs and Hoban, Rebecca and Hou, Liping and Jamain, St{\´e}phane and Kahn, Jean-Pierre and Kassem, Layla and Kato, Tadafumi and Kelsoe, John R. and Kittel-Schneider, Sarah and Kliwicki, Sebastian and Kuo, Po-Hsiu and Kusumi, Ichiro and Laje, Gonzalo and Lavebratt, Catharina and Leboyer, Marion and Leckband, Susan G. and L{\´o}pez Jaramillo, Carlos A. and Maj, Mario and Malafosse, Alain and Martinsson, Lina and Masui, Takuya and Mitchell, Philip B. and Mondimore, Frank and Monteleone, Palmiero and Nallet, Audrey and Neuner, Maria and Nov{\´a}k, Tom{\´a}s and O'Donovan, Claire and {\"O}sby, Urban and Ozaki, Norio and Perlis, Roy H. and Pfennig, Andrea and Potash, James B. and Reich-Erkelenz, Daniela and Reif, Andreas and Reininghaus, Eva and Richardson, Sara and Rouleau, Guy A. and Rybakowski, Janusz K. and Schalling, Martin and Schofield, Peter R. and Schubert, Oliver K. and Schweizer, Barbara and Seem{\"u}ller, Florian and Grigoroiu-Serbanescu, Maria and Severino, Giovanni and Seymour, Lisa R. and Slaney, Claire and Smoller, Jordan W. and Squassina, Alessio and Stamm, Thomas and Steele, Jo and Stopkova, Pavla and Tighe, Sarah K. and Tortorella, Alfonso and Turecki, Gustavo and Wray, Naomi R. and Wright, Adam and Zandi, Peter P. and Zilles, David and Bauer, Michael and Rietschel, Marcella and McMahon, Francis J. and Schulze, Thomas G. and Alda, Martin},
  title     = {Assessment of Response to Lithium Maintenance Treatment in Bipolar Disorder: A Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) Report},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0065636},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-130938},
  pages     = {e65636},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Objective: The assessment of response to lithium maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder (BD) is complicated by variable length of treatment, unpredictable clinical course, and often inconsistent compliance. Prospective and retrospective methods of assessment of lithium response have been proposed in the literature. In this study we report the key phenotypic measures of the "Retrospective Criteria of Long-Term Treatment Response in Research Subjects with Bipolar Disorder" scale currently used in the Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) study. Materials and Methods: Twenty-nine ConLiGen sites took part in a two-stage case-vignette rating procedure to examine inter-rater agreement [Kappa (\(\kappa\))] and reliability [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)] of lithium response. Annotated first-round vignettes and rating guidelines were circulated to expert research clinicians for training purposes between the two stages. Further, we analyzed the distributional properties of the treatment response scores available for 1,308 patients using mixture modeling. Results: Substantial and moderate agreement was shown across sites in the first and second sets of vignettes (\(\kappa\) = 0.66 and \(\kappa\) = 0.54, respectively), without significant improvement from training. However, definition of response using the A score as a quantitative trait and selecting cases with B criteria of 4 or less showed an improvement between the two stages (\(ICC_1 = 0.71\) and \(ICC_2 = 0.75\), respectively). Mixture modeling of score distribution indicated three subpopulations (full responders, partial responders, non responders). Conclusions: We identified two definitions of lithium response, one dichotomous and the other continuous, with moderate to substantial inter-rater agreement and reliability. Accurate phenotypic measurement of lithium response is crucial for the ongoing ConLiGen pharmacogenomic study.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WaszakNorthcottBuchhalteretal.2018,
  author    = {Waszak, Sebastian M and Northcott, Paul A and Buchhalter, Ivo and Robinson, Giles W and Sutter, Christian and Groebner, Susanne and Grund, Kerstin B and Brugi{\`e}res, Laurence and Jones, David T W and Pajtler, Kristian W and Morrissy, A Sorana and Kool, Marcel and Sturm, Dominik and Chavez, Lukas and Ernst, Aurelie and Brabetz, Sebastian and Hain, Michael and Zichner, Thomas and Segura-Wang, Maia and Weischenfeldt, Joachim and Rausch, Tobias and Mardin, Balca R and Zhou, Xin and Baciu, Cristina and Lawerenz, Christian and Chan, Jennifer A and Varlet, Pascale and Guerrini-Rousseau, Lea and Fults, Daniel W and Grajkowska, Wiesława and Hauser, Peter and Jabado, Nada and Ra, Young-Shin and Zitterbart, Karel and Shringarpure, Suyash S and De La Vega, Francisco M and Bustamante, Carlos D and Ng, Ho-Keung and Perry, Arie and MacDonald, Tobey J and Driever, Pablo Hern{\´a}iz and Bendel, Anne E and Bowers, Daniel C and McCowage, Geoffrey and Chintagumpala, Murali M and Cohn, Richard and Hassall, Timothy and Fleischhack, Gudrun