@article{JariusRuprechtWildemannetal.2012,
  author    = {Jarius, Sven and Ruprecht, Klemens and Wildemann, Brigitte and Kuempfel, Tania and Ringelstein, Marius and Geis, Christian and Kleiter, Ingo and Kleinschnitz, Christoph and Berthele, Achim and Brettschneider, Johannes and Hellwig, Kerstin and Hemmer, Bernhard and Linker, Ralf A. and Lauda, Florian and Hayrettin, Christoph A. and Tumani, Hayrettin and Melms, Arthur and Trebst, Corinna and Stangel, Martin and Marziniak, Martin and Hoffmann, Frank and Schippling, Sven and Faiss, J{\"u}rgen H. and Neuhaus, Oliver and Ettrich, Barbara and Zentner, Christian and Guthke, Kersten and Hofstadt-van Oy, Ulrich and Reuss, Reinhard and Pellkofer, Hannah and Ziemann, Ulf and Kern, Peter and Wandinger, Klaus P. and Bergh, Florian Then and Boettcher, Tobias and Langel, Stefan and Liebetrau, Martin and Rommer, Paulus S. and Niehaus, Sabine and M{\"u}nch, Christoph and Winkelmann, Alexander and Zettl, Uwe K and Metz, Imke and Veauthier, Christian and Sieb, J{\"o}rn P. and Wilke, Christian and Hartung, Hans P. and Aktas, Orhan and Paul, Friedemann},
  title     = {Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: A multicentre study of 175 patients},
  series = {Journal of Neuroinflammation},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Journal of Neuroinflammation},
  number    = {14},
  doi       = {10.1186/1742-2094-9-14},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-133636},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Background: The diagnostic and pathophysiological relevance of antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4-Ab) in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) has been intensively studied. However, little is known so far about the clinical impact of AQP4-Ab seropositivity. Objective: To analyse systematically the clinical and paraclinical features associated with NMO spectrum disorders in Caucasians in a stratified fashion according to the patients' AQP4-Ab serostatus. Methods: Retrospective study of 175 Caucasian patients (AQP4-Ab positive in 78.3\%). Results: Seropositive patients were found to be predominantly female (p < 0.0003), to more often have signs of co-existing autoimmunity (p < 0.00001), and to experience more severe clinical attacks. A visual acuity of <= 0.1 during acute optic neuritis (ON) attacks was more frequent among seropositives (p < 0.002). Similarly, motor symptoms were more common in seropositive patients, the median Medical Research Council scale (MRC) grade worse, and MRC grades <= 2 more frequent, in particular if patients met the 2006 revised criteria (p < 0.005, p < 0.006 and p < 0.01, respectively), the total spinal cord lesion load was higher (p < 0.006), and lesions >= 6 vertebral segments as well as entire spinal cord involvement more frequent (p < 0.003 and p < 0.043). By contrast, bilateral ON at onset was more common in seronegatives (p < 0.007), as was simultaneous ON and myelitis (p < 0.001); accordingly, the time to diagnosis of NMO was shorter in the seronegative group (p < 0.029). The course of disease was more often monophasic in seronegatives (p < 0.008). Seropositives and seronegatives did not differ significantly with regard to age at onset, time to relapse, annualized relapse rates, outcome from relapse (complete, partial, no recovery), annualized EDSS increase, mortality rate, supratentorial brain lesions, brainstem lesions, history of carcinoma, frequency of preceding infections, oligoclonal bands, or CSF pleocytosis. Both the time to relapse and the time to diagnosis was longer if the disease started with ON (p < 0.002 and p < 0.013). Motor symptoms or tetraparesis at first myelitis and > 1 myelitis attacks in the first year were identified as possible predictors of a worse outcome.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{vanUnenStumpfSchmidetal.2016,
  author    = {van Unen, Jakobus and Stumpf, Anette D. and Schmid, Benedikt and Reinhard, Nathalie R. and Hordijk, Peter L. and Hoffmann, Carsten and Gadella, Theodorus W. J. and Goedhart, Joachim},
  title     = {A New Generation of FRET Sensors for Robust Measurement of Gα\(_{i1}\), Gα\(_{i2}\) and Gα\(_{i3}\) Activation Kinetics in Single Cells},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0146789},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-167387},
  pages     = {e0146789},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) can activate a heterotrimeric G-protein complex with subsecond kinetics. Genetically encoded biosensors based on F{\"o}rster resonance energy transfer (FRET) are ideally suited for the study of such fast signaling events in single living cells. Here we report on the construction and characterization of three FRET biosensors for the measurement of Gα\(_{i1}\), Gα\(_{i2}\) and Gα\(_{i3}\) activation. To enable quantitative long-term imaging of FRET biosensors with high dynamic range, fluorescent proteins with enhanced photophysical properties are required. Therefore, we use the currently brightest and most photostable CFP variant, mTurquoise2, as donor fused to Gα\(_{i}\) subunit, and cp173Venus fused to the Gγ\(_{2}\) subunit as acceptor. The Gα\(_{i}\) FRET biosensors constructs are expressed together with Gβ\(_{1}\) from a single plasmid, providing preferred relative expression levels with reduced variation in mammalian cells. The Gα\(_{i}\) FRET sensors showed a robust response to activation of endogenous or over-expressed alpha-2A-adrenergic receptors, which was inhibited by pertussis toxin. Moreover, we observed activation of the Gα\(_{i}\) FRET sensor in single cells upon stimulation of several GPCRs, including the LPA\(_{2}\), M\(_{3}\) and BK\(_{2}\) receptor. Furthermore, we show that the sensors are well suited to extract kinetic parameters from fast measurements in the millisecond time range. This new generation of FRET biosensors for Gα\(_{i1}\), Gα\(_{i2}\) and Gα\(_{i3}\) activation will be valuable for live-cell measurements that probe Gα\(_{i}\) activation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WeissenbergerHeinzRueckletal.2020,
