@article{WernerWeichKircheretal.2018,
  author    = {Werner, Rudolf A. and Weich, Alexander and Kircher, Malte and Solnes, Lilja B. and Javadi, Mehrbod S. and Higuchi, Takahiro and Buck, Andreas K. and Pomper, Martin G. and Rowe, Steven and Lapa, Constantin},
  title     = {The theranostic promise for neuroendocrine tumors in the late 2010s - Where do we stand, where do we go?},
  series = {Theranostics},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Theranostics},
  number    = {22},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-170264},
  pages     = {6088-6100},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {More than 25 years after the first peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), the concept of somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-directed imaging and therapy for neuroendocrine tumors (NET) is seeing rapidly increasing use. To maximize the full potential of its theranostic promise, efforts in recent years have expanded recommendations in current guidelines and included the evaluation of novel theranostic radiotracers for imaging and treatment of NET. Moreover, the introduction of standardized reporting framework systems may harmonize PET reading, address pitfalls in interpreting SSTR-PET/CT scans and guide the treating physician in selecting PRRT candidates. Notably, the concept of PRRT has also been applied beyond oncology, e.g. for treatment of inflammatory conditions like sarcoidosis. Future perspectives may include the efficacy evaluation of PRRT compared to other common treatment options for NET, novel strategies for closer monitoring of potential side effects, the introduction of novel radiotracers with beneficial pharmacodynamic and kinetic properties or the use of supervised machine learning approaches for outcome prediction. This article reviews how the SSTR-directed theranostic concept is currently applied and also reflects on recent developments that hold promise for the future of theranostics in this context.},
  subject      = {Positronen-Emissions-Tomografie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WernerBeykanHiguchietal.2016,
  author    = {Werner, Rudolf A. and Beykan, Seval and Higuchi, Takahiro and L{\"u}ckerath, Katharina and Weich, Alexander and Scheurlen, Michael and Bluemel, Christina and Herrmann, Ken and Buck, Andreas K. and Lassmann, Michael and Lapa, Constantin and H{\"a}nscheid, Heribert},
  title     = {The impact of \(^{177}\)Lu-octreotide therapy on \(^{99m}\)Tc-MAG3 clearance is not predictive for late nephropathy},
  series = {Oncotarget},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Oncotarget},
  number    = {27},
  doi       = {10.18632/oncotarget.9775},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177318},
  pages     = {41233-41241},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors may lead to kidney deterioration. This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of \(^{99m}\)Tc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (\(^{99m}\)Tc-MAG3) clearance for the early detection of PRRT-induced changes on tubular extraction (TE). TE rate (TER) was measured prior to 128 PRRT cycles (7.6±0.4 GBq \(^{177}\)Lu-octreotate/octreotide each) in 32 patients. TER reduction during PRRT was corrected for age-related decrease and analyzed for the potential to predict loss of glomerular filtration (GF). The GF rate (GFR) as measure for renal function was derived from serum creatinine. The mean TER was 234 ± 53 ml/min/1.73 m² before PRRT (baseline) and 221 ± 45 ml/min/1.73 m² after a median follow-up of 370 days. The age-corrected decrease (mean: -3\%, range: -27\% to +19\%) did not reach significance (p=0.09) but significantly correlated with the baseline TER (Spearman p=-0.62, p<0.001). Patients with low baseline TER showed an improved TER after PRRT, high decreases were only observed in individuals with high baseline TER. Pre-therapeutic TER data were inferior to plasma creatinine-derived GFR estimates in predicting late nephropathy. TER assessed by \(^{99m}\)Tc-MAG3­clearance prior to and during PRRT is not suitable as early predictor of renal injury and an increased risk for late nephropathy.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WernerSolnesJavadietal.2018,
  author    = {Werner, Rudolf and Solnes, Lilja and Javadi, Mehrbod and Weich, Alexander and Gorin, Michael and Pienta, Kenneth and Higuchi, Takahiro and Buck, Andreas and Pomper, Martin and Rowe, Steven and Lapa, Constantin},
  title     = {SSTR-RADS Version 1.0 as a Reporting System for SSTR-PET Imaging and Selection of Potential PRRT Candidates: A Proposed Standardization Framework},
  series = {Journal of Nuclear Medicine},
  journal   = {Journal of Nuclear Medicine},
  issn      = {0161-5505},
  doi       = {10.2967/jnumed.117.206631},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-161298},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Reliable standards and criteria for somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positron emission tomography (PET) are still lacking. We herein propose a structured reporting system on a 5-point scale for SSTR-PET imaging, titled SSTR-RADS version 1.0, which might serve as a standardized assessment for both diagnosis and treatment planning in neuroendocrine tumors (NET). SSTR-RADS could guide the imaging specialist in interpreting SSTR-PET scans, facilitate communication with the referring clinician so that appropriate work-up for equivocal findings is pursued, and serve as a reliable tool for patient selection for planned Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy.},
  subject      = {Standardisierung},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WernerWeichHiguchietal.2017,
  author    = {Werner, Rudolf A. and Weich, Alexander and Higuchi, Takahiro and Schmid, Jan S. and Schirbel, Andreas and Lassmann, Michael and Wild, Vanessa and Rudelius, Martina and Kudlich, Theodor and Herrmann, Ken and Scheurlen, Michael and Buck, Andreas K. and Kropf, Saskia and Wester, Hans-J{\"u}rgen and Lapa, Constantin},
  title     = {Imaging of Chemokine Receptor 4 Expression in Neuroendocrine Tumors - a Triple Tracer Comparative Approach},
  series = {Theranostics},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Theranostics},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.7150/thno.18754},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158008},
  pages     = {1489-1498},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and somatostatin receptors (SSTR) are overexpressed in gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET). In this study, we aimed to elucidate the feasibility of non-invasive CXCR4 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in GEP-NET patients using [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor in comparison to \(^{68}\)Ga-DOTA-D-Phe-Tyr3-octreotide ([\(^{68}\)Ga]DOTATOC) and \(^{18}\)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([\(^{18}\)F]FDG). Twelve patients with histologically proven GEP-NET (3xG1, 4xG2, 5xG3) underwent [\(^{68}\)Ga]DOTATOC, [\(^{18}\)F]FDG, and [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT for staging and planning of the therapeutic management. Scans were analyzed on a patient as well as on a lesion basis and compared to immunohistochemical staining patterns of CXCR4 and somatostatin receptors SSTR2a and SSTR5. [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor visualized tumor lesions in 6/12 subjects, whereas [\(^{18}\)F]FDG revealed sites of disease in 10/12 and [\(^{68}\)Ga]DOTATOC in 11/12 patients, respectively. Regarding sensitivity, SSTR-directed PET was the superior imaging modality in all G1 and G2 NET. CXCR4-directed PET was negative in all G1 NET. In contrast, 50\% of G2 and 80\% of G3 patients exhibited [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-positive tumor lesions. Whereas CXCR4 seems to play only a limited role in detecting well-differentiated NET, increasing receptor expression could be non-invasively observed with increasing tumor grade. Thus, [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT might serve as non-invasive read-out for evaluating the possibility of CXCR4-directed endoradiotherapy in advanced dedifferentiated SSTR-negative tumors.},
  subject      = {Positronen-Emissions-Tomografie},
  language  = {en}
}