and Eggen, Tone and Wesenberg, Finn and Feychting, Maria and Lannering, Birgitta and Sch{\"u}z, Joachim and Johansen, Christoffer and Andersen, Tina V and R{\"o}{\"o}sli, Martin and Kuehni, Claudia E and Grotzer, Michael and Kjaerheim, Kristina and Monoranu, Camelia M and Archer, Tenley C and Duke, Elizabeth and Pomeroy, Scott L and Shelagh, Redmond and Frank, Stephan and Sumerauer, David and Scheurlen, Wolfram and Ryzhova, Marina V and Milde, Till and Kratz, Christian P and Samuel, David and Zhang, Jinghui and Solomon, David A and Marra, Marco and Eils, Roland and Bartram, Claus R and von Hoff, Katja and Rutkowksi, Stefan and Ramaswamy, Vijay and Gilbertson, Richard J and Korshunov, Andrey and Taylor, Michael D and Lichter, Peter and Malkin, David and Gajjar, Amar and Korbel, Jan O and Pfister, Stefan M},
  title     = {Spectrum and prevalence of genetic predisposition in medulloblastoma: a retrospective genetic study and prospective validation in a clinical trial cohort},
  series = {The Lancet Oncology},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {The Lancet Oncology},
  doi       = {10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30242-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233425},
  pages     = {785-798},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background Medulloblastoma is associated with rare hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes; however, consensus medulloblastoma predisposition genes have not been defined and screening guidelines for genetic counselling and testing for paediatric patients are not available. We aimed to assess and define these genes to provide evidence for future screening guidelines. Methods In this international, multicentre study, we analysed patients with medulloblastoma from retrospective cohorts (International Cancer Genome Consortium [ICGC] PedBrain, Medulloblastoma Advanced Genomics International Consortium [MAGIC], and the CEFALO series) and from prospective cohorts from four clinical studies (SJMB03, SJMB12, SJYC07, and I-HIT-MED). Whole-genome sequences and exome sequences from blood and tumour samples were analysed for rare damaging germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes. DNA methylation profiling was done to determine consensus molecular subgroups: WNT (MBWNT), SHH (MBSHH), group 3 (MBGroup3), and group 4 (MBGroup4). Medulloblastoma predisposition genes were predicted on the basis of rare variant burden tests against controls without a cancer diagnosis from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). Previously defined somatic mutational signatures were used to further classify medulloblastoma genomes into two groups, a clock-like group (signatures 1 and 5) and a homologous recombination repair deficiency-like group (signatures 3 and 8), and chromothripsis was investigated using previously established criteria. Progression-free survival and overall survival were modelled for patients with a genetic predisposition to medulloblastoma. Findings We included a total of 1022 patients with medulloblastoma from the retrospective cohorts (n=673) and the four prospective studies (n=349), from whom blood samples (n=1022) and tumour samples (n=800) were analysed for germline mutations in 110 cancer predisposition genes. In our rare variant burden analysis, we compared these against 53 105 sequenced controls from ExAC and identified APC, BRCA2, PALB2, PTCH1, SUFU, and TP53 as consensus medulloblastoma predisposition genes according to our rare variant burden analysis and estimated that germline mutations accounted for 6\% of medulloblastoma diagnoses in the retrospective cohort. The prevalence of genetic predispositions differed between molecular subgroups in the retrospective cohort and was highest for patients in the MBSHH subgroup (20\% in the retrospective cohort). These estimates were replicated in the prospective clinical cohort (germline mutations accounted for 5\% of medulloblastoma diagnoses, with the highest prevalence [14\%] in the MBSHH subgroup). Patients with germline APC mutations developed MBWNT and accounted for most (five [71\%] of seven) cases of MBWNT that had no somatic CTNNB1 exon 3 mutations. Patients with germline mutations in SUFU and PTCH1 mostly developed infant MBSHH. Germline TP53 mutations presented only in childhood patients in the MBSHH subgroup and explained more than half (eight [57\%] of 14) of all chromothripsis events in this subgroup. Germline mutations in PALB2 and BRCA2 were observed across the MBSHH, MBGroup3, and MBGroup4 molecular subgroups and were associated with mutational signatures typical of homologous recombination repair deficiency. In patients with a genetic predisposition to medulloblastoma, 5-year progression-free survival was 52\% (95\% CI 40-69) and 5-year overall survival was 65\% (95\% CI 52-81); these survival estimates differed significantly across patients with germline mutations in different medulloblastoma predisposition genes. Interpretation Genetic counselling and testing should be used as a standard-of-care procedure in patients with MBWNT and MBSHH because these patients have the highest prevalence of damaging germline mutations in known cancer predisposition genes. We propose criteria for routine genetic screening for patients with medulloblastoma based on clinical and molecular tumour characteristics.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZinnerHauserBornetal.2015,