  author    = {Weissenberger, Manuel and Heinz, Tizian and Rueckl, Kilian and Rudert, Maximilian and Klug, Alexander and Hoffmann, Reinhard and Schmidt-Horloh{\´e}, Kay},
  title     = {No functional differences in anatomic reconstruction with one vs. two suture anchors after non-simultaneous bilateral distal biceps brachii tendon rupture: a case report and review of the literature},
  series = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12891-020-03304-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229266},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background Surgical reattachment of the tendon is still the gold standard for ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon. Several fixation techniques have been described in the literature, with suture anchors being one of the most common fixation techniques. Currently, there is no data available on how many anchors are required for a safe and stable refixation. In this case report clinical data of a patient with non-simultaneous bilateral distal biceps tendon ruptures treated with a different number of suture anchors for each side (one vs. two) are demonstrated. Case presentation A 47-year-old factory worker suffered a rupture of the distal biceps tendon on both arms following two different occasions. The left side was fixed using a single suture anchor, while refixation on the right side was performed with two anchors. The patient was prospectively followed for one year. Functional outcome was assessed using the Andrews Carson Score (ACS), the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score after six, twelve, 24 and 48 weeks. Furthermore, an isokinetic strength measurement for flexion strength was performed after 24 and 48 weeks. After 48 weeks the patient presented with excellent functional outcome scores and no follow-up complications. During the follow-up period, no differences in the functional scores nor in the isokinetic flexion strength measurement could be detected. Furthermore, no radiological complications (like heterotopic ossifications) could be detected in the postoperative radiographs after one year. Conclusions Anatomic reattachment of the distal biceps tendon is a successful operative treatment option for distal biceps tendon ruptures. Suture anchor fixation remains one of the most common techniques, as it allows fast surgery and provides good results with respect to range of motion (ROM) and functional scoring according to the current literature. However, the number of anchors required for a stable fixation remains unclear. As indicated by our presented case, we hypothesize, that there are no significant differences between a one-point or a two-point fixation. In the presented case report, no intraindividual differences between the usage of one versus two suture anchors were evident in the short-term follow-up.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FehskeBerningerAlmetal.2021,
  author    = {Fehske, Kai and Berninger, Markus T. and Alm, Lena and Hoffmann, Reinhard and Zellner, Johannes and K{\"o}sters, Clemens and Barzen, Stefan and Raschke, Michael J. and Izadpanah, Kaywan and Herbst, Elmar and Domnick, Christoph and Sch{\"u}ttrumpf, Jan Philipp and Krause, Matthias},
  title     = {Aktueller Versorgungsstandard von Patellafrakturen in Deutschland},
  series = {Der Unfallchirurg},
  volume    = {124},
  journal   = {Der Unfallchirurg},
  organization    = {Komitee Frakturen der Deutschen Kniegesellschaft (DKG)},
  issn      = {0177-5537},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00113-020-00939-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-235047},
  pages     = {832-838},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Hintergrund Die Versorgung von Patellafrakturen ist technisch anspruchsvoll. Auch wenn die radiologischen Ergebnisse zumeist zufriedenstellend sind, deckt sich dies h{\"a}ufig nicht mit der subjektiven Einsch{\"a}tzung der Patienten. Die klassische Versorgung mittels Drahtzuggurtung weist einige Komplikationen auf. Die winkelstabile Plattenosteosynthese hat sich in den letzten Jahren biomechanisch als vorteilhaft erwiesen. Fragestellung Von wem werden Patellafrakturen in Deutschland versorgt? Wie sieht der aktuelle Versorgungsstandard aus? Haben sich „moderne" Osteosyntheseformen durchgesetzt? Was sind die h{\"a}ufigsten Komplikationen? Material und Methoden Die Mitglieder der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Orthop{\"a}die und Unfallchirurgie sowie der Deutschen Kniegesellschaft wurden aufgefordert, an einer Onlinebefragung teilzunehmen. Ergebnisse Insgesamt wurden 511 komplett ausgef{\"u}llte Fragebogen ausgewertet. Die Befragten sind zum gr{\"o}ßten Teil auf Unfallchirurgie spezialisiert (51,5 \%) und verf{\"u}gen {\"u}ber langj{\"a}hrige Berufserfahrung in Traumazentren. Die H{\"a}lfte der Operateure versorgt ≤5 Patellafrakturen j{\"a}hrlich. In knapp 40 \% der F{\"a}lle wird die pr{\"a}operative Bildgebung um eine Computertomographie erg{\"a}nzt. Die klassische Zuggurtung ist noch die bevorzugte Osteosyntheseform bei allen Frakturtypen (Querfraktur 52 \%, Mehrfragmentfrakturen 40 \%). Bei Mehrfragmentfrakturen entscheiden sich 30 \% der Operateure f{\"u}r eine winkelstabile Plattenosteosynthese. Bei Beteiligung des kaudalen Pols dient als zus{\"a}tzliche Sicherung die McLaughlin-Schlinge (60 \%). Diskussion Der Versorgungsstandard von Patellafrakturen in Deutschland entspricht weitgehend der aktualisierten S2e-Leitlinie. Nach wie vor wird die klassische Zuggurtungsosteosynthese als Verfahren der Wahl genutzt. Weitere klinische (Langzeit‑)Studien werden ben{\"o}tigt, um die Vorteile der winkelstabilen Plattenosteosynthese zu verifizieren.},
  language  = {de}
}