@article{HiguchiSerflingRoweetal.2022,
  author    = {Higuchi, Takahiro and Serfling, Sebastian E. and Rowe, Steven P. and Werner, Rudolf A.},
  title     = {Therapeutic effects of lipid lowering medications on myocardial blood flow, inflammation, and sympathetic nerve activity using nuclear techniques},
  series = {Current Cardiology Reports},
  volume    = {24},
  journal   = {Current Cardiology Reports},
  number    = {12},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11886-022-01792-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324599},
  pages     = {1849-1853},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Purpose of Review Statins are routinely applied in patients with coronary artery disease, as they allow significantly to reduce blood cholesterol levels. Although those drugs are endorsed by current guidelines and prescribed routinely, a substantial portion of patients are still statin-intolerant and image-piloted strategies may then be helpful to identify patients that need further intensified treatment, e.g., to initiate treatment with proprotein convertase subtilisin / kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i). In addition, it has also been advocated that statins exhibit nonlipid, cardio-protective effects including improved cardiac nerve integrity, blood flow, and anti-inflammatory effects in congestive heart failure (HF) patients. Recent Findings In subjects after myocardial infarction treated with statins, \(^{123}\)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy has already revealed enhanced cardiac nerve function relative to patients without statins. In addition, all of those aforementioned statin-targeted pathways in HF can be visualized and monitored using dedicated cardiac radiotracers, e.g., \(^{123}\)I-MIBG or \(^{18}\)F-AF78 (for cardiac nerve function), \(^{18}\)F-flurpiridaz (to determine coronary flow) or \(^{68}\)Ga-PentixaFor (to detect inflammation). Summary Statins exhibit various cardio-beneficial effects, including improvement of cardiac nerve function, blood flow, and reduction of inflammation, which can all be imaged using dedicated nuclear cardiac radiotracers. This may allow for in vivo monitoring of statin-induced cardioprotection beyond lipid profiling in HF patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HartrampfWeinzierlBucketal.2022,
  author    = {Hartrampf, Philipp E. and Weinzierl, Franz-Xaver and Buck, Andreas K. and Rowe, Steven P. and Higuchi, Takahiro and Seitz, Anna Katharina and K{\"u}bler, Hubert and Schirbel, Andreas and Essler, Markus and Bundschuh, Ralph A. and Werner, Rudolf A.},
  title     = {Matched-pair analysis of [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA I\&T and [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer},
  series = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  volume    = {49},
  journal   = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  number    = {9},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00259-022-05744-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324581},
  pages     = {3269-3276},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background Labelled with lutetium-177, the urea-based small molecules PSMA I\&T and PSMA-617 are the two agents most frequently used for radioligand therapy (RLT) in patients with advanced metastatic castration-resistant and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expressing prostate cancer (mCRPC). In this matched-pair analysis, we aimed to compare the toxicity and efficacy of both agents for PSMA-directed RLT. Materials and methods A total of 110 mCRPC patients from two centres were accrued, 55 individuals treated with [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA I\&T, and a matched cohort of 55 patients treated with [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Matching criteria included age at the first cycle, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, and previous taxane-based chemotherapy. Using common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v. 5.0), toxicity profiles were investigated (including bone marrow and renal toxicity). Overall survival (OS) between both groups was compared. Results Toxicity assessment revealed grade III anaemia in a single patient (1.8\%) for [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA I\&T and five (9.1\%) for [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. In addition, one (1.9\%) grade III thrombopenia for [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 was recorded. Apart from that, no other grade III/IV toxicities were present. A median OS of 12 months for patients treated with [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA I\&T did not differ significantly when compared to patients treated with [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (median OS, 13 months; P = 0.89). Conclusion In this matched-pair analysis of patients receiving one of the two agents most frequently applied for PSMA RLT, the rate of clinically relevant toxicities was low for both compounds. In addition, no relevant differences for OS were observed.},
  language  = {en}
}