  author    = {Zinner, Christoph and Hauser, Anna and Born, Dennis-Peter and Wehrlin, Jon P. and Holmberg, Hans-Christer and Sperlich, Billy},
  title     = {Influence of Hypoxic Interval Training and Hyperoxic Recovery on Muscle Activation and Oxygenation in Connection with Double-Poling Exercise},
  series = {PLoS One},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {PLoS One},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0140616},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126299},
  pages     = {e0140616},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Here, we evaluated the influence of breathing oxygen at different partial pressures during recovery from exercise on performance at sea-level and a simulated altitude of 1800 m, as reflected in activation of different upper body muscles, and oxygenation of the m. triceps brachii. Ten well-trained, male endurance athletes (25.3±4.1 yrs; 179.2±4.5 cm; 74.2±3.4 kg) performed four test trials, each involving three 3-min sessions on a double-poling ergometer with 3-min intervals of recovery. One trial was conducted entirely under normoxic (No) and another under hypoxic conditions \((Ho; F_iO_2 = 0.165)\). In the third and fourth trials, the exercise was performed in normoxia and hypoxia, respectively, with hyperoxic recovery \((HOX; F_iO_2 = 1.00)\) in both cases. Arterial hemoglobin saturation was higher under the two HOX conditions than without HOX (p<0.05). Integrated muscle electrical activity was not influenced by the oxygen content (best d = 0.51). Furthermore, the only difference in tissue saturation index measured via near-infrared spectroscopy observed was between the recovery periods during the NoNo and HoHOX interventions (P<0.05, d = 0.93). In the case of HoHo the athletes' \(P_{mean}\) declined from the first to the third interval (P < 0.05), whereas Pmean was unaltered under the HoHOX, NoHOX and NoNo conditions. We conclude that the less pronounced decline in \(P_{mean}\) during 3 x 3-min double-poling sprints in normoxia and hypoxia with hyperoxic recovery is not related to changes in muscle activity or oxygenation. Moreover, we conclude that hyperoxia \((F_iO_2 = 1.00)\) used in conjunction with hypoxic or normoxic work intervals may serve as an effective aid when inhaled during the subsequent recovery intervals.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SepahiFaustSturmetal.2019,
  author    = {Sepahi, Ilnaz and Faust, Ulrike and Sturm, Marc and Bosse, Kristin and Kehrer, Martin and Heinrich, Tilman and Grundman-Hauser, Kathrin and Bauer, Peter and Ossowski, Stephan and Susak, Hana and Varon, Raymonda and Schr{\"o}ck, Evelin and Niederacher, Dieter and Auber, Bernd and Sutter, Christian and Arnold, Norbert and Hahnen, Eric and Dworniczak, Bernd and Wang-Gorke, Shan and Gehrig, Andrea and Weber, Bernhard H. F. and Engel, Christoph and Lemke, Johannes R. and Hartkopf, Andreas and Huu Phuc, Nguyen and Riess, Olaf and Schroeder, Christopher},
  title     = {Investigating the effects of additional truncating variants in DNA-repair genes on breast cancer risk in BRCA1-positive women},
  series = {BMC Cancer},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {BMC Cancer},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12885-019-5946-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-237676},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background Inherited pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most common causes of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). The risk of developing breast cancer by age 80 in women carrying a BRCA1 pathogenic variant is 72\%. The lifetime risk varies between families and even within affected individuals of the same family. The cause of this variability is largely unknown, but it is hypothesized that additional genetic factors contribute to differences in age at onset (AAO). Here we investigated whether truncating and rare missense variants in genes of different DNA-repair pathways contribute to this phenomenon. Methods We used extreme phenotype sampling to recruit 133 BRCA1-positive patients with either early breast cancer onset, below 35 (early AAO cohort) or cancer-free by age 60 (controls). Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) was used to screen for variants in 311 genes involved in different DNA-repair pathways. Results Patients with an early AAO (73 women) had developed breast cancer at a median age of 27 years (interquartile range (IQR); 25.00-27.00 years). A total of 3703 variants were detected in all patients and 43 of those (1.2\%) were truncating variants. The truncating variants were found in 26 women of the early AAO group (35.6\%; 95\%-CI 24.7 - 47.7\%) compared to 16 women of controls (26.7\%; 95\%-CI 16.1 to 39.7\%). When adjusted for environmental factors and family history, the odds ratio indicated an increased breast cancer risk for those carrying an additional truncating DNA-repair variant to BRCA1 mutation (OR: 3.1; 95\%-CI 0.92 to 11.5; p-value = 0.07), although it did not reach the conventionally acceptable significance level of 0.05. Conclusions To our knowledge this is the first time that the combined effect of truncating variants in DNA-repair genes on AAO in patients with hereditary breast cancer is investigated. Our results indicate that co-occurring truncating variants might be associated with an earlier onset of breast cancer in BRCA1-positive patients. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{NemesJohannSteinbuegletal.2022,
  author    = {Nemes, Karolina and Johann, Pascal D. and Steinb{\"u}gl, Mona and Gruhle, Miriam and Bens, Susanne and Kachanov, Denis and Teleshova, Margarita and Hauser, Peter and Simon, Thorsten and Tippelt, Stephan and Eberl, Wolfgang and Chada, Martin and Lopez, Vicente Santa-Maria and Grigull, Lorenz and Hern{\´a}iz-Driever, Pablo and Eyrich, Matthias and Pears, Jane and Milde, Till and Reinhard, Harald and Leipold, Alfred and van de Wetering, Marianne and Gil-da-Costa, Maria Jo{\~a}o and Ebetsberger-Dachs, Georg and Kerl, Kornelius and Lemmer, Andreas and Boztug, Heidrun and Furtw{\"a}ngler, Rhoikos and Kordes, Uwe and Vokuhl, Christian and Hasselblatt, Martin and Bison, Brigitte and Kr{\"o}ncke, Thomas and Melchior, Patrick and Timmermann, Beate and Gerss, Joachim and Siebert, Reiner and Fr{\"u}hwald, Michael C.},
  title     = {Infants and newborns with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (ATRT) and extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumors (eMRT) in the EU-RHAB registry: a unique and challenging population},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {9},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers14092185},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-270730},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Introduction: Malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT) predominantly affect infants and young children. Patients below six months of age represent a particularly therapeutically challenging group. Toxicity to developing organ sites limits intensity of treatment. Information on prognostic factors, genetics, toxicity of treatment and long-term outcomes is sparse. Methods: Clinical, genetic, and treatment data of 100 patients (aged below 6 months at diagnosis) from 13 European countries were analyzed (2005-2020). Tumors and matching blood samples were examined for SMARCB1 mutations using FISH, MLPA and Sanger sequencing. DNA methylation subgroups (ATRT-TYR, ATRT-SHH, and ATRT-MYC) were determined using 450 k / 850 k-profiling. Results: A total of 45 patients presented with ATRT, 29 with extracranial, extrarenal (eMRT) and 9 with renal rhabdoid tumors (RTK). Seventeen patients demonstrated synchronous tumors (SYN). Metastases (M+) were present in 27\% (26/97) at diagnosis. A germline mutation (GLM) was detected in 55\% (47/86). DNA methylation subgrouping was available in 50\% (31 / 62) with ATRT or SYN; for eMRT, methylation-based subgrouping was not performed. The 5-year overall (OS) and event free survival (EFS) rates were 23.5 ± 4.6\% and 19 ± 4.1\%, respectively. Male sex (11 ± 5\% vs. 35.8 ± 7.4\%), M+ stage (6.1 ± 5.4\% vs. 36.2 ± 7.4\%), presence of SYN (7.1 ± 6.9\% vs. 26.6 ± 5.3\%) and GLM (7.7 ± 4.2\% vs. 45.7 ± 8.6\%) were significant prognostic factors for 5-year OS. Molecular subgrouping and survival analyses confirm a previously described survival advantage for ATRT-TYR. In an adjusted multivariate model, clinical factors that favorably influence the prognosis were female sex, localized stage, absence of a GLM and maintenance therapy. Conclusions: In this cohort of homogenously treated infants with MRT, significant predictors of outcome were sex, M-stage, GLM and maintenance therapy. We confirm the need to stratify which patient groups benefit from multimodal treatment, and which need novel therapeutic strategies. Biomarker-driven tailored trials may be a key option.},
  language  = {en}
}