@article{EdgecockCarettaDavenneetal.2013, author = {Edgecock, T. R. and Caretta, O. and Davenne, T. and Densam, C. and Fitton, M. and Kelliher, D. and Loveridge, P. and Machida, S. and Prior, C. and Rogers, C. and Rooney, M. and Thomason, J. and Wilcox, D. and Wildner, E. and Efthymiopoulos, I. and Garoby, R. and Gilardoni, S. and Hansen, C. and Benedetto, E. and Jensen, E. and Kosmicki, A. and Martini, M. and Osborne, J. and Prior, G. and Stora, T. and Melo Mendonca, T. and Vlachoudis, V. and Waaijer, C. and Cupial, P. and Chanc{\´e}, A. and Longhin, A. and Payet, J. and Zito, M. and Baussan, E. and Bobeth, C. and Bouquerel, E. and Dracos, M. and Gaudiot, G. and Lepers, B. and Osswald, F. and Poussot, P. and Vassilopoulos, N. and Wurtz, J. and Zeter, V. and Bielski, J. and Kozien, M. and Lacny, L. and Skoczen, B. and Szybinski, B. and Ustrycka, A. and Wroblewski, A. and Marie-Jeanne, M. and Balint, P. and Fourel, C. and Giraud, J. and Jacob, J. and Lamy, T. and Latrasse, L. and Sortais, P. and Thuillier, T. and Mitrofanov, S. and Loiselet, M. and Keutgen, Th. and Delbar, Th. and Debray, F. and Trophine, C. and Veys, S. and Daversin, C. and Zorin, V. and Izotov, I. and Skalyga, V. and Burt, G. and Dexter, A. C. and Kravchuk, V. L. and Marchi, T. and Cinausero, M. and Gramegna, F. and De Angelis, G. and Prete, G. and Collazuol, G. and Laveder, M. and Mazzocco, M. and Mezzetto, M. and Signorini, C. and Vardaci, E. and Di Nitto, A. and Brondi, A. and La Rana, G. and Migliozzi, P. and Moro, R. and Palladino, V. and Gelli, N. and Berkovits, D. and Hass, M. and Hirsh, T. Y. and Schuhmann, M. and Stahl, A. and Wehner, J. and Bross, A. and Kopp, J. and Neuffer, D. and Wands, R. and Bayes, R. and Laing, A. and Soler, P. and Agarwalla, S. K. and Cervera Villanueva, A. and Donini, A. and Ghosh, T. and G{\´o}mez Cadenas, J. J. and Hern{\´a}ndez, P. and Mart{\´i}n-Albo, J. and Mena, O. and Burguet-Castell, J. and Agostino, L. and Buizza-Avanzini, M. and Marafini, M. and Patzak, T. and Tonazzo, A. and Duchesneau, D. and Mosca, L. and Bogomilov, M. and Karadzhov, Y. and Matev, R. and Tsenov, R. and Akhmedov, E. and Blennow, M. and Lindner, M. and Schwetz, T. and Fern{\´a}ndez Martinez, E. and Maltoni, M. and Men{\´e}ndez, J. and Giunti, C. and Gonz{\´a}lez Garc{\´i}a, M. C. and Salvado, J. and Coloma, P. and Huber, P. and Li, T. and L{\´o}pez Pav{\´o}n, J. and Orme, C. and Pascoli, S. and Meloni, D. and Tang, J. and Winter, W. and Ohlsson, T. and Zhang, H. and Scotto-Lavina, L. and Terranova, F. and Bonesini, M. and Tortora, L. and Alekou, A. and Aslaninejad, M. and Bontoiu, C. and Kurup, A. and Jenner, L. J. and Long, K. and Pasternak, J. and Pozimski, J. and Back, J. J. and Harrison, P. and Beard, K. and Bogacz, A. and Berg, J. S. and Stratakis, D. and Witte, H. and Snopok, P. and Bliss, N. and Cordwell, M. and Moss, A. and Pattalwar, S. and Apollonio, M.}, title = {High intensity neutrino oscillation facilities in Europe}, series = {Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams}, volume = {16}, journal = {Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.16.021002}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126611}, pages = {21002}, year = {2013}, abstract = {The EUROnu project has studied three possible options for future, high intensity neutrino oscillation facilities in Europe. The first is a Super Beam, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of pions created by bombarding targets with a 4 MW proton beam from the CERN High Power Superconducting Proton Linac. The far detector for this facility is the 500 kt MEMPHYS water Cherenkov, located in the Frejus tunnel. The second facility is the Neutrino Factory, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of