@article{KrugVollandReichetal.2020,
  author    = {Krug, Ralf and Volland, Julian and Reich, Sebastian and Soliman, Sebastian and Connert, Thomas and Krastl, Gabriel},
  title     = {Guided endodontic treatment of multiple teeth with dentin dysplasia: a case report},
  series = {Head \& Face Medicine},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Head \& Face Medicine},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13005-020-00240-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230271},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background To report the outcome of guided endodontic treatment (GET) of a case of dentin dysplasia with pulp canal calcification (PCC) and apical periodontitis based on the use of a 3D-printed template designed by merging cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and surface scan data. Case presentation A 12-year old female with radicular dentin dysplasia type I (DD-1) presented for endodontic treatment. Radiography revealed PCC in all teeth and apical radiolucency in seven teeth (12, 15, 26, 31, 32, 36 and 46). Tooth 36 had the most acute symptoms and was thus treated first by conventional access cavity preparation and root canal detection. Despite meticulous technique, the distal and mesiolingual canals were perforated. The perforations were immediately repaired with mineral trioxide aggregate, and the decision was made to switch to guided endodontic treatment for the remaining 6 teeth. CBCT and intraoral surface scans were acquired and matched using coDiagnostix planning software (Dental Wings Inc.), the respective drill positions for root canal location were determined, and templates were virtually designed and 3D-printed. The template was positioned on the respective tooth, and a customized drill was used to penetrate the calcified part of the root canal and perform minimally invasive access cavity preparation up to the apical region. All root canals were rapidly and successfully located with the templates. At 1-year follow-up, clear signs of apical healing were present in all treated teeth. Conclusions In patients with dentin dysplasia, conventional endodontic therapy is challenging. GET considerably facilitates the root canal treatment of teeth affected by dentin dysplasia.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Reich2021,
  author    = {Reich, Sebastian},
  title     = {Computergest{\"u}tztes Auffinden obliterierter Wurzelkan{\"a}le mit Hilfe der Planungssoftware SicatEndo und CDX - eine In-vitro-Vergleichsstudie},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-20687},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-206875},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Ziel der Untersuchung: Verglichen wurden die r{\"a}umlichen Abweichungen der Bohrpfade nach virtueller Planung von Schablonen gef{\"u}hrten Trepanationen mit Hilfe der Softwaresysteme SicatEndo (SE) und coDiagnostiX (CDX) und der ben{\"o}tigte Arbeitsaufwand. Material und Methode: Basierend auf µCT-Datens{\"a}tzen von humanen obliterierten Frontz{\"a}hnen wurden identische Kunststoffz{\"a}hne und acht Zahnmodelle (4 Ober-, 4 Unterkiefer) hergestellt. Es wurde jeweils ein DVT und ein Oberfl{\"a}chenscan angefertigt. Diese Datens{\"a}tze (DICOM; STL) wurden in die Softwaresysteme importiert und fusioniert. Anschließend wurden die Bohrpfade f{\"u}r je 16 Probenz{\"a}hne pro Software geplant. Mit Hilfe der erstellten Schablonen wurden alle Trepanationen an den im Phantomkopf fixierten Modellen von einem Behandler durchgef{\"u}hrt. Nach Erschließung des apikalen Wurzelkanalanteils wurde ein DVT angefertigt und mit dem pr{\"a}operativen DVT {\"u}berlagert. Die r{\"a}umliche drei-dimensionale (3D) Abweichung zwischen virtuell geplantem und tats{\"a}chlichem Bohrpfad wurde {\"u}ber die Vektorl{\"a}nge bestimmt und der Arbeitsaufwand anhand der Planungszeit und der Anzahl der Mausklicks pro Kiefer erfasst. Ergebnisse: F{\"u}r die Trepanationen mit SE zeigten sich signifikant geringe Abweichungen an der Bohrerspitze vestibul{\"a}r-oral [CDX 0,54mm ± 0,32mm; SE 0,12mm ± 0,11mm; p < 0.05], 3D [CDX 0,74mm ± 0,26 mm; SE 0,35mm ± 0,17mm; p < 0.05] und hinsichtlich des Winkels [CDX 1,57° ± 0,76°; SE 0,68° ± 0,41°; p < 0.05] als mit CDX. F{\"u}r CDX war der Planungsaufwand signifikant geringer als f{\"u}r SE hinsichtlich Planungszeit [CDX {\O} 10min 50sec; SE {\O} 20min 28sec] und hinsichtlich der Anzahl der Klicks pro Kiefer [CDX {\O} 107; SE {\O} 341]. Zusammenfassung: Beide Planungssysteme erm{\"o}glichen ausreichend pr{\"a}zise Schablonen gef{\"u}hrte Bohrungen zur Erschließung apikaler Wurzelkanalanteile.},
