@article{FoersterPfisterWirthetal.2023,
  author    = {Foerster, Anna and Pfister, Roland and Wirth, Robert and Kunde, Wilfried},
  title     = {Post-execution monitoring in dishonesty},
  series = {Psychological Research},
  volume    = {87},
  journal   = {Psychological Research},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00426-022-01691-x},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324862},
  pages     = {845-861},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {When telling a lie, humans might engage in stronger monitoring of their behavior than when telling the truth. Initial evidence has indeed pointed towards a stronger recruitment of capacity-limited monitoring processes in dishonest than honest responding, conceivably resulting from the necessity to overcome automatic tendencies to respond honestly. Previous results suggested monitoring to be confined to response execution, however, whereas the current study goes beyond these findings by specifically probing for post-execution monitoring. Participants responded (dis)honestly to simple yes/no questions in a first task and switched to an unrelated second task after a response-stimulus interval of 0 ms or 1000 ms. Dishonest responses did not only prolong response times in Task 1, but also in Task 2 with a short response-stimulus interval. These findings support the assumption that increased monitoring for dishonest responses extends beyond mere response execution, a mechanism that is possibly tuned to assess the successful completion of a dishonest act.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PfisterSchwarzWirthetal.2017,
  author    = {Pfister, Roland and Schwarz, Katharina A. and Wirth, Robert and Lindner, Isabel},
  title     = {My Command, My Act: Observation Inflation in Face-To-Face Interactions},
  series = {Advances in Cognitive Psychology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Advances in Cognitive Psychology},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.5709/acp-0216-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-170739},
  pages     = {166-176},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {When observing another agent performing simple actions, these actions are systematically remembered as one's own after a brief period of time. Such observation inflation has been documented as a robust phenomenon in studies in which participants passively observed videotaped actions. Whether observation inflation also holds for direct, face-to-face interactions is an open question that we addressed in two experiments. In Experiment 1, participants commanded the experimenter to carry out certain actions, and they indeed reported false memories of self-performance in a later memory test. The effect size of this inflation effect was similar to passive observation as confirmed by Experiment 2. These findings suggest that observation inflation might affect action memory in a broad range of real-world interactions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WirthFoersterKundeetal.2020,
  author    = {Wirth, Robert and Foerster, Anna and Kunde, Wilfried and Pfister, Roland},
  title     = {Design choices: Empirical recommendations for designing two-dimensional finger-tracking experiments},
  series = {Behavior Research Methods},
  volume    = {52},
  journal   = {Behavior Research Methods},
  doi       = {10.3758/s13428-020-01409-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-235569},
  pages     = {2394-2416},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The continuous tracking of mouse or finger movements has become an increasingly popular research method for investigating cognitive and motivational processes such as decision-making, action-planning, and executive functions. In the present paper, we evaluate and discuss how apparently trivial design choices of researchers may impact participants' behavior and, consequently, a study's results. We first provide a thorough comparison of mouse- and finger-tracking setups on the basis of a Simon task. We then vary a comprehensive set of design factors, including spatial layout, movement extent, time of stimulus onset, size of the target areas, and hit detection in a finger-tracking variant of this task. We explore the impact of these variations on a broad spectrum of movement parameters that are typically used to describe movement trajectories. Based on our findings, we suggest several recommendations for best practice that avoid some of the pitfalls of the methodology. Keeping these recommendations in mind will allow for informed decisions when planning and conducting future tracking experiments.},
  language  = {en}
}