@article{KonijnenbergHerrmannKobeetal.2021,
  author    = {Konijnenberg, Mark and Herrmann, Ken and Kobe, Carsten and Verburg, Frederik and Hindorf, Cecilia and Hustinx, Roland and Lassmann, Michael},
  title     = {EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy},
  series = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  volume    = {48},
  journal   = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  issn      = {1619-7070},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00259-020-05038-9},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-235280},
  pages     = {67-72},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The EC Directive 2013/59/Euratom states in article 56 that exposures of target volumes in nuclear medicine treatments shall be individually planned and their delivery appropriately verified. The Directive also mentions that medical physics experts should always be appropriately involved in those treatments. Although it is obvious that, in nuclear medicine practice, every nuclear medicine physician and physicist should follow national rules and legislation, the EANM considered it necessary to provide guidance on how to interpret the Directive statements for nuclear medicine treatments. For this purpose, the EANM proposes to distinguish three levels in compliance to the optimization principle in the directive, inspired by the indication of levels in prescribing, recording and reporting of absorbed doses after radiotherapy defined by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU): Most nuclear medicine treatments currently applied in Europe are standardized. The minimum requirement for those treatments is ICRU level 1 ("activity-based prescription and patient-averaged dosimetry"), which is defined by administering the activity within 10\% of the intended activity, typically according to the package insert or to the respective EANM guidelines, followed by verification of the therapy delivery, if applicable. Non-standardized treatments are essentially those in developmental phase or approved radiopharmaceuticals being used off-label with significantly (> 25\% more than in the label) higher activities. These treatments should comply with ICRU level 2 ("activity-based prescription and patient-specific dosimetry"), which implies recording and reporting of the absorbed dose to organs at risk and optionally the absorbed dose to treatment regions. The EANM strongly encourages to foster research that eventually leads to treatment planning according to ICRU level 3 ("dosimetry-guided patient-specific prescription and verification"), whenever possible and relevant. Evidence for superiority of therapy prescription on basis of patient-specific dosimetry has not been obtained. However, the authors believe that a better understanding of therapy dosimetry, i.e. how much and where the energy is delivered, and radiobiology, i.e. radiation-related processes in tissues, are keys to the long-term improvement of our treatments.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AertsEberleinHolmetal.2021,
  author    = {Aerts, An and Eberlein, Uta and Holm, S{\"o}ren and Hustinx, Roland and Konijnenberg, Mark and Strigari, Lidia and van Leeuwen, Fijs W. B. and Glatting, Gerhard and Lassmann, Michael},
  title     = {EANM position paper on the role of radiobiology in nuclear medicine},
  series = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  volume    = {48},
  journal   = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  number    = {11},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00259-021-05345-9},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265595},
  pages     = {3365-3377},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {With an increasing variety of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic nuclear medicine as valuable diagnostic or treatment option, radiobiology plays an important role in supporting optimizations. This comprises particularly safety and efficacy of radionuclide therapies, specifically tailored to each patient. As absorbed dose rates and absorbed dose distributions in space and time are very different between external irradiation and systemic radionuclide exposure, distinct radiation-induced biological responses are expected in nuclear medicine, which need to be explored. This calls for a dedicated nuclear medicine radiobiology. Radiobiology findings and absorbed dose measurements will enable an improved estimation and prediction of efficacy and adverse effects. Moreover, a better understanding on the fundamental biological mechanisms underlying tumor and normal tissue responses will help to identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers as well as biomarkers for treatment follow-up. In addition, radiobiology can form the basis for the development of radiosensitizing strategies and radioprotectant agents. Thus, EANM believes that, beyond in vitro and preclinical evaluations, radiobiology will bring important added value to clinical studies and to clinical teams. Therefore, EANM strongly supports active collaboration between radiochemists, radiopharmacists, radiobiologists, medical physicists, and physicians to foster research toward precision nuclear medicine.},
  language  = {en}
}