mu(+) and mu(-) beams in a storage ring. The far detector in this case is a 100 kt magnetized iron neutrino detector at a baseline of 2000 km. The third option is a Beta Beam, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of beta emitting isotopes, in particular He-6 and Ne-18, also stored in a ring. The far detector is also the MEMPHYS detector in the Frejus tunnel. EUROnu has undertaken conceptual designs of these facilities and studied the performance of the detectors. Based on this, it has determined the physics reach of each facility, in particular for the measurement of CP violation in the lepton sector, and estimated the cost of construction. These have demonstrated that the best facility to build is the Neutrino Factory. However, if a powerful proton driver is constructed for another purpose or if the MEMPHYS detector is built for astroparticle physics, the Super Beam also becomes very attractive.}, language = {en} } @article{KreisslStoutWongetal.2011, author = {Kreissl, Michael C. and Stout, David B. and Wong, Koon-Pong and Wu, Hsiao-Ming and Caglayan, Evren and Ladno, Waldemar and Zhang, Xiaoli and Prior, John and Reiners, Christoph and Huang, Sung-Cheng and Schelbert, Heinrich R.}, title = {Influence of Dietary Interventions and Insulin on Myocardial, Skeletal Muscle and Brain [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Kinetics in Mice}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-68775}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Background: We evaluated the effect of insulin stimulation and dietary changes on myocardial, skeletal muscle and brain [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) kinetics and uptake in vivo in intact mice. Methods: Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and imaged under different conditions: non-fasted (n = 7; "controls"), non-fasted with insulin (2 IU/kg body weight) injected subcutaneously immediately prior to FDG (n = 6), fasted (n = 5), and fasted with insulin injection (n = 5). A 60-min small-animal PET with serial blood sampling and kinetic modeling was performed. Results: We found comparable FDG standardized uptake values (SUVs) in myocardium in the non-fasted controls and non-fasted-insulin injected group (SUV 45-60 min, 9.58 ± 1.62 vs. 9.98 ± 2.44; p = 0.74), a lower myocardial SUV was noted in the fasted group (3.48 ± 1.73; p < 0.001). In contrast, the FDG uptake rate constant (Ki) for myocardium increased significantly by 47\% in non-fasted mice by insulin (13.4 ± 3.9 ml/min/100 g vs. 19.8 ± 3.3 ml/min/100 g; p = 0.030); in fasted mice, a lower myocardial Ki as compared to controls was observed (3.3 ± 1.9 ml/min/100 g; p < 0.001). Skeletal muscle SUVs and Ki values were increased by insulin independent of dietary state, whereas in the brain, those parameters were not influenced by fasting or administration of insulin. Fasting led to a reduction in glucose metabolic rate in the myocardium (19.41 ± 5.39 vs. 3.26 ± 1.97 mg/min/100 g; p < 0.001), the skeletal muscle (1.06 ± 0.34 vs. 0.34 ± 0.08 mg/min/100 g; p = 0.001) but not the brain (3.21 ± 0.53 vs. 2.85 ± 0.25 mg/min/100 g; p = 0.19). Conclusions: Changes in organ SUVs, uptake rate constants and metabolic rates induced by fasting and insulin administration as observed in intact mice by small-animal PET imaging are consistent with those observed in isolated heart/muscle preparations and, more importantly, in vivo studies in larger animals and in humans. When assessing the effect of insulin on the myocardial glucose metabolism of non-fasted mice, it is not sufficient to just calculate the SUV - dynamic imaging with kinetic modeling is necessary.}, subject = {Insulin}, language = {en} }