@unpublished{BoehnkeDellermannCeliketal.2018, author = {B{\"o}hnke, Julian and Dellermann, Theresa and Celik, Mehmet Ali and Krummenacher, Ivo and Dewhurst, Rian D. and Demeshko, Serhiy and Ewing, William C. and Hammond, Kai and Heß, Merlin and Bill, Eckhard and Welz, Eileen and R{\"o}hr, Merle I. S. and Mitric, Roland and Engels, Bernd and Meyer, Franc and Braunschweig, Holger}, title = {Isolation of diradical products of twisted double bonds}, series = {Nature Communications}, journal = {Nature Communications}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-160248}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Molecules containing multiple bonds between atoms—most often in the form of olefins—are ubiquitous in nature, commerce, and science, and as such have a huge impact on everyday life. Given their prominence, over the last few decades, frequent attempts have been made to perturb the structure and reactivity of multiply-bound species through bending and twisting. However, only modest success has been achieved in the quest to completely twist double bonds in order to homolytically cleave the associated π bond. Here, we present the isolation of double-bond-containing species based on boron, as well as their fully twisted diradical congeners, by the incorporation of attached groups with different electronic properties. The compounds comprise a structurally authenticated set of diamagnetic multiply-bound and diradical singly-bound congeners of the same class of compound.}, language = {en} } @article{BittnerBingenerCaseyDietzetal.2014, author = {Bittner, R. and Bingener-Casey, J. and Dietz, U. and Fabian, M. and Ferzli, G. S. and Fortelny, R. H. and K{\"o}ckerling, F. and Kukleta, J. and LeBlanc, K. and Lomanto, D. and Misra, M. C. and Morales-Conde, S. and Ramshaw, B. and Reinpold, W. and Rim, S. and Rohr, M. and Schrittwieser, R. and Simon, T. and Smietanski, M. and Stechemesser, B. and Timoney, M. and Chowbey, P.}, title = {Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS])—Part 2}, series = {Surgical Endoscopy}, volume = {28}, journal = {Surgical Endoscopy}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1007/s00464-013-3171-5}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121510}, pages = {353 - 379}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Guidelines are increasingly determining the decision process in day-to-day clinical work. Guidelines describe the current best possible standard in diagnostics and therapy. They should be developed by an international panel of experts, whereby alongside individual experience, above all, the results of comparative studies are decisive. According to the results of high-ranking scientific studies published in peer-reviewed journals, statements and recommendations are formulated, and these are graded strictly according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine. Guidelines can therefore be valuable in helping particularly the young surgeon in his or her day-to-day work to find the best decision for the patient when confronted with a wide and confusing range of options. However, even experienced surgeons benefit because by virtue of a heavy workload and commitment, they often find it difficult to keep up with the ever-increasing published literature. All guidelines require regular updating, usually every 3 years, in line with progress in the field. The current Guidelines focus on technique and perioperative management of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and constitute the first comprehensive guidelines on this topic. In this issue of Surgical Endoscopy, the first part of the Guidelines is published including sections on basics, indication for surgery, perioperative management, and key points of technique. The next part (Part 2) of the Guidelines will address complications and comparisons between open and laparoscopic techniques. Part 3 will cover mesh technology, hernia prophylaxis, technique-related issues, new technologic developments, lumbar and other unusual hernias, and training/education.}, language = {en} } @article{BittnerBingenerCaseyDietzetal.2014, author = {Bittner, R. and Bingener-Casey, J. and Dietz, U. and Fabian, M. and Ferzli, G. S. and Fortelny, R. H. and K{\"o}ckerling, F. and Kukleta, J. and LeBlanc, K. and Lomanto, D. and Misra, M. C. and Bansal, V. K. and Morales-Conde, S. and Ramshaw, B. and Reinpold, W. and Rim, S. and Rohr, M. and Schrittwieser, R. and Simon, T. and Smietanski, M. and Stechemesser, B. and Timoney, M. and Chowbey, P.}, title = {Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)—Part 1}, series = {Surgical Endoscopy}, volume = {28}, journal = {Surgical Endoscopy}, doi = {10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121294}, pages = {2-29}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Guidelines are increasingly determining the decision process in day-to-day clinical work. Guidelines describe the current best possible standard in diagnostics and therapy. They should be developed by an international panel of experts, whereby alongside individual experience, above all, the results of comparative studies are decisive. According to the results of high-ranking scientific studies published in peer-reviewed journals, statements and recommendations are formulated, and these are graded strictly according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine. Guidelines can therefore be valuable in helping particularly the young surgeon in his or her day-to-day work to find the best decision for the patient when confronted with a wide and confusing range of options. However, even experienced surgeons benefit because by virtue of a heavy workload and commitment, they often find it difficult to keep up with the ever-increasing published literature. All guidelines require regular updating, usually every 3 years, in line with progress in the field. The current Guidelines focus on technique and perioperative management of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and constitute the first comprehensive guidelines on this topic. In this issue of Surgical Endoscopy, the first part of the Guidelines is published including sections on basics, indication for surgery, perioperative management, and key points of technique. The next part (Part 2) of the Guidelines will address complications and comparisons between open and laparoscopic techniques. Part 3 will cover mesh technology, hernia prophylaxis, technique-related issues, new technologic developments, lumbar and other unusual hernias, and training/education.}, language = {en} } @techreport{SchuesslervonGehlenMatthesetal.1991, author = {Sch{\"u}ssler, Ulrich and von Gehlen, K. and Matthes, S. and Okrusch, Martin and Richter, P. and R{\"o}hr, C.}, title = {Ultramafische Einschaltungen in Metabasiten der KTB-Vorbohrung}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-39206}, year = {1991}, abstract = {No abstract available}, subject = {Kontinentales Tiefbohrprogramm}, language = {de} } @article{vonGehlenMatthesOkruschetal.1990, author = {von Gehlen, K. and Matthes, S. and Okrusch, Martin and Richter, P. and R{\"o}hr, C. and Sch{\"u}ssler, Ulrich}, title = {Metapyroxenite in der KTB-Vorbohrung}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-87539}, year = {1990}, abstract = {No abstract available.}, subject = {Kontinentales Tiefbohrprogramm der Bundesrepublik Deutschland}, language = {de} } @article{BoehnkeDellermannCeliketal.2018, author = {B{\"o}hnke, Julian and Dellermann, Theresa and Celik, Mehmet Ali and Krummenacher, Ivo and Dewhurst, Rian D. and Demeshko, Serhiy and Ewing, William C. and Hammond, Kai and Heß, Merlin and Bill, Eckhard and Welz, Eileen and R{\"o}hr, Merle I. S. and Mitric, Roland and Engels, Bernd and Meyer, Franc and Braunschweig, Holger}, title = {Isolation of diborenes and their 90°-twisted diradical congeners}, series = {Nature Communications}, volume = {9}, journal = {Nature Communications}, number = {Article number: 1197}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-018-02998-3}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-160431}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Molecules containing multiple bonds between atoms—most often in the form of olefins—are ubiquitous in nature, commerce, and science, and as such have a huge impact on everyday life. Given their prominence, over the last few decades, frequent attempts have been made to perturb the structure and reactivity of multiply-bound species through bending and twisting. However, only modest success has been achieved in the quest to completely twist double bonds in order to homolytically cleave the associated π bond. Here, we present the isolation of double-bond-containing species based on boron, as well as their fully twisted diradical congeners, by the incorporation of attached groups with different electronic properties. The compounds comprise a structurally authenticated set of diamagnetic multiply-bound and diradical singly-bound congeners of the same class of compound.}, language = {en} }