  subject      = {Wurzelkanalbehandlung},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ManchiaAdliAkulaetal.2013,
  author    = {Manchia, Mirko and Adli, Mazda and Akula, Nirmala and Arda, Raffaella and Aubry, Jean-Michel and Backlund, Lena and Banzato, Claudio E. M. and Baune, Bernhard T. and Bellivier, Frank and Bengesser, Susanne and Biernacka, Joanna M. and Brichant-Petitjean, Clara and Bui, Elise and Calkin, Cynthia V. and Cheng, Andrew Tai Ann and Chillotti, Caterina and Cichon, Sven and Clark, Scott and Czerski, Piotr M. and Dantas, Clarissa and Del Zompo, Maria and DePaulo, J. Raymond and Detera-Wadleigh, Sevilla D. and Etain, Bruno and Falkai, Peter and Fris{\´e}n, Louise and Frye, Mark A. and Fullerton, Jan and Gard, S{\´e}bastien and Garnham, Julie and Goes, Fernando S. and Grof, Paul and Gruber, Oliver and Hashimoto, Ryota and Hauser, Joanna and Heilbronner, Urs and Hoban, Rebecca and Hou, Liping and Jamain, St{\´e}phane and Kahn, Jean-Pierre and Kassem, Layla and Kato, Tadafumi and Kelsoe, John R. and Kittel-Schneider, Sarah and Kliwicki, Sebastian and Kuo, Po-Hsiu and Kusumi, Ichiro and Laje, Gonzalo and Lavebratt, Catharina and Leboyer, Marion and Leckband, Susan G. and L{\´o}pez Jaramillo, Carlos A. and Maj, Mario and Malafosse, Alain and Martinsson, Lina and Masui, Takuya and Mitchell, Philip B. and Mondimore, Frank and Monteleone, Palmiero and Nallet, Audrey and Neuner, Maria and Nov{\´a}k, Tom{\´a}s and O'Donovan, Claire and {\"O}sby, Urban and Ozaki, Norio and Perlis, Roy H. and Pfennig, Andrea and Potash, James B. and Reich-Erkelenz, Daniela and Reif, Andreas and Reininghaus, Eva and Richardson, Sara and Rouleau, Guy A. and Rybakowski, Janusz K. and Schalling, Martin and Schofield, Peter R. and Schubert, Oliver K. and Schweizer, Barbara and Seem{\"u}ller, Florian and Grigoroiu-Serbanescu, Maria and Severino, Giovanni and Seymour, Lisa R. and Slaney, Claire and Smoller, Jordan W. and Squassina, Alessio and Stamm, Thomas and Steele, Jo and Stopkova, Pavla and Tighe, Sarah K. and Tortorella, Alfonso and Turecki, Gustavo and Wray, Naomi R. and Wright, Adam and Zandi, Peter P. and Zilles, David and Bauer, Michael and Rietschel, Marcella and McMahon, Francis J. and Schulze, Thomas G. and Alda, Martin},
  title     = {Assessment of Response to Lithium Maintenance Treatment in Bipolar Disorder: A Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) Report},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0065636},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-130938},
  pages     = {e65636},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Objective: The assessment of response to lithium maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder (BD) is complicated by variable length of treatment, unpredictable clinical course, and often inconsistent compliance. Prospective and retrospective methods of assessment of lithium response have been proposed in the literature. In this study we report the key phenotypic measures of the "Retrospective Criteria of Long-Term Treatment Response in Research Subjects with Bipolar Disorder" scale currently used in the Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) study. Materials and Methods: Twenty-nine ConLiGen sites took part in a two-stage case-vignette rating procedure to examine inter-rater agreement [Kappa (\(\kappa\))] and reliability [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)] of lithium response. Annotated first-round vignettes and rating guidelines were circulated to expert research clinicians for training purposes between the two stages. Further, we analyzed the distributional properties of the treatment response scores available for 1,308 patients using mixture modeling. Results: Substantial and moderate agreement was shown across sites in the first and second sets of vignettes (\(\kappa\) = 0.66 and \(\kappa\) = 0.54, respectively), without significant improvement from training. However, definition of response using the A score as a quantitative trait and selecting cases with B criteria of 4 or less showed an improvement between the two stages (\(ICC_1 = 0.71\) and \(ICC_2 = 0.75\), respectively). Mixture modeling of score distribution indicated three subpopulations (full responders, partial responders, non responders). Conclusions: We identified two definitions of lithium response, one dichotomous and the other continuous, with moderate to substantial inter-rater agreement and reliability. Accurate phenotypic measurement of lithium response is crucial for the ongoing ConLiGen pharmacogenomic study.},
  language  = {